Kantian Approaches to Human Reproduction: Both Favourable and Unfavourable
- DOI
- 10.5922/0207-6918-2021-1-2
- Pages
- 51-96
Abstract
Recent years have seen a surge of interest in the question of whether humans should reproduce. Some say human life is too punishing and cruel to impose upon an innocent. Others hold that such harms do not undermine the great and possibly unique value of human life. Tracing these outlooks historically in the debate has barely begun. What might philosophers have said, or what did they say, about human life itself and its value to merit reproduction? Herein it is useful to look to Kant, who wrote much on whether, by reproducing, humans do wrong or right morally. Two main arguments are put forward and assessed: one examining whether perfect or imperfect duties condone reproduction, the other whether Kant’s teleological or, in the opposite sense, his eschatological outlooks can salvage reproduction. These two arguments are essential for building the entire argument. I find that, although Kant’s arguments against reproducing are strong, some of his writing seems to support reproduction as a good. Yet, must we assume an author, even one who strove for systematicity, is consistent over an entire life’s work on every issue, especially if it is not handled directly in a single work? I conclude that Kant does not sufficiently, systematically support anti-natalism as more moral than pro-natalism. It is best for the current debate to grapple with the very dilemma that daunted Kant.
Reference
Allison, H. E., 1986. Morality and Freedom: Kant’s Reciprocity Thesis. Philosophical Review, 95(3), pp. 393-425.
Anscombe, G. E. M., 1989. Why Have Children? In: Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association, 63, pp. 48-53.
Benatar, D., 2006. Better Never to Have Been: The Harm of Coming into Existence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Benatar, D. and Wasserman, D., 2015. Debating Procreation: Is It Wrong to Reproduce? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bojanowski, J., 2018. Thinking About Cases. The European Journal of Philosophy, 26(4), pp. 1253-1268.
Carson, R., 1962. Silent Spring. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Chalmers, D., 2020. The Singularity: A Philosophical Analysis. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 17(9-10), pp. 7-65.
Conly, S., 2016. One Child: Do We Have a Right to More? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dawkins, R., 1975. The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hannan, S., Brennan, S. and Vernon, R. eds. 2016. Permissible Progeny? The Morality of Procreation and Parenting. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kant, I., 1997. Moral Philosophy: Collins’s Lecture Notes. In: I. Kant, 1997. Lectures on Ethics. Edited by P. Heath and J. B. Schneewind; translated by P. Heath. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 37-222.
Kant, I., 1993. Grounding of the Metaphysics of Morals. Translated and edited by J. W. Ellington. Indianapolis: Hackett.
Kant, I., 1996. Metaphysics of Morals. In: I. Kant, 1996. Practical Philosophy. Translated by M. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 353-604.
Kant, I., 2000. Critique of the Power of Judgment. Edited by P. Guyer, translated by P. Guyer and E. Matthews. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kleingeld, P., 2017. Contradiction and Kant’s Formula of Universal Law. Kant-Studien, 108(1), pp. 89-115.
Mill, J. S., 1859. On Liberty. In: R. M. Hutchins, ed. 1952. Great Books of the Western World 43: American State Papers. The Federalist. J. S. Mill. Chicago: Encyclopedia Britannica, pp. 265-323.
Miller, L. F., 2017. No Longer as Free as the Wind: Human Reproduction and Parenting Enter the Scope of Morality. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 20(3), pp. 657-664.
Nyholm, S., 2015. Kant’s Universal Law Formula Revisited. Metaphilosophy, 46(2), pp. 280-299.
O’Neill, O., 1988. Consistency in Action. In: P. Guyer, ed. 1988. Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals: Critical Essays. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 105-132.
Overall, C., 2012. Why Have Children? The Ethical Debate. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Parfit, D., 1984. Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Clarendon.
Parfit, D., 2011. On What Matters, Volume 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Puls, H., 2016. Kant’s Justification of Parental Duties. Kantian Review, 21(1), pp. 53-75.
Rumbaugh, D. and Washburn, D., 2003. Intelligence of Apes and Other Rational Beings. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Scheffler, S., 2011. Introduction. In: D. Parfit, 2011. On What Matters. Volume 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. XIX-XXXII.
Shiffrin, S., 1999. Wrongful Life, Procreative Responsibility, and the Significance of Harm. Legal Theory, 5(2), pp. 117-148.
Singer, P. and Cavalieri, P., eds. 1993. The Great Ape Project: Equality Beyond Humanity. London: Fourth Estate.
Weinberg, R., 2016. The Risk of a Lifetime: How, When, and Why Procreation May Be Permissible. Oxford: Oxford University Press.