The Baltic Region

2021 Vol. 13 №2

Back to the list Download an article

Media images of the Kaliningrad region in the structure of migration attitudes of millennials and the reform generation

DOI
10.5922/2079-8555-2021-2-9
Pages
165-182

Abstract

This article explores the role of a regional media image on migration attitudes. Attention is drawn to the Kaliningrad region, a Russian exclave whose population growth is solely due to migration. The study aims to determine how the media images of Kaliningrad affect the decision to move. The research draws on Radaev’s concept of generations. It uses 2014—2018 regional and national publications about the Kaliningrad region (N=1913) and semi-structured interviews with informants (N=44). The research methods are publication analysis and in-depth interviews processed using the Atals.ti software. The five images identified are a region of international cooperation, a military outpost, an economically attractive area, a territory of developing infrastructure, and a tourist destination. The most substantial intergenerational differences concern the media images of a military outpost and an economically attractive area. Members of the reform generation are more likely than millennials to see a military threat and consider the security aspect when moving. Millennials showed greater awareness of what constitutes the image of an economically attractive region. It is concluded that differences between millennials and the reform generation in evaluating the significance of the region’s media images depend crucially on the migration motives. For millennials, the priority is employment and career growth, whilst for the reform generation, it is finding a comfortable place to live in old age.

Reference

1. Golenkova, Z. T., Sushko, P. E. 2016, Social mobility in the context of migration biographies of Russians, Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological studies], no. 12, p. 95—104 (in Russ.).

2. Lyalina, A. V. 2019, The role of migration in the demographic development of the Kaliningrad region, Regional’nye issledovaniya [Regional studies], no. 4 (66), p. 73—84. doi: 10.5922/1994-5280-2019-4-6 (in Russ.).

3. Zotova, M. V., Gritsenko, A. A., Sebentsov, A. B. 2018, Everyday life in the Russian borderlands: motives and practices of cross-border practices, Mir Rossii. Sotsiologiya. Etnologiya [The world of Russia. Sociology. Ethnology], no. 4 (27), p. 56—77. doi: 10.17323/1811-038X-2018-27-4-56-77 (in Russ).

4. Vendina, O. 2019, Living in the Borderlands: Interpretation of Border Security Problems by Residents of Russian Border Towns, Laboratorium, no. 2 (11), p. 30—69. doi: 10.25285/2078-1938-2019-11-2-30-69 (in Russ.).

5. Sebentsov, A., Zotova, M. 2018, The Kaliningrad region: challenges of the exclave position and ways to offset them, Balt. Reg., no. 1 (10), p. 89—106. doi: 10.5922/2079-8555-2018-1-6.

6. Batyk, I., Semenova, L. 2013, Cross-border cooperation in tourism between the Warmian-Masurian voivodeship and the Kaliningrad region, Balt. Reg., no. 3 (7), p. 77—85. doi: 10.5922/2079-8555-2013-3-8.

7. Almedia-Garcia, F., Domigunez-Azcue, J., Mercade-Mele, P., Perez-Tapia, G. 2020, Can a destination really change its image? The roles of information sources, motivations, and visits, Tourism Management Perspectives, no. 34, p. 1—16. doi: 10.1016/j. tmp.2020.100662.

8. Afshardoost, M., Eshaghi, M. 2020, Destination image and tourist behavioral intentions: a meta-analysis, Tourism Management, no. 81, p. 1—10. doi: 10.1016/j. tourman.2020.104154.

9. Nadeau, J., Olafsen, A. 2015, Country image evaluations and migration intentions, Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, no. 11, p. 293—308. doi:10.1057/pb.2015.8.

10. Gorshkov, M. K. (ed.) 2018, Youth: Constructing a Labor Biography, Institute of Sociology, FCTAS RAS. doi: 10.19181/inab.2018.1 (in Russ.).

11. Ravenstein, E. 1885, The Laws of Migration, Journal of the Statistical Society of London, vol. 48, no. 2, p. 167—235.

12. Thomas, D., Heberle, R., Hutchinson, E. et al. 1938, Research Memorandum on Migration Differentials, New York, Social Science Research Council.

13. Kashnitskiy, I. S., Mkrtchyan, N. V., Leshukov, O. V. 2016, Interregional migration of youth in Russia: a comprehensive analysis of demographic statistics, Voprosy obrazovaniya [Educational issues], no. 3, p. 169—203. doi: 10.17323/1814-9545-2016-3-169-203 (in Russ).

14. Karachurina, L. B., Mkrtchyan, N. V. 2017, Internal long-term migration of the population in Russia and other countries, Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 5. Geografiya [Moscow University Bulletin. Series 5. Geography], no. 2, p. 74—80 (in Russ.).

15. Lee, E. S. 1966, A theory of migration, Demography, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 47—57.

16. Rogers, A., Castro, L. 1981, Model migration schedules, II ASA, Laxenburg.

17. Sokolov, N., Rekhtina, L. 2018, From youth migration to migration of the elderly: paradoxes of aging of the host society, Zhurnal issledovanii sotsial’noi politiki [Journal of Social Policy Research], vol. 16, no. 1, p. 51—66. doi: 10.17323/727-0634-2018-16-1-51-66 (in Russ.)

18. Balakina, G. F., Anaiban, Z. V. 2016, Features of ethno-regional migration in Tuva, Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological research], no. 10, p. 85—92 (in Russ.).

19. Helmer, E. 2017, Mutations of a modern myth: how changing discourses of migration, patriotism, and personhood shape migration narratives of foreign-language students from Pskov, 1991—2015, Laboratorium, no. 1 (9), p. 82—109.

20. Simonyan, R. Kh. 2017, Migration attitudes of Russian youth: a regional aspect, Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny [Opinion Monitoring: Economic and Social Change], no. 6, p. 313—326. doi: 10.14515/monitoring.2017.6.16 (in Russ.).

21. Fielding, A. J. Data, Inter-Regional Migration and Social Change: A Study of South East England Based upon from the Longitudinal Study, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, no. 14 (1), p. 24—36.

22. Stark, O. 2005, Inequality and migration: A behavioral link, available at: http://irihs.ihs.ac.at/1664/1/es-178.pdf (accessed 16.04.2020).

23. Jenes, B. 2012, Theoretical and practical issues in measuring country image dimensions and measurement model of country image and country brand, Ph.D. dissertation, Budapest, Cornivus University of Budapest Doctoral School of Business and Management.

24. Choi, S., Cai, L. 2016, Dimensionality and associations of country and destination images and visitor intention, Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, no. 12, p. 268—284. doi: 10.1057/s41254-016-0004-z.

25. Loginova L. V. The. 2016, Formation of the migration attractiveness of the region in the context of a decrease in the number of labor resources, Vestnik Saratovskoi gosudarstvennoi yuridicheskoi akademii [Bulletin of the Saratov State Law Academy], no. 6, p. 203—211 (in Russ.).

26. Ivanova, N. A., Kuteinikov, A. E. 2015, Outbound migration of residents of the Magadan region, Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological research], no. 9, p. 80—85 (in Russ.).

27. Taranova, Yu. V. 2010, Traditional and new media in regional image-making in the information network society, Izvestiya Altaiskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of Altai State University], no. 4—1 (68), p. 309—312 (in Russ.).

28. Vdovina, E. L., Kruglova, A. V. 2009, Assessment of the migration attractiveness of the depressed regions of Central Russia, Izvestiya Penzenskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. V. G. Belinskogo [Izvestia of the Penza State Pedagogical University. V. G. Belinsky], no. 18, p. 105—110 (in Russ.).

29. Lu, I. R. R., Kwan, E., Heslop, L. A., Thomas, D. R., Cedzynski, M. 2019, The ivory tower and the street: How researchers defined country image over four decades and what consumers think it means, Journal of Business Research, no. 105, p. 80—97. doi: 10.1016/j. jbusres.2019.07.030.

30. Napalkova, I. G., Kurochkina, K. V. 2018, Image of the region: specificity, basic elements and design technologies, Ekonomicheskaya istoriya [Economic history], no. 4 (14), p. 404—413. doi: 10.15507/2409-630X.043.014.201804.414-429 (in Russ.).

31. Galinskaya, T. N. 2013, The concept of a media image and the problem of its reconstruction in modern linguistics, Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Orenburg State University], no. 11, p. 91—94 (in Russ.).

32. Nim, E. G. 2013, Media image of territories: sociological analysis, Filosofiya sotsial’nykh kommunikatsii [Philosophy of Social Communication], no. 3 (24), p. 119—125 (in Russ.).

33. Radaev, V. V. 2019, Millenialy: kak menyaetsya rossiiskoe obshchestvo [Millennials: how Russian society is changing], Moscow, 224 p. (in Russ.).

34. Mannheim, K. 2000, Ocherki sotsiologii znaniya: problema pokolenii — sostyazatel’nost’ — ekonomicheskie ambitsii [Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge: the Problem of Generations — Competitiveness — Economic Ambitions], Moscow, 164 p. (in Russ.).

35. Schekoturov, A. V., Vinokurov, V. V. 2020, Outpost or region of international cooperation: how the images of the Kaliningrad region in the Russian media changed in 2014—2018, Mediascope, no. 3. doi: 10.30547/mediascope.3.2020.3 (in Russ.).

36. Zimovina, E. P., Krishtal, M. I., Shchekoturov, A. V. 2020, Mobility and migration intentions of the Reform Generation and Millennials of the Kaliningrad region, IKBFU’s Vestnik. Humanities and social science, no. 2, p. 86—105 (in Russ.).

37. Zadorin, I. V. 2018, Regions of the “frontier”: territorial identity and perception of “specialness”, Politiya, no. 2, p. 102—136. doi: 10.30570/2078-5089-2018-89-2-102-136 (in Russ.).