Schelling’s Criticism of Ontological Argument and Interpretation of Kant’s Doctrine of the Ideal of Reason
- DOI
- 10.5922/0207-6918-2021-3-2
- Pages
- 28-62
Abstract
To reconstruct a critique of the ontological proof of the existence of God in Schelling’s philosophy I examine his interpretation of the ontological argument by Anselm of Canterbury and Descartes as well as Schelling’s assessment of the critique of the Kantian ontological proof of the existence of God. I propose a reconstruction of Schelling’s account of undoubted being which cannot be deduced from the concept of the totality of all that is possible and therefore must come before any thought. He interprets reason as having an ecstatic nature which posits precedent undoubted being. This enables Schelling to formulate his own version of the thesis on the unity of being and thought, whereby being comes first and thought is only second. Against this background I analyse Schelling’s interpretation of the Kantian account of the ideal of reason. Schelling, on the one hand, agrees with Kant that being is not a real predicate, hence real existence cannot be deduced from essence in the sense of “what.” But, on the other hand, in contrast to Kant, he believes that real existence of the individual absolute must be assumed, which would be the subject for all possible predicates and whose being is ecstatically posited by reason as being external to itself. I raise the question of the relevance of Schelling’s thought for modern ontology, above all in overcoming ontotheology. Proceeding from the works of J. F. Courtine and L. Tengelyi I single out two aspects of Schelling’s doctrine that are relevant to my subject: (1) the priority of existence over essence in God’s being and (2) the fundamental irreducibility of God to a necessarily existent being, i.e. God’s freedom. It is evident that, in his interpretation of Kant, Schelling somewhat simplifies his train of thought and leaves it unclear how Kant links the concepts of necessary being and the supremely perfect being. It is also evident that Schelling’s concepts of “contingency,” “contingent necessity,” “the whole experience” need further study.
Reference
Anselm of Canterbury, 2000. Proslogion. Complete Philosophical and Theological Treatises of Anselm of Canterbury. Translated by J. Hopkins and H. Richardson. Minneapolis: The Arthur J. Banning Press.
Apel, K.-O., 1991. Die beiden Phasen der Phänomenologie in ihrer Auswirkung auf das philosophische Vorverständnis von Sprache und Dichtung in der Gegenwart. In: K.-O. Apel, 1991. Transformation der Philosophie. Band 1: Sprachanalytik, Semiotik, Hermeneutik. 4. Auflage. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp, pp. 79-105.
Beaufret, J., 2006. Dialogue with Heidegger: Greek Philosophy. Translated by M. Sinclair. Bloomington & Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
Courtine, J.-F., 1990. Extase de la raison: Esssais sur Schelling. Paris: Galilée.
Fink, E., 1959. Kants Kritik des ontologischen Gottesbeweises. In: E. Fink, 1959. Alles und Nichts. Ein Umweg zur Philosophie. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 134-146.
Franz, A., 1992. Philosophische Religion: Eine Auseinandersetzung mit den Grundlegungsproblemen der Spätphilosophie F. W. J. Schellings. Würzburg & Amsterdam: Königshausen und Neumann, Rodopi.
Halldén, S., 1952. Kants Kritik des ontologischen Gottesbeweises. Theoria, 18(1-2), pp. 1-31.
Harris, E., 1977. Kant’s Refutation of the Ontological Proof. Philosophy, 52(199), pp. 90-92.
Heathwood, Ch., 2011. The relevance of Kant’s objection to Anselm’s ontological argument. Religious Studies, 47, pp. 345-357.
Heidegger, M., 1969. The Onto-theo-logical Constitution of Metaphysics. In: M. Heidegger, 1969. Identity and Difference. Translated by J. Stambaugh. New York, Evanston & London: Harper & Row Publishers, pp. 42-74.
Heidegger, M., 1996. Einleitung in die Philosophie. In: M. Heidegger, 1996. Gesamtausgabe. II. Abteilung. Band 27. Frankfurt a. M.: Vittorio Klostermann.
Heidegger, M., 1997. Besinnung. In: M. Heidegger, 1997. Gesamtausgabe. III. Abteilung. Band 66: Frankfurt a. M.: Vittorio Klostermann.
Heidegger, M., 2014. Überlegungen II-VI. (Schwarze Hefte 1931-1938). In: M. Heidegger, 2014. Gesamtausgabe. IV. Abteilung. Band 94: Frankfurt a. M.: Vittorio Klostermann.
Henrich, D., 1960. Der ontologische Gottesbeweis. Sein Problem und seine Geschichte in der Neuzeit. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).
Kant, I., 1998. Critique of Pure Reason. Translated and edited by P. Guyer and A. W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Krichevskii, A. V., 2009. Obraz absolyuta v filosofii Gegelya i pozdnego Shellinga [The Shape of the Absolute in the Philosophy of Hegel and late Schelling]. Moscow: Institute of Philosophy RAS. (In Rus.)
Krichevskii, A. V., 2011. Absolyutnyi dukh skvoz’ liki triedinstva: Sravnitel’nyi analiz filosofsko-teologicheskikh kontseptsii Gegelya i pozdnego Shellinga [The Absolute Spirit through the Persons of the Trinity: A Comparative Analysis of the Philosophical and Theological Conceptions of Hegel and the Late Schelling]. Moscow: Institute of Philosophy RAS. (In Rus.)
Leinkauf, T., 1998. Schelling als Interpret der philosophischen Tradition: Zur Rezeption und Transformation von Platon, Plotin, Aristoteles und Kant. Münster: Lit.
Marquet, J.-F., 1985. Schelling et Descartes. Les Études philosophiques, 2 (Descartes et l’Allemagne), pp. 37-250.
Protopopov, I. A., 2012. The Problem of Ontological Proof and the Concept of the Transcendental Ideal in Philosophy of Kant. Einai. Filosofiya. Religiya. Kul’tura [Einai. Philosophy. Religion. Culture], 1 (1-2), pp. 74-107. (In Rus.)
Rezvykh, P. V., 2003. Late Schelling and Kant. Yearbook of History of Philosophy — 2002. Edited by N. V. Motroshilova. Moscow: Nauka, pp. 280-303. (In Rus.)
Richir, M., 1996. L’expérience du penser. Grenoble: Jérôme Millon.
Röd, W., 1992. Der Gott der reinen Vernunft: Die Auseinandersetzung um den ontologischen Gottesbeweis von Anselm bis Hegel. München: C. H. Beck.
Sartre, J.-P., 2007. Existentialism is a Humanism. New Heaven & London: Yale University Press, pp. 17-72.
Schelling, F. W. J. v., 1856a. Einleitung in die Philosophie der Mythologie. Erster Band. Zweites Buch: Philosophische Einleitung in die Philosophie der Mythologie oder Darstellung der reinrationalen Philosophie. In: F. W. J. Schelling, 1856. Sämmtliche Werke. II. Abteilung. Band 1. Stuttgart und Augsburg: J. G. Cotta’scher Verlag, pp. 254-572.
Schelling, F. W. J. v., 1856b. Abhandlung über die Quelle der Ewigen Wahrheiten. In: F. W. J. Schelling, 1856. Sämmtliche Werke. II. Abteilung. Band 1. Stuttgart und Augsburg: J. G. Cotta’scher Verlag, pp. 573-590.
Schelling, F. W. J. v., 1858a. Philosophie der Offenbarung. Erster Band. In: F. W. J. Schelling, 1858. Sämmtliche Werke. II. Abteilung. Band 3. Stuttgart und Augsburg: J. G. Cotta’scher Verlag.
Schelling, F. W. J. v., 1858b. Andere Deduktion der Prinzipien der positiven Philosophie. In: F. W. J. Schelling, 1858. Sämmtliche Werke. II. Abteilung. Band 4. Stuttgart und Augsburg: J. G. Cotta’scher Verlag, pp. 336-356.
Schelling, F. W. J. v., 1861. Zur Geschichte der neueren Philosophie: Münchener Vorlesungen. In: F. W. J. Schelling, 1856. Sämmtliche Werke. I. Abteilung. Band 10. Stuttgart und Augsburg: J. G. Cotta’scher Verlag, pp. 1-200.
Schelling, F. W. J., 1990. On the Source of Eternal Truths. The Owl of Minerva, 22(1), pp. 55-67.
Schelling, F. W. J., 1994. On the History of Modern Philosophy. Translated by A. Bowie. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tengelyi, L., 2015. Welt und Unendlichkeit: Zum Problem phänomenologischer Metaphysik. 3. Auflage. Freiburg i. B. und München: Karl Alber.
Trawny, P., 2002. Die Zeit der Dreieinigkeit. Untersuchungen zur Trinität bei Hegel und Schelling. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.