Search
Submit an article RU
Kantian Journal

2023 Vol. 42. №3

Back to the list Download the article
ENG
Сохранить XML для: JATS (вып.)
RUS
Сохранить XML для: JATS (вып.)
Mezhuev B.V.

“Conservative Enlightenment” as “Heroisation of the Present”

DOI
10.5922/0207-6918-2023-3-6
Pages
130-158
enlightenment Kant prehistory social evolution modernity counter-enlightenment

Abstract

This text is a polemic against the 2023 article by Sergey N. Gradirovsky who wrote about the present-day relevance of Immanuel Kant’s concept of enlightenment and challenged the idea of the modern human being as a child who needs an external guardian or guide to control his behaviour. In my polemic with Gradirovksy I point out that in addition to “self-incurred immaturity” Kant writes about the historical “immaturity” of savage or backward peoples. I also argue that for Kant “maturity” carries not only biological but also socio-historical connotations. I show that in the modern world Kant’s idea of the social or even historical maturity of the modern human acquires serious problematisation which was shown to be possible and inevitable in the article “What Is Enlightenment?” (1784) and its notion of the historicity of enlightenment, i.e. the very strategy of modernity is possible only when humankind reaches a certain historical age. Using as a point of departure the ideas of the French philosopher Michel Foucault, I maintain that the Kant­ian conception of enlightenment is at once ironic and tragic. It is ironic because it does not rule out that its main thesis on the historical maturity of the human being may turn out to be wrong. It is tragic because its main thrust is “heroisation of the present”, i.e. a readi­ness to resist the temptation of being absorbed by the future, which takes on added relevance in view of the virtualisation of reality.

Reference

Avtonomova, N. S., 2009. Michel Foucault. In: Filosofy dvadcatogo veka [Philosophers of the 20th Century]. Book 3. Moscow: Iskusstvo-XXI vek, pp. 274-294. (In Rus.)

Foucault, M., 2005. The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. London & New York: Routledge.

Foucault, M., 1984. What is Enlightenment? In: P. Rabinow, ed. 1984. The Foucault Reader. New York: Pantheon Books, pp. 32-50.

Foucault, M., 2010. The Government of Self and Others: Lectures at the Collège de France 1982—1983. Ed. by F. Gros, F. Ewald and A. Fontana, translated by G. Burchell. Basingstoke & New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Fukuyama, F., 1992. The End of History and the Last Man. New York & Toronto: Free Press.

Gradirovsky, S. N., 2023. Dare to Know, or the Gospel According to Kant. Kantian Journal, 42(2), pp. 141-170. http://dx.doi:10.5922/0207-6918-2023-2-7.

Habermas, J., 1994. Taking Aim at the Heart of Present: On Focault’s Lecture on Kant’s “What Is Enlightenment?” In: J. Habermas, 1994. The New Conservatism. Cultural Criticism and the Historians Debate. Boston: Policy Press, pp. 173-180.

Horkheimer, M. and Adorno, T., 1972. Dialectic of Enlightenment. New York: Herder and Herder.

Kant, I., 1999. An Answer to the Question: What Is Enlightenment? (1784). ln: I. Kant, 1999. Practical Philosophy. Translated and edited by M. J. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 15-22.

Kant, I., 2007. Review of J. G. Herders Ideas for the Philosophy of the History of Humanity. Parts 1 and 2. In: I. Kant, 2007. Anthropology, History, and Education. Edited by G. Zöller and R. B. Louden; translated by A. W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 121-142.

Kant, I., 1996. The Conflict of the Faculties. In: I. Kant, 1996. Religion and Rational Theology. Translated by M. J. Gregor and R. Anchor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 233-328.

Kaplun, V., 2001. From Nietzsche to Nietzsche: On the Intersection of Two Philosophical Biographies (Semyon Frank and Michel Foucault). In: O. Kharkhordin, ed. 2001. Michel Foucault i Rossiya [Michel Foucault and Russia]. Saint Petersburg & Moscow: European University at Saint Petersburg; Letnij sad. (In Rus.)

Marx, K., 1987. A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy. Part One. In: K. Marx, F. Engels, 1987. Collected Works, Volume 29: Marx: 1857—1861. Moscow, London & New York: Progress; Lawrence and Wishart; International Publishers, pp. 257-417.

Mezhuev, B. V., 2022. Dialectics of the Counter-Enlightenment. Voprosy Filosofii, 6, pp. 45-57. https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2022-6-45-57. (In Rus.)

Nietzsche, F., 2006. Thus Spoke Zarathustra. A Book for All and None. Edited by A. del Caro, R. B. Pippin, translated by A. del Caro. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Strugatsky, A. and Strugatsky, B., 1995. Volny gasyat veter [The Waves Extinguish the Wind]. In: A. Strugatsky and B. Strugatsky, 1995. Sobranie sochinenii [Collected Works]. Volume 10. Moscow: Text, pp. 175-316. (In Rus.)

Strugatsky, A. and Strugatsky, B., 2018. Bespokojstvo [Disquiet]. In: A. Strugatsky and B. Strugatsky, 2018. Sobranie sochinenii [Collected Works]. Volume 4: 1964—1966. Moscow: AST, pp. 183-286. (In Rus.)

Strugatsky, A. and Strugatsky, B., 2022. Kommentarii k projdennomu [Comments on What Has Been Done]. Moscow: AST. (In Rus.)

Tsoi, V. R., 2022. Svoimi slovami. Kniga interv’yu [In My Own Words. A Book of Interviews], 1983—1990. Edited by V. Kalgin. Moscow: AST. (In Rus.)