The Baltic Region

2021 Vol. 13 №3

Back to the list Download the article

The Visegrad Group and the Baltic Assembly: coalitions within the EU as seen through Russian foreign policy

DOI
10.5922/2079-8555-2021-3-2
Pages
25-41

Abstract

Today Russia has difficulty doing business-as-usual with EU states. It seems that the countries of the Visegrad Group (V4) and the Baltic Assembly/Baltic Council of Ministers (BA/BСM) have contributed substantially to this state of affairs. Overall, the tensions between Russia and the EU are building up – another tendency that did not arise on the Russian initiative. This article aims to address the question of whether Russia should establish direct relations with the V4 and the BA/BCM as tools to overcome the mentioned difficulties. On the one hand, these associations date back to before the countries acceded to the Union. On the other, they are products of regionalisation in the EU. In answering this question, we achieve three objectives. Firstly, we look for an appropriate theoretical and methodological framework for the study. Secondly, we produce a comparative description of the V4 and the BA/BCM. Thirdly, we examine the capacity of these associations to pursue an independent foreign and domestic policy. This study uses a comparison method to analyse the activities of the two organisations and identify their significance for the EU.

Reference

1. Busygina, I.M., Klimovich, S.A. 2017, A coalition within a coalition: the baltics in the European Union, Balt. Reg., vol. 9, no. 1, p. 4—17. doi: https://doi.org/10.5922/2079-8555-2017-1-1.

2. Borzel, T.A., Risse, T. 2019, Grand Theories of Integration and the Challenges of Comparative Regionalism, Journal of European Public Policy, vol. 26, no. 8, p. 1231—1252. doi: https://doi.org/1010.1080/13501763.2019.1622589.

3. Efremova, K.A. 2017, From Regionalism to Transregionalism: Some Theoretical Conseptualisation of a New Reality, Comparative Politics vol. 8, no. 2, p. 58—72. doi: https://doi.org/10.18611/2221-3279-2017-8-2-58-72.

4. Kuznetsov, D.A. 2017, Transregionalism: Problems of Terminology and Conceptualization, Comparative Politics, vol. 8, no. 2, p. 22. doi: https://doi.org/10.18611/2221-3279-2016-7-2 (23) –14-25.

5. Doidge, M. 2007, Joined at the Hip: Regionalism and Interregionalism, Journal of European Integration, vol. 29, no. 2, p. 242. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/07036330701252474.

6. Bache, I., Flinders, M. 2004, Multi-Level Governance in Theory and Practice Oxford, p. 3. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/0199259259.001.0001.

7. Chikharev, I., Romanova, M. 2011, The notion and the basic concepts of multilevel governance in world political discourse, Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 12. Politicheskie nauki [Moscow University Bulletin. Series 12. Political sciences], no. 5, p. 3—16 (in Russ.).

8. Strezhneva, M. 2009, Theories of European Integration, Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 12. Politicheskie nauki [Moscow University Bulletin. Series 12. Political sciences], vol. 25, no. 1, p. 28—45 (in Russ.).

9. Multilevel Governance and Partnership, 2014, The Van den Brande Report Prepared at the request of the Commissioner for Regional and Urban Policy Johannes Hahn, p. 10, available at: https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/informing/dialog/2014/5_vandenbrande_report.pdf (accessed 15.04.2021).

10. Strezhneva, M. (ed.) 2017, Evropeiskii soyuz v global’nom ekonomicheskom upravlenii [European Union in Global Economic Governance], Moscow, IMEMO RAN, 255 р. doi: https://doi.org/10.20542/978-5-9535-0491-1.

11. Busygina, I., Filippov, M. 2020, Changing incentives and strategies of national governments in the context of multi-level governance in the European Union, Polis (Russian Federation), no. 5, p. 148—163. doi: https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2020.05.11 (in Russ.)

12. Hooghe, L., Marks, G. 2003, Unraveling the Central State, But How? Types of Multi-Level Governance, American Political Science Review, vol. 97, no. 2, p. 233—243. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055403000649

13. Olenchenko, V. 2019, Northern Europe — Baltic — Eastern Europe: Coexistence or Interaction? Istoriya [History], vol. 10, no. 7 (81). Doi: https://doi.org/10.18254/S207987840006635-7 (in Russ.).

14. Shishelina, L.N. (ed.) 2010, Vishegradskaya Evropa: otkuda i kuda? Dva desyatiletiya po puti reform v Vengrii, Pol`she, Slovakii i Chexii Visegrad [Europe: from where and to where? Two decades on the path of reform in Hungary, Poland, Slovakia and the Czech Republic], Moscow, 563 p. (in Russ.).

15. Mozel, T.N. 2001, Baltiya, Rossiya i Zapad v poiskax modeli bezopasnosti v Evrope [The Baltic States, Russia and the West in search of a security model in Europe], Moscow, 303 p. (in Russ.).

16. Strezhneva, M., Rudenkova, D. 2016, Evropeiskii soyuz: arkhitektura vneshnei politiki [European Union: the Architecture of Foreign Policy], Moscow, p. 135. doi: https://doi.org/10.20542/978-5-9535-0480-5 (in Russ.).

17. Gardini, G.L., Malamud, A. 2015, Debunking Interregionalism: Concepts, Types and Critique — With a Transatlantic Focus, Atlantic Future Working Paper, no. 38, p. 3—7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62908-7_2.

18. Maksimtsev, I.A., Mezhevich, N.M., Koroleva A. V. 2017, Economic Development of the Baltic and Nordic Countries: Characteristics of Еconomic Models, Balt. Reg., vol. 9, no. 1, p. 41—54. doi: https://doi.org/10.5922/2079-8555-2017-1-4.

19. Mezhevich, N. 2016, Eastern Europe. On the centenary of the political project, Balt. Reg., vol. 8, no.1, p.17—32. doi: https://doi.org/10.5922/2079-8555-2016-1-2.

20. Olenchenko, V.A. 2016, Russia and the Baltic States: outlines of the concept of bilateral relations, International affairs, no. 9, p. 58—76.

21. Shishelina, L.N. 2014, Visegrad group: stages of formation and development // Perspektivy [Perspectives], available at: www.perspektivy.info/book/vishegradskaja_gruppa_etapy_stanovlenija_i_razvitija_2014—08—20.html (accessed 02.03.2021).

22. Esenskiy, G. 2016, 25 years of the Visegrad group, Sovremennaya Evropa, no. 6. p. 13—19 (in Russ.).

23. Lyubavsky, M. 2004, Istoriya zapadnih slavyan [History of the Western Slavs], Moscow, Parade, 608p. (in Russ.).

24 Shishelina, L. 2013, Visegrad Group and Eastern Partnership, Visegrad Yearbook, Supplement to the journal, Sovremennaya Evropa, vol. 4, no. 2, p. 5—20. (in Russ.)

25. Ofitserov-Belskii, D. 2015, Visegrad cooperation: the search for new forms against the background of the Ukrainian crisis, World Eсonomy and International Relations, vol. 65, no. 3, p. 76—85. doi: https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2015-3-76-85 (in Russ.)

26. Bache, I., Bartle, I., Flinders, M. 2016, Multi-Level Governance. In: Ansell, C., Torfing, J. (eds.) Handbook on Theories of Governance, Cheltenham, United Kingdom, Edward Elgar Publishing, p. 486—498.

27. Busygina, I., Filippov, M. 2010, European Union from specific to general. The limits and prospects of EU geopolitics, Rossiya v global`noj politike [Russia in global affairs], vol. 8, no. 1, p. 124 (in Russ.).