The Baltic Region

2021 Vol. 13 №2

Back to the list Download an article

Developing geotourism with a focus on geoheritage in a transboundary region: the case of the Curonian Spit, a UNESCO site

DOI
10.5922/2079-8555-2021-2-6
Pages
112-128

Abstract

Recreation in protected areas (PAs) has received special attention amid international travel restrictions. The conflict between the conservation and economic use of these territories is increasing. This work aims to find ways to optimise and modernise environmental outreach and recreation in national parks as a type of PAs. Geotourism is viewed here as a sustainable form of tourism bridging the gap between conservation and recreation. Several objectives have been attained to fulfil this aim. The first one was the analysis of the best practices of geotourism development in Pas; the second one was measuring the resource potential for diversifying ecotourism events in PAs; the third objective was designing an algorithm for creating a geological heritage-focused eco-trail, an innovative recreation product aimed at environmental education and community outreach. The authors view the methodology for geo-tour design as an example of heritage preservation and propose a new tourist trail — the Geological and Geomorphological Chronicle of the Baltic Sea. This tour acquaints sightseers with the nature of the Curonian Spit National Park, a unique geological and geomorphological feature whose landscapes are a product of centuries-long human-nature interactions. Twenty years ago, in 2000, the conservation area was listed by UNESCO as a place of considerable natural significance. The field studies were carried out as part of the international project Ecotour4Natur: Ecotourism as a Tool for the Preservation of Natural and Cultural Heritage within the Lithuania-Russia Cross-border Cooperation Programme 2014—2020. The developed algorithm for eco-trail design may benefit other national parks as well.

Reference

1. Hose, T. A. 2011, The English Origins of Geotourism (as a Vehicle for Geoconservation) and Their Relevance to Current Studies, Acta geographica Slovenica, vol. 51, no. 2, p. 343—359.

2. Hose, T. A. 2012, Editorial: Geotourism and Geoconservation, Geoheritage, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 1—5.

3. Hose, T. A., Marković, S. B., Komac, B., Zorn, M. 2011, Geotourism — a short introduction, Acta geographica Slovenica, vol. 51, no. 2, p. 339—342.

4. Gray, M. 2004, Geodiversity. Valuing and Conserving Abiotic Nature, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, available at: https://geoduma.files.wordpress.com/2010/02/geodiversity.pdf (accessed 10.03.2021).

5. Gordon, J. E. 2018, Geoheritage, Geotourism and the Cultural Landscape: Enhancing the Visitor Experience and Promoting Geoconservation, Geosciences, vol. 8, no. 4, p. 136. doi: https://doi. org/10.3390/geosciences8040136.

6. Dowling, R. K. 2013, Global Geotourism — An Emerging Form of Sustainable Tourism, Czech journal of tourism, vol. 2, no. 2. doi: https://doi.org/10.2478/cjot-2013-0004.

7. Santangelo, N., Valente, E., 2020, Geoheritage and Geotourism Resources, Resources, vol. 9, no. 7, art. 80. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/resources9070080.

8. Justice, S. C. 2018, UNESCO Global Geoparks, Geotourism and Communication of the Earth Sciences: A Case Study in the Chablais UNESCO Global Geopark, France, Geosciences, vol. 8, no. 5, art. 149. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8050149.

9. Becerra-Ramírez, R., Gosálvez, R. U., Escobar, E., González, E., Serrano-Patón, M., Guevara, D. 2020, Characterization and Geotourist Resources of the Campo de Calatrava Volcanic Region (Ciudad Real, Castilla-La Mancha, Spain) to Develop a UNESCO Global Geopark Project, Geosciences, vol. 10, no. 11, art. 441. doi: doi. org/10.3390/geosciences10110441.

10. Zgłobicki, W., Kukiełka, S., Baran-Zgłobicka, B. 2020, Regional Geotourist Resources—Assessment and Management (A Case Study in SE Poland), Resources, vol. 9, no. 2, art. 18. doi: doi.org/10.3390/resources9020018.

11. Badiali, F., Ilieş, D., Castaldini, D. 2018, A tale of a city, through its urban landscape and cultural heritage in the heart of Europe: the case study of Oradea city (Romania), GeoJournal of Tourism and Geosites, Year XI, no. 1, vol. 21, p.88—102.

12. Chashina, B., Ramazanova, N., Atasoy, E., Berdenov, Zh., Ilieș, D. C. 2020, Natural recreation potential of the West Kazakhstan region of the Republic of Kazakhstan, GeoJournal of Tourism and Geosites, vol. 32, no. 4, p. 1355—1361. doi: https://doi.org/10.30892/gtg.32424-580.

13. Ardislamov, F. R. 2019, Geopark “Toratau”: geological heritage as an object of ecological tourism. In: Ardislamov, F. R., Lukashina, N. A., Tretyakova, E. A. (eds.) Trudy Kolskogo Nauchnogo Zentra RAN [Proceedings of the Kola Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences], vol. 10. no. 6—1, p. 25—32. doi: 10.25702/KSC.2307-5252.2019.6.003 (In Russ.).

14. Soboleva, N. P. 2006, Comprehensive assessment of natural and socio-economic conditions of the Altai Republic for the purposes of geotourism, Geographia i prirodnye resursy [Geography and nature, resources], no. 2, p. 131—136 (In Russ.)

15. Redkin, A. G., Otto, O. V. 2015, Geopark as a new direction of tourism development in the mountainous regions of the Altai Territory, Nauka i turism: strategii vzaimodeistvija [Science and tourism: interaction strategies], no. 4 (2), available at: https://cyberleninka. ru/article/n/geopark-kak-novoe-napravlenie-razvitiya-turizma-v-gornyh-rayonah-altayskogo-kraya (accessed 10.04.2021) (In Russ.).

16. Ruban, D. A. 2017, Unique centers of geodiversity in Russia: some organizational and legal issues. In: Ruban, D. A. (ed.) Sovremennye problemy prava, economiki i upravlenijz, no. 1 (4), p. 126—130 (In Russ.)

17. Ruban, D. A. 2021, Real and Promoted Aesthetic Properties of Geosites: New Empirical Evidence from SW Russia. In: Ruban, D. A., Yashalova, N. N. (eds.) Heritage, vol. 4, no 1. p. 160—170. doi 10.3390/heritage4010009.

18. Ruban, D. A. 2012, Geoconservation organizations and management support for their effective activities in the context of the paradigm of the use of specially protected natural areas, Vestnik Taganrogskogo institute upravlenija i economiki [Bulletin of the Taganrog Institute on management and economics], no. 1, p. 19—24 (In Russ.)

19. Shaplygina, T. V., Volkova, I. I. 2013, Natural and anthropogenic transformation of landscapes and relief of the Curonian and Vistula spits, Geomorphologia [Geomorphology], no. 1, p. 95—103 (In Russ.).

20. Shaplygina, T. V., Volkova I. I. 2017, Geoecological aspects of recreational nature management in the Curonian Spit National Park. In: Problemy prirodopolsovanija, sokhranenija bioraznoobrazija I kulturnogo nasledija na osobo okhranjaemykh prirodnykh territorijakh Rossii, Materials of the Russian Sientific and Practical Jubelee conference, devoted to the 30th yeas Jubelee of the National park “Kurshskaja kosa/Curonian spit”, p. 128—134 (In Russ).

21. Kropinova, E. G. 2017, The Reduction in the Beach Area as the Main Limiting Factor for Sustainable Tourism Development (Case for the Kaliningrad Oblast). In: Gritsenko, V. A., Sivkov, V. V., Yurov, A. V., Kostianoy, A. G. (eds.) Terrestrial and Inland Water Environment of the Kaliningrad Region. The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry, vol 65, Springer, Cham. doi: doi.org/10.1007/698_2017_113.

22. Spiriajevas, E., Perminas, K., Locaitienė, V. 2020, Laivybos kliūčių šalinimo Kuršių mariose galimybių studija [Feasibility study for the removal of shipping barriers in the Curonian Lagoon], p. 190, available at: https://www.klaipedos-r.lt/index.php?2285236220) (accessed 10.04.2021) (In Lithuanian).

23. Gutak, J. M. 2014, Regional Geological Heritage. In: Tiess, G., Majumder, T., Cameron, P. (eds.) Encyclopedia of Mineral and Energy Policy, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. doi: doi. org/10.1007/978-3-642-40871-7_10-1.

24. Vaitkevičius, V., Baltrūnas, V. 2009, Lietuva: 101 įdomiausia vieta, [Lithuania: 101 most interesting places], Alma littera, p.313.

25. Kilkus, K., Stonevičius, E. 2011, Lietuvos vandenų geografija [Geography of Lithuanian waters], VU, p. 184.

26. Zhukovskaya, I. P., Kharin, G. S. Curonian spit — geological phenomena, Samarskaja Luka: problem regionalnoj i globalnoj ecologii, vol. 18, no. 4, p. 60—69, available at: https://www. elibrary. ru/download/elibrary_18075030_69281899.pdf (accessed 10.04.2021) (In Russ.).

27. Burnashov, E. M., Karmanov, K. B. 2016, Deflation processes at the marine coast of the Curonian spit, Uchenye zapiski Rossijskogo gosudarstvennogo gidrometeo university [Scientific Notes of the Russian State Hydrometeorological University], no. 45, p. 180—191, available at: http://www.rshu. ru/university/notes/archive/issue45/uz45-180-191.pdf (accessed 10.04.2021) (In Russ.).

28. Zotova, M. V., Sebentsov, A. B. 2017, Tourism and cultural heritage of the Kaliningrad region: ways and prospects of development. In: V focuse naslediyz [Focus on heritage], Collection of articles dedicated to the 80th anniversary of Yu. A. Vedenin and the 25th anniversary of the creation of the Russian Research Institute for Cultural and Natural Heritage named after D. S. Likhachev, Moscow, Federal State Budgetary Institution of Science Institute of Geography of the Russian Academy of Sciences, p. 478—488.