Search
Submit an article RU
The Baltic Region

Current issue

Back to the list Download the article
Megem M. E.

Preserve vs dismantle: major trends in the Baltics’ politics of memory regarding Soviet monuments at sites of mass violence

DOI
10.5922/2079-8555-2022-4-8
Pages
128-145
politics of memory mass violence commemoration sites Baltics Soviet monuments Ponary Salaspils memorial Pirčiupis Klooga

Abstract

Another round of the Soviet ‘monument fall’ in the Baltics, which began in the early 2000s, continued into 2022. This process, however, has not affected Soviet memorials at the sites of mass violence perpetrated during the German occupation of the Baltics. This article aims to investigate major trends in the Baltics’ politics of memory regarding Soviet monuments erected at sites of mass violence. The official policy of the Baltics towards these memorial sites has been largely shaped by the international agenda and the perception of the commemorated events. During the Euroatlantic drift, the concept of the Baltic States’ past incorporated the Holocaust narrative, recoding the symbolic space of Soviet sites remembering Nazi crimes against Jews and integrating them into the national culture of remembrance. Soviet memorials at sites commemorating the tragedy of local peoples were incorporated as is into the national memorial landscape. Yet, Lithuanian authorities viewed these memorials with greater suspicion because of the Soviet countermemory, which the sites preserved. Memorials to Soviet POWs, albeit perceived as ‘alien’, are protected by law in the Baltics. Nevertheless, it did not save the places of remembrance from acts of vandalism. Moreover, there are trends in the Baltics towards a revision of the laws protecting the monuments.

Reference

1. Kantor, Yu. Z. 2011, Pribaltika: vojna bez pravil (1939—1945) [The Baltics: war without rules (1939—1945)], St. Petersburg, “Zvezda” Journal, 336 p. (in Russ.).

2.  Weiss-­Wendt, A. 2008, Why the Holocaust Does Not Matter to Estonians, Journal of Baltic Studies, vol. 39, № 4, p. 475—497, https://doi.org/10.1080/01629770802461530.

3. Makhotina, E. 2013, Vilnius, Neprikosnovennyj zapas. Debaty o politike i kul’ture [Emergency ration. Debate about politics and culture], № 4 (in Russ.).

4. Makhotina, E. 2017, Erinnerungen an den Krieg — Krieg der Erinnerungen: Litauen und der Zweite Weltkrieg, Göttingen, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht GmbH & Co, 478 s.

5. Makhotina, E. 2020, Prelomlenija pamjati. Vtoraja mirovaja vojna v memorial’noj kul’ture sovetskoj i postsovetskoj Litvy [Refractions of Memory. World War II in the memorial culture of Soviet and post-­Soviet Lithuania], St. Petersburg, Izdatel’stvo Evropejskogo universiteta v Sankt-­Peterburge (in Russ.).

6. Makhotina, E. 2020, Den’ Po­bedy kak po­le kom­me­mora­tiv­nyh kon­flik­tov: 9 maja v Vil’njuse [Victory Day as a field of commemorative conflicts: May 9 in Vilnius], International Memorial: Project “Lessons of History”, URL: https://urokiistorii.ru/articles/den-pobedy-kak-pole-kommemorativnyh (accessed 13.06.2022).

7. Arlauskaitė Zakšauskienė, I., Černiauskas, N., Kulevičius, S., Jakubčionis, A. 2016, Kariai. Betonas. Mitas. Antrojo pasaulinio karo Sovietų sąjungos karių palaidojimo vietos Lietuvoje, Vilnius, Vilniaus universiteto leidykla, 312 p.

8. Brüggemann, K., Kasekamp, A. 2008, The Politics of History and the “War of Monuments” in Estonia, Nationality Papers, vol. 36, № 3, p. 425—448, https://doi.org/10.1080/00905990802080646.

9. Adamson, A. 2009, Nacional’naja istorija Jestonii v kontekste evropeizacii proshlogo i «vojny pamjatnikov» [Estonian national history in the context of Europeanisation of the past and the “war of monuments”] in National histories in the post-­Soviet space — II, Moscow, Fond Fridriha Naumanna, AIRO-XXI, p. 182—200 (in Russ.).

10. Tamm, М. 2012, Monumentaalne ajalugu. Esseid Eesti ajalookultuurist, Loomingu Raamatukogu, № 28—30.

11.  Zelče, V. 2010, The Texture of Memory. World War II Monuments in the Baltic States, Rīga, ASPRI, 40 p.

12. Simonyan, R. H. 2011, Occupation doctrine in the Baltics: a substantive and legal aspects, State and Law, № 11, p. 106—114 (in Russ.).

13. Skachkov, A. S. 2017, Historical memory in post-­Soviet Baltic political processes, Comparative Politics Russia, № 1, p. 140—151, https://doi.org/10.18611/2221-3279-2017-8-1-140-151 (in Russ.).

14. Zverev, K. A. 2020, Memory policy in the Baltic republics: foreign policy aspect, Bulletin of the Russian Nation, № 5, p. 44—55 (in Russ.).

15. Zverev, K. A. 2021, Estonia’s memory politics in the context of nation building, National Strategy Issues, № 1, p. 202—215 (in Russ.).

16. Simindei, V. V. 2015, Ognem, shtykom i lest’yu. Mirovye voiny i ikh natsionalisticheskaya interpretatsiya v Pribaltike [With fire, bayonet and flattery. World Wars and their Nationalist Interpretation in the Baltics], Moscow, Fond «Istoricheskaya pamyat’», 352 p. (in Russ.).

17. Romanova, O. A., Guzenkova, T. S. 2015, Lithuania. Occupation syndrome, in: Nasledniki Pobedy i porazheniya. Vtoraya mirovaya voina v istoricheskoi politike stran SNG i ES [Heirs to Victory and defeat. World War II in the historical politics of the CIS and EU countries], Мoscow, RISI, p. 371—388 (in Russ.).

18. Safronovas, V. 2009, On Tendencies of the Politics of Remembrance in Contemporary Lithuania, Ab Imperio, № 3, p. 424—458 (in Russ.).

19. Liivik, О., Maripuu, М. 2013, Commemoration at Klooga, Koncentracionnyj lager’ Klooga i memorial zhertvam Holokosta [Klooga concentration camp and Holocaust memorial], URL: https://klooga.nazismvictims.ee/ru/materjalid/ohvrite-­malestamine-kloogal/ (accessed 12.07.2022) (in Russ.).

20. Liivik, О., Maripuu, М. 2013, The Estonian history museum’s open air exhibition: the Klooga camp and the Holocaust, Koncentracionnyj lager’ Klooga i memorial zhertvam Holokosta [Klooga concentration camp and Holocaust memorial], URL: https://klooga.nazismvictims.ee/ru/materjalid/eesti-­ajaloomuuseumi-valiekspositsioon-­klooga-laager-ja-holokaust/ (accessed 12.07.2022) (in Russ.).

21. Bubnys, A. 2004, The Holocaust in Lithuania: an outline of the major stages and their results, In: Nikžentaitis, A., Schreiner, S., Staliūnas, D. (eds.), Vanished world of Lithuanian Jews, Amsterdam, Rodopi, p. 205—221.

22. Felker, A. V. 2018, The “uneasy” legacy: the problematic of sites of memory of mass violence in Western and Eastern Europe, In: Metodologicheskie voprosy izuchenija politiki pamjati [Methodological issues in the study of memory politics], Moscow, St. Petersburg, Nestor-­Istoriya, p. 93—109 (in Russ.).

23. Bogov, V. 2019, Practice of hipocricy: children’s homes andorphanages during German occupation of Latvia (1941—1944), Journal of Historical Research, № 2, p. 117—137 (in Russ.).

24. Bogov, V. 2021, Salaspils: Zabytaja istorija. Sbornik fotdokumental’nyh svidetel’stv o zlodejanijah nemeckih nacistov i ih posobnikov v gody germanskoj okkupacii Latvii v 1941—1945 g. [Salaspils: Forgotten history. A collection of photo-­documentary evidence of the atrocities of healthy Nazis and their accomplices during the years of the German occupation of Latvia in 1941—1945], Riga, Fond razvitiya kul’tury (in Russ.).

25. Gaponenko, A. V. (ed.). 2010, Pribaltijskie russkie: istorija v pamjatnikah kul’tury (1710—2010) [Baltic Russians: History in Cultural Monuments (1710—2010)], Riga, Institut evropejskih issledovanij (in Russ.).

26. Kangeris, K., Neiburgs, U., Vīksne, R. 2016, Aiz šiem vārtiem vaid zeme. Salaspils nometne 1941—1944, Riga, Lauku avīze, 431 p.

27. Veidemane, E. 2017, Vēsturnieks Neiburgs: Salaspils nometnes vēsture jāattīra no padomju propagandas, Nra.lv, URL: https://nra.lv/latvija/229993-vesturnieks-­neiburgs-salaspils-­nometnes-vesture-­jaattira-no-padomju... (accessed 29.06.2022).

28. Švedаs, А. 2009, Matricos nelaisvėje. Sovietmečio lietuvių istoriografija (1944—1985), Vilnius, Aidai, 335 p.

29. Vitkus, Z. 2020, Pirčiupiai: maskvėnų ar mūsų? LRT.lv, URL: https://www.lrt.lt/naujienos/nuomones/3/1184281/zigmas-­vitkus-pirciupiai-­maskvenu-ar-musu (accessed 27.05.2022).

30. Plyuhin, E. V., Rimkus, V. 1977, Ablinga, Leningrad, Iskusstvo (in Russ.).

31. Zizas, R., Indriulaitis, A. 2022, Ablinga, Visuotinė lietuvių enciklopedija, URL: https://www.vle.lt/straipsnis/ablinga/ (accessed 13.07.2022).

32. Gentvilas, S. 2007, Ablinga: paminklas tragiškoms aukoms atminti, URL: https://www.xxiamzius.lt/archyvas/priedai/uzlaisve/20070615/2-1.html (accessed 13.07.2022).

33. Ananyev, A., Tulikov, F. 1979, Tragedy in the Anchupan Hills, In: Neotvratimoe vozmezdie. Po materialam sudebnyh processov nad izmennikami Rodiny, fashistskimi palachami i agentami imperialisticheskih razvedok [Inevitable retribution. According to the materials of the trials of traitors to the Motherland, fascist executioners and agents of imperialist intelligence], Moscow, Voenizdat, URL: http://militera.lib.ru/h/sb_neotvratimoe_vozmezdie/16.html (accessed 13.07.2022) (in Russ.).

34. Dembickij, N. P. 2004, The fate of prisoners, In: Vojna i obshhestvo. 1941—1945 [War and society. 1941—1945], vol. 2, Moscow, Nauka, p. 232—264 (in Russ.).

35. Andrulienė, А., Nognienė, S. 2021, Pagėgių koncentracijos stovykla, Buchenvaldo filialo “Oflager-53” memorialinis kompleksas, Krašto paveldo gidas, URL: http://www.krastogidas.lt/objektai/833-pagegiu-­koncentracijos-stovykla-­buchenvaldo-filialo-­oflager-53-memorialinis-­kompleksas (accessed 15.07.2022).

36. Mordvinov, V., Kochetov, A. (eds.). 2010, Lithuania remembers = Lietuva atsimena, Vilnius, [s. n.] (in Russ.).

37. Giniotis, I. 2021, Pagėgių karo belaisvių stovykla “Oflager 53”, Šilainės kraštas, URL: https://www.silaineskrastas.lt/kultura/silaines-­sodas/pagegiu-karo-belaisviu-­stovykla-oflager-53/ (accessed 15.07. 2022).

38. Korotkova, Е. 2018, Heritage Custodian Jurijus Trakselis: “You Can’t Just Break History”, МК, URL: https://www.mk.ru/social/2018/12/26/khranitel-­naslediya-yuriyus-­trakshyalis-nelzya-­prosto-tak-raz... (accessed 12.07.2022).