Some Remarks about the Difference between Überzeugung and Überredung

Martinez L.

Some Remarks about the Difference between Überzeugung and Überredung

DOI: 10.5922/0207-6918-2023-2-5
Pages: 95-110

Kant holding to be true conviction persuasion freedom of speech

Abstract

According to several passages in the available sources, Kant developed some ideas about the difference between being persuaded and being convinced which have antecedents in the German tradition, but with regard to which he developed ideas of his own. It is my intention to examine precisely some of these passages. I will explain how the philosopher understood this difference, what its relevance is and why the figure of the other is necessary to determine it. For this purpose, texts published in the critical period and students’ lecture notes from the same period are considered. Furthermore, I will compare the treatment of the subject in these sources and in the textbooks used by Kant in his courses. In the conclusions, the link between this issue and Kantian arguments in defending freedom of thought and expression is also suggested. In order to do so, I first explain the notion of holding to be true and its difference from the notion of being true. Secondly, I examine what it means to be convinced and what it means to be persuaded. Finally, I analyse the relevance of alterity for the identification of this difference and consider the importance of freedom of expression.

Reference

Baumgarten, A. G., 1757. Metaphysica. In: I. Kant, 1922. Kant’s gesammelte Schriften, Volume 15, Part 1. Edited by Königlich-Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Berlin & Leipzig: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 5-54.

Chignell, A., 2007. Belief in Kant. Philosophical Review, 116 (3), pp. 323-360.

Heimsoeth, H., 1966. Transzendentale Dialektik. Ein Kommentar zu Kants Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

Kant, I., 1989. What is Orientation in Thinking? In: I. Kant. Political Writings. Translated by H. B. Nisbet and edited by H. S. Reiss. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 237-248.

Kant, I., 1992. Lectures on Logic. Translated and edited by J. M. Young. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kant, I., 1998. Critique of Pure Reason. Translated and edited by P. Guyer and A. Wood. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Kant, I., 2000. Critique of the Power of Judgment. Translated and edited by P. Guyer. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Kant, I. Lectures on Anthropology. Edited by A. Wood and R. Lauden. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Keller, P., 2015. Schein. In: M. Willaschek, J. Stolzenberg, G. Mohr and S. Bacin, eds. 2015. Kant-Lexikon. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter, pp. 2008-2009.

La Rocca, C., 2018. Selbstbewusstsein und Fürwahrhalten in Kants Theorie des Gewissens. In: V. Waibel, M. Ruffing and D. Wagner, eds. 2018. Natur und Freiheit: Akten des XII. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter, pp. 441-456.

Meier, G. F., 1752. Auszug aus der Vernunflehre. In: I. Kant, 1924. Kant’s gesammelte Schriften, Volume 16. Edited by Königlich-Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Berlin & Leipzig: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 3-872.

Reiki, B., 1998. Der Kanon der reinen Vernunft. In: G. Mohr and M. Willaschek, eds. 1998. Kritik der reinen Vernunft (Klassiker Auslegen). Berlin: Akademie Verlag, pp. 597-616.

Reyna Fortes, R. 2023. Hipótesis y tener por verdadero en Kant. Daimon Revista Internacional de Filosofía, 88, pp. 137-151.

Willaschek, M. and Watkins, E., 2020. Kant on Cognition and Knowledge. Synthese, 197, pp. 3195-3213.

Login:
Password:
	Remember Me

Register Forgot your password?

2023 Vol. 42. №2