The Baltic Region

2021 Vol. 13 №3

Back to the list Download an article

Evaluating the impact of integration processes on the ethnopolitical competition of languages in the Baltic Region

DOI
10.5922/2079-8555-2021-3-4
Pages
58-77

Abstract

In the literature, the impact of integration processes on language learning and usage is traditionally evaluated either through the prism of sociolinguistics or soft power. This article proposes a new conceptual approach based on measuring various aspects of competition between languages by the language integration and monopolization indices, on the one hand, and the polylingualism coefficient, on the other. The approach is applied to the situation in the Baltic Sea region of the EU. The article uses data from Eurostat, Eurobarometer, and the Baltic statistical offices to analyze the performance of Baltic language markets by assessing the impact of the EU integration on the use of languages in the region. The findings show a growing tendency towards polylingualism in countries participating in integration associations. Integration bodies, however, do not give one language precedence over others but encourage convergence of the languages of their leading economies. The main factor behind a language’s popularity is the strength of commodity and labor markets in the country where it is spoken.

The authors conclude that close economic and political integration stimulates heterochronous processes in supranational associations. The first is increasing monopolization in the language market of the association and the language markets of its sub-regions. The second is the decrease in monopolization in national language markets.

Reference

1. Nye, J. S. 2004, Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics, Public Affairs, 191 p.

2. Naumov, A. O. 2016, “Soft power” and “Smart power”. Foreign policy experience of USA, Strategiya Rossii [Russia’s strategy], no. 1, p.57—64 (in Russ.).

3. Naumov, A. O. 2016, “Soft power” and “Smart power”. Foreign policy experience of USA, Strategiya Rossii [Russia’s strategy], no. 2, p. 65—76 (in Russ.).

4. Potebnya, A. A. 1993, Mysl’ iyazyk [Think and language], Kiev, SINTO, 192 p. (in Russ.).

5. Vygotskij, L. V. 2007, Myshlenie i rech’ [Thougth and oration], Moscow, Labirint, 350 p. (in Russ.).

6. Leont’ev, A. N. 1981, Problemy razvitiya psihiki [The problems of psychic progress].— 4-e izdanie, Mocow, 584 p. (in Russ.).

7. Leont’ev, A. A. 1990, Puteshestvie po karte yazykov mira [The trip on World language map], Moscow, Prosveshchenie, 144 p. (in Russ.).

8. Ayupova, L. L., Ibragimova, V. L. 2010, Soderzhanie ponyatiya «yazykovaya situatsiya» v otechestvennoi izarubezhnoi literature [The content of the concept of “language situation” in domestic and foreign literature], The decision of the national language issues in the modern world. CIS and Baltic Countries, Azbukovnik, p. 81—90 (in Russ.).

9. Kryuchkova, T. B. 2010, O ponyatiino-terminologicheskom apparate opisaniya yazykovogo sostoyaniya [On the conceptual and terminological apparatus for describing the language state], The decision of the national language issues in the modern world. CIS and Baltic Countries, Azbukovnik, p. 63—80 (in Russ.).

10. Khashimov, R. I. 2010, Yazykovaya politika i etnosotsiolingvisticheskie terminy i ponyatiya [Language policy and ethnosociolinguistic terms and concepts], The decision of the national language issues in the modern world. CIS and Baltic Countries, Azbukovnik, p. 91—101. (in Russ.)

11. Tarasov, I. N. 2019, Instruments of ethnic policy in Latvia, Yuzhno-rossiiskii zhurnal sotsial’nykh nauk [South Russian Journal of Social Sciences], vol. 20, no. 2, p. 34—44 (in Russ.).

12. Kazak, E. A., Klimenko, O. K. 2013, Yazyk v global’nom kontekste: Severnaya Amerika segodnya kak kul’turno-yazykovoi fenomen [Language in a global context: North America today as a cultural and linguistic phenomenon], Collection of reviews, 166 p. (in Russ.)

13. Marusenko, M. A. 2014, Yazykovaya politika Evropeiskogo Soyuza: institutsional’nyi, obrazovatel’nyi ekonomicheskii aspekty [Language policy of the European Union: institutional, educational and economic aspects], Publishing house of the St. Petersburg University, 288 p. (in Russ.).

14. Troshina, N. N. 2015, The German language in modern Europe (scientific and analytical review). In: Troshina, N. N. (ed.) Yazykovaya situatsiya v Evrope nachala XXI veka [The linguistic situation in Europe at the beginning of the XXI century], scientific and analytical review, Moscow, p. 102—121 (in Russ.).

15. Troshina, N. N. 2015, Yazykovaya situatsiya v Evrope v epokhu globalizatsii [The language situation in Europe in the era of globalization]. In: Troshina, N.N. (ed.) Yazykovaya situatsiya v Evrope nachala XXI veka [The linguistic situation in Europe at the beginning of the XXI century], scientific and analytical review, Moscow, p. 5—13 (in Russ.).

16. Kirilina, A. V. 2015, The linguophilosophicalreflexion in the age of globalization. In: Troshina, N.N. (ed.) Yazykovaya situatsiya v Evrope nachala XXI veka [The linguistic situation in Europe at the beginning of the XXI century], scientific and analytical review, Moscow, p. 122—135. (in Russ.).

17. Ammon, U. 2014, Die Stellung der deutschen Spracheinder Welt, B.; N.Y. XVIII, 1296 s.

18. Ammon, U. 2009, Thesen zur Abträglichkeit der EU-Sprachenpolitik für Deutsch als Fremdsprache, Der Sprachdienst, H. 1, s. 16—19.

19. Devlin, K. 2020, Speaking the national language at home is less common in some European countries: update 2020, Pew Research Centre, available at: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/01/06/speaking-the-national-language-at-home-is-less-comm... (accessed 06.08.2020).

20. Shteinke, K. 2006, Globalization — regionalization and linguistics. In: Globalizatsiya — etnizatsiya: Etnokul’turnye i yazykovye protsessy [Globalization — Ethnization: Ethnocultural and Linguistic Processes], p. 249—258 (in Russ.).

21.Solntsev, E. M. 2015, French in the modern world (scientific and analytical review). In: Troshina, N. N. (ed.) Yazykovaya situatsiya v Evrope nachala XXI veka [The linguistic situation in Europe at the beginning of the XXI century], scientific and analytical review, Moscow, p. 136—145 (in Russ.).

22. Akova, S. Kantar, G. 2020, Globalization in the context of multiculturalism and ethnicity in the Western Balkans and intercultural communication, Journal of Public Affairs. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2218.

23. Xiong, T., Li, Q. N., Hu, G. W. 2020, Teaching English in the shadow: identity construction of private English language tutors in China, Discourse-Studies in the cultural politics of education, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2020.1805728.

24. He, J. 2020, A language-political and comparative Examination of the German Language in Japan, Korea and China Historical Overview, Present Situation and Future Perspectives, Muttersprache, vol. 130, no 3—4, p. 216—234.

25. Emmorey, K., Mott, M., Meade, G., Holcomb, P.J., Midgley, K.J. 2020, Lexical selection in bimodal bilinguals: ERP evidence from picture-word interference, Language Cognition and Neuroscience. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2020.1821905.

26. Sarkis, J. T., Montag, J. L. 2020, The effect of lexical accessibility on Spanish-English intra-sentential codeswitching, Memory& Cognition. doi: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-020-01069-7.

27. Wong, S. W. L., Cheung, H., Zheng, M., Yang, X. J., McBride, C., Ho, C. S. H., Leung, S. M., Chow, B. W. Y., Waye, M. M. Y. 2020, Effect of Twinning on Chinese and English Vocabulary Knowledge, Child Development. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13400.

28. Mandal, S., Best, C. T., Shaw, J., Cutler, A. 2020, Bilingual phonology in dichotic perception: A case study of Malayalam and English voicing, Glossa-A Journal of General Linguistics, vol. 5, no 1. doi: https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.853.

29. Saha, S., Chakraborty, N., Kundu, S., Paul, S., Mollah, A. F., Basu, S., Sarkar, R. 2020, Multi-lingual scene text detection and language identification, Pattern Recognition Lenners, no. 138, p. 16—22. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2020.06.024.

30. Sanjaume-Calvet, M., Riera-Gil, E. 2020, Languages, secessionism and party competition in Catalonia: A case of de-ethnicising outbidding? Party Politics. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/ 1354068820960382.

31. McDonald, M., Kaushanskaya, M. 2020, Factors modulating cross-linguistic co-activation in bilinguals, Journal of Phonetics, no. 81. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2020.100981.

32. Malins, J. G., Landi, N., Ryherd, K., Frijters, J.C., Magnuson, J.S., Rueckl, J.G., Pugh, K.R., Sevcik, R., Morris, R. 2020, Is that apibuorapibo? Children with reading and language deficits show difficulties in learning and overnight consolidation of phonologically similar pseudowords, Developmental Science. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.13023.

33. Silver, B. 1975, Methods of Deriving Data on Bilingualism from the 1970 Soviet Census, Soviet Studies, vol. 27, no. 4, p. 574—597.

34. Xo Hur, S. C. 2000, The language situation in Russia and other newly independent states of the former USSR: analysis of data from the 1989 All-Union Population Census. In: Yazyki Rossiiskoi Federatsii i novogo zarubezh’ya. Status i funktsii [Languages of the Russian Federation and the New Abroad. Status and functions], Moscow, p. 381—391 (in Russ.).

35. Dauth, W., Findeisen, S., Suedekum, J. 2021, Adjusting to Globalization in Germany, Journal of Labor Economics. doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/707356.

36. Carbonell, J. M. 2018, Cross-Cultural Communication, Public Diplomacy and Soft Regulation in Global Society, TRIPODOS, no. 42, p. 11—20.

37. Airapetian, A. S. 2019, The mathematical instruments of measures the polylingual dynamic in modern world, Psikhologo-ekonomicheskie issledovaniya [Journal of psycho-economics], no. 3, p. 20—28 (in Russ.).

38. Neverov, A.N., Airapetian, A.S. 2019, Markets oflanguage and the tools of its analisys, Psikhologo-ekonomicheskie issledovaniya [Journal of psycho-economics], no. 2, p. 11—22 (in Russ.).

39. de Stefano, C. 2017, Reforming the Governance of International Financial Law in the Era of Post-Globalization, Journal of International Economic Law, vol. 20, no 3, p. 509—533. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgx029.

40. Benocci, B. 2018, A twenty-five year transition. The forms of power and the alleged crisis of the nation-state in the contemporary age, OASIS-OBSERVATORIO DE ANALISIS DE LOS SISTEMAS INTERNACIONALES, no. 28, p. 7—24. doi: https://doi.org/10.18601/16577558.n28.02.

41. Badie, B. 2019, Exploring the New World. In: New Perspectives on the International Order: No Longer Alone in This World, p. 53—74. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94286-5_4.

42. Beloshitzkaya, V. 2019, Democracy and Redistribution: The Role of Regime Revisited, East European Politics and Societies, vol. 34, no. 3, p. 571—590. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0888325419892063.

43. Ballor, G. A., Yildirim, A. B. 2020, Multinational Corporations and the Politics of International Trade in Multidisciplinary Perspective, Business and Politics, vol. 22, no 4, p. 573—586. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/bap.2020.14.

44. Hirschman, A. 1945, National Power and the Structure of Foreign Trade, Berkely and Los Angeles, University of California Press, 1945, 170 p.