Search
Submit an article RU
Kantian Journal

2025 Vol. 44. №2

Back to the list Download the article
ENG
Сохранить XML для: JATS (вып.)
RUS
Сохранить XML для: JATS (вып.)
Emelyanov A. S.

Copernican Turn 2.0: Meillassoux versus Kant

DOI
10.5922/0207-6918-2025-2-4
Pages
76-100
Kant Meillassoux Copernican turn transcendental philosophy correlationism diachronic judgments contingency

Abstract

This article examines the essence of the Copernican turn accomplished by the modern French philosopher Quentin Meillassoux, a representative of speculative realism, in his work After Finitude. I use as a starting point the classical definition of the Copernican turn given by Kant in the second introduction to the Critique of Pure Reason. I then compare this definition with the “new” interpretation offered by the French philosopher. According to Meillassoux, Kant and the following philosophical tradition (Neo-Kantianism and phenomenology) misinterpreted the true role of the Copernican discovery in the new European science in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries and turned the objective world into a correlate of consciousness. I subject this assessment of Kant’s philosophy to critical analysis. I compare two points of view — that of Kant and of Meillassoux — on the essence of the Copernican turn and demonstrate the limited character of the latter in comparison with the former. I come to the conclusion that Meillassoux’s critique of the substance of the Copernican turn, as well as his labelling of it as “Ptolemaism” is not only unjustified, but is in many ways in stark contradiction with the real content of the new European science. Proceeding from the Critique of Pure Reason I examine the main postulates of Meillassoux’s anti-correlationist programme, in particular, the problematic character of diachronic judgments as well as decentring and desubjectivation of thinking. In conclusion I note that although Meillassoux’s pro­ject in a number of ways repeats the main intentions of post-structuralism, the call of the speculative philosophy “back to Hume and pre-critical metaphysics” is in a way an answer to the crisis in which post-critical philosophy finds itself today.

Reference

Bruno, G. А., 2017. The Empirical Realism and the Great Outdoors: A Critique of Meillassoux. In: M. -E. Morin, 2017. Continental Realism and its Discontents. New Perspectives in Ontology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 21-37.

Cohen, J., 2017. Speculating the Real: On Quentin Meillassoux’s Philosophical Realism. In: F. Gironi, ed., 2017. The Legasy of Kant in Sellars and Meillassoux. Analytic and Continental Kantianism. New York: Routledge, pp. 171-179.

Dalton, D. M., 2016. On the Possibility of Speculative Ethical Absolutes after Kant. Angelaki, 21(4), pp. 157-172. https://doi.org/10.1080/09.69725X2016.1229447.

Golumbia, D., 2016. “Correlationism”: The Dogma That Never Was. Boundary 2, 43(2), pp. 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1215/01903659-3469889.

Hegel, G. W. F., 2010. The Science of Logic. Edited by G. di Giovanni. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Husserl, E., 2006. Kopernikanische Umwendung der Kopernikanischen Umwendung. In: J. Dünne and S. Günzel, eds. 2006. Raumtheorie. Grundlagentexte aus Philosophie und Kulturwissenschaften. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 153-165.

Kant, I., 1992. The Vienna Logic. In: I. Kant, 1992. Lectures on Logic. Edited by J. Young. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 249-378.

Kant, I., 1998. Critique of Pure Reason. Edited and translated by P. Guyer and A. W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kant, I., 2012. Universal Natural History and Theory of the Heavens. In: I. Kant, 2012. Natural Science. Edited by E. Watkins. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 182-308.

Katrechko, S. L., 2022. Kant’s Copernican Revolution as an Altered Method of Thinking [in Metaphysics]: Its Structure and Status in the System of Transcendental Philosophy. Studies in Transcendental Philosophy, 3(1-2). https://doi.org/10.18254/S271326680020991-0. (In Rus.)

Khamis, D., 2013. Correlationist Sterility. Logos, 92(2), pp. 113-127. (In Rus.)

Lyubutin, K. N., 1980. Kant’s Philosophy: The Problem of the Transcendental Subject. Kantian Journal, 5, pp. 3-18.

Maimon, S., 2010. Essay on Transcendental Philosophy. Translated by N. Midgley, H. Somers-Hall, A. Welchman and M. Reglitz, introduction by N. Midgley, note by A. Welchman. London & New York: Continuum.

Malabou, C., 2014. Can We Relinquish the Transcendental? The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 28(3), pp. 242-255.

Meillassoux, Q., 2008. After Finitude. An Essay on the Necessity of Contingency. Translated by R. Brassier. London: Continuum.

O’Shea, J. S., 2017. After Kant, Sellars, and Meillassoux: Back to Empirical Realism? In: F. Gironi, ed. 2017. Legacy of Kant in Sellars and Meillassoux: Analytic and Continental Kantianism. New York: Routledge, pp. 21-40.

Robin, E. Y., 2021. Kant Walls Meillassoux: Finitude and Correlationism. Journal of Indian Council of Philosophical Research, 38(2), pp. 197-211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40961-021-00244-8.

Schäferling, K., 2022. Meillassoux’s Reinterpretation of Kant’s Transcendental Dialectic. Open Philosophy, 5(1), pp. 702-717. https://doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2022-0224.

Schopenhauer, A., 2010. Critique of the Kantian Philosophy. In: A. Schopenhauer, 2010. The World as Will and Representation, Volume 1. Translated and edited by J. Norman, A. Welchman and Ch. Janaway. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 441-565.

Stoliarova, O. E., 2019. Kant’s Copernican Revolution as an Object of Philosophical Retrospection. Epistemology & Philosophy of Science, 56(4), pp. 219-236. https://doi.org/10.5840/eps201956477. (In Rus.)

Torubarova, T. V., 2012. Science as mathesis universalis. European Social Science Journal, 1, pp. 22-26.

Toscano, A., 2010. Against Speculation, or, A Critique of the Critique of Critique: A Remark on Quentin Meillassoux’s After Finitude (After Colletti). In: L. Bryant, N. Srnicek and G. Harman, eds. 2010. The Speculative Turn: Continental Materialism and Realism. Melbourne: re.press, pp. 84-91.

Tritten, T., 2016. Against Kant: Toward an Inverted Transcendentalism or a Philosophy of the Doctrinal. Angelaki, 21(4), pp.143-155. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969725X.2016.1229444.

Wiltsche, H. A., 2017. Science, Realism and Correlationism. A Phenomenological Critique of Meillassoux Argument from Ancestrality. European Journal of Philosophy, 25(3), pp. 808-832. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejop.12159.

Zahavi, D., 2016. The End of What? Phenomenology vs. Speculative Realism. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 24(3), pp. 289-309. https://doi.org/10.1080/09672559.2016.1175101.