Population Change in the Neighbouring Regions of Russia and the European Union States :: IKBFU's united scientific journal editorial office


Forgot your password?
Login As
You can log in if you are registered at one of these services:
There is only one science. Two sciences are impossible as two universes are
Alexander Herzen

DOI-generator Search by DOI on Crossref.org

Population Change in the Neighbouring Regions of Russia and the European Union States

Author Kuznetsova T. Yu.
DOI 10.5922/2079-8555-2018-3-3
Pages 41-57
Article Download
Keywords demographic situation, border regions, border cities, Russia, Baltics, Poland, Finland
Abstract (summary) In this article, I carry out a comparative analysis of population change in the bordering regions of Russia and the European Union. Peripheries of their countries, most of these regions enjoy a more or less favourable demographic situation, which, however, differs from place to place. To attain the aims of the study, I analyse official data from Russian and EU statistical offices and map the results obtained. I identify significant differences between border regions and cities. The most adverse demographic situation is observed in the borderlands of the Baltics, a slightly better one in Poland and Finland. As to Russia’s border regions, a population increase is characteristic of Saint Petersburg and the Leningrad and Kaliningrad regions. Yet, a number of cities in the immediate vicinity of the border face a population decline. The demographic situation could be improved by more active transboundary collaborations and by the border serving increasingly as a contact area rather than a barrier.
1. Fedorov, G. 2014, The Concept of Geo-Demographic Situation and Geo-Demographic
Typology of the Subjects of the Russian Federation, Bulletin of Geography, 25(25), 101—114. doi: 10.2478/bog-2014-0032.
2. Biermann, U., Stiller, S. 2013, Migration in the Baltic Sea Region in the Context of
Demographic Change, Journal of East-West Business, Vol. 19, no. 1—2, p. 105—121.
3. Hanell, T. 1998, Facts in Figures: The Baltic States and Northwest Russia at a Glance,
North, Vol. 9, no. 2—3, p. 10—16.
4. Kolosov, V. A. 2016, Cross-border Regionalization and Frontal Migration: European
Experience for Russia? Regional'nye Issledovaniya [Regional Research], no. 3, p. 83—93 (in Russ.).
5. Kuznetsova, T. Yu. 2013, Tendencies and Factors of Demographic Development in
the Baltic Region: Regional Analysis, Regional'nye Issledovaniya [Regional research], no. 3, p. 50—57 (in Russ.).
6. Mkrtchyan, N., Karachurina, L. 2014, The Baltics and Russian North-West: the Core
and the Periphery in the 2000s, Balt. Reg., no. 2, p. 48—62. doi: 10.5922/2079-8555-2014-2-4.
7. Thoborg, M. 2002, Population Around the Baltic Sea, In: Maciejewski,W. (ed.) The
Baltic Sea Region. Cultures, Politics, Societies, Uppsala, p. 495—509.
8. Fedorov, G. M., Mikhailov, A. S., Kuznetsova, T. Yu. 2017, The Influence of the Sea
on the Economic Development and Settlement Structure in the Baltic Sea region, Balt. Reg., Vol. 9, no. 2, p. 4—18. doi: 10.5922/2079-8555-2017-2-1.
9. Karachurina, L., Mkrtchyan, N. 2015, Population Change in the Regional Centres and
Internal Periphery of the Regions in Russia, Ukraine and Belarus over the Period of 1990— 2000s, Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, no. 28, p. 91—111. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/bog-2015-0018.
10. Nefedova, T. G., Slepukhina, I. L., Brade, I. 2016, Migration Attractiveness of Cities
in the Post-Soviet Space: A Case Study of Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus, Reg. Res. Russ, no. 6, p. 131—143. doi: https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970516020088.
11. Emelyanova, A., Rautio, A. 2016, Population Diversification in Demographics, Health,
and Living Environments: the Barents Region in Review. In: Lankila, T., Tervo-Kankare, K. (eds.) NGP Yearbook 2016: Geographies of Well-Being in the North, Finland, p. 3—18.
12. Zupančič, J. Wendt, J. A. Ilieş, A., An Outline of Border Changes in the Area between
the Baltic and the Mediterranean: their Geopolitical Implications and Classification,
Geographia Polonica. Vol. 91, no. 1, p. 33—46. doi: https://doi.org/10.7163/GPol.0104.
13. Mikhaylov, A. S., Mikhaylova, A. A., Kuznetsova, T. Y. 2018, Coastalization Effect
and Spatial Divergence: Segregation of European regions, Ocean and Coastal Management, Vol. 161, p. 57—65.
14. Komornicki, T., Czapiewski, K. Ł. 2006, Regional Periphery in Central and Eastern
Europe, Stanisław Leszczycki Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization, PAS Warszawa, 234 p.
15. Lauko, V. 2001, Postavenie pohraničnej oblasti juhozápad neho Slovenska v regionálnom rozvoji SR, Miscellanea Geographica Universitatis Bohemiae Occidentalis, no. 9, p. 213—220.
16. Haase, A., Bernt, M., Großmann, K., Mykhnenko, V., Rink, D. 2013, Varieties of Shrinkage in European Cities, European Urban and Regional Studies, Vol. 23, no. 1, p. 86—102.
17. Hudson, R. 2015, Uneven Development, Socio-Spatial Polarization and Political Responses. In: Lang, T., Henn, S., Sgibnev, W., Ehrlich, K. (eds.) Understanding Geographies of Polarization and Peripheralization, London, p. 25—39. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137415080.
18. Lavrinovich, I., Lavrinenko, O., Jefimovs, N. 2012, Sustainable Development, Economic Growth and Differentiation of Incomes of Latvian Population, Journal of Security and Sustainability, Vol. 2, no. 1, p. 33—39.
19. Fratesi, U., Perucca, G. 2018, Territorial Capital and the Resilience of European Regions, The Annals of Regional Science, Vol. 60, no. 2, p. 241—264 doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-017-0828-3.
20. Lagas, P., van Dongen, F., van Rijn, F., Visser, H. 2015, Regional Quality of Living
in Europe, Region, Vol. 2, no. 2, p. 1—26. doi: 10.18335/region.v2i2.43.
21. Crescenzi, R., Iammarino, S. 2017, Global Investments and Regional Development
Trajectories: The Missing Links, Regional Studies, Vol. 51, no. 1, p. 97—115. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2016.1262016.
22. Ubarevičienė, R., van Ham, M. 2017, Population Decline in Lithuania: Who Lives in
Declining Regions and Who Leaves? Regional Studies, Regional Science, Vol. 4, no. 1,
p. 57—79. doi: 10.1080/21681376.2017.1313127.
23. Klupt, M. A. 2015, Centre-Periphery Relations in Europe: Demographic Aspect,
World Economy and International Relations, Vol. 59, no. 2, p. 58—67.
24. Klemeshev, A. P., Fedorov, G. M. 2004, Ot izolirovannogo eksklava — k «koridoru
razvitiya». Al'ternativy rossiiskogo eksklava na Baltike [From an Isolated Exclave — to the "Corridor of Development". Alternatives to the Russian Exclave in the Baltic], Kaliningrad, 253 p. (in Russ.).
25. Fedorov, G. M. 2010, The Kaliningrad Dilemma: a 'Development Corridor' or a
'Double Periphery'? The Geopolitical Factor of the Development of the Russian Exclave on the Baltic Sea, Balt. Reg., no. 2, p. 4—12. doi: 10.5922/2079-8555-2010-2-1.
26. Friedmann, J. 1966, Regional Development Policy: A Case Study of Venezuela, MIT
Press, 279 p.
27. Zhitin, D. V., Shendrik, A. V. 2018, Population Dynamics in Towns of Leningrad
Oblast: Effects of the Crisis of 2014—2016, Reg. Res. Russ., Vol.8, no. 1, p. 46—57. doi:
https:// doi.org/10.1134/S2079970518010112.
28. Nipers, A., Pilvere, I., Bulderberga, Z. 2017, Territorial Development Assessment in
Latvia, Research for Rural Development, no. 2, p. 126—134.  doi: 10.22616/rrd.23.2017.059.

Back to the section