The Baltic Region

Current issue

Back to the list Download an article

Response of the Lithuanian municipalities to the First Wave of COVID-19

DOI
10.5922/2079-8555-2021-1-4
Pages
70-88

Abstract

This article analyses the response of Lithuanian local authorities to the first wave of COVID-19 with a special focus on the economic support measures they took. The main goal of this in-depth study is to compare the economic response measures included in the action plans of Riga and Tallinn, two large Lithuanian municipal administrations, as well as to analyse the narrative developed in the two cities. The methodology of this research is based on the review of literature, the analysis of action plans, and a case study. The Vilnius and Klaipėda city municipalities adopted action plans to support residents and businesses. Although there are many measures the plans have in common, they differ in the context and scope of application. Municipalities are willing to grant exemptions from various fees and taxes. They have used innovative measures: Vilnius allowed the opening of outdoor cafes, the practice, which was observed by global media. According to the research findings, the actions of municipal authorities can be successful, as municipalities are closer to the residents and can respond to their needs and those of entrepreneurs more quickly and flexibly. The approval of COVID-19 management action plans by municipalities has contributed to the narrative of recovery and hope.

Reference

1. Nakrošis, V. 2020, Klaidos valdant COVID-19 epidemija Lietuvoje, Nuomonės, 24.03.2020, available at: URL: https://www.lrt.lt/naujienos/nuomones/3/1154138/vitalis-nakrosis-klaidos- valdant-covid-19-epidemija-lietuvoje?fbclid=IwAR1kfhlZCQ5JYOyjlNbr_KtlfKC1JZ_RDI6lJb843JSDShoBRwSJ_2NUEXM (accessed 13. 05.2020).

2. Šiugždinienė, J. 2020, Kiek dar krizių turėsime išgyventi, kad pagaliau suprastume valstybės tarnybos svarbą, SUPRASTI AKIMIRKSNIU, 20.04.2020, available at: https://www.15min.lt/naujiena/aktualu/nuomones/jurgita-siugzdiniene-kiek-dar-kriziu-turesime-isgyventi-kad-pagaliau-suprastume-valstybes-tarnybos-svarba-18—1306136?fbclid=IwAR3s8aAV1CSeekRgo69_vSlU2TimbVRTCXlrW_qXgkHEJwqkvUgENiFzEuA (accessed 13. 05.2020).

3. Johanson, J. E., Pekkola, E., Husman, P. 2017, Government programme as a strategy — The Finnish experience, Administrative Sciences, vol. 7, no. 2, p.1—16 doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci7020016.

4. Poister, T. H. 2020, The future of strategic planning in the public sector: Linking strategic management and performance, Public Administration Review, vol. 70, s. 1, p. s246-s254. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540—6210.2010.02284.x.

5. Deslatte, A., Stokan, E. 2019, Hierarchies of need in sustainable development: A resource dependence approach for local governance, Urban Affairs Review, vol. 55, no. 4, p. 1125—1152. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087417737181.

6. Thomas, M. B., Fay, D. L., Berry, F. S. 2020, Strategically Marketing Florida’s Cities: An Exploratory Study Into How Cities Engage in Public Marketing, The American Review of Public Administration, vol. 50, no. 3, p. 275—285. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074019897599.

7. McKenzie, G., Adams, B. 2020, A Country Comparison of Place-based Activity Response to COVID-19 policies, Applied Geography, vol. 125, 102363. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2020.102363.

8. Hale, T., Petherick, A., Phillips, T., Webster, S. 2020, Variation in government responses to COVID-19, Blavatnik School of Government Working Paper, no. 31, available at: https://www.bsg.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2020-03/BSG-WP-2020-031-v2.0.pdf (accessed 13. 05.2020).

9. George, B., Verschuere, B., Wayenberg, E., Zaki, B. L. 2020, A Guide to Benchmarking COVID-19 Performance Data, Public Administration Review, vol.80, no. 4, p. 696—700. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13255.

10. Bučaitė-Vilkė, J., Vilkas, M. 2018, Discussing municipal performance alternatives: Public Perceptions of Municipal Services Delivery in Lithuania, International Journal of Public Sector Management, vol. 31, no. 4, p. 525—542. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/ijpsm-01-2017-0011.

11. Burbulytė-Tsiskarishvili, G., Dvorak, J., Žernytė, A. 2018, Changes of Local Functions and Local Powers in Lithuania 1994—2016, Public Policy And Administration, vol. 17, no, 3, p. 399—420. doi: https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ppaa.17.3.21955.

12. Burksiene, V., Dvorak, J., Burbulyte-Tsiskarishvili, G. 2018, Sustainability and sustainability marketing in competing for the title of European Capital of Culture, Organizacija, vol. 51, no. 1, p. 66—78. doi: https://doi.org/10.2478/orga-2018-0005.

13. Burksiene, V., Dvorak, J., Burbulytė-Tsiskarishvili, G. 2020, City Diplomacy in Young Democracies: The Case of the Baltics. In: Amiri, S., Sevin, E. (eds) City Diplomacy. Palgrave Macmillan Series in Global Public Diplomacy, Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. p. 305—330. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45615-3_14.

14. Lazauskienė, A., Bučaitė-Vilkė, J. 2018, Vietos politinės lyderystės paieškos: kokio mero nori Lietuvos gyventojai, Filosifija sociologija, vol. 29, no. 4, p. 276—284.

15. Vedung, E. 2007, Policy Instruments: Typologies and Theories. In: Bemelmans-Videc, M. L., Rist, R. C., Vedung, E. C. Carrots, Sticks & Sermons. New Brunswick, London, Transaction Publishers, p. 1—277.

16. Gabris, G. T., Nelson, K. L. 2013, Transforming Municipal Boards into Accountable, High-Performing Teams: Toward a Diagnostic Model of Governing Board Effectiveness: Organizational Learning Mechanisms: A Structural-Cultural Approach to Organizational Learning, Public Performance & Management Review, vol. 36, no. 3, p. 472—495. doi: https://doi.org/10.2753/pmr1530-9576360305.

17. Guogis, A., Koht, H. 2009, Why not the Nordic model of welfare state in Lithuania? Trends in Lithuanian and Norwegian social policies. In J. Aidukaite (Ed.), Poverty, urbanity and social policy. Central and Eastern Europe in a broader context. New York: Nova Sciences, p. 1—19.

18. Green, R. K., White, M. J. 1997, Measuring the benefits of homeowning: Effects on children, Journal of urban economics, vol. 41, no 3. p. 441—461

19. Maher, C. S., Hoang, T., Hindery, A. 2020, Fiscal Responses to COVID-19: Evidence from Local Governments and Nonprofits, Public Administration Review, vol. 80, no. 4, p. 644—650. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13238.

20. Rose, R. 2011, Micro-economic responses to a macro-economic crisis: a pan-European perspective, Journal of communist studies and transition politics, vol. 27, no. 3—4, p. 364—384.

21. Janauskaitė, I., Tizenhauzienė, V. 2020, Karantino metu išaugo bedarbių skaičius — kritikuojama “patogi” pašalpų politika, LRT, 01.07.2020, available at: https://www.lrt.lt/naujienos/verslas/4/1193921/karantino-metu-isaugo-bedarbiu-skaicius-kritikuojama-patogi-pasalpu-politika (accessed 11.11.2020).

22. Deslatte, A., Hatch, M. E., Stokan, E. 2020, How Can Local Governments Address Pandemic Inequities? Public Administration Review, vol. 80, no. 5, p 827—831. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13257.

23. Schuster, C., Weitzman, L., Sass Mikkelsen, K., Meyer-Sahling, J., Bersch, K., Fukuyama, F., Paskov, P., Rogger, D., Mistree, D., Kay, K. 2020, Responding to COVID-19 Through Surveys of Public Servants, Public Administration Review. vol. 80, no. 5, p. 792—796. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13246.

24. Dvorak, J. 2020, Lithuanian COVID-19 lessons for public governance. In Joyce, P., Maron, F., Reddy, P. S. (eds) Good Public Governance in a Global Pandemic, Brussels: IIAS-IISA, p. 329—338.

25. Bouckaert, G., Van Hecke, S., Galli, D., Kuhlmann, S., Reiter, R. 2020, European Coronationalism? A Hot Spot Governing a Pandemic Crisis, Public Administration Review, vol. 80, no. 5, p. 765—776. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13242.

26. He, E. 20200, The Results of Europe’s Lockdown Experiment Are, Bloomberg Opinion, 20.05.2020, available at: https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2020-opinion-coronavirus-europe-lockdown-excess-deaths-recession/ (accessed 23.05. 2020).

27. Raudla, R. 2020, Estonian response to COVID-19 pandemic: advantages of smallness, learning and cooperation, Revista de Administração Pública, 28.08.2020, available at: http://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/ojs/index.php/rap/article/view/81779 (accessed 28.08. 2020).

28. Navakas, N. 2020, Patvirtinti dar du koronaviruso atvejai, Verslo Zinious, 19.03.2020, available at: https://www.vz.lt/verslo-aplinka/2020/03/19/patvirtinti-dar-du-koronaviruso-atvejai (accessed 13.05.2020).

29. Šimelevičienė, J. 2020, „Invegos“ vadovas K. Motiejūnas į aidinčią verslo kritiką: „Mes ir patys norėtume, kad viskas suktųsi greičiau“, Verslas, 26.04.2020, available at: https://www.15min.lt/verslas/naujiena/finansai/invega-vadovas-k-motiejunas-mes-ir-patys-noretume-kad-viskas-suktusi-greiciau-662-1308828 (accessed 13. 05.2020).

30. Rakauskė, R. 2020, Pandemijos metu — rekordiniai Lietuvos įmonių indėliai bankuose, Delfi, 11.11.2020, available at: https://www.delfi.lt/verslas/verslas/pandemijos-metu-rekordiniai-lietuvos-imoniu-indeliai-bankuose.d?id=85694598 (accessed 11.11.2020).

31. Chan, D. K. H. 2016, City diplomacy and “glocal” governance: revitalizing cosmopolitan democracy, Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research. vol. 29, no. 2, p. 134—160.

32. Ito, N. C., Pongeluppe, L. S. 2020, The COVID-19 Outbreak and the Municipal Administration Responses: Resource Munificence, Social Vulnerability, and the Effectiveness of Public Actions, Revista de Administração Pública, vol. 54, no. 4, p. 782—838.

33. Burkšienė, V., Dvorak, J., Burbulytė-Tsiskarishvili, G., Normantė, I., Dūda, M., Civinskas, R. 2017, Viešosios paslaugos: iššūkiai kuriant gerovės visuomenę: mokslo studija, Klaipedos universiteto leidykla.