Tourism development in border areas: a benefit or a burden? The case of Karelia :: IKBFU's united scientific journal editorial office

×

Login
Password
Forgot your password?
Login As
You can log in if you are registered at one of these services:
   
Science is but an image of the truth
Francis Bacon

DOI-generator Search by DOI on Crossref.org

Tourism development in border areas: a benefit or a burden? The case of Karelia

Author Stepanova, S. V.
DOI 10.5922/2079-8555-2019-2-6
Pages 94-111
Article Download
Keywords borderlands, tourism, municipal districts, tourism infrastructure, tourist flow, road border crossing point, Republic of Karelia
Abstract (summary) Border regions are expected to benefit from their position when it comes to tourism de­velopment. In this article, I propose a new approach to interpreting the connection between an area’s proximity to the national border and the development of tourism at the municipal level. The aim of this study is to identify the strengths and limitations of borderlands as re­gards the development of tourism in seven municipalities of Karelia. I examine summarised data available from online and other resources, as well as my own observations. Using medi­an values, I rely on the method of content analysis of strategic documents on the development of cross-border municipalities of Karelia. My research focuses on the tourism and recreation potential of borderlands and analyses the development of local tourism infrastructure. I de­scribe the major types of tourism, examine tourist flows, and consider the strategic aspects of tourism at the municipal level. I identify the strengths and limitations of the development of tourism in border areas by comparing the data on border and inland municipalities of Kare­lia and investigate the role of international border crossing points in the development of tou­rism in borderlands.
References

1.  Matznetter, J. 1979, Border and tourism: fundamental relations, Tourism and borders: proceedings of the meeting of the IGU Working group: Geography of tourism and recreation, Frankfurt, p. 61¾73.

2.  Timothy, D. J. 2001, Tourism and political boundarie, London, Routlenge, 240 p.

3.  Więckowski, M. 2009, Development of the new tourist space in the Polish border­lands, Old and new borderlines, Frontiers, Margins — Pécs, Centre for regional studies, p. 89¾97.

4.  Prokkola, E.-K. 2010, Borders in tourism: the transformation of the Swedish-Finnish border landscape, Current Issues in tourism, Vol. 13, no. 3, p. 223¾238.

5.  Gelbman, A., Timothy, D. J. 2010, From hostile boundaries to tourist attractions, Cur­rent issues in tourism, Vol. 13, no. 3, p. 239―259.

6.  Aleksandrova, A. Yu., Stupina, O. G. 2014, Turistskoe regionovedenie: vliyanie re­gion­nal'noi integratsii na mirovoi tu-ristskii rynok [Tourist Regional Studies: The Impact of Regional Integration on the World Tourist Market], Мoscow, 176 p. (in Russ.).

7.  Nilson, J. H., Eskilsson, L., Ek, R. 2010, Creating cross-border destinations: Interreg Programmes and regionalization in the Baltic Sea area, Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, Vol. 10, no. 2, p. 153¾172.

8.  Kropinova, Е. G. 2013, Cooperation between Russia and the EU in the field of innova­tive development of tourism: the case of the Lithuania — Poland — Russia cross-border co­operation programme, Balt. Reg., no. 4, p. 48¾57. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5922/2079-8555-2013-4-5.

9.  Więckowski, M., Cerić, D. 2016, Evolving tourism on the Baltic Sea coast: perspec­tives on change in the Polish maritime borderland, Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, Vol. 16, no. 1, p. 98¾111.

10.  Kovács, I., Nagy, G. 2013, Tourism in peripheric regions ¾ the possibilities of the­ma­tic routes, Analele Universității din Oradea ¾ Seria Geografie, no. 2, p. 220¾228.

11.  Kropinova, E., Anokhin, A. 2014, The Development of New Trans-border Water Routes in the South-East Baltic: Methodology and Practice, Balt. Reg., no. 3, p. 121¾136. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5922/207985552014311.

12.  Tömöri, M. 2010, Investigating shopping tourism along the borders of Hungary — a theoretical perspective. GeoJournal of Tourism and Geosites, Vol. 6, no. 2, p. 202¾210.

13.  Makkonen, T. 2016, Cross-border shopping and tourism destination marketing: the case of Southern Jutland, Denmark, Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, Vol. 16, no. 1, p. 36¾50.

14.  Druzhinin, P. V., Razvitie ekonomiki prigranichnogo regiona v perekhodnyi period [The development of the economy of the border region in transition], Petrozavodsk, 245 p. (in Russ.).

15.  Russian Karelia in search of a new role, 1994, Joensuu, Karelian institute, University of Joensuu, 173 p.

16.  Shlyamin, V. A. 2002, Rossiya v «Severnom izmerenii» [Russia in the Northern Di­mension], Petrozavodsk, 188 p. (in Russ.).

17.  Gromov, V. V. 2003, Vozdeistvie turizma na razvitie regiona [Impact of tourism on the development of the region], Petrozavodsk, 187 p. (in Russ.).

18.  Upravlenie razvitiem turizma v regione. Opyt realizatsii strategii Res-publiki Kareli­ya [Management of tourism development in the region. Experience of implementing the strat­egy of the Republic of Karelia], 2008, Petrozavodsk, 227 p. (in Russ.).

19.  Morozova, T. V. 2006, Karelian model of cross-border cooperation and development of border local communities, Ekonomicheskaya nauka sovremennoi Rossii [Economic science of modern Russia], no. 1, p. 73¾89 (in Russ.).

20.  Shekov, V. A. 2015, Geological and mining-industrial heritage of Karelia Finland-Finland. Project of the Cross-Border Cooperation Program ENPI CBC «Karelia» KA 334 «Mining road», Trudy Karel'skogo nauchnogo tsentra RAN [Proceedings of the Karelian Re­search Center of RAS], no. 7, p. 205¾210 (in Russ.).

21.  Nenonen, J. K., Stepanova, S. V. 2018, Geological tourism development in the Finn­ish-Russian borderland: the case of the cross-border geological route "Mining Road", Acta Geoturistica, Vol. 9, no. 1, p. 23¾29.

22.  Makkonen, T., Williams, A., Weidenfeld, A., Kaisto, V. 2018, Cross-border know­led­ge transfer and innovation in the European neighbourhood: tourism cooperation at the Fin­nish-Russian border, Tourism management, Vol. 68, p. 140¾151.

23.  Shishkin, A. I., Petrova, N. V. 2013, Cross-border space for the development of rural tourism of the Republic of Karelia and Finland, Ekonomika i upravlenie [Economics and Management], no. 3 (89), p. 16¾20 (in Russ.).

24.  Artobolevskii, S. S. 2006, Border territories of the Russian Federation: what can a sta­te do? Rossiiskoe ekspertnoe obozrenie [Russian expert review], no. 4, p. 9¾11 (in Russ.).

25.  Mezhevich, N. M. 2006, Models of cross-border cooperation in Russia: experience of research of municipalities of the Pskov region, Rossiiskoe ekspertnoe obozrenie [Russian ex­pert review], no. 4 (18), p. 28—30 (in Russ.).

26.  Stepanova, S. 2014, Cross-border Tourism in the Russian Northwest: General Trends and Features of Development, Balt. Reg., no. 3, p. 109—120. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5922/ 2079-8555-2014-3-10.

27.  Osobo okhranyaemye prirodnye territorii Respubliki Kareliya [Specially Protected Natural Territories of the Republic of Karelia], 2017, Petrozavodsk, 432 p. (in Russ.).

28.  Freeman, A., Hogmander, Y. 2001, Strategiya razvitiya turizma dlya karel'skoi chas­ti Zelenogo poyasa: proekt TASIS [Tourism Development Strategy for the Karelian part of the Green Belt: TACIS project], Petrozavodsk, 141 p. (in Russ.).

29.  Titov, A. F., Butorin, A. A., Gromtsev, A. N., Ieshko, E. P., Kryshen, A. M., Saveliev, Yu. V. 2009, Green belt of Fennoscandia: state and development prospects // Trudy Ka­rel'skogo nauchnogo tsentra Rossiiskoi akademii nauk [Proceedings of the Karelian Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences], no. 2, p. 3¾11 (in Russ.).

30.  Stepanova, S. V., Shulepov, V. I. 2019, Way to assess the development of municipal tourism infrastructure, Journal of Applied Engineering Science, Vol. 17, no. 1, p. 87¾92.

31.  Bjorn, I. 2015, Border Province: the main features of the development of North Kare­lia after the Second World War, Studia Humanitatis Borealis, no. 2, p. 4¾16 (in Russ.).


Back to the section