Economic and geopolitical aspects of the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline :: IKBFU's united scientific journal editorial office


Forgot your password?
Login As
You can log in if you are registered at one of these services:
There are no complicated sciences, there are only complicated interpretations
Alexader Herzen

DOI-generator Search by DOI on

Economic and geopolitical aspects of the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline

Author Zhiznin S. Z., Timokhov V. M.
DOI 10.5922/2079-8555-2019-3-2
Pages 25-42
Article Download
Keywords Nord Stream 1, Nord Stream 2, third energy package, energy security, gas pipeline, NS 1, NS 2, geopolitical and economic factors
Abstract (summary) The Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline project (NS 2) along the bottom of the Baltic Sea is aimed to increase gas supply from Russia to Germany and other EU countries. It serves mutual economic interests: the predicted growth in gas demand in the EU markets and the need to strengthen the energy security of the EU. The implementation of the NS 2 project is complicated by the need to allow for the EU energy legislation and by the expanding influence of geopolitical factors on EU – Russia cooperation, including those stemming from the aggressive US energy diplomacy seeking to prevent the project from being successful and thus promoting the geopolitical interests of Washington. In this work, we aim to study the economic and geopolitical stances taken by the project’s supporters and opponents and to evaluate the prospects of NS 2. To this end, we carry out a factor analysis and employ the methods of economic, statistical and geopolitical analysis.We conclude that the project is high on the agenda of both EU-Russia economic relations and world politics. The project has good prospects despite counteraction from its geopolitical opponents. This is explained by it having a decided economic edge over alternative options for the EU. The launch of NS 2 may contribute both to providing the energy security of the EU and to easing the military tensions between NATO and Russia in the Baltic region. The need to ensure the reliable operation of gas supply infrastructure makes any military conflict in the region impossible.
References 1. Goldthau, A., Sitter, N. 2014, A liberal actor in a realist world? The Commission and the external dimension of the single market for energy, Journal of European Public Policy, no. 21 (10), p. 1452—1472.
2. Goldthau, A., Sitter, N. 2015, Soft power with a hard edge: EU policy tools and energy security, Review of International Political Economy, no. 22 (5), p. 941—965. Doi: 1080/09692290.2015.1008547.
3. Simonija, N. A., Torkunov, A. V. 2014, Energy Security of the EU and Russia, Polis. Politicheskie issledovanija [Polis. Political studies], no. 5, p. 9—19. Doi: (in Russ.).
4. Simonija, N. A., Torkunov, A. V. 2016, Influence of geopolitical factors on the state of international energy markets (for example, the United States), Polis. Politicheskie issledovanija [Polis. Political studies], no. 2, p. 38—48. Doi: (in Russ.).
5. Kravchenko, S. A., Salygin, V. I. 2015, Risks of energy security: the demand for humanistic geopolitics, Polis. Politicheskie issledovanija [Polis. Political studies], no. 5, p. 64—74. DOI: (in Russ.).
6. Simonija, N. A., Torkunov, A. V. 2018, Energy dimension of world politics. In: Gaman-Golutvinoy, O. V., Nikitin, A. I. (eds.) Sovremennaja politicheskaja nauka. Metodologija [Modern political science. Methodology], Moscow, p. 614—628 (In Russ.).
7. Zhiznin S. 2010, Russian energy diplomacy and international energy security (geopolitics and economics), Baltic Region, no. 1 (3), p. 7—17 (in Russ.).
8. Casier, T. 2011, The Rise of Energy to the Top of the EU-Russia Agenda: From Interdependence to Dependence? Geopolitics, Vol. 16 (3), р. 536—552.
9. Casier, T. 2010, The issue of energy security in relations between Russia and the European Union, European Security, Vol. 19 (4), р. 585—605.
10. Kaplan, R. 2016, Mest’ geografii. Chto mogut rasskazat’ geograficheskie karty o grjadushhih konfliktah i bitve protiv neizbezhnogo [The Revenge of Geography: What can geographical maps tell about future conflicts and beatve against the inevitable], Moscow, 384 р. (in Russ.).
11. Grigas, A. 2017, The New Geopolitics of Natural Gas, Cambridge MA (USA), Harvard University Pres, 416 p.
12. Ergin D. 2017, V poiskah jenergii: Resursnye vojny, novye tehnologii i budushhee jenergetiki [Resource Wars, New Technologies and the Future of Energy], Moscow, 720 p. (in Russ.).
13. Murgash, R. 2018, The state of relations in the field of energy between the European Union and the Russian Federation, Mirovaja politika [World Politics], no. 3, p. 31—32. (in Russ.).
14. Polak, P. 2017, The Trouble With Nord Stream 2 (How the Pipeline Would Benefit Russia at the EU’s Expense), Foreign Affairs Magazine, August 23, available at: http: (accessed 15.01.2019).
15. Little, A. D. 2017, Two new studies confirm the economic benefits of Nord Stream 2, Nord Stream 2, available at: novykh-issledovaniia-podtverzhdaiut-ekonomicheskuiu-vygodu-severnogo-potoka-2—16/ (acces­sed 25.10.2018) (in Russ.).
16. Teterev, M. 2017, Nord Stream 2: What stands in the way of implementing a project designed to improve Europe’s energy security, Valdai, International Discussion Club, available at: (accessed 20.09.2018) (In Russ.).
17. Belova, M. A., Kolbikova, E. S. 2017, Amerikanskij SPG na mirovyh rynkah: uspeh ili Fiasko? [American LNG in world markets: success or a fiasco?], Moscow, 24 p. (In Russ.).
18. Heshmati, A., Abolhosseini, S. 2017, European Energy Security: Challenges and Green Opportunities. In: The Political Economy of Clean Energy Transitions, Oxford, Oxford University Press, р. 292—313.
19. Pirani, S., Yafimava, K. 2016, Russian Gas Transit Across Ukraine Post-2019: pipeline scenarios, gas flow consequences, and regulatory constraints, Oxford, The Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, 75 p.
20. Bordoff, J. 2017, The American Energy Superpower (Why Dominance Is About More Than Just Production) Foreign Affairs, Foreign Affairs Magazine, July 6, available at: (accessed 20.09.2018)
21. Casier, T. 2018, The different faces of power in European Union–Russia relations, Cooperation and Conflict, Vol. 53, no. 1, р. 101—117.
22. Slobodian, N. 2016, Single Gas Market and Energy Security in The Visegrad States: Models, Challenges, Perspectives, Warsaw, The National Centre For Strategic Studies, 44 p.
23. Coote, B. 2018, Impact of Sanctions on Russia’s Energy Sector, Atlantic Council, available at: (accessed: 12.01.2019).
24. Skalamera, M. 2017, Energy Security in the Wake of the Ukraine Crisis: Getting the Real Threats Right. Global Policy Essay, MA (USA), Harvard University Publishing, р. 6—8.
25. Peker, E. 2017, EU Says It Can’t Block Russia Backed Nord Stream 2 Pipeline, The Wall Street Journal, available at: 15.01.2019).
26. Lough, J. 2016, The EU’s Tough Gas Game With Russia, Chatham House: International Affairs Think Tank, available at: https: (accessed: 31.10.2018).
27. Pigliuccim M. 2016, Russo-Ukrainian Gas War: The Lack of a Common Strategy Jeopardizes European Unity, Advances in Economics and Business, Vol. 4, no, 3, р. 124—131.
28. Motjashov, V. P. 2016, Gaz i geopolitika: shans Rossii [Gas and Geopolitics: Russia’s Chance], Moscow, p. 152 (in Russ.).
29. Murgash, R. 2017, Reverse of gas to Ukraine: the essence of the problem and its impact on international relations in the field of energy, Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta [Bulletin of MGIMO-University], no. 4 (55), p. 275—278 (in Russ.).
30. Zhiznin, S. Z., Timokhov, V. M. 2017, The impact of energy on sustainable development, Mirovaja ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnoshenija [World economy and international relations], Vol. 61, no. 11, p. 34—42 (In Russ.).
31. Zhiznin, S. Z., Timokhov, V. M. 2018, Environmental and economic aspects of methane emissions in the fuel and energy complex, Problemy ekonomiki i upravlenija neftegazovym kompleksom [Problems of economics and management of oil and gas complex], no. 3, p. 23—28 (In Russ.).

Back to the section