Search
Submit an article RU
Kantian Journal

2019 Vol. 38. №4

Back to the list Download the article
ENG
Сохранить XML для: JATS (вып.)
RUS
Сохранить XML для: JATS (вып.)
Leonid Yu. Konilaev

“The Turn towards Ontology” in Russian Neo-Kantianism in the Late 1910s and Early 1920s (Lev Salagov and Nikolai Boldyrev)

Abstract

The period between the late 1910s and early 1920s saw the emergence of onto-epistemological philosophical projects in Russia that was determined by criticism and attempts to overcome the domination of epistemology in philosophy which was the result of the intensive development of Neo-Kantianism and the influence of Husserl’s phenomenology. Attempts to turn towards ontology were made both by Russian religious philosophers and by Russian Neo-Kantians. I look at the little-studied philosophical projects of the Russian Neo-Kantians Lev Salagov and Nikolai Boldyrev. Their philosophical concepts share the tendency to transpose epistemological problems to ontology, and to identify and bring closer together epistemology and ontology. Russian philosophers ontologise the theory of cognition through the analysis of subjectivity, the complete elimination of psychological motives and the separation of transcendentalism from transcendentism. These principles enable Salagov to ground a three-part structure of cognition (consciousness, being, committing to consciousness) and to assert that the main task of genuine epistemology is exclusively the study of the cognitive relationship, committing to consciousness. They enable Boldyrev, proceeding from the separation of reflection and sensibility, to build a doctrine on the self-unfolding of being. Similar tendencies — a turn towards ontology — were observed in the same period in West European philosophy, including German Neo-Kantianism. However, the concepts of Russian Neo-Kantians, which imply a new orientation towards ontology, are fairly independent, and not only on account of the original interpretation of Kantian critical philosophy and Neo-Kantian epistemology, but also on account of internal discussion with the Russian philosophers belonging to other movements (for example, intuitivists). The analysis of the onto-epistemological projects of Russian Neo-Kantians makes important additions to the picture of the reception of Neo-Kantianism in Russia.

Full text

json#{"TEXT":"","TYPE":"HTML"}

Reference

Boldyrev, N. V., 1922. Being and Knowledge, Intuition and Reason. Ontological Motives of Critical Philo­s­ophy. Mysl. Zhurnal Peterburgskogo filosofskogo ob­shchestva [Thought. Bulletin of the Russian Philosophical Society], 1, pp. 13-32. (In Russ.)

Cassirer, E., 1953. Substance and Function. Mineola, N.Y.: Dover Publications.

Cohen, H., 1922. Logik der reinen Erkenntnis. Berlin: Bruno Cassirer.

Dmitrieva, N. A., 2007. Russkoe neokantianstvo: “Marburg” v Rossii. Istoriko-filosofskie ocherki [Russian Neo-Kantianism: ‘Marburg’ in Russia. Historico-Philosophical Essays]. Moscow: ROSSPEN. (In Russ.)

Dmitrieva, N. A., 2016a. Back to Kant, or Forward to Enlightenment: The Particularities and Issues of Russian Neo-Kantianism. Russian Studies in Philosophy, 54(5), pp. 378-394. doi: 10.1080/10611967.2016.1290414.

Dmitrieva, N. A., 2016b. The Conception of History by Nikolai Boldyrev: Neo-Kantian Perspectives. History of Philosophy, 2(21), pp. 45-58. (In Russ.)

Frank, S. L., 1995. Predmet znaniia ob osnovakh i predelakh otvlechennogo znaniia [The Object of Knowledge. Principles and Limitations of Conceptual Cognition]. In: S. L. Frank, 1995. Predmet znaniia. Dusha cheloveka [The Object of Knowledge. Man’s Soul]. St. Petersburg: Nauka, pp. 37-416. (In Russ.)

Holzhey, H., 1997. Platon im Neukantianismus. In: K. Theo and M. Burkhard, eds. 1997. Platon in der abendländischen Geistesgeschichte. Neue Forschungen zum Platonismus. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, pp. 227-240.

Kant, I., 1998. Critique of Pure Reason. Edited and translated by P. Guyer and A. W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kant, I., 2011. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. A German-English Edition. Traslated by M. Gregor, edited by J. Timmermann. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kubalica, T., 2010. Relative Truth of the Reflection Theory in the Interpretation of Heinrich Rickert. (Translated by V. Prokhorov and V. Belov). Kantian Journal, 2(32), pp. 69-79. (In Russ.)

Lembeck, K. -H., 1994. Platon in Marburg. Platonrezeption und Philosophiegeschichtsphilosophie bei Cohen und Natorp. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.

Lossky, N. O., 1919. The Intuitive Basis of Knowledge. Translated by N. Duddington. Preface by G. Dawes Hicks. London: MacMillan.

Lossky, N. O., 1928. The World as an Organic Whole. Translated by N. A. Duddington. London: Oxford University Press, H. Milford.

Molchanov, V. I., 2011. Analytical Phenomenology in Edmund Husserl’s “The Logical Investigations”. In: E. Husserl, 2011. Logicheskie issledovaniia [The Logical Investigations]. Volume 2, part 1. Translated [into Russian] by V. I. Molchanov. Moscow: Akademicheskii Proekt, pp. 462-557. (In Russ.)

Obolevich, T., 2014. From Neo-Kantianism to Ontologism. Mysl. Zhurnal Peterburgskogo filosofskogo obshchestva [Thought. Bulletin of the St. Peterburg Philosophical Society], 16, pp. 62-69. (In Russ.)

Prokhorov, M. M., 2018. From Ontology and Gnoseology to Onto-Epistemology. In: M. M. Prokhorov, ed. 2018. Mirovozzrencheskaia paradigma v filosofii Osnovopolozheniia ontognoseologii [World View Paradigm in Philosophy: the Fundamentals of Onto-Epistemology]. Nizhny Novgorod: NNGASU, pp. 16-34, [online] Available at: <http://www.bibl.nngasu.ru/electronicresources/uch-metod/philosophy/869385.pdf&gt; [Accessed 20 Juli 2019]. (In Russ.)

Salagoff, L., 1910. Vom Begriff des Geltens in der modernen Logik. Inaugural-Dissertation zur Erlangung der Doktorwürde der hohen philosophischen Fakultät der Ruprecht Karls-Universität zu Heidelberg vorgelegt. Leipzig: J. A. Barth.

Salagov, L. P., 1916. “Gnoseology” is Ontology. In: Georgiiu Ivanovichu Chelpanovu ot uchastnikov ego seminariev v Kieve i Moskve, 1891 — 1916. Stat’i po filosofii i psikhologii [To George Ivanovich Chelpanov from Participants of His Seminaries in Kiev and Moscow, 1891—1916. Articles on Philosophy and Psychology]. Moscow: Tovarishchestvo tipografii A. I. Mamontova, pp. 120-141. (In Russ.)

Salagov, L. P., 1997a. About the Translation of Husserl’s “The Logical Investigations”. Review [Notes by V. A. Kurennoy]. In: I. M. Chubarov, ed. 1997. Antologiya fenomenologicheskoi filosofii v Rossii [Anthology of Phenomenological Philosophy in Russia], Volume 1. Moscow: Logos, pp. 197-210. (In Russ.)

Salagov, L.P., 1997b. On the Concept of Validity in Modern Logic [Preface, selected translation into Russian, notes by V. A. Kurennoy]. In: I. M. Chubarov, ed. Antologiia fenomenologicheskoi filosofii v Rossii [Anthology of phenomenological philosophy in Russia], Volume 1. Moscow: Logos, pp. 239-273. (In Russ.)