Why Kant’s “Ethical State” Might Prove Instrumental in Challenging Current Social Pathologies
- DOI
- 10.5922/0207-6918-2021-4-6
- Pages
- 156-186
Abstract
As recent social research demonstrates, the life world is increasingly impacted by a corrosion of social bonds and aggressive habits expressed, for instance, in hate speech in the social media. Significantly, such phenomena have not been prevented from evolving within the framework of constitutional liberal states. In search of an appropriate mode of challenging the current social pathologies, we should examine Kant’s claim that, alongside the “juridico-civil (political) state”, an “ethico-civil state”, uniting human beings “under laws of virtue alone”, needs to be established and cultivated. Kant’s claim is discussed in comparison with “postmetaphysical” conceptions of morality, as maintained by Rawls and Habermas. These prove deficient owing to their contract-based approach. Important in the examination of the key idea of the “state of virtue” is Kant’s thesis that such a state “cannot be realized (by human organization) except in the form of a church”. In view of the fact that, today, in many parts of the world significant segments of the population adhere to agnostic or atheistic convictions, the focus is placed on Kant’s specific conception of “church” that is clearly distinct from “historical” creeds and religious practices, and on the way in which he addresses non-believers, since he insists on the intrinsic relation between morality and the “purely moral religion”. Based on these reflections, the relevance of Kant’s argument that it is “a duty of the entire human race” to establish a community in which people mutually support one another in the cultivation of moral sensitivity is scrutinised.
Reference
Anderson-Gold, S., 1991. God and Community. Religious Implications of the Highest Good. In: P. Rossi and M. Wreen, eds. 1991. Kant’s Philosophy of Religion Reconsidered. Bloomington & Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, pp. 113-132.
Bell, D., 2016. Communitarianism. In: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, [online] Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/communitarianism/ (Accessed 20.05.2021).
Byrne, P., 2007. Kant on God. Hampshire: Ashgate.
Dallmayr, F., 1993. G. W. F. Hegel: Modernity and Politics. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Forst, R., 2002. Contexts of Justice. Political Philosophy beyond Liberalism and Communitarianism. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Forst, R., 2014. The Right to Justification. New York: Columbia University Press.
Forst, R., 2015. Rechtfertigung in der praktischen Philosophie: Stellungnahmen. Information Philosophie, 4, pp. 20-27.
Habermas, J., 1990. Discourse Ethics: Notes on a Program of Philosophical Justification. In: J. Habermas, 1990. Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 43-115.
Habermas, J., 1991. Erläuterungen zur Diskursethik. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.
Habermas, J. 2003. Truth and Justification. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Habermas, J., 2008. Between Naturalism and Religion. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Habermas, J., 2016. Kommunikative Vernunft. Ein Interview mit Christoph Demmerling und Hans-Peter Krüger. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, 64(5), pp. 806-827.
Habermas, J. 2021. Versuch einer Replik. In: F. Gruber and M. Knapp, eds. 2021. Wissen und Glauben. Theologische Reaktionen auf das Werk von Jürgen Habermas Auch eine Geschichte der Philosophie. Freiburg: Herder, 2021, pp. 224-252.
Honneth, A., 2014. Freedom’s Right. The Social Foundations of Democratic Life. New York: Columbia University Press.
Horkheimer, M., 1970. Die Sehnsucht nach dem ganz Anderen. Ein Interview mit Kommentar von H. Gumnior. Hamburg: Furche Verlag.
Kant, I., 1978. The Critique of Judgement. Translated by J. C. Meredith. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kant, I., 1996a. An Answer to the Question: What is Enlightenment? In: I. Kant, 1996. Practical Philosophy. Translated and edited by M. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 15-22.
Kant, I., 1996b. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. In: I. Kant, 1996. Practical Philosophy. Translated and edited by M. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 37-108.
Kant, I., 1996c. Critique of Practical Reason. In: I. Kant, 1996. Practical Philosophy. Translated and edited by M. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 133-271.
Kant, I., 1996d. The Metaphysics of Morals. In: I. Kant, 1996. Practical Philosophy. Translated and edited by M. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 363-602.
Kant, I., 1996e. What Does It Mean to Orient Oneself in Thinking? In: I. Kant, 1996. Religion and Rational Theology. Edited by A. W. Wood and G. di Giovanni. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 7-18.
Kant, I., 1996f. Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason. Translated by G. di Giovanni. In: I. Kant, 1996. Religion and Rational Theology. Edited by A. W. Wood and G. di Giovanni. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 55-215.
Kant, I., 1996g. The Conflict of Faculties. In: I. Kant, 1996. Religion and Rational Theology. Edited by A. W. Wood and G. di Giovanni. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 233-327.
Kant, I., 1998. Critique of Pure Reason. Translated and edited by P. Guyer and A. W. Wood. Cambridge University Press.
Kant, I., 2004. Vorlesung zur Moralphilosophie. Edited by W. Stark. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Kant, I., 2007a. Idea for a Universal History with a Cosmopolitan Aim. In: I. Kant, 2007. Anthropology, History, and Education. Edited by G. Zöller and R. B. Louden. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 107-120.
Kant, I., 2007b. Lectures on Pedagogy. In: I. Kant, 2007. Anthropology, History, and Education. Edited by G. Zöller and R. B. Louden. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 437-485.
Lutz-Bachmann, M., 2021. Hoffnung aus Vernunft. Kants Hoffnung auf ein “ethisches Gemeinwesen“. In: F. Gruber and M. Knapp, eds. 2021. Wissen und Glauben. Theologische Reaktionen auf das Werk von Jürgen Habermas Auch eine Geschichte der Philosophie. Freiburg: Herder, 2021, pp. 145-205.
Nagl, L., 2021. Contemporary Discourses on Humanism (Richard Rorty, Charles Taylor, Tu Weiming). In: L. Nagl, 2021. Toward a Global Discourse on Religion in a Secular Age. Essays on Philosophical Pragmatism. Wien: LIT, pp. 45-62.
Nagl-Docekal, H., 2014a. Learning to Listen or Why Morality Calls for Liberal Politics. In: G. Fløistad, ed. 2014. Ethics or Moral Philosophy: Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 109-130.
Nagl-Docekal, H., 2014b. Innere Freiheit. Grenzen der nachmetaphysischen Moralkonzeptionen. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Nagl-Docekal, H., 2020a. Immanuel Kant’s Concept of Reasonable Hope. In: M. Lichner, ed. 2020. Hope. Where Does Our Hope Lie? Zürich: LIT, pp. 177-192.
Nagl-Docekal, H., 2020b. Nach einer erneuten Lektüre: Max Horkheimer, Die Sehnsucht nach dem ganz Anderen. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 5(68), pp. 659-688.
Rawls, J., 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Rawls, J., 2000. Lectures on the History of Moral Philosophy. Cambridge, MA & London: Harvard University Press.
Sensen, O., 2013. Duties to Others from Respect. In: A. Trampota, O. Sensen and J. Timmermann, eds. 2013. Kant’s “Tugendlehre”. Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 343-363.
St. Augustine, 1955. Confessions and Enchiridion. Translated by A. C. Outler. Grand Rapids, MI: Christian Classics Etheral Library, pp. 1-259.
Tu Weiming, 2022. Wie man Menschlichkeit lernt. In: Tu Weiming, 2022. Geistiger Humanismus: Selbst, Gemeinschaft, Erde und Himmel. Edited by K. Marchal. Berlin: Matthes & Seitz. (forthcoming)
Tuschling, B., 1991. Rationis societas: Remarks on Kant and Hegel. In: P. Rossi and M. Wreen, eds. 1991. Kant’s Philosophy of Religion Reconsidered. Bloomington & Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, pp. 181-205.
Wood, A. W., 1992. Rational Theology, Moral Faith, and Religion. In: P. Guyer, ed. 1992. The Cambridge Companion to Kant. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 394-416.