Search
Submit an article RU
Kantian Journal

2022 Vol. 41. №1

Back to the list Download the article
ENG
Сохранить XML для: JATS (вып.)
RUS
Сохранить XML для: JATS (вып.)
Katrechko S. L.

Review of the 13th International Kant Congress

Abstract

The 13th International Kant Congress was held on August 6-9, 2019 in Oslo, Norway. The main tasks of this review are to analyse the central theme of the Congress, “The Court of Reason”, the related spheres of philosophical inquiry such as metaphilosophy and philosophical methodology, as well as to reveal the main approaches and development trends of transcendental philosophy in “theoretical” and “practical” fields and modern Kant studies, notably transcendental philosophy of language and consciousness. The solution of these tasks will make it possible to raise the question of the prospects of Kantian transcendentalism in relation to the pressing problems of our time (especially political philosophy and the philosophy of law) and to chart the paths of such development.

Full text

json#{"TEXT":"","TYPE":"HTML"}

Reference

Allais, L., 2015. Manifest Reality: Kant’s Idealism and his Realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ameriks, К., 1982. Recent Work on Kant’s Theoretical Philosophy. American Philosophical Quarterly, 19(1), рр. 1-24.

Ameriks, К., 2011. Kant’s Idealism on a Moderate Interpretation. In: Kant’s Idealism New Interpretations of a Controversial Doctrine. Edited by D. Schulting and J. Verburgt. Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London & New York: Springer, pp. 29-54.

Anderson, R. L., 2021. Transcendental Idealism as Formal Idealism: an Anti-Metaphysical Reading. In: C. Serck-Hanssen and B. Himmelmann, eds. 2021. The Court of Reason: Proceedings of the 13th International Kant Congress. Oslo, 6-9 August 2019. Berlin & Boston: Walter de Gruyter, 2021, pp. 49-67.

Anderson, R. L., 2022. Transcendental Idealism as Formal Idealism. European Journal of Philosophy, [e-journal] pp. 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejop.12753

Buroker, J. V., 1981. Space and Incongruence: The Origin of Kant’s Idealism. Dordrecht: Springer-Science+Business Media.

Buroker, J. V., 2021. Thought and Language in the Critical Philosophy. In: C. Serck-Hanssen and B. Himmelmann, eds. 2021. The Court of Reason: Proceedings of the 13th International Kant Congress. Oslo, 6-9 August 2019. Berlin & Boston: Walter de Gruyter, 2021, pp. 69-83.

Capozzi, M., 1987. Kant on Logic, Language and Thought. In: M. Ferrian and D. Buzzetti, eds. 1987. Speculative Grammar, Universal Grammar, and Philosophical Analysis of Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 97-148.

Capozzi, M., 2011. Philosophy and Writing: The Philosophical Book According to Kant. Quaestio, 1, pp. 307-350.

Capozzi, M., 2021. Why Language Matters to Kant’s Philosophy and Logic. In: C. Serck-Hanssen and B. Himmelmann, eds. 2021. The Court of Reason: Proceedings of the 13th International Kant Congress. Oslo, 6-9 August 2019. Berlin & Boston: Walter de Gruyter, 2021, pp. 97-115.

Dmitrieva, N. A., 2021. Kant in Early Russian Neo-Kantianism: The Case of Vvedensky. In: C. Serck-Hanssen and B. Himmelmann, eds. 2021. The Court of Reason: Proceedings of the 13th International Kant Congress. Oslo, 6—9 August 2019. Berlin & Boston: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 1247-1254.

Forster, M. N., 2012. Kant’s Philosophy of Language? Tijdschrift voor Filosofie, 74(3), pp. 485-511.

Friebe, C., 2021. Inkongruente Gegenstücke und Ununterscheidbares: Wozu braucht es Anschauung? In: C. Serck-Hanssen and B. Himmelmann, eds. 2021. The Court of Reason: Proceedings of the 13th International Kant Congress. Oslo, 6—9 August 2019. Berlin & Boston: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 707-715.

Friedman, M., 1998. Kant and the Exact Sciences. Cambridge, MА: Harvard University Press.

Friedman, M., 2021. The Court of Reason and its Authority. In: C. Serck-Hanssen and B. Himmelmann, eds. 2021. The Court of Reason: Proceedings of the 13th International Kant Congress. Oslo, 6-9 August 2019. Berlin & Boston: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 191-207.

Heidemann, D., 2021. Kant’s Supposed Realism about Things-in-Themselves. In: C. Serck-Hanssen and B. Himmelmann, eds. 2021. The Court of Reason: Proceedings of the 13th International Kant Congress. Oslo, 6-9 August 2019. Berlin & Boston: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 515-524.

Henrich, D., 1969. The Proof-Structure of Kant’s Transcendental Deduction. Review of Metaphysics, 22(4), pp. 640-659.

Henrich, D., 1989. Kant’s Notion of a Deduction and the Methodological Background of the First Critique. In: E. Förster, ed. 1989. Kant’s Transcendental Deduction; The Three ‘Critiques’ and the ‘Opus Postumum’. Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 29-46.

Jurkiewicz, A., 2021. Kant and the Mereology of the Perceiver’s Body. In: C. Serck-Hanssen and B. Himmelmann, eds. 2021. The Court of Reason: Proceedings of the 13th International Kant Congress. Oslo, 6-9 August 2019. Berlin & Boston: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 1237-1244.

Kant, I., 1998. Critique of Pure Reason. Translated and edited by P. Guyer and A. W. Wood. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.

Katrechko, S. L., 2021. Kant’s “Idea [Project] of Transcendental Philosophy”. Studies in Transcendental Philosophy, 1(1), [online] Available at: <http://ras.jes.su/transcendental/s123456780008967-4-1&gt; [Accessed 01 Au­gust 2021].

Katrechko, S. L., 2021. The Ambivalent Character of the Kantian Notion of Appearance: The Objective-Objectual (‘gegenständlich’) Nature of Appearances as ‘Objects of Experience’. In: C. Serck-Hanssen and B. Himmelmann, eds. 2021. The Court of Reason: Proceedings of the 13th International Kant Congress. Oslo, 6-9 August 2019. Berlin & Boston: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 319-327.

Kornilaev, L., 2021. Kant’s Copernican Turn: Emil Lask’s Interpretation and Its Criticism in Russia. In: C. Serck-Hanssen and B. Himmelmann, eds. 2021. The Court of Reason: Proceedings of the 13th International Kant Congress. Oslo, 6-9 August 2019. Berlin & Boston: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 1265-1273.

Møller, S., 2020. Kant’s Tribunal of Reason: Legal Metaphor and Normativity in the Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Rusnock, P., 2004. Was Kant’s Philosophy of Mathematics Right for Its Time? Kant-Studien, 95, pp. 426-442.

Serck-Hanssen, S. and Himmelmann, B., eds. 2021. The Court of Reason: Proceedings of the 13th International Kant Congress. Oslo, 6-9 August 2019. Berlin & Boston: Walter de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110701357

Trevisan, D. K., 2018. Der Gerichtshof der Vernunft. Eine historische und systematische Untersuchung über die juridischen Metaphern der Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.

Trotsak, A. I., 2021. The Dispute over Universal Competences during a Pandemic. In: C. Serck-Hanssen and B. Himmelmann, eds. 2021. The Court of Reason: Proceedings of the 13th International Kant Congress. Oslo, 6-9 August 2019. Berlin & Boston: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 1595-1604.

Willaschek, M., 2021. The Structure of Normative Space: Kant’s System of Rational Principles. In: C. Serck-Hanssen and B. Himmelmann, eds. 2021. The Court of Reason: Proceedings of the 13th International Kant Congress. Oslo, 6-9 August 2019. Berlin & Boston: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 245-266.