Broken Facets of Ethical Universalism. Commentary on the Book Universality in Morality
- DOI
- 10.5922/0207-6918-2022-2-5
- Pages
- 122-147
Abstract
Some ideas expressed in the collective monograph Universality in Morality (2020), edited by Ruben Apressyan, are here critically examined. The book is based on the results of a large-scale study by professional ethical philosophers devoted to the question of the nature of universality in morality and the mechanisms of universalisation of individual maxims and norms from antiquity to modern ethical theories, represented above all by the analytical tradition in philosophy. Of great interest is the analysis of related phenomena in morality, which makes it possible to determine the causes and nature of the transformation of morality in different eras and the accompanying change in the terminological apparatus of absolute ethical universalism, considered to be the starting point in the analysis of key modern concepts of moral universality. The article also suggests possible avenues for continued research in this area which could prompt modifications not only to the history of the concept of universality in morality, but also to our assessment of the contribution of individual authors and entire eras to the progress of human civilisation. This concerns above all the moral theory of contractarianism and the Enlightenment. Focus on their ideas goes a long way to determining the direction of current historical-philosophical research that reconstructs the history of ethical teachings and individual concepts. The importance attached today to a new view of the theory of the social contract, considered not only from socio-political but also from moral positions, forces us to approach in a new way the question concerning the universality of the key philosophical categories developed within this theory throughout its history. Elaborating the ideas set forth in the monograph, the author also stresses the relevance of the problem of justifying the thesis about the moral law as an analogue of the universal law of nature in the modern context.
Reference
Apressyan, R. G., ed. 2020. Universal’nost’ v morali: kollektivnaya monografiya [Universality in Morality: A Collective Monograph]. Moscow: Sadra. (In Rus.)
Callahan, D., 2000. Universalism and Particularism: Fighting to a Draw. Hastings Center Report, 30(1), pp. 37-44.
Dévédec, N. le, 2015. La société de l’amélioration : la perfectibilité humaine des Lumières au transhumanisme. Montréal: Liber.
Gauthier, D., 1985. Moral by Agreement. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Gauthier, D., 2013. Why Contractarianism? In: R. Shafer-Landau, ed. 2013. Ethical Theory: An Anthology. Second Edition. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 571-580.
Habermas, J., 1991. Treffen Hegels Einwände gegen Kant auch auf die Diskursethik zu? In: J. Habermas. Erläuterungen zur Diskursethik. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp, pp. 9-30.
Hare, R. M., 1963. Freedom and Reason. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Hare, R. M., 1981. Moral Thinking. Its Levels, Method, and Point. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Hegel, G. W. F., 1991. Elements of the Philosophy of Right. Translated by H. B. Nisbeth, edited by A. W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hegel, G. W. F., 2010. The Science of Logic. Translated and edited by G. Di Giovanni. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Höffe, O., 1985. Introduction à la philosophie pratique de Kant. Castella: Albeuve.
Kant, I., 2000. Critique of the Power of Judgment. Edited by P. Guyer. Translated by P. Guyer and E. Matthews. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kant, I., 2002. Critique of Practical Reason. Translated by W. S. Pluhar. Cambridge and Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.
Kant, I., 2006. Idea for a Universal History from a Cosmopolitan Perspective. In: I. Kant, 2006. Toward Perpetual Peace and Other Writings on Politics, Peace, and History. Edited and with an introduction by P. Kleingeld; translated by D. L. Colclasure. New Haven & London: Yale University Press, pp. 3-16.
Kant, I., 2007. Lectures on Pedagogy. In: I. Kant, 2007. Anthropology, History, and Education. Edited by G. Zöller and R. B. Louden; translated by R. B. Louden. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 434-485.
Kant, I., 2011. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. German-English Edition. Translated by M. Gregor, edited by J. Timmermann. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kashnikov, B. N., 2004. Liberal’nye teorii spravedlivosti i politicheskaya praktika Rossii [Liberal Theories of Justice and Political Practice in Russia]. Veliky Novgorod: NovSU Yaroslav Mudryj. (In Rus.)
Macklin, R., 1999. Against Relativism. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rawls, J., 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Scanlon, T. M., 2013. Contractualism and Utilitarianism. In: R. Shafer-Landau, ed. 2013. Ethical Theory: An Anthology. Second Edition. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 593-607.
Schelling, F. W. J., 2001. System of Transcendental Idealism. Translated by P. Heath, Introduction by M. Vater. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.
Singer, M. G., 1971. Generalization in Ethics. New York: Atheneum.
Vinogradova, O. and Ugleva, A., 2019. The Birth of the Idea of Perfectibility: From the Enlightenment to Transhumanism. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences = Filosofskie nauki, 62(4), pp. 113-131. https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2019-62-4-113-131