Kant in the Time of COVID
- DOI
- 10.5922/0207-6918-2022-1-4
- Pages
- 89-117
Abstract
During the coronavirus pandemic, communities have faced shortages of important healthcare resources such as COVID-19 vaccines, medical staff, ICU beds and ventilators. Public health officials in the U.S. have had to make decisions about two major issues: which infected patients should be treated first (triage), and which people who are at risk of infection should be inoculated first (vaccine distribution). Following Beauchamp and Childress’s principlism, adopted guidelines have tended to value both whole lives (survival to discharge) and life-years (survival for years past discharge). This process of collective moral reasoning has revealed our common commitment to both Kantian and utilitarian principles. For Kant, respecting people’s rights entails that we ought to value whole lives equally. Therefore we ought to allocate resources so as to maximise the number of patients who survive to discharge. By contrast, the principle of utility has us maximise life-years so that people can satisfy more of their considered preferences. Although people are treated impartially in the utilitarian calculus, it does not recognise their equal worth. Subjecting Kantian ethics and utilitarianism to the process of reflective equilibrium lends support to the idea that we need a pluralistic approach that would accommodate our moral intuitions regarding both the equal value of whole lives and the additive value of life-years.
Reference
Afroogh, S., Kazemi, A. and Seyedkazemi, A., 2021. COVID-19, Scarce Resources and Priority Ethics: Why Should Maximizers Be More Conservative? Ethics, Medicine and Public Health, 18, September, 100698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemep.2021.100698
Alexander, S., 1962. They Decide Who Lives, Who Dies: Medical Miracle Puts Moral Burden on Small Committee. Life, 53(19), pp. 102-125.
Allais, L., 2016. Kant’s Racism. Philosophical Papers, 45(1-2), pp. 1-36.
Altman, M. C., 2011. Kant and Applied Ethics: The Uses and Limits of Kant’s Practical Philosophy. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.
Altman, M. C., 2021. A Consequentialist Argument for Considering Age in Triage Decisions during the Coronavirus Pandemic. Bioethics, 35(4), pp. 356-365.
Beauchamp, T. L., Childress, J. F., 1994. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Fourth Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Beauchamp, T. L., Childress, J. F., 2001. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Fifth Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Beauchamp, T. L., Childress, J. F., 2019. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Eighth Edition. New York: Oxford University Press.
Blagg, C. R., 1998. Development of Ethical Concepts in Dialysis: Seattle in the 1960s. Nephrology, 4(4), pp. 235-238.
Cesari, M. and Proietti, M., 2020. COVID-19 in Italy: Ageism and Decision Making in a Pandemic. JAMDA, 21(5), pp. 576-577.
Childress, J. F., Faden, R. R., Gaare, R. D. et al., 2002. Public Health Ethics: Mapping the Terrain. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, 30(2), pp. 170-178.
Chu, Q., Correa R., Henry T. L. et al., 2020. Reallocating Ventilators during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic: Is It Ethical? Surgery, 168(3), pp. 388-391.
Clouser, K. D. and Gert, B., 1990. A Critique of Principlism. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 15(2), pp. 219-236.
Emanuel, E. J., Persad, G., Upshur, R. et al., 2020. Fair Allocation of Scarce Medical Resources in the Time of Covid-19. New England Journal of Medicine, 382, pp. 2049-2055. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsb2005114
Foot, P. 1967. The Problem of Abortion and the Doctrine of the Double Effect. Oxford Review, 5, pp. 5-15.
Goldberg, N., 2021. You Think Vaccine Mandates Are Controversial? What If the Police Pinned You Down and Injected You? Los Angeles Times, 29 Sep., [online]. Available at: <https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2021-09-29/forced-vaccinations-china-ethics-covid>
[Accessed on 19 October 2021].
Gostin, L., 2006. Public Health Strategies for Pandemic Influenza: Ethics and the Law. JAMA, 295(14), pp. 1700-1704. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.295.14.1700
Kant, I., 1996a. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. In: I. Kant, 1996. Practical Philosophy. Translated and edited by M. J. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 41-108.
Kant, I., 1996b. The Metaphysics of Morals. In: I. Kant, 1996. Practical Philosophy. Translated and edited by M. J. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 363-602.
Kuylen, M. N. I., Kim, S. Y., Keene, A. R. and Owen G. S., 2021. Should Age Matter in COVID-19 Triage? A Deliberative Study. Journal of Medical Ethics, 47(5), pp. 291-295.
Mill, J. S., 2001. Utilitarianism. Second Edition. Edited by George Sher. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
Mills, Ch., 2005. Kant’s Untermenschen. In: A. Valls, eds. 2005. Race and Racism in Modern Philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 169-193.
New York State Task Force on Life and the Law, 2015. Ventilator Allocation Guidelines. (November 2015). Albany, N Y: New York State Department of Health. Available at: <https://www.health.ny.gov/regu
lations/task_force/reports_publications/docs/ventila
tor_guidelines.pdf> [Accessed on 19 October 2021].
Ogedegbe, G., Ravenell, J., Adhikari, S. et al., 2020. Assessment of Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Hospitalization and Mortality in Patients with COVID-19 in New York City. JAMA Network Open, 3(12), e2026881. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.26881
Rawls, J., 1999. A Theory of Justice. Revised Edition. Cambridge, Mass.: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Rosenbaum, L., 2020. Facing Covid-19 in Italy — Ethics, Logistics, and Therapeutics on the Epidemic’s Front Line. New England Journal of Medicine. 382(18), pp. 1-3.
Ross, W. D., 2002. The Right and the Good. Edited by P. Stratton-Lake. Oxford: Clarendon.
Singer, P., 1972. Famine, Affluence, and Morality. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 1(3), pp. 229-243.
Smart, J. J. C., 1956. Extreme and Restricted Utilitarianism. Philosophical Quarterly, 6(25), pp. 344—354.
Thomson, J. J., 1985. The Trolley Problem. Yale Law Journal, 94(6), pp. 1395-1415.
Vergano, M., Bertolini, G., Giannini, A. et al., 2020. Clinical Ethics Recommendations for the Allocation of Intensive Care Treatments, in Exceptional, Resource-Limited Circumstances. Version n. 1. Posted on March 16th, 2020 by Italian Society of Anesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation and Intensive Care (SIAARTI). Available at: <https://www.mentice.com/hubfs/COVID-19/White%20paper%202020%20-%20SIAARTI%20-%20Covid-19%20-%20Clini...; [Accessed on 7 Mai 2021].
White, D. B., Katz, M., Luce, J., Lo, B. et al., 2020. Allocation of Scarce Critical Care Resources during a Public Health Emergency. Posted by University of Pittsburgh, Department of Critical Care Medicine, April 15, 2020. Available at: <https://ccm.pitt.edu/sites/default/files/UnivPittsburgh_ModelHospitalResourcePoli
cy_2020_04_15.pdf> [Accessed on 15 March 2021].
Wood, A. W., 1999. Kant’s Ethical Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zhou, F., Yu, T., Du, R. et al., 2020. Clinical Course and Risk Factors for Mortality of Adult Inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Lancet, 395(10229), pp. 1054-1062. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30566-3