The Baltic Region

Current issue

Back to the list Download an article

Geography of inbound tourism and transboundary tourism-and-recreation region-building in Sweden



Sweden’s tourism industry stands out for its large contribution to the development of the national economy. The vast size of the country makes it possible to trace differences in incoming tourist flows from neighbouring countries. This circumstance accounts for the novelty of this study, which lies in viewing national tourism geography from the perspective of the theory of transboundary tourism-and-recreation region building. Interregional differences in the structure of incoming tourist flows help identify the country’s cross-border tourism-and-recreation regions and delineate their borders. This research employs statistical and cartographic methods. The incoming tourist flow to Sweden grew steadily until 2020. However, the Covid-19 crisis has led to a drastic reduction in the number of incoming tourists. Based on the 2019 statistics, the findings confirm the existence of a developed transboundary tourism-and-recreation mesoregion that brings together Germany, Denmark, and Sweden. The formation boasts strong tourist links. There are another five cross-border tourism-and-recreation mesoregions: Sweden-Norway-Denmark, Middle Sweden-Norway, Sweden-Norway-Finland, Middle Sweden-Finland, and South Sweden-Finland. The number of tourists visiting cross-border mesoregions indicates the degree of development of the latter.


1. Carson, D. A., Carson, D. B. 2018, International lifestyle immigrants and their contributions to rural tourism innovation: Experiences from Sweden’s far north, Journal of Rural Studies, no. 64, p. 230—240. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.08.004.

2. Almstedt, Å., Lundmark, L., Pettersson, Ö. 2016, Public spending on rural tourism in Sweden, Fennia, vol. 194, no. 1, p. 18—31. doi: 194. 10.11143/46265.

3. Rytkönen, P., Tunón, H. 2020, Summer Farmers, Diversification and Rural Tourism — Challenges and Opportunities in the Wake of the Entrepreneurial Turn in Swedish Policies (1991—2019), Sustainability, no. 12, p. 1—27. doi: 10.3390/su12125217.

4. Demiroglu, O. C., Lundmark, L., Saarinen, J., Müller, D.K. 2019, The last resort? Ski tourism and climate change in Arctic Sweden, Journal of Tourism Futures,vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 91—101. doi: 10.1108/JTF-05-2019-0046.

5. Pashkevich, A. 2017, Processes of Reinterpretation of Mining Heritage: the Case of Bergslagen, Sweden, ALMATOUIRSM Journal of Tourism, Culture and Territorial Development, no. 7, p. 107—123. doi: 10.6092/issn.2036-5195/6758.

6. Lundmark, L. J. T., Fredman, P., Sandell, K. 2010, National Parks and Protected Areas and the Role for Employment in Tourism and Forest Sectors: a Swedish Case, Ecology and Society, vol. 15, no. 1, р. 19. doi: 10.5751/ES-03175-150119.

7. Fredman, P., Romild, U., Yuan, M., Wolf-Watz, D. 2012, Latent Demand and Time Contextual Constraints to Outdoor Recreation in Sweden, Forests, no. 3, p. 1—21. doi: 10.3390/f3010001.

8. Margaryan, L., Fredman, P. 2017, Bridging outdoor recreation and nature-based tourism in a commercial context: Insights from the Swedish service providers, Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, no. 17, p. 84—92. doi: 10.1016/j.jort.2017.01.003.

9. Petersson-Forsberg, L. 2014, Swedish spatial planning: A blunt instrument for the protection of outdoor recreation, Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, no. 5—6, p. 37—47. doi: 10.1016/j.jort.2014.03.003.

10. Lindström, K. N., Larson, M. 2016, Community-based tourism in practice: evidence from three coastal communities in Bohuslän, Sweden, Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, no. 33, p. 71–78. doi: 10.1515/bog-2016-0025.

11. Farsari, I. 2018, A structural approach to social representations of destination collaboration in Idre, Sweden, Annals of Tourism Research, no. 71, p. 1—12. doi: 10.1016/j.annals.2018.02.006.

12. Lundberg, E. 2017, The importance of tourism impacts for different local resident groups: A case study of a Swedish seaside destination, Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 46—55. doi: 10.1016/j.jdmm.2016.02.002.

13. Hultman, J., Michael, H. C. 2012, Tourism place-making: Governance of Locality in Sweden, Annals of Tourism Research, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 547—570. doi: 10.1016/j.annals.2011.07.001.

14. Van, E. N., Reijnders, S. 2016, Chasing sleuths and unravelling the metropolis: Analyzing the tourist experience of Sherlock Holmes’ London, Philip Marlowe’s Los Angeles and Lisbeth Salander’s Stockholm, Annals of Tourism Research, no. 57, p. 113—125.

15. Kozlova, K. S. 2020, Development of educational tourism in Finland and Sweden. In: Nedelya nauki SPBPU. Materialy` nauchnoj konferencii s mezhdunarodny`m uchastiem [SPBPU Science Week. Materials of a scientific conference with international participation], p. 244—247 (In Russ.).

16. Majorov, N. N. 2020, Development of sea ferry transportation in the Baltic Sea in the context of global trends, Sistemny`j analiz i logistika [System analysis and logistics], no. 1 (23), p. 65—73 (In Russ.).

17. Sarancha, M. A. 2020, Assessing competitiveness of the Baltic states in tourism, Bal. Reg., vol. 12, no. 3, p. 147—166. doi: 10.5922/2079-8555-2020-3-9.

18. Safina, S. S., Amosova, G. M. 2018, Modern features of the development of international tourism in the Nordic countries, Izvestiya Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo e`konomicheskogo universiteta [Bulletin of the St. Petersburg State University of Economics], no. 4 (112), p. 38—43 (In Russ.).

19. Kondratov, N. A. 2010, Prerequisites and current state of tourism in the Nordic countries: the geographical aspect. In: Geografiya i turizm. Sbornik nauchny`x trudov [Geography and tourism. Collection of scientific papers], Perm, p. 77—90 (In Russ.).

20. Demidova, E. E. 2016, Metamorphoses of the polar city (on the example of Kiruna, Sweden). In: Mozaika gorodskix prostranstv: e`konomicheskie, social`ny`e, kul`turny`e i e`kologicheskie processy`. Sbornik materialov Vserossijskoj nauchnoj konferencii [Mosaic of urban spaces: economic, social, cultural and ecological processes. Collection of materials of the All-Russian scientific conference], Moscow, p. 126—131 (In Russ.).

21. Samborskaya, V. 2020, Prospects for the development of tourism in the Baltic Sea region on the example of coastal regions of Sweden, Polish Journal of Science, no. 31—2 (31), p. 40—45 (In Russ.).

22. Prokkola, E. -K. 2007, Cross-border Regionalization and Tourism Development at the Swedish-Finnish Border: “Destination Arctic Circle”, Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, vol. 7, no. 2, p. 120—138. doi: 10.1080/15022250701226022.

23. Prokkola, E. -K. 2010, Borders in tourism: the transformation of the Swedish-Finnish border landscape, Current Issues in Tourism, vol. 13, no. 3, p. 223—238. doi: 10.1080/13683500902990528.

24. Manakov, A. G., Chuchenkova, O. A., Ivanov, I. A. 2019, Geography of tourism in Estonia in the context of cross-border tourism and recreation region formation, Pskovskij regionologicheskij zhurnal [Pskov Journal of Regional Studies], no. 4 (40), p. 80—95. doi: 10.37490/S221979310010191-3 (In Russ.).

25. Manakov, A. G., Kondrateva, S. V., Ivanov, I. A. 2020, The structure and geography of the distribution of the incoming tourist flow in Finland, Geograficheskij vestnik [Geographical Bulletin], no. 1(52), p. 165—176. doi: 10/17072/2079-7877-2020-1-165-176 (In Russ.).

26. Ivanov, I. A., Mikhaylov, B. S. 2020, Structure and geography of the inbound tourist flow distribution in Norway, Pskovskij regionologicheskij zhurnal [Pskov Journal of Regional Studies], no. 4 (44), p.107—118. doi: 10.37490/S221979310011436-2 (In Russ.).

27. Kropinova, E. G. 2016, Transgranichny`e turistsko-rekreacionny`e regiony` na Baltike [Transboundary tourist and recreational regions in the Baltic], Kaliningrad, Immanuel Kant Russian State University, 272 p (In Russ.).

28. Manakov, A. G., Golomidova, E. S. 2018, Estimating the development of the Latvian-Estonian-Russian transboundary tourism and recreation region, Balt. Reg., vol. 10, no. 1, p. 130—141. doi: 10.5922/2079-8555-2018-1-8.

29. Golomidova, E. S. 2019, Infrastructure of the Estonian part of transboundary touristic and recreational region “Setomaa”, Pskovskij regionologicheskij zhurnal [Pskov Journal of Regional Studies], no. 2 (38), p. 118—125. doi: 10.37490/S221979310012064-3 (In Russ.).

30. Krasilnikova, I. N., Terenina, N. K. 2019, Pskov-Peipsi coast as a territory of cross-border tourism. In: Turizm i industriya gostepriimstva: sovremennoe sostoyanie i tendencii razvitiya. Materialy` Mezhdunarodnoj nauchnoj konferencii [Tourism and hospitality industry: current state and development trends. Materials of the International Scientific Conference], Pskov, p. 103—108 (In Russ.).

31. Kondrateva (Stepanova), S. V. 2019, Factors of development of border tourism in related territories of Russia and Finland, Pskovskij regionologicheskij zhurnal [Pskov Journal of Regional Studies], no. 4 (40), p. 106—114. doi: 10.37490/S221979310011766-5 (In Russ.).

32. Korneevets, V. S. 2010, Formirovanie transgranichny`x mezoregionov na Baltike [Formation of transboundary mesoregions in the Baltic], Kaliningrad, Immanuel Kant Russian State University, 80 p (In Russ.).