Search
Submit an article RU
Kantian Journal

2025 Vol. 44. №2

Back to the list Download the article
ENG
Сохранить XML для: JATS (вып.)
RUS
Сохранить XML для: JATS (вып.)
Medova A. A.

The Problem of the Unity of Experience from the Transcendental Perspective

DOI
10.5922/0207-6918-2025-2-1
Pages
7-35
Kant conditions of the possibility of experience a priori forms of sensibility transcendental categories transcendental subject

Abstract

This article is devoted to the problem of the possibility of experience in transcendental idealism. In its classical formulation by Kant, the problem pertains to the correlation between a priori structures of reason and reality. I approach the question of the conditions of the possibility of experience in an alternative way, i.e. as a question about the conditions of its unity, while remaining within the framework of transcendental idealism. The purport of this investigation is to demonstrate how the problem of the unity of experience permeates the problem of the transcendental conditions of its possibility. Proceeding from Kant’s correspondence, the Critique of Pure Reason, Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, and some modern conceptions of consciousness, I reconstruct the transcendental model of experience in terms of the conditions of its coherence. This model includes the systematic unity of the properties of objects, which is the flip side of the rational unity of cognizing reason. Important conditions of the unity of experiential data are their connectedness due to the homogeneity of time and space (non-empirical intuition), and the organizing work of the a priori forms of sensing, which creates the sequence and coordination of phenomena. The activity of transcendental schemes is described as a more complex, synthetic condition of the unity of experience; as modified forms of spatio-temporal representation, they mediate categories and phenomena, being “homogeneous” with both. At the top of the activity of reason is the most problematic level of the unity of experience, on which intuitions are ordered in accordance with a priori categories. The following conditions of the homogeneity of experience are assessed as being original and going beyond the epistemological problematics: 1) the homogeneity of the consciousness of external things and self-consciousness, and 2) the unity of experience created by the end-goals of the pure application of reason. In conclusion, I examine Kant’s hypothesis that the transcendental affinity of phenomena creates the homogeneity of mental acts, and that objective reality is the key and most telling prerequisite of the homogeneity of experience.

Reference

Agafonov, A. Yu., 2003. Osnovy smyslovoj teorii soznaniya [The Fundamentals of the Semantic Theory of Consciousness]. Saint Petersburg: Rech’. (In Rus.)

Allais, L., 2015. Manifest Reality: Kant’s Idealism and his Realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Aristotle, 1933. The Metaphysics. Books I-IX. With an English Translation by H. Tredennik. London: William Heinemann LTD; New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons.

Boer K. de, 2010. Pure Reason’s Enlightenment: Transcendental Reflection in Kant’s first Critique. Kant Yearbook, 2, pр. 53-73. https://doi.org/10.1515/kantyb-2010-020103

Brook, A., 1994. Kant and the Mind. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.

Brook A. and Wuerth J., 2023. Kant’s View of the Mind and Consciousness of Self. In: E. N. Zalta and U. Nodelman, eds. 2023. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2023 Edition). Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2023/entries/kant-mind/ [Accessed 11 December 2024].

Catren, G., 2018. A Plea for Narcissus: On the Transcendental Reflexion ^ Refraction Mediation Tandem. In: F. Gironi, ed. 2018. The Legacy of Kant in Sellars and Meillassoux. Analytic and Continental Kantianism. New York: Routledge, pp. 155-170.

Cohen, J., 2018. A Speculating the Real: On Quentin Meillassoux’s Philosophical Realism. In: F. Gironi, ed., 2018. The Legacy of Kant in Sellars and Meillassoux. Analytic and Continental Kantianism. New York: Routledge, pр. 171-178.

Einstein, A., 1936. Physics and Reality. The Journal of the Franklin Institute, 221, pp. 349-382. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-0032(36)91047-5

Hanna, R., 2001. Kant and the Foundations of Analytic Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Husserl, E., 1989. Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy: Second Book, Studies in the Phenomenology of Constitution. Translated by R. Rojcewicz and A. Schuwer. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Kant, I., 1998. Critique of Pure Reason. Translated and edited by P. Guyer and A. W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kant, I., 1999. Correspondence. Translated and edited by A. Zweig. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kant, I., 2001. Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics That Will Be Able to Come Forward as Science, with Kant’s letter to Marcus Herz, February 27, 1772. The P. Carus translation extensively revised by J. W. Ellington. Indianapolis & Cambridge: Hackett.

Katrechko, S. N., 2022. Kantian Cognitive Model of the Mind. In: S. N. Katrechko, ed. 2022. Transcendental Turn in modern Philosophy — 7. Epistemology, Cognitive Science and Artificial Intelligence. Proceedings of the International Workshop. Moscow, April 21-23, 2022. Moscow: RGGU, pp. 15-19. (In Rus.)

Mamardashvili, M. K., 1992. Phenomenology —
A Concomitant Feature of All Philosophy. In: M. K. Mamardashvili, 1992. Kak ya ponimaiu filosofiyu [How I Understand Philosophy]. Moscow: Progress-Kul’tura, pp. 100-106. (In Rus.)

Manoussakis, J. P., 2019. Sacred Addictions: On the Phenomenology of Religious Experience. Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 33(1), рр. 41-55.

Mazijk, C. van, 2020. Perception and Reality in Kant, Husserl, and McDowell. New York: Routledge.

Medova, А. А., 2018. On the Question of the Transcendental Correlation of Mind and Reality: An Ontological Perspective. In: S. N. Katrechko, ed. 2018. Transcendental Turn in modern Philosophy — 3. Nature (Specificity) of Transcendental Philosophy. Proceedings of the International Workshop. Moscow, April 21—23, 2018. Moscow: Fond CGI; SHAU-Press, pp. 52-54. (In Rus.)

Meillassoux, Q., 2008. After Finitude. An Essay on the Necessity of Contingency. London; New York: Continuum.

Paton, H. J., 1936. Kant’s Metaphysic of Experience. A Commentary on the First Half of the Kritik der reinen Vernunft, in Two Volumes. Volume 2. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.

Soboleva, M. E., 2017. Analytical Kant Studies, Transcendental Idealism, and the Thing in Itself. Kantian Journal, 36(4), pp. 88-99.

Strawson, P. F., 1966. The Bounds of Sense: An Essay on Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. London & New York: Routledge.

Van Cleve, J., 1999. Problems from Kant. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ypi, L., 2021. The Architectonic of Reason: Purposiveness and Systematic Unity in Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Whitehead, A. N., 1961. Adventures of Ideas. New York: The Free Press.