The Kantian Concept of Human Dignity Today
- DOI
- 10.5922/0207-6918-2024-1-3
- Pages
- 47-75
Abstract
Although Kant was born three hundred years ago, his practical philosophy is still relevant and helpful for understanding difficult and crucial issues of today. One example is the strange transformation the concept of human dignity has undergone in post-Soviet Russia — in everyday language, in ideological doctrines, and in legal documents. While in ordinary life dignity is increasingly reduced to access to material benefits, in its legal sense — above all in the 1993 Constitution of the Russian Federation — anti-communist ideology has turned it into the “right” to enjoy comfortable living conditions, being almost totally divorced from duties and from morality. Such interpretations of human dignity lead to a dead end, creating problems for its perception and for its relationship to other constitutional provisions — problems that are impossible to resolve in the framework of such an interpretation of right. By turning to Kant, one of the pillars of the modern egalitarian universalist conception of human dignity, we can trace the idea of personal dignity back to its origin as an absolute inner value which, unlike external material benefits, has no equivalent, and involves self-legislation, restriction of freedom, and the fulfilling of moral duty.
Reference
Achenwall, G., 1763. Juris naturalis pars posterior complectens jus familiae, jus publicum et jus gentium in usum auditorum. Göttingen: Bossiegel.
Anon., 1751. Von der hohen Würde des Menschen. Der Mensch: eine moralische Wochenschrift (edited by G. F. Meier and S.G. Lange, Halle a.S.), Thl. 1, St. 3, pp. 17-24.
Anon., 1777. On the Dignity of Human Being, in Relationship to God and the World. Utrennij svet, ezhemesyachnoe izdanie [Morning Light, monthly edition] (St. Petersburg), Pars 1, December, pp. 285-297. (In Rus.)
Baglay, M. V., 2007. Konstitucionnoe pravo Rossijskoj Federacii: uchebnik dlya vuzov [Constitutional Law of the Russian Federation: textbook for High Schools]. Moscow: Norma. (In Rus.)
Basic Law of the Federal Republic of Germany, 1949. Translated by C. Tomuschat, D. P. Currie, D. P. Kommers and R. Kerr, 2022. Available at: <https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_gg/englisch_gg.html> (Accessed 9 January 2024).
Brandt, R., 2010. Die Würde des Menschen. In: R. Brandt, 2010. Immanuel Kant — was bleibt? Hamburg: Meiner, pp. 215-237.
Chetvernin, V. A., 2003. Russian Constitutional Concept of Legal Understanding. Konstitutsionnoye pravo: vostochnoyevropeyskoye obozreniye, 4, pp. 28-36. (In Rus.)
Constitution of the Russian Federation, 1993. Available at: <http://www.constitution.ru/en/10003000-01.htm> (Accessed 9 January 2024).
Deklaraciya o pravah i dostoinstve cheloveka X Vsemirnogo russkogo narodnogo sobora [Declaration on Human Rights and Dignity of the X World Russian People’s Council], 2006. Available at: <http://www.patriarchia.ru/db/text/103235.html> (Accessed 9 January 2024). (In Rus.)
Dmitriev, Yu. A., 2008. On the Legal Significance of the Preamble to the Russian Constitution. State and Law, 12, pp. 35-38. (In Rus.)
Hegel, G. W. F., 2008. Outlines of the Philosophy of Right. Translated by T. M. Knox; revised, edited, and introduced by S. Houlgate. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hegel, G. W. F., 2009. Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts. In: G. W. F. Hegel. Gesammelte Werke. Hg. von der Rheinisch-Westfälischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Bd. 14,1. Hamburg: Meiner, pp. 5-282.
Hesse, K., 1999. Grundzüge des Verfassungsrechts der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. 20th Edition. Heidelberg: C. F. Müller.
Hinske, N. 2023. Würde als Schlüsselbegriff der Philosophie Kants. In: N. Hinske, 2023. Vernunft, Wissen, Glaube. Wege zu einem neuen Berständnis Immanuel Kants. Edited by C. Böhr. Wiesbaden: Springer, pp. 203-216.
Hobbes, Th., 2011. Leviathan. Parts I and II Revised Edition. Edited by A. P. Martinich and B. Battiste. Peterborough: Broadview editions.
Hübner, K., 1985. Die Wahrheit des Mythos. Münich: C. H. Beck.
Isensee, J. and Kirchhof, P., eds. 1987-1992. Handbuch des Staatsrechts der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Heidelberg: C.F. Müller.
Kant, I., 1992. The Vienna Logic. In: I. Kant, 1992. Lectures on Logic. Translated and edited By J. M. Young. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 251-377.
Kant, I., 1996a. The Metaphysics of Morals (1797). ln: I. Kant, 1996. Practical Philosophy. Translated and edited by M. J. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 365-603.
Kant, I., 1996b. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals (1785). ln: I. Kant, 1996. Practical Philosophy. Translated and edited by M. J. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 43-108.
Kant, I. 1996c. Critique of Practical Reason (1788). In: I. Kant, 1996. Practical Philosophy. Translated and edited by M. J. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 139-271.
Kant, I., 2010. Naturrecht Feyerabend. Abhandlung. Neue, anhand des Manuskriptes revidierte Fassung. In: N. Hinske, H. P. Delfosse, G. Sadun Bordoni, eds. 2010. Kant-Index. Volume 30.1: Stellenindex und Konkordanz zum “Naturrecht Feyerabend”. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: frommann-holzboog, pp. 3-15.
Kant, I. 2016. Natural Right Course Lecture Notes by Feyerabend. In: I. Kant, 2016. Lectures and Drafts on Political Philosophy. Edited by F. Rauscher, translated by F. Rauscher and K. R. Westphal. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 73-180.
Kirill, Metropolitan, 2006. Prava cheloveka i nravstvennaya otvetstvennost’ [Human Rights and Moral Responsibility]. Available at: http://www.patriarchia.ru/db/text/102261.html (Accessed 9 January 2024). (In Rus.)
Klemme, H. F., 2011. Das rechtsstaatliche Folterverbot aus der Perspektive der Philosophie Kants. In: K. Altenhain and N. Willenberg, eds. 2011. Die Geschichte der Folter seit ihrer Abschaffung. Göttingen: V&R Unipress, pp. 39-53.
Klemme, H. F., 2013. Menschenwürde und Menschenrecht. Variationen eines Kantischen Themas in systematischer Absicht. In: F. Brosow and T. R. Rosenhagen, eds. 2013. Moderne Theorien Praktischer Normativität. Zur Wirklichkeit und Wirkungsweise des praktischen Sollens. Münster: Mentis, pp. 213-229.
Kovler, A. I., 2019. The Constitution of Russia as a Comparative Project (To the History of the Constitution of the Russian Federation). Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law, 1, pp. 8-14. (In Rus.)
Kozlova, E. I. and Kutafin, O. E., 2001. Konstitucionnoe pravo Rossii. Uchebnik [Russian Constitutional Law. Textbook]. Moscow: Yurist. (In Rus.)
Konstituciya RF [Constitution of the Russian Federation], 1993. Available at: <http://www.constitution.ru/index.htm> (Accessed 9 Januar 2024). (In Rus.)
Kurkin, B. A., 2008. Ideology of Human Rights and Its Interpretation in Modern Domestic Legal Theory. Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 2, pp. 110-117. (In Rus.)
Kurkin, B. A. and Iskevich, I.S., 2017. Human Rights: Two Looks at the Phenomenon. Law: history and modernity, 1, pp. 18-26. (In Rus.)
Lukasheva, E. A., ed. 2011. Prava cheloveka: uchebnik [Human Rights: A Textbook]. Moscow: Norma. (In Rus.)
Merkel, R., 2001. Rechte für Embryonen? Die Menschenwürde lässt sich nicht allein auf die biologische Zugehörigkeit zur Menschheit gründen. In: C. Geyer, ed. 2001. Biopolitik. Die Positionen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 51-64.
Mezhdunarodnyj pakt o grazhdanskih i politicheskih pravah [International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights], 1966/1976. Available at: https://www.un.org/ru/documents/decl_conv/conventions/pactpol.shtml (Accessed 9 January 2024). (In Rus.)
Mohr, G., 2009. „nur weil er verbrochen hat“ — Menschenwürde und Vergeltung in Kants Strafrechtsphilosophie. In: H. F. Klemme, 2009. Kant und die Zukunft der europäischen Aufklärung. Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 469-499.
Morozov, V., 1962. Dignity. In: F. V. Konstantinov, ed. 1962. Filosofskaya enciklopediya [Philosophical Encyclopedy], Volume 2. Moscow: Sovetskaya enciklopediya, pp. 58-60. (In Rus.)
Nersesyants, V. S., 2005. Filosofiya prava. Uchebnik dlya vuzov [Philosophy of Right. Textbook for High Schools]. Moscow: Norma. (In Rus.)
Niederberger, A. 2018. Braucht die Kantische Rechtsphilosophie die Menschenwürde? In: R. Mosayebi, ed. 2018. Kant und Menschenrechte. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 81-100.
Putin, V. V., 2000. Poslanie Prezidenta Federal’nomu Sobraniyu. 15 yanvarya 2020 g. [Message from the President to the Federal Assembly. January 15, 2020]. Available at: <http://kremlin.ru/events/president/news/62582> (Accessed 9 January 2024). (In Rus.)
Sánchez, N., 2013. Bemerkungen zur Kants Auffassung der menschlichen Würde. Studia Philosophica Kantiana, 2, pp. 27-47.
Sensen, O., 2009. Kant’s Conception of Human Dignity. Kant-Studien, 100, pp. 309-331.
Simankov, V. I., 2010. Iz razyskanij o zhurnale “Pribavlenie k Moskovskim vedomostyam” (1783—1784) ili ob avtorstve sochinenij, pripisyvavshihsya N.I. Novikovu, I. G. Shvarcu i F.V. Karzhavinu [From Research on the Journal “Addendum to the Moscow Vedomosti” (1783—1784), or On the Authorship of Works Attributed to N. I. Novikov, I. G. Shvarts and F. V. Karzhavin]. Kharkov: s.n. (In Rus.)
Slovar’ Akademii Rossijskoj [Dictionary of the Russian Academy], 1794. Volume 5. St. Petersburg: Pri Imperatorskoj akademii nauk. (In Rus.)
Tolstoy, L. N., 1904. Critique of Dogmatic Theology. In: L. N. Tolstoy, 1904. My Confession. Critique of Dogmatic Theology. Boston: D. Estes & Co, pp. 93-451.
Topornin, B. N., ed. 1994. Gosudarstvennoe pravo Germanii. Sokrashchennyj perevod nemeckogo semitomnogo izdaniya [German State Law. Abridged Translation of the German Seven-Volume Edition], 2 Volumes. Moscow: IGiP RAN Press. (In Rus.)
Zor’kin, V. D., ed. 2011. Kommentarij k Konstitucii Rossijskoj Federacii [Commentary to the Constitution of the Russian Federation]. Moscow: Norma. (In Rus.)