The Baltic Region

2019 Vol. 11 № 3

Back to the list Download an article

New stage in the development of political science in Russia

Pages
161-166

Reference

1. Gaman-Golutvina, O. V., Nikitin, A. I. (Ex. ed.) 2019, Sovremennaya politicheskaya nauka: Metodologiya [Contemporary Political Science: Methodology], Moscow (in Russ.).
2. Beck, N. 2000, Political Methodology: A Welcoming Discipline, Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 95, no. 450, p. 651—654.
3. King, G. 1991, On Political Methodology, Political Analysis, no. 2, p. 1—30, available at: https://gking.harvard.edu/files/gking/files/polmeth. pdf (accessed 21.06.2019).
4. Achen, C. 2002, Toward a New Political Methodology: Microfoundations and ART, Annual Review of Political Science, no. 5, p. 423—450.
5. King, G., Keohane, R. O., Verba, S. 1994, Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research, Princeton University Press, available at: http://assets. press. princeton. edu/chapters/p5458.pdf (accessed 20.06.2019).
6. Roberts, M. E. 2018, What is Political Methodology? PS: Political Science and Politics, Vol. 51, no. 3, p. 597—601. Doi: https://doi.org/1017/S1049096518000537.
7. Hay, C. 2002, Political Analysis: A Critical Introduction, McMillan International Higher Education.
8. Gaman-Golutvina, O. V. 2016, Political science facing the challenges of modern politics. to the 60th anniversary of RPSA / SPSA, Polis. Political Studies, no. 1, p. 8—28. Doi: https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2016.01.02  (in Russ.).
9. King, G., Keohane, R. O., Verba, S. 1994, Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research, Princeton University Press, available at: http://assets.press.princeton.edu/chapters/p5458.pdf (accessed 20.06.2019).
10. Gaman-Golutvina, O. V. (ed.) 2015, Sravnitel’naya politologiya [Comparative Political Science], textbook, Moscow (in Russ.).
11. Brady, H. E., Collier, D., Box-Steffensmeier, J. M. 2011, Overview Of Political Methodology: Post-Behavioral Movements and Trends. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199604456.013.0048, available at: https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199604456.001.0001/oxfo rdhb-9780199604456-e-048 (accessed 23.06.2019).
12. Glynn, A. N., Ichino, N. 2015, Using Qualitative Information to Improve Causal Inference, American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 59, no. 4, p. 1055—1071.
13. Hollyer, J. R., Rosendorff, P. B., Vreeland, J. R. 2014, Measuring Transparency, Political Analysis, Vol. 22, no. 4, p. 413—434.
14. Mahoney, J., Thelen, K. 2015, Advances in Comparative-Historical Analysis, Cambridge University Press.
15. Shames, S. L., Wise, T. 2017, Gender, Diversity, and Methods in Political Science: A Theory of Selection and Survival Biases, PS: Political Science & Politics, Vol. 50, no. 3, p. 811—823.
16. Gaman-Golutvina, O. 2007, Political Elites in the Commonwealth of Independent States: Recruitment and Rotation Tendencies, Comparative Sociology, Vol. 6, no. 1—2. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/156913307X208140.
17. Gaman-Golutvina, O. 2008, The Changing Role of the State and State Bureaucracy in the Context of Public Administration Reforms: Russian and Foreign Experience, Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, Vol. 24, no. 1, p. 37—53. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13523270701840449.
18. Monroe, K. R. (ed.) 2005, Perestroika! The Raucous Rebellion in Political Science,Yale Univer­sity Press.
19. Miller, A. H., Tien, C., Peebler, A. A. 1996, The American Political Science Review Hall of Fame: Assessments and Implications for an Evolving Discipline, PS: Political Science & Politics, Vol. 29, no. 1, p. 73—83. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/420198.
20. Thies, C. G., Hogan, R. E. 2005, The State of Undergraduate Research Methods Training in Political Science, PS: Political Science & Politics, Vol. 38, no. 2, p. 293—297. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096505056519.