The Baltic Region

2021 Vol. 13 №3

Back to the list Download an article

The remaking of geopolitical space and institutional transformations: the case of the Baltic Region

DOI
10.5922/2079-8555-2021-3-3
Pages
42-57

Abstract

This article adopts the historical neo-institutional approach to analyse the dissolution of the Livonian Confederation and the ensuing reshaping of the Baltic region in the 16th-19th centuries. These historical events are employed to describe the post-bifurcation incorporation of a society in a different social system. Several inclusion models are identified. The centralised model suggests that the incorporated society reproduces the institutions of the incorporating society. Modified institutions are transplanted to the incorporated society within the quasi-centralised model, whilst only selected modified institutions are transferred within the autonomist one. The author analyses mechanisms playing a part in state mergers and emphasises their dependence on the institutional environment of the incorporating society. For instance, a part of Livonia was incorporated in the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth (PLC) through transplanting PLC institutions, primarily political ones, to the newly acquired territories. To this end, a mechanism was developed to encourage cooperation from the nobility without further stratification. Sweden, however, acted on the autonomist model when incorporating Estland and Livland. Economic, political, and sociocultural institutions, many of which were of hybrid type, were transplanted, whilst socialisation mechanisms and incentives applied to a wider section of the population. The Russian approach, which had at its core security considerations, combined autonomist elements (establishment of hybrid institutions in the new territories) and centralised components (propagation of Russian imperial institutions). The merger mechanisms included the creation of an Ostsee estate system and incentives for the higher estates coupled with repressions against commoners. Overall, the nature of state mergers and institutional transplantations depends on whether the incorporated territories have had a history of statehood, another significant factor is the degree of similarity between the institutions of the acquired territories and the metropole.

Reference

1. Hendriks, F. 1996, Beleid, Cultuur en Instituties, Het Verhaal van Twee Steden, Leiden, available at: https://openaccess.leidenuniv.nl/handle/ 1887/4972 (accessed 14.06.2020).

2. Durkheim, E. 1982, The Rules of Sociological Method.

3. North, D. C. 1990, Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808678.

4. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., Vishny, R. W. 1998, Law and Finance, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 106, no.6, p. 1113—1154. doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/250042.

5. Roland, G. 2000, Transition and Economics. Politics, Markets and Firms, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

6. Stiglitz, J. 1998, Distinguished Lecture on Economics in Government. The Private Uses of Public Interests: Incentives and Institutions, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 12, no. 2, p. 3—22. doi: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.12.2.3.

7. Polterovich, V. M. 2001, Transplantation of economic institutions, Ekonomicheskaya nauka sovremennoi Rossii [Economic science of modern Russia], no. 3, p. 24—50 (in Russ.).

8. Dowd, A. C., Pak, J. H., Bensimon, E. M. 2013, The role of institutional agents in promoting transfer access, Education Policy Analysis Archives, vol. 21, no. 15, available at: http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/1187 (accessed 05.07.2020).

9. Mamadouh, V., De Jong, M., Lalenis, K. (eds). 2002, The Theory and Practice of Institutional Transplantation. Experiences with Transfer of Policy Institutions, Springer. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0001-4.

10. Judson, P. M. 1996, Exclusive Revolutionaries: Liberal Politics, Social Experience, and National Identity in the Austrian Empire, 1848—1914 (Social History, Popular Culture, And Politics In Germany), University of Michigan Press, Michigan, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03612759.1997.10525297.

11. Marshall, P. J. 1998, Oxford History of British Empire. V.II. The Eighteenth Century, Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.

12. Roberts, M. 1979, The Swedish imperial experience (1560—1718), Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511622274.

13. Pihlajamäki, H. 2013, Claiming Authority: Criminal Procedure in Seventeenth Century Swedish Livonia, Bergen Journal of Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, vol. 1, no. 2, p. 80—97.

14. Ciesielski, T. 2014, The Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth and Russia’s expansion in the Baltic region in the 18th century, Studia Slavica et Balcanica Petropolitana, no. 15, p. 118—134.

15. Gibson, C. 2015, Absent Culture: The Case of Polish Livonia, Central Europe, vol. 13, no. 1—2, p. 132—134.

16. Heide, Y. 2014, Livonia under the rule of the Commonwealth. Power Struggle and Social Transformation, Quaestio Rossica, no. 2, p. 112—143 (in Russ).

17. Szabaciuk, A. 2008, Organizacja samorządu ziemskiego szlachty bałtyckiej na terytorium Inflant w latach 1561—1920, Annales Universitatismariaecurie-Skłodowska Lublin-Polonia, vol. LXIII, Sectio F, p. 67—78.

18. Tyszkowski, K. 1939, Polska polityka kościelna w Inflantach (1581—1621), Wydawnictwa Instytutu Baltyckiego, available at: https://pbc.gda.pl/dlibra/publication/352/edition/4713/content (accessed 02.07.2020).

19. Parsons, T. 1971, The System of Modern Societies, Paperback.

20. Matveev, A. A. 2019, Application of the Theory of «Path dependence» In the Study of Institutional Transformations in Russia, Administrative consulting, no. 4, p. 107—113. doi: https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2019-4-107-113 (in Russ.).

21. Kasekamp, A. 2010, A History of the Baltic States, Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire. doi: https://doi.org/10.30965/25386565-01701020.

22. Wezel, K. 2017, Transcending boundaries: Riga’s Baltic German entrepreneurs in an era of nationalism, revolution, and war, Journal of Baltic Studies, vol. 48, no. 1, p. 39—54. doi: https://doi.org/1010.1080/01629778.2016.1269434.

23. O’Connor, K. 2003, The History of the Baltic States, Westport.

24. North, М. 2007, Europa expandiert 1250—1500, Stuttgart.

25. Ewert, U. C., Selzer, S. 2016, Institutions of Hanseatic Trade Studies on the Political Economy of a Medieval Network Organisation, Frankfurt am Main, NY. doi: https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-06851-2.

26. Wubs-Mrozewicz, J. 2017, The Late Medieval and Early Modern Hanse as an Institution of Conflict Management, Continuty and Change, vol.32, Special issue 1 (Merchants and Commercial Conflicts in Europe, 1250—1600), p. 59—84. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0268416017000066.

27. Oberlender, E. 2012, Concept of the Early Modern Era and the History of Estonia, Vidzeme and Kurzeme (1561—1795), Latvijas Vēstures Institūta Žurnāls, vol. 85, p. 1—49.

28. Jacobson, S., Andersen, A., Bešlin, B., Göederle, W., Györe, Z, Muigg, M. 2011, What is a Region? Regions in European History. In: Ellis, S. G., Michailidis, I. (eds.) Regional and Transnational History in Europe, Pisa, p. 1—66.

29. Ivanovs, A., Soms, H. 2007, Origins of Regional Identity of Eastern Latvia (Latgale) and Approaches to its Investigation, Reģionālais ziņojums. Pētījumu materiāli, no. 3, p. 41—50.

30. Plakans, A. 2011, A Concise History of the Baltic States, Cambridge, doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975370.

31. Jekabsons, E. 2012, The Rule of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth in the Territory of the Present Day Latvia (1561—1795): the State of Latvian Historiography, Latvijas Vēstures Institūta Žurnāls, no. 85, p. 32—56.

32. Kamusella, T. 2013, Germanization, Polonization, and Russification in the partitioned lands of Poland-Lithuania, Nationalities Papers, vol. 41, no. 5, p. 815—838. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00905992.2013.767793.

33. Koenigsberger, H. G. 1978, Monarchies and Parliaments in Early Modern Europe. “Dominium Regale” or “Dominium Politicum et Regale”, Theory and Society, vol. 5, no. 2, p. 191—217.

34. Elliott, J. H. 1992, A Europe of Composite Monarchies, Past & Present, no. 137, p. 48—71, available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/650851 (accessed 20.07.2020).

35. Gustafsson, H. 1998, The Conglomerate State: A Perspective on State Formation in Early Modern Europe, Scandinavian Journal of History, vol. 23, no. 3—4, p. 189—213.

36. Kirby, D. 1998, Northern Europe in the Early Modern Period: The Baltic World, 1492—1772, NY.

37. Pihlajamäki, H. 2017, Conquest and the Law in Swedish Livonia (ca. 1630—1710). A Case of Legal Pluralism in Early Modern Europe. Leiden, Boston, p. 85—150, available at: https://brill.com/downloadpdf/title/33908.pdf (accessed 3.07.2010).

38. Drost, A. 2010, Historical Borderlands in the Baltic Sea Area Layers of Cultural Diffusion and New Borderland Theories: The Case of Livonia, Journal of History for the Public, no. 7, p. 10—24.