The Baltic Region

2022 Vol. 14 №1

Back to the list Download an article

Sustainable development of coastal regions: geographical and geopolitical factors and limitations

DOI
10.5922/2079-8555-2022-1-1
Pages
4-16

Abstract

Having formed at the end of the 20th century, the concept of spatial development retains its relevance today. Yet, it is associated with a range of problems with its practical implementation and theoretical vindication, especially at a regional level. Attaining sustainable regional development, understood as a steady progress balanced across the economy, social industries and environmental protection, has been deemed impossible without identifying and considering regional development factors, such as geographical and economic-geographical position, environmental conditions and their geographical diversity, natural resource and their location, spatial features of the economy and the settlement structure. Coastal regions are affected by sundry other factors, such as the presence of a seacoast, viewed as a special resource, access to maritime transport and the availability of marine resources, including renewable ones, which are essential for sustainable development. The geopolitical situation of a region and the components of this situation are considered as geopolitical factors. Other limitations include extreme natural processes and events (large waves, tsunamis, typhoons etc.) The article aims to show that an integral geographical system or a combination thereof covering a region should be considered as the most appropriate object for assessment, planning and management of sustainable development, which is based on regional nature management including water and land resources. It is proposed that sustainable development criteria include economic, social and environmental metrics of regional development. Strategic marine and spatial planning and the monitoring of regional environmental management and development are identified as principal tools for attaining and maintaining sustainable development.

Reference


  1. Agafonov N. T., Islyaev R. A. 1995, Osnovnye polozheniya perekhoda Rossiiskoi Federatsii na model’ ustoichivogo razvitiya [Basic Provisions for the Transition of the Russian Federation to a Sustainable Development Model], Central Political Research and Development, St. Petersburg, 117 p. (in Russ.).
  2. Lavrov, S. B., Seliverstov, Yu. P. 1996, The concept of sustainable development: stereotypes and reality (Concept of the Russian Geographical Society), Geograficheskie problemy strategii ustoichivogo razvitiya prirodnoi sredy i obshchestva [Geographical problems of the strategy of sustainable development of the natural environment and society], Moscow, RAS, p. 42—47 (in Russ.).
  3. Kondratiev, K. Ya. 1997, Global Ecodynamics and Sustainable Development: Natural Science and the Human Dimension, Regional Research of Russia, vol. 129, no. 6, p. 1—12 (in Russ.).
  4. Glazovsky, N. F. 1999, Goals, opportunities and mechanisms of sustainable development at different levels of natural and social systems. In: Geograficheskie aspekty problemy perekhoda k ustoichivomu razvitiyu stran Sodruzhestva nezavisimykh gosudarstv [Geographic Aspects of the Problem of Transition to Sustainable Development in the Countries of the Commonwealth of Independent States], Kiev, M., Association. scientific Fund Council. geogr. prob. RAS, p. 21—35 (in Russ.)
  5. Tikunov, V. S., Tsapuk, D. A. 1999, Ustoichivoe razvitie territorii: kartografo-geoinformatsionnoe obespechenie [Sustainable development of the territory: cartographic and geoinformation support], M., Smolensk, SGU, 173 p. (in Russ.).
  6. Baklanov, P. Ya. 2005, Sustainable Regional Development and the Role of Geographic Science. In: Universitetskaya geografiya. Materialy yubileinoi nauchnoi konferentsii [University geography. Materials of the anniversary scientific conference], M., Geogr. Faculty of Moscow State University, p. 30—40 (in Russ.).
  7. Perekhod k ustoichivomu razvitiyu: global’nyi, regional’nyi i lokal’nyi urovni. Zarubezhnyi opyt i problemy Rossii [Transition to sustainable development: global, regional and local levels. Foreign experience and problems of Russia], 2002, M., KMK, 444 p. (in Russ.).
  8. Gallopin, G. C., Raskin, P. 1998, Windows on the Future: Global Scenarios and Sustainability, Environment, no. 40, p. 6—11, 26—31.
  9. Tulokhonov, A. K. 1999, Baikal’skie regiony: problemy ustoichivogo razvitiya [Baikal regions: problems of sustainable development], Novosibirsk, Nauka, 208 p. (in Russ.).
  10. Baklanov, P. Ya. 2001, Dal’nevostochnyi region Rossii: problemy i predposylki ustoichivogo razvitiya [Far East region of Russia: problems and prerequisites for sustainable development], Vladivostok, Dalnauka, 144 p. (in Russ.).
  11. Vinokurov, Yu. I., Krasnoyarova, B. A., Ovdienko, V. I. et al. 2003, Ustoichivoe razvitie Sibirskikh regionov [Sustainable Development of the Siberian Regions], Novosibirsk, Nauka, 240 p. (in Russ.).
  12. Semenov, Yu. M., Belov, A. V., Suvorov, E. G. et al. (eds.) 2007, Geograficheskie issledovaniya Sibiri [Geographical studies of Siberia], T. 1. Struktura i dinamika geosystem [Structure and dynamics of geosystems], Novosibirsk, Geo Publishing House, 413 p. (in Russ.).
  13. Baklanov, P. Ya., Karakin, V. P. (red.) 2010, Geosistemy Dal’nego Vostoka na rubezhe XX i XXI vekov [Geosystems of the Far East at the turn of the 20th and 21st centuries], Т. II. Prirodnye resursy i regional’noe prirodopol’zovanie [Natural resources and regional nature management], Vladivostok, Dalnauka, 560 p. (in Russ.).
  14. Towards a Green Economy. Pathways to Sustainable Development and Poverty Eradication. A Synthesis for Policy Makers, 2011, UNEP, 43 p.
  15. Sustainability Development. The UK Strategy Report, 1994, SD 2426, London, 20 p.
  16. Tishkov, A. A., Korytny, L. M. (hand. count); Sdasyuk, G. V., Klyuev, N. N. (responsible editor) 2012, Rossiya i ee regiony: integratsionnyi potentsial, riski, puti perekhoda k ustoichivomu razvitiyu [Russia and Its Regions: Integration Potential, Risks, Ways of Transition to Sustainable Development], M., Association of Scientific Publications KMK, Moscow (in Russ.).
  17. Wehong, C. Baklanov, P. Ya. (eds.) 2009, Sustainable Development and cyclic economy informatization, Science and Technology of China” Publishing House, Beijing, 512 p. (in Chinese)
  18. Fedorov, G. M., Korneevets, V. S. 2009, Trans-Border Regions in the System of the Regional Hierarchy: the Systemic Approach, Balt. Reg., no. 2, p. 26—33. doi: https://doi.org/10.5922/2079-8555-2009-2-3.
  19. Sikka, G., Yenneti, K., Singh, R. B. 2021, IGU-YECG, Special Issue: Geospatiality And Sustainable Development Goals, Geography, Environment, Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 6—8. doi: https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2020-196.
  20. Baburin, V. L. 2019, The resistance of the greater Baltic region states to market cycle changes, Balt. Reg., vol. 11, no. 1, p. 4—13. doi: https://doi.org/10.5922/2079-8555-2019-1-1.
  21. Barinova, V. A., Zemtsov, S. P. 2020, Inclusive Growth and Regional Sustainability of Russia, Regional Research of Russia, no. 10, p. 10—19. doi: https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970520010025.
  22. Kuznetsova, A. 2015, Towards a Stable and Dynamic Economy in the Kaliningrad Region, Balt. Reg., vol. 5, no. 3, p. 83—95. doi: https://doi.org/10.5922/2079-8555-2015-3-7.
  23. Kudryavtseva, O. V., Malikova, O. I., Egorov, E. G. 2021, Sustainable Urban Development And Ecological Externalities: Russian Case, Geography, Environment, Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 81—90. doi: https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2020-151.
  24. Voloshenko, K., Michailova, A. 2012, Innovative factors and conditions of sustainable development of rural territories, Balt. Reg., no. 3, p. 79—87. doi: https://doi.org/10.5922/2079-8555-2012-3-7.
  25. Eremchenko, E., Tikunov, V., Strobl, J., Del Mastro, A., Monaсo, F. 2021, Sustainable Development: Understanding The Least Resource Base, Geography, Environment, Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 25—32. doi: https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2020-119.
  26. Seliverstov, V. E., Melnikova, L. V. 2013, Analysis of strategic planning in regions of the Siberian Federal District, Regional Research of Russia, no. 3, p. 96—102. doi: https://doi.org/ 10.1134/S2079970513010097.
  27. Skaterschikov, S. V., Chistobaev, А. I. 2014, Spatial planning in the European Union and the Russian Federation, Balt. Reg., no. 1 (19), p. 104—112. doi: https://doi.org/10.5922/2079-8555-2014-1-9.
  28. Eiler, Ch. N. 2014, Obzor mirovogo opyta v oblasti morskogo prostranstvennogo planirovaniya [Survey of World Experience in Marine Spatial Planning], M., World Wildlife Fund (WWF), 136 p. (in Russ.).
  29. Baklanov P. Ya. 2018, Marine Spatial Planning: Theoretical Aspects, Balt. Reg., vol. 10, no. 2, p. 76—85. doi: https://doi.org/10.5922/2079-8555-2018-2-5.
  30. Domingues-Tejo, E., Metternicht, G., Johnston, E., Hedge, L. 2016, Marine Spatial Planning Advancing the Ecosystem-Based Approach to Coastal Zone Management: A review, Marine Policy, no. 72, p. 115—130. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2016.06.023.
  31. Voloshenko, K., Kuznetsova, A. 2014, The Balance Model of Regional Development Management in Certain Territorial Conditions: Development and Application, Balt. Reg., no. 3, p. 4—21. doi: https://doi.org/10.5922/2079-8555-2014-3-1.
  32. Baklanov, P. Ya. 2020, Geopolitical factors in regional development, Tamozhennaya politika Rossii na Dal’nem Vostoke [Customs policy of Russia in the Far East], no. 4, p. 75—83. doi: https://doi.org/1024866/1815-0683/2020-4/75-83 (in Russ.).
  33. 0 Baklanov, P. Y. 2019, Spatial structures of nature management in regional development, Geography and Natural Resources, Т. 40, no. 1, p. 1—8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1875372819010013.
  34. Druzhinin, A. G. 2020, The strongholds of Russian coastal borderlands: economic dynamics amid geopolitical turbulence, Balt. Reg., vol. 12, no. 3, p. 89—104. doi: https://doi.org/ 10.5922/2079-8555-2020-3-6.