Societal security in the Baltic Sea Region: the Russian perspective
- DOI
- 10.5922/2079-8555-2021-3-1
- Pages
- 4-24
Abstract
This study discusses whether the concept of societal security is embedded in the Russian formal and informal discourses as well as in the Russian strategic documents on national security and the Baltic Sea region. Particularly, the paper describes four paradigms of international relations (neorealism, neoliberalism, globalism and postpositivism) and theoretical approaches to the concept of societal security formulated in them. On a practical plane, Russia has managed to develop — together with other regional players — a common regional approach to understanding societal security threats and challenges in the Baltic Sea region. These challenges include uneven regional development, social and gender inequalities, unemployment, poverty, manifestations of intolerance, religious and political extremism, separatism, large-scale migration, climate change, natural and man-made catastrophes, transnational organized crime and cybercrime, international terrorism, so-called hybrid threats, disharmony between education systems, etc. In 2017, Russia and other Baltic countries agreed that the Council of the Baltic Sea States would be the regional institution to implement a common societal security strategy exemplified by the Baltic 2030 Agenda Action Plan.
Reference
1. Buzan, B., Wæver, O., de Wilde, J. H. 1998, Security: A New Framework for Analysis, Lynne Rienner, London/Boulder.
2. Aaltola, M., Kuznetsov, B., Sprūds, A., Vizgunova, E. (eds.) 2018, Societal Security in the Baltic Sea region: Expertise Mapping and Raising Policy Relevance, Latvian Institute of International Affairs/Zinātne, Riga.
3. Ozoliņa, Ž. (ed.) 2016, Societal Security. Inclusion-Exclusion Dilemma. A Portrait of the Russian-Speaking Community in Latvia, Zinātne, Riga.
4. Smith, D.J. (ed.) 2005, The Baltic States and Their Region: New Europe or Old? Rodopi, New York.
5. Keller, R. 2013. Doing Discourse Research: An Introduction for Social Scientists, SAGE, Los Angeles.
6. Moravcsik, A., Schimmelfennig, F. 2009, Liberal Intergovernmentalism. In: Wiener, A., Diez, T. (eds.) European Integration Theory, Oxford University Press, Oxford, p. 67—87.
7. Baluev, D. 2002, Sovremennaya Mirovaya Politika i Problemy Lichnostnoi Bezopasnosti [Contemporary World Policy and Problems of Human Security], Nizhny Novgorod State University Press, Nizhny Novgorod (in Russ.).
8. Chugayev, S. 1997, State of the Economy and Society Is the Main Threat for Russia, Says the Russian National Security Concept, Izvestiya, 19 December (in Russ.).
9. Tsygankov, P.A. 2010, Human Security Theory: Political Implications and Lessons for Russia, Moscow University Bulletin. Series no. 12. Political Science, no. 4, p. 80—83 (in Russ.).
10. Kozyreva, A. 2003, Human Security Concept in the Contemporary World, Obozrevatel’-Observer, no. 9 (in Russ.).
11. Kulagin, V.M. 2006, Mezhdunarodnaya Bezopasnost [International Security], Moscow, Aspect Press (in Russ.).
12. Lebedeva, M. 2006, Mirovaya Politika [World Politics], Moscow, Aspect Press (in Russ.).
13. Vasilchenko, O. 2016, Human Security: on a Concept. In: Akhmetov, I.G. (ed.) Novye Idei v Filosophii [New Ideas in Philosophy], Moscow, Buk, p. 13—19 (in Russ.).
14. Bakuntsev, A.V. 2009, The Russians in the Baltic Sea Region: the Problem of Self-Identification, Vestnik Tsentra Mezhdunarodnogo Obrazovaniya Moskovskogo Gosudarsetvennogo Universiteta. Filologiya. Pedagogika. Metodika [The Bulletin of the International Education Center, Moscow State University. Philology. Pedagogy. Methods], no. 1, p. 67—69 (in Russ.).
15. Belobrovtseva, I. (ed.) 2010, Russkie v Pribaltike [Russians in the Baltic Sea Region], Moscow, Flinta/Nauka (in Russ.).
16. Bugay, N. 2017, Finny-Ingermanlandtsy. Transformatsii Etnicheskoi Obshnosti: Zabvenie, Vozrozhdenie, Perspektiva [The Ingrian Finns. Transformations of Ethnic Community: Oblivion, Revival, Perspectives], Moscow, Akvarius (in Russ.).
17. Alekseev, Y.V., Manakov, A.G. 2005, Narod Setu: Mezhdu Rossiey i Estoniey [The People of Setu: Between Russia and Estonia], Moscow, Europe (in Russ.).
18. Polovina, E.V. 2015, The Problem of Definition of the Human Security Concept in the UN Documents, Politika, Gosudarstvo i Pravo [Politics, State and Law], no. 4 (in Russ.).
19. Baranovsky, V. (ed.) 1997, Russia and Europe: The Emerging Security Agenda, New York, Oxford University Press.
20. Gorny, M. (ed.) 2004, Publichnaya Politika: Voprosy Myagkoi Bezopasnosti v Baltiyskom Regione [Public Policy: Soft Security Issues in the Baltic Sea Region], St. Petersburg, Norma (in Russ.).
21. Selin, V.S., Vasiliev, V.V. 2010, Vzaimodeistvie Global’nykh, Natsional’nykh i Regional’nykh Ekonomicheskikh Interesov v Osvoenii Severa i Arktiki [Interaction of Global, National and Regional Economic Interests in the Development of the North and Arctic], The Kola Science Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Apatity (in Russ.).
22. Vvedenskiy, A. 2014, Innovation Infrastructure as the Key Element of Sustainable Venture Ecosystem in Russia, Baltic Rim Economies, 29 April, p. 44.
23. Makarychev, A., Sergunin, A. 2017, Russia’s Role in Regional Cooperation and the EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region (EUSBSR), Journal of Baltic Studies, vol. 48, no. 2, p. 34—50.
24. Kapustin, B. 1996, National Interest as a Conservative Utopia, Svobodnaya Mysl [Liberal Thought], no. 6, p. 13—28 (in Russ.).
25. Wæver, O. 1993, Societal Security: The Concept. In: Wæver, O., Buzan, B., Kelstrup, M., Lemaitre, P. (eds.) Identity, Migration, and the New Security Agenda in Europe, New York, St. Martin’s Press, p. 17—40.
26. Vasilieva, N.A., Chensin, V. 2011, Modernization as a Search for Russia’s New Identity: the Arctic Model, Vestnik Mezhdunarodnykh Organizatsiy [International Organizations Research Journal], no. 3, p. 20—26 (in Russ.).
27. Makarychev, A. 2003, Contours of Regional Identity: Testing Constructivism on Kaliningrad’s Ground, Journal of Eurasian Research, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 18—25.
28. Morozov, V. 2004, Russia in the Baltic Sea Region: Desecuritization or Deregionalization? Cooperation and Conflict, vol. 39, no. 3, p. 317—331.
29. Morozov, V. 2005, On the West’s Cunning and Its Unmaskers: Russia’s Foreign Policy Thought and Self-Isolation, Neprikosnovenny Zapas [Emergency Store], no. 5, p. 14—22.
30. Sergunin, A. 2019, The Baltic Sea region after the Ukrainian crisis and Trump: a Russian perspective, DIIS Report, no. 4, The Danish Institute for International Studies, Copenhagen.
31. Zhuravel, V., Ivanov, S. 2018, Cooperation of the Baltic Sea states in the sphere of regional security, Geopoliticheskiy zhurnal [Geopolitical Journal], no. 1, p. 40—46 (in Russ.).
32. Sergunin, A. 2019, Applying EU standards to planning Russian Arctic cities’ sustainable development strategies: challenges and opportunities. In: Varaksin, A.N. (eds.) Environmental Knowledge and Policy Innovation between East and West. Lessons Learned and Not? Open Science Conference Proceedings, Minsk, 28—30 May 2019, Minsk, p. 108—109.
33. Palmowski, T. 2021, The European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region and accomplishments, Baltic Region, vol.13, no. 1, p. 138—152. doi: https://doi.org/10.5922/2079-8555-2021-1-8.
34. Nikers, O., Tabuns, O. 2019, Baltic Security Strategy Report. What the Baltics Can Offer for a Stronger Alliance, The Jamestown Foundation, Washington.
35. Wolanin, J. 2017, Common societal security culture in the Baltic Sea Region: basics and the way forward, 13 December, Council of the Baltic Sea States Secretariat, Stockholm, available at: https://cbss.org/publications/common-societal-security-culture-in-the-baltic-sea-region-basics-and-t... (accessed 15.05.2021).