Kantian Journal

2016 Vol. 35. No. 4

Back to the list Download an article

Ideas of Kant’s theoretical philosophy in Peirce’s graph theory

DOI
10.5922/0207-6918-2016-4-2
Pages
24-37

Abstract

C. S. Peirce is a prominent figure in the nineteenth-century American philosophy. His contribution to philosophy and logic is enormous. The significance of some of his ideas was not realized until today. As a philosopher, Peirce was shaped by Kant, whose Critique of Pure Reason he knew almost by heart. Peirce was fascinated by the German thinker, who literally opened for him the philosophy of modern era and introduced him to the problem of cognition and increment of knowledge. Peirce was never a Kantian but the oeuvre of the Königsberg philosopher had a profound effect on all of his further works. The major elements of Kant’s theory (transcendental deduction of categories, classification of judgements, synthetic and analytic judgement dichotomy, etc.) were substantially modified by Peirce. He reduced the number of categories, changed their content, and transformed analytic and synthetic judgements into ampliative and explicative reasoning. Kant helped Peirce to overcome the doctrine of nominalism and develop the doctrine of critical realism. This paper addresses the existential graph theory, which is scrutinised from the perspective of transformations of Kant’s ideas. The graph theory was chosen, firstly, because of its chronological significance — it is the last logical theory of the American thinker. Secondly, it was greatly valued by the author, who called the theory his greatest accomplishment. The fact that the echo of Kant’s philosophy is heard in such a recent theory is an evidence of Kant’s strong influence. This thesis is proven in this work.

Reference

1. Apel, K-O., 2001, Transformaziya philosophii [Philosophy Transformation], Mosсow.
2. Peirce C. S., 2005, Rassuzhdeniya i Logica Vech'ei: Leczii Dlya Kembridgskih Conferenziy 1898 Goda [Reasoning and the Logic of Things: the Cambridge Conferences Lectures of 1898], Moscow.
3. Kant, I., 1994a, Kritika Chistogo Razuma [Critique of Pure Reason], in Kant Sobr. Soch. v 8 t. [Collected Works in 8 Volumes], Moscow, t. 3.
4. Kant, I., 1994b, Prolelgomeni ko Vsyakoy Budush'ey Metaphisike, kotoraya Mozhet Poyavit'sya kak Nauka [Prolegomena to Any Future Mataphysics that Will Be Able to Present Itself as a Science], in Kant Sobr. Soch. v 8 t. [Collected Works in 8 Volumes], Moscow, t. 4, pp. 5—152.
5. Krouglov, A. N., 2014, Philosophiya Kanta v Issledovanii Knigi E. N. Trubetskogo [Kant’s Philosophy in E. N. Trubetskoy's Book Investigation], in S. M. Polovinkin, T. G. Schedrina (eds.), Evgeniy Nickolaevich Trubetskoy, pp. 266—308, Moscow.
6. Dau, F., 2006, The Role of Existential Graphs in Peirce’s Philosophy, in H. Scharfe, P. Hitzler, P. Ohrstrom (eds.), ICCS 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4068, pp. 8—41, Heidelberg- Berlin, Springer.
7. He, C., 2015, E-type interpretation without E-type pronoun: How Peirce’s Graphs capture the uniqueness implication of donkey sentences, in Synthese, no. 192 (4), pp. 971—990. 
8. Hookway, C., 1985. Peirce, London, Routledge and Kegan Paul. 
9. Hookway, C., 2002, Truth, Rationality, and Pragmatism: Themes from Peirce, New York, Oxford University Press.
10. Keeler, M., 1995, The Philosophical Context of Peirce's Existential Graphs. University of Washington, Seattle, available at: www.dipf.de/projekte/PaedSem HCI/Texte/Keeler context.htm (accessed 01 August 2016).
11. Kempski, J. v., 1952, C. S. Peirce und der Pragmatismus, Stuttgart. 
12. Kiryushenko, V., 2011, Logic, Ethics and Aesthetics: Some Consequences of Kant’s Critiques in Peirce’s Early Pragmatism, in European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, III-2, pp. 258—274.
13. Moore, E. C., and Robin R. (eds.), 1964, Studies in the Philosophy of Charles Sanders  Peirce, Amherst, University of Massachusetts Press. 
14. Murphey, M. G., 1961, The Development of Peirce’s Philosophy, Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
15. Peirce, C. S., 1931—1958, Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Eight volumes, Arthur W. Burks, Charles Hartshornce, and Paul Weiss (eds.). Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
16. Peirce, C. S., 1967, Manuscripts in the Houghton Library of Harvard University, as identified by Richard Robin [Annotated Catalogue of the Papers of Charles S. Peirce. Amherst].
17. Pietarinen, A.-V., 2006, Signs of Logic. Peircean Themes on the Philosophy of Language, Games, and Communication, Dordrecht, Springer.
18. Øhrstrøm, P., 1997, C. S. Peirce and the quest for gamma graphs, in Conceptual Structures: Fulfilling Peirce’s Dream, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 1257, pp. 357—370, Berlin, Springer.
19. Roberts, D., 1973, The Existential Graphs of Charles S. Peirce, The Hague, Paris, Mouton.
20. Sowa, J., 2011, Cognitive Architectures For Conceptual Structures, in S. Andrews, S. Polovina, R. Hill, & B. Akhgar (eds.), 19th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, pp. 35—49, Heidelberg, Springer.
21. Stjernfelt, F., 2007, Diagrammatology: an Investigation on The Borderlines of Phenomenology, Ontology, and Semiotics. Dordrecht: Springer.
22. Zeman J., 1964, The Graphical Logic of C. S. Peirce. PhD thesis, University of Chicago, available at: www.clas.ufl.edu/users/jzeman/ (accessed 30 May 2016).