When and why regional clusters become basic building blocks of modern economy :: IKBFU's united scientific journal editorial office


Forgot your password?
Login As
You can log in if you are registered at one of these services:
There is only one science. Two sciences are impossible as two universes are
Alexander Herzen

DOI-generator Search by DOI on Crossref.org

When and why regional clusters become basic building blocks of modern economy

Author Smorodinskaya N. V., Katukov D. D.
DOI 10.5922/2079-8555-2019-3-4
Pages 61-91
Article Download
Keywords innovation clusters, cluster initiatives, collaboration, innovation ecosystems, triple helix model, complex adaptive systems, global value chains
Abstract (summary) In this paper, we examine the modern cluster theory and the specific features of regional innovation clusters as complex adaptive systems. Clusters have become a typical pattern of industrial organization in national economies under their transition to innovation-driven model of growth. We provide an overview of the contribution of various theoretical frameworks (evolutionary theory, spatial development theory, theory of technological change and system innovation, and Porter’s competitiveness theory) to the cluster concept and consider the latter from the perspective of complexity economics. On this basis, we differentiate true clusters from their nominal counterparts and propose three analytical dimensions to explore clusters, namely, as a special class of industrial agglomerations, as a special class of innovation ecosystems, and as a special class of economic projects (cluster initiatives). We examine the properties of clusters corresponding to each class and demonstrate their role in the geographical and functional fragmentation of production, in the integration of local exporters into global value chains, and in bridging communication gaps and developing collaboration among economic agents. We show that clusters occupy a central place among various types of business networks and have a comparative edge making them key building blocks of the modern industrial landscape. Further, we explain how the innovation capacity of clusters is affected by network synergy effects arising from the triple-helix pattern of collaboration among their participants. Finally, we draw conclusions regarding national cluster supporting policies, including those applied in modern Russia.
References 1. Smorodinskaya, N. V. 2015, Globalizirovannaya ekonomika: Ot ierarkhiy k setevomu ukladu [Globalized economy: From hierarchies to a network order], Moscow, Institute of Economics RAS (In Russ.).
2. Smorodinskaya, N. V., Katukov, D. D. 2017, Dispersed model of production and smart agenda of national economic strategies, Ekonomicheskaya politika [Economic Policy], Vol. 12, no. 6, p. 72—101. Doi: https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2017-6-04b (In Russ.).
3. Baldwin, R. E. 2016, The great convergence: Information technology and the new globalization, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.
4. Russell, M. G., Smorodinskaya, N. V. 2018, Leveraging complexity for ecosystemic innovation, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, no. 136, p. 114—131. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.11.024.
5. Porter, M. E. 1990, The competitive advantage of nations, New York, NY, Free Press.
6. Sedita, S. R., Caloffi, A., Lazzeretti, L. 2018, The invisible college of cluster research: A bibliometric core-periphery analysis of the literature, Industry and Innovation, Vol. 22, no. 2, p. 1—23. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2018.1538872.
7. Becattini, G. 1990, The Marshallian industrial district as a socio-economic notion. In: Pyke, F., Becattini, G., Sengenberger, W. (eds.) Industrial districts and inter-firm co-operation in Italy, Geneva, International Institute for Labour Studies, p. 37—51.
8. Williamson, O. E. 1973, Markets and hierarchies: Some elementary considerations, American Economic Review, Vol. 63, no. 2, p. 316—325.
9. Lazzeretti, L., Sedita, S. R., Caloffi, A. 2014, Founders and disseminators of cluster research, Journal of Economic Geography, Vol. 14, no. 1, p. 21—43. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbs053.
10. Schumpeter, J. A. 1942, Capitalism, socialism, and democracy, New York, NY, Harper & Brothers.
11. Saxenian, A. 1994, Regional advantage: Culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.
12. Scott, A. J. 1988, New industrial spaces: Flexible production organization and regional development in North America and Western Europe, London, Pion.
13. Martin, R., Sunley, P. 2003, Deconstructing clusters: Chaotic concept or policy panacea? Journal of Economic Geography, Vol. 3, no. 1, p. 5—35. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/3.1.5.
14. Hospers, G.-J., Desrochers, P., Sautet, F. 2009, The next Silicon Valley?: On the relationship between geographical clustering and public policy, International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Vol. 5, no. 3, p. 285—299. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-008-0080-5.
15. Brakman, S., van Marrewijk, C. 2013, Reflections on cluster policies, Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Vol. 6, no. 2, p. 217—231. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rst001.
16. Zemtsov, S. P., Barinova, V. A., Pankratov, A. A., Kutsenko, E. S. 2016, Potential high-tech clusters in Russian regions: From current policy to new growth areas, Forsait [Foresight], Vol. 10, no. 3, p. 34—52. Doi: https://doi.org/10.17323/1995—459X.2016.3.34.52 (In Russ.).
17. Kutsenko, E. S., Abashkin, V. L., Fiyaksel, E. A., Islankina, E. A. 2017, A decade of cluster policy in Russia: A comparative outlook, Innovatsii [Innovations], Vol. 230, no. 12, p. 46—58 (In Russ.).
18. Kutsenko, E. S., Abashkin, V. L., Islankina, E. A. 2019, Focusing regional industrial policy via sectorial specialization, Voprosy Ekonomiki [Economic issues], no. 5, p. 65—89. Doi: https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2019-5-65-89 (In Russ.).
19. Shastitko, A. E. 2009, Clusters as a Form of Spatial Organisation of Economic Acti­vity: Theory and Practical Observations, Balt. Reg, Vol. 1, no. 2, p. 7—25. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5922/2079-8555-2009-2-2.
20. Gareev, T. R. 2012, Clusters in the institutional perspective: on the theory and methodology of local socioeconomic development, Balt. Reg., Vol. 4, no. 3, p. 4—24. Doi: https://doi.org/ 10.5922/2079-8555-2012-3-1.
21. Markov, L. S. 2015, Teoretiko-metodologicheskie osnovy klasternogo podhoda [Theoretical and methodological foundations of cluster approach], Novosibirsk, IEIE SB RAS (In Russ.).
22. Martin, R., Sunley, P. 2007, Complexity thinking and evolutionary economic geography, Journal of Economic Geography, Vol. 7, no. 5, p. 573—601. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbm019.
23. Granovetter, M. 1985, Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 91, no. 3, p. 481—510. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/228311.
24. Iammarino, S., McCann, P. 2006, The structure and evolution of industrial clusters: Transactions, technology and knowledge spillovers, Research Policy, Vol. 35, no. 7, p. 1018—1036. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.05.004.
25. Menzel, M.-P., Fornahl, D. 2010, Cluster life cycles: Dimensions and rationales of cluster evolution, Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 19, no. 1, p. 205—238. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtp036.
26. Ter Wal, A. L., Boschma, R. A. 2011, Co-evolution of firms, industries and networks in space, Regional Studies, Vol. 45, no. 7, p. 919—933. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400802662658.
27. Frenken, K., Boschma, R. A. 2007, A theoretical framework for evolutionary economic geography: Industrial dynamics and urban growth as a branching process, Journal of Economic Geography, Vol. 7, no. 5, p. 635—649. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbm018.
28. Krugman, P. 1991, Increasing returns and economic geography, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 99, no. 3, p. 483—499. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/261763.
29. Fujita, M., Krugman, P., Venables, A. J. 1999, The spatial economy: Cities, regions, and international trade, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
30. Krugman, P. 2011, The New economic geography, now middle-aged, Regional Studies, Vol. 45, no. 1, p. 1—7. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2011.537127.
31. Neffke, F., Henning, M., Boschma, R. A., Lundquist, K.-J., Olander, L.-O. 2011, The dynamics of agglomeration externalities along the life cycle of industries, Regional Studies, Vol. 45, no. 1, p. 49—65. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343401003596307.
32. Braczyk, H.-J., Cooke, P., Heidenreich, M. (eds.) 1998, Regional innovation systems: The role of governances in a globalized world, London, UCL Press.
33. Asheim, B. T., Gertler, M. S. 2005, The geography of innovation: Regional innovation systems. In: Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D. C., Nelson, R. R. (eds.) The Oxford handbook of innovation, Oxford, Oxford University Press, p. 291—317.
34. Boschma, R. A., Frenken, K. 2011, The emerging empirics of evolutionary economic geography, Journal of Economic Geography, Vol. 11, no. 2, p. 295—307. Doi: https://doi.org/ 1010.1093/jeg/lbq053.
35. Trippl, M., Bergman, E. M. 2014, Clusters, local districts, and innovative milieu. In: Fischer, M. M., Nijkamp, P. (eds.) Handbook of regional science, Berlin, Springer, p. 439—456.
36. Cooke, P. 2014, Systems of innovation and the learning region. In: Fischer, M. M., Nijkamp, P. (eds.) Handbook of regional science, Berlin, Springer, p. 457—474.
37. Porter, M. E. 2000, Location, competition, and economic development: Local clusters in a global economy, Economic Development Quarterly, Vol. 14, no. 1, p. 15—34. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/089124240001400105.
38. Malerba, F. (ed.) 2004, Sectoral systems of innovation: Concepts, issues and analyses of six major sectors in Europe, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
39. Edquist, C. (ed.) 1997, Systems of innovation: Technologies, institutions and organizations, London, Pinter.
40. Muro, M., Katz, B. 2011, The new “cluster moment”: How regional innovation clusters can foster the next economy. In: Libecap, G. D., Hoskinson, S. (eds.) Entrepreneurship and global competitiveness in regional economies: Determinants and policy implications, Bingley, Emerald, p. 93—140.
41. Wessner, C. W. 2005, Entrepreneurship and the innovation ecosystem policy lessons from the United States. In: Audretsch, D. B., Grimm, H., Wessner, C. W. (eds.) Local heroes in the global village: Globalization and the new entrepreneurship policies, New York, NY, Springer, p. 67—89.
42. Carayannis, E. G., Campbell, D. F. 2009, ‘Mode 3’ and ‘Quadruple Helix’: Toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem, International Journal of Technology Management, Vol. 46, no. ¾, p. 201—234. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2009.023374.
43. Smorodinskaya, N. V., Russell, M. G., Katukov, D. D., Still, K. 2017, Innovation ecosys­tems vs. innovation systems in terms of collaboration and co-creation of value. Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/41798 (accessed: 12.12.2018).
44. Jacobides, M. G., Cennamo, C., Gawer, A. 2018, Towards a theory of ecosystems, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 39, no. 8, p. 2255—2276. Doi: https://doi.org/1010.1002/smj.2904.
45. European Commission 2019, Cluster programmes in Europe and beyond, Luxembourg, Publications Office of the European Union.
46. Nallari, R., Griffith, B. 2013, Clusters of competitiveness, Washington, DC, World Bank.
47. Bergenholtz, C., Waldstrøm, C. 2011, Inter-organizational network studies: A literature review, Industry and Innovation, Vol. 18, no. 6, p. 539—562. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2011.591966.
48. Powell, W. W., Grodal, S. 2005, Networks of innovators. In: Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D. C., Nelson, R. R. (eds.) The Oxford handbook of innovation, Oxford, Oxford University Press, p. 56—85.
49. Huggins, R., Johnston, A., Thompson, P. 2012, Network capital, social capital and knowledge flow: How the nature of inter-organizational networks impacts on innovation, Industry and Innovation, Vol. 19, no. 3, p. 203—232. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2012.669615.
50. Ketels, C. H. 2011, Clusters and competitiveness: Porter’s contribution. In: Huggins, R., Izushi, H. (eds.) Competition, competitive advantage, and clusters: The ideas of Michael Porter, Oxford, Oxford University Press, p. 173—191.
51. Porter, M. E. 1998, On competition, Boston, MA, Harvard Business School Press.
52. Porter, M. E., Delgado, M., Ketels, C. H., Stern, S. 2008, Moving to a new Global competitiveness index. In: Porter, M. E., Schwab, K. (eds.) The global competitiveness report 2008—2009, Geneva, World Economic Forum, p. 43—63.
53. Smorodinskaya, N. V., Malygin, V. E., Katukov, D. D. 2015, Kak ukrepit konkurentospo­sob­nost v usloviyakh globalnykh vyzovov: Klasternyy podkhod [How to upgrade competitiveness under the global challenges: The cluster approach], Moscow, Institute of Economics RAS (In Russ.).
54. Porter, M. E. 2003, The economic performance of regions, Regional Studies, Vol. 37, no. 6—7, p. 549—578. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340032000108688.
55. Delgado, M., Porter, M. E., Stern, S. 2016, Defining clusters of related industries, Journal of Economic Geography, Vol. 16, no. 1, p. 1—38. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbv017.
56. Sölvell, Ö. 2009, Clusters: Balancing evolutionary and constructive forces, Stockholm, Ivory Tower.
57. Ketels, C. H. 2013, Recent research on competitiveness and clusters: What are the implications for regional policy? Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Vol. 6, no. 2, p. 269—284. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rst008.
58. Al-Suwailem, S. 2011, Behavioural complexity, Journal of Economic Surveys, Vol. 25, no. 3, p. 481—506. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2010.00657.x.
59. OECD 2017, Debate the issues: Complexity and policy making, Paris, OECD Publishing.
60. Smorodinskaya, N. V. 2017, Growing organizational complexity of economic systems under non-linear development, Vestnik Instituta ekonomiki RAN [Bulletin of Intitute of Economics RAS], no. 5, p. 104—115 (In Russ.).
61. Rullani, E. 2002, The industrial cluster as a complex adaptive system. In: Quadrio Curzio, A., Fortis, M. (eds.) Complexity and industrial clusters: Dynamics and models in theory and practice, Heidelberg, Physica-Verlag, p. 35—61.
62. OECD 2013, Interconnected economies: Benefiting from global value chains, Paris, OECD Publishing.
63. Gereffi, G., Humphrey, J., Kaplinsky, R., Sturgeon, T. J. 2001, Introduction: Globalisation, value chains and development, IDS Bulletin, Vol. 32, no. 3, p. 1—8. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j. 1759—5436.2001.mp32003001.x.
64. Taglioni, D., Winkler, D. 2016, Making global value chains work for development, Washington, DC, World Bank.
65. Hausmann, R., Hidalgo, C. A., Bustos, S., Coscia, M., Simoes, A., Yildirim, M. A. 2013, The atlas of economic complexity: Mapping paths to prosperity, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
66. Ivanova, I. A., Smorodinskaya, N. V., Leydesdorff, L. 2019, On measuring complexity in a post-industrial economy: The ecosystem’s approach, Quality & Quantity. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135—019—00844—2.
67. Sturgeon, T. J. 2002, Modular production networks: A new American model of industrial organization, Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 11, no. 3, p. 451—496. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/11.3.451.
68. Delgado, M. 2018, Firms in context: Internal and external drivers of success. In: Clark, G. L., Feldman, M. P., Gertler, M. S., Wójcik, D. (eds.) The new Oxford handbook of economic geography, Oxford, Oxford University Press, p. 324—344.
69. Lindqvist, G. 2009, Disentangling clusters: Agglomeration and proximity effects, Stockholm, Stockholm School of Economics.
70. Litzel, N. 2017, Does embeddedness in clusters enhance firm survival and growth?: An establishment-level analysis using CORIS data, Regional Studies, Vol. 51, no. 4, p. 563—574. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2015.1115009.
71. McDermott, G., Mudambi, R., Parente, R. 2013, Strategic modularity and the architecture of multinational firm, Global Strategy Journal, Vol. 3, no. 1, p. 1—7. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042—5805.2012.01051.x.
72. Ketels, C. H., Memedovic, O. 2008, From clusters to cluster-based economic development, International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development, Vol. 1, no. 3, p. 375—392. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTLID.2008.019979.
73. Sölvell, Ö., Lindqvist, G., Ketels, C. H. 2003, The cluster initiative greenbook, Stockholm, Ivory Tower.
74. Ivanova, I. A., Leydesdorff, L. 2014, Rotational symmetry and the transformation of innovation systems in a triple helix of university–industry–government relations, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, no. 86, p. 143—156. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.08.022.
75. Nieto, M. J., Santamaría, L. 2007, The importance of diverse collaborative networks for the novelty of product innovation, Technovation, Vol. 27, no. 6—7, p. 367—377. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2006.10.001.
76. Tsai, K.-H. 2009, Collaborative networks and product innovation performance: Toward a contingency perspective, Research Policy, Vol. 38, no. 5, p. 765—778. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.12.012.
77. West, J., Bogers, M. 2014, Leveraging external sources of innovation: A review of research on open innovation, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 31, no. 4, p. 814—831. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12125.
78. Plechero, M., Chaminade, C. 2016, Spatial distribution of innovation networks, technological competencies and degree of novelty in emerging economy firms, European Planning Studies, vol. 24, no. 6, p. 1056—1078. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2016.1151481.
79. Camarihna-Matos, L. M., Afsarmanesh, H. 2008, Concept of collaboration. In: Putnik, G. D., Cruz-Cunha, M. M. (eds.) Encyclopedia of networked and virtual organizations, Hershey, PA, IGI Global, p. 311—315.
80. Ritala, P., Almpanopoulou, A. 2017, In defense of ‘eco’ in innovation ecosystem, Technovation, no. 60—61, p. 39—42. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2017.01.004.
81. Tsujimoto, M., Kajikawa, Y., Tomita, J., Matsumoto, Y. 2018, A review of the ecosystem concept: Towards coherent ecosystem design, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, no. 136, p. 49—58. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.06.032.
82. Etzkowitz, H., Leydesdorff, L. 2000, The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and “Mode 2” to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations, Research Policy, Vol. 29, no. 2, p. 109—123. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048—7333 (99) 00055—4.
83. Leydesdorff, L. 2010, The knowledge-based economy and the triple helix model, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, Vol. 44, no. 1, p. 365—417. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.2010.1440440116.
84. Porter, M. E., Ketels, C. H. 2009, Clusters and industrial districts: Common roots, different perspectives. In: Becattini, G., Bellandi, M., de Propis, L. (eds.) A handbook of industrial districts, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, p. 172—183.
85. Napier, G., Kethelz, S. 2014, The welfare technological ecosystem in the region of Southern Denmark, Copenhagen, REG X.
86. European Committee of the Regions 2011, Clusters and clustering policy: A guide for regional and local policy makers, Brussels, European Commission.
87. Lindqvist, G., Ketels, C. H., Sölvell, Ö. 2013, The cluster initiative greenbook 2.0, Stockholm, Ivory Tower.
88. OECD 2013, Regions and innovation: Collaborating across borders, Paris, OECD Publishing.
89. Kidd, P. T. 2008, Agile holonic network organizations. In: Putnik, G. D., Cruz-Cunha, M. M. (eds.) Encyclopedia of networked and virtual organizations, Hershey, PA, IGI Global, p. 35—42.
90. Sölvell, Ö., Williams, M. 2013, Building the cluster commons: An evaluation of 12 cluster organizations in Sweden 2005—2012, Stockholm, Ivory Tower.
91. Katukov, D. D. 2014, Cluster initiative as a special economic project: European and Russian practices, Innovatsii [Innovations], Vol. 189, no. 7, p. 47—52 (In Russ.).
92. Storper, M., Kemeny, T., Makarem, N., Osman, T. 2015, The rise and fall of urban economies: Lessons from San Francisco and Los Angeles, Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press.
93. Calignano, G., Fitjar, R. D., Kogler, D. F. 2018, The core in the periphery?: The cluster organization as the central node in the Apulian aerospace district, Regional Studies, Vol. 52, no. 11, p. 1490—1501. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2017.1420155.
94. Turkina, E., Oreshkin, B., Kali, R. 2019, Regional innovation clusters and firm innovation performance: An interactionist approach, Regional Studies, Vol. 80, no. 7, p. 1—14. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1566697.
95. Ketels, C. H. 2013, Cluster policy: A guide to the state of the debate. In: Meusburger, P., Glückler, J., el Meskioui, M. (eds.) Knowledge and the economy, Dordrecht, Springer, p. 249—269.
96. Audretsch, D. B., Lehmann, E. E., Menter, M., Seitz, N. 2018, Public cluster policy and firm performance: Evaluating spillover effects across industries, Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Vol. 31, no. 1—2, p. 150—165. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2018.1537153.

Back to the section