Kantian Journal

2022 Vol. 41. №2

Back to the list Download the article

Kant and Wittgenstein on Thought Experiments and the Matter of Transcendental Arguments



It is necessary to reconsider P. M. S. Hacker’s assessment of Kant and Wittgenstein’s philosophical affinities and the question concerning Wittgenstein’s alleged use of “transcendental arguments”. First, Alfred Norman’s reading of the Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus as a thought experiment receives revision to develop a view of the Critique of Pure Reason as a large-scale thought experiment that shares important logical features with the Tractatus. Then the question is addressed whether the middle Wittgenstein and the pre-critical Kant employed any thought experiments that could be equally characterised as “transcendental arguments”. A rational reconstruction of both thinkers’ arguments is carried out in the light of the contemporary literature on thought experimenting. The novelty and relevance of this approach is the emphasis laid upon a largely neglected affinity between Kant and Wittgenstein, namely the systematic use of thought experiments in their epistemological pursuits. The conclusions are: i) Wittgenstein’s and Kant’s magna opera can be seen as philosophical thought experiments that attempt to try out the limits of language and the limits of possible experience respectively; ii) Both philosophers developed arguments that can be designated as transcendental if only from a methodological standpoint; and iii) some key arguments put forward by the middle Wittgenstein in the determination of the structure of visual space could be characterised better as thought experiments than transcendental arguments.


Brendel, E., 2004. Intuition Pumps and the Proper Use of Thought Experiments. Dialectica, 58(1), pp. 89-108.

Brown, J. R., 1991. Thought Experiments: A Platonic Account. In: T. Horowitz and G. J. Massey, eds. 1991. Thought Experiments in Science and Philosophy. Savage, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

Brown, J. R., 2004. Why Thought Experiments Transcend Empiricism. In: C. Hitchcock, ed. 2004. Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Science. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub, pp. 23-43.

Broyles, J. E., 1974. An Observation on Wittgenstein’s Use of Phantasy. Metaphilosophy, 5(4), pp. 291-297.

Buzzoni, M., 2018. Kantian Accounts of Thought Experiments. In: M. T. Stuart, Y. Fehige and J. R. Brown, eds. 2018. The Routledge Companion to Thought Experiments. London & New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, pp. 327-341.

Diamond, C., 2000. Ethics, Imagination, and the Method of Wittgenstein’s Tractatus. In: A. Crary and R. Read, eds. 2000. The New Wittgenstein. London & New York: Routledge, pp. 149-173.

Dragalina-Chernaya, E. G., 2020. Colours in Ludwig Wittgenstein’s Logical Space. Voprosy Filosofii, 6, pp. 146-156.

Engelmann, M. L., 2013. Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Development. Phenomenology, Grammar, Method, and the Anthropological View. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Fehige, Y. and Stuart, M. T., 2014. On the Origins of the Philosophy of Thought Experiments: The Forerun. Perspectives on Science, 22(2), pp. 179-220.

Hacker, P. M. S., 2013. Kant and Wittgenstein: The Matter of Transcendental Arguments. In: N. Venturinha, ed. 2013. The Textual Genesis of Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations. New York: Routledge, pp. 120-134.

Hanna, R., 2017. Wittgenstein and Kantianism. In: H. J. Glock & J. Hyman, eds. 2017. A Companion to Wittgenstein. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 682-698.

Kalin, M.G., 1972. Kant’s Transcendental Arguments as Gedankenexperimente. Kant-Studien, 63(3), pp. 315-328.

Kant, I., 1992a. Concerning the Ultimate Ground of the Differentiation of Directions in Space. Translated by D. Walford. In: I. Kant, 1992. Theoretical philosophy, 1755-1770. Edited by D. Walford. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 365-372.

Kant, I., 1992b. On the Form and Principles of the Sensible and the Intelligible World [Inaugural Dissertation]. In: I. Kant, 1992. Theoretical philosophy, 1755-1770. Edited by D. Walford. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 373-416.

Kant, I., 1998. Critique of Pure Reason. Translated by P. Guyer and A. W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kant, I., 2002. Prolegomena to any Further Metaphysics that Will Be Able to Come Forward as Science, In: I. Kant, 2002. Theoretical Philosophy After 1781. Edit­ed by H. E. Allison and P. Heath. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 53-169.

Nordmann, A., 2005. Wittgenstein’s Tractatus: An Introduction. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.

Norton, J., 2004. Why Thought Experiments do not Transcend Empiricism. In: C. Hitchcock, ed. 2004. Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Science. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub, pp. 44-66.

Ramsey, F. P., 1923. Critical Notice of L. Wittgenstein’s Tractatus. Mind, 32(128), pp. 465-478.

Ryle, G., 2009. Philosophical Arguments. In: G. Ryle, 2009. Collected Papers, Volume 2: Collected Essays 1929 — 1968. London & New York: Routledge, pp. 203-221. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203875308

Silva, M., 2014. Holismo e Verofuncionalidade: Sobre Um Conflito Lógico-Filosófico Essencial. Philósophos — Revista de Filosofia, 18(2), pp. 167-200.

Sorensen, R. A., 1992. Thought Experiments. New York: Oxford University Press.

Virvidakis, S., 2011. On Kant’s Critique of Thought Experiments in Early Modern Philosophy. In: K. Ierodiakonou and S. Roux, eds. 2011. Thought Experiments in Methodological and Historical Contexts. Leiden & Boston: Brill, pp. 127-142.

Westphal, K. R., 2015. Experiment. In: M. Willaschek, J. Stolzenberg, G. Mohr and S. Bacin, eds. 2015. Kant-Lexikon. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 591-594.

Witt-Hansen, J., 1976. H. C. Ørsted, Immanuel Kant and the Thought Experiment. Danish Yearbook of Philosophy, 13, pp. 48-65.

Wittgenstein, L., 1961. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Translated by B. McGuinness and D. Pears. London: Routledge & Paul.

Wittgenstein, L., 1969. Notebooks 1914—1916. Second Edition. Translated by G. E. M. Anscombe. New York: Harper & Row.

Wittgenstein, L., 1990. Philosophical Remarks. Reprint. Translated by R. Hargraves and R. White. Oxford: Blackwell.

Wittgenstein, L., 1993. Some Remarks on Logical Form. In: J. C. Klagge and A. Nordmann, eds. 1993. Philosophical Occasions, 1912—1951. Indianapolis: Hacket Pub. Co., pp. 29-35.

Wittgenstein, L., 1997. Philosophical Investigations. Second Edition. Translated by G. E. M. Anscombe. Oxford: Blackwell Pub.