From the Mediterranean to the Baltic: the problem of implementing the principle of solidarity in the EU area of immigration and asylum :: IKBFU's united scientific journal editorial office


Forgot your password?
Login As
You can log in if you are registered at one of these services:
There is only one science. Two sciences are impossible as two universes are
Alexander Herzen

DOI-generator Search by DOI on

From the Mediterranean to the Baltic: the problem of implementing the principle of solidarity in the EU area of immigration and asylum

Author Voynikov, V. V.
DOI 10.5922/2079-8555-2019-2-2
Pages 17-31
Article Download
Keywords migration crisis, principle of solidarity, refugee relocation system, migration policy, Dublin Regulation, refugees
Abstract (summary) The 2015 migration crisis significantly affected the EU’s area of freedom, security, and justice and challenged the cohesion and solidarity of the European Union. Although the crisis is past its peak, it is not over yet: problems and challenges associated with it persist. One of them is the lack of a common approach among member states to the implementation of the principle of solidarity in the EU area of immigration and asylum. This work aims to consider the legal and political aspects of the implementation of the principle of solidarity and fair sharing of responsibility in the area of immigration and asylum. This study relies on the works of Russian and international experts in European integration and European law and on the analysis of EU regulations. There are two dimensions to the implementation of the princi­ple of solidarity: the political and legal ones. The legal perspective provides certain clarity to the issue. According to the European Court of Justice, this principle is binding: it is capable of imposing the legal obligation of solidarity. However, as to the political perspective, mem­ber states have not been able to reach compromise. Although it is possible to introduce a permanent relocation mechanism using qualified majority voting, the Council usually seeks consensus. In this situation, the goal of the EU is not to ensure the right decision but rather to create conditions for it to be implemented by all the member states.

1.  Hailbronner, K., Thym, D. 2016, EU Immigration and Asylum Law. Commentary, 2th edition C. H. Beck/Hart/Nomos, 1638 p.

2.  Peers, S. 2016, EU Justice and Home Affairs Law: Forth edition. Volume I: EU Immi­gration and Asylum Law, Oxford University Press, 640 p.

3.  Pimor, A. 2017, Solidarity was a founding principle of European unity — it must re­main so, The Conversatiaon, available at: principle-of-european-unity-it-must-remain-so-74580 (accessed 15.03.2019).

4.  Lenaerts, K., Gutiérrez-Fons, J. A. 2011, The Role of General Principles of EU Law. In: Arnull, A., Barnard, C., Dougan, M., Spaventa E. (eds.) A Constitutional Order of States? Essays in EU Law in Honour of Alan Dashwood, Hart Publishing, p. 179—197.

5.  Sangiovanni, A. 2013, Solidarity in the European Union, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 33, no. 2, p. 213—241. doi:

6.  Balleix, C. 2016, What Type of Reform of the Common European Asylum Regime are we heading Toward? European Issue, no. 400, available at: en/european-issues/0400-what-type-of-reform-of-the-common-european-asylum-regime-are- we-heading-toward (accessed 15.03.2019).

7.  Egorova, E. N., Lyakh, K. A. 2018, Legal aspects of resolving the refugee crisis and the granting of asylum in the European Union, Migratsionnoe pravo [Migration law], no. 2, p. 19—22 (in Russ.).

8.  Lavenex, S. 2018, ‘Failing Forward’ Towards Which Europe? Organized Hypocrisy in the Common European Asylum System, JCMS, Vol. 56, no. 5. doi: jcms.12739, pp. 1195—1212.

9.  Chetverikov, A. O. 2018, Migratsionnoe pravo Evropeiskogo soyuza [European Union Migration Law], Moscow, 338 p. (in Russ.).

10.  Thym, D. 2016, The «refugee crisis» as a challenge of legal design and institutional legitimacy, Common Market Law Review, Vol. 53, no. 6, p. 1545—1573.

11.  Costello, C., Mouzourakis, M. 2016, The Common European Asylum System. In: Fletcher, M., Herlin-Karnell, E., Matera, C. (eds.) The European Union as an Area of Free­dom, Security and Justice, Routledge, p. 264—299.

12.  Thielemann, E. 2018, Why Refugee Burden-Sharing Initiatives Fail: Public Goods, Free-Riding and Symbolic Solidarity in the EU, JCMS, Vol. 56, no. 1, p. 63—82. doi: https://

13.  Trauner, F. 2016, Asylum policy: the EU’s ‘crises’ and the looming policy regime failure, Journal of European Integration, Vol. 38, no. 3, p. 311—325. doi: 1080/07036337.2016.1140756.

14.  Kaveshnikov, N. Yu. 2017, Institutional and political development of the EU: crisis and transformation options, Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya [World economy and international relations], Vol. 61, no. 5, p. 14—24 (in Russ.).

15.  Bisson, L. S. 2019, Migration again violates the unity of the European Union, Evro­peiskii Soyuz: fakty i kommentarii [European Union: Facts and Comments], no. 94, p. 60—64 (in Russ.).

16.  Peers, S. 2016, The Dublin Regulation: Is the End Nigh? Where should Unaccompanied Children Apply for Asylum? EU Law Analysis, 21 January, available at: http://eulawanalysis. (accessed 20.03.2019).

17.  Turkina, A.2017, Distribution of refugees by EU countries: the mechanism is legiti­mate, but states still disagree, Vsya Evropa [Whole europe], available at: http://alleuropalux. org/?p=15063 (accessed 20.03.2019) (in Russ.).

18.  Obradovic, D. 2017, Cases C-643 and C-647/15: Enforcing solidarity in EU migra­tion policy. The duty of solidarity between EU Member States, European Law Blog, available at: eu-migration-policy/ (accessed 15.03.2019).

19.  Schmälter, J. A. 2018, European response to non-compliance: the Commission’s en­forcement efforts and the Common European Asylum System, West European Politics, Vol. 41, no. 6, p. 1330—1353. doi:

20.  Küçük, E. 2016, The Principle of Solidarity and Fairness in Sharing Responsibility: More than Window Dressing? European Law Journal, Vol. 22, no. 4, p. 448—469. doi: https://

21.  Voinkov, V. V. 2017, Reform of European Union asylum legislation as a response to the migration crisis in Europe, Trudy instituta gosudarstva i prava RAN [Proceedings of the Institute of State and Law RAS], Vol. 12, no. 5, p. 149—169 (in Russ.).

22.  Radovic, M. L., Cuckovic, B. 2018, Dublin IV Regulation, the Solidarity Principle and Protection of Human Rights — Step(s) Forward or Backward, EU and Comparative Law Issues and Challenges Series, Vol. 2, p. 10—30. doi:

23.  Potemkina, O. Yu. 2018, «Compromise» decisions of the June summit on migration, Evropeiskii Soyuz: fakty i kommentarii [European Union: Facts and Comments], no. 93, p. 64—68 (in Russ.)

24.  Niemann, A., Zaun, N. 2018, EU Refugee Policies and Politics in Times of Crisis: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives, JCMS, Vol. 56, no. 1, p. 3—22. doi: 10.1111/jcms.12650.

25.  Potemkina, O. Yu. 2016, Visegrad Group and “Flexible Solidarity”, Sovremennaya Evropa [Modern europe], no. 6, p. 43—52. doi: (in Russ.).

26.  Potemkina, O. Yu., Gracheva, M. L. 2018, European Union: the migration crisis has passed — migration problems remain, Evropeiskii Soyuz: fakty i kommentarii [European Un­ion: Facts and Comments], no. 90, p. 32—35 (in Russ.).

27.  Menéndez, A. J. 2016, The Refugee Crisis: Between Human Tragedy and Symptom of the Structural Crisis of European Integration, European Law Journal, Vol. 22, no. 4, p. 388—416.

28.  Potemkina, O. Yu. 2018, Disputes over migration issues persist, Evropeiskii Soyuz: fakty i kommentarii [European Union: Facts and Comments], no. 92, p. 5—8 (in Russ.).

29.  Murray, P., Longo, M. 2018, Europe’s wicked legitimacy crisis: the case of refugees, Journal of European Integration, Vol. 40, no. 4, p. 411—425. doi: 07036337.2018.1436543.

30.  Vignon, J. 2011, Solidarity and responsibility in the European Union, Notre Europe, no. 26, available at: (accessed 21.03.2019).

Back to the section