Security in the Baltic region as a Projection of Global Confrontation between Russia and the USA
This article considers the problem of security in the Baltic region, namely, that of Poland and the Baltics. The authors rely on the works of Karl Deutsch, Emanuel Adler, on Michael Barnett’s theory of security communities and Barry Buzan’s regional security complex theory, address Steven Mann’s controlled chaos theory and the concept of Intermarium. Their starting assumption is that the situation in the Baltic depends largely on the politics of external powers — Russia and the United States, — being a projection of their global geopolitical confrontation. The US strategy thus becomes a major part of the equation. The authors believe that since the end of the second Iraq war the American elite has been divided along ideological lines into adherents of the chaos theory and traditionalists thinking in terms of sharing control with the other centres of global power. The US strategy in the Baltic region does not seek an open military conflict with Russia. On the contrary, the US strives to preserve the current level of confrontation between Russia and the EU, convincing the latter of the reality of the Russian threat. Countries that traditionally support confrontation with Russia, Poland and the Baltics, serve as a conduit for Washington strategy in Europe and a cordon sanitaire. This function is implemented through the Intermarium project meant to separate Russia from the EU. The four countries are rather active in this area, striving to attain the status of the US principal partners in the region and Europe in general. To retaliate, Moscow does everything within its power to ‘separate’ Brussels from Washington, yet the US influence is still very strong in Europe.
2 Korzinkina, S. 2016, Klintsevich: NATO prepares a base for a "global impact" on Russia, Izvestia, June 5, available at: http://izvestia.ru/news/616778# ixzz4GZClJrPI (accessed 18.12.2016). (In Russ.)
3. Fomichev, M. 2016, Korochenko: NATO prepares for real war, RIA Novosti, May 6, available at: http://ria.ru/radio_brief/20160506/1427964205.html (accessed 18.12.2016). (In Russ.)
4. Mann, S.R. 1992, Chaos Theory and Strategic Thought, available at: http:// spkurdyumov.ru/what/mann/ (accessed 21.11.2016). (In Russ.)
6. Estonian Information Board «International Security and Estonia, 2016, p. 9, available at: https://www.teabeamet.ee/pdf/2016-en.pdf (accessed 18.12.2016).
7. Stent, A. 2015, Pochemu Amerika i Rossiya ne slyshat drug druga. Vzglyad Vashingtona na noveishuyu istoriyu rossiisko-amerikanskikh otnoshenii [Why America and Russia can not hear each other. Washington Looking at the recent history of Russian-American relations], Moscow. (In Russ.)
9. Russia’s European supporters. In the Kremlin’s pocket, 2015, The Economist, Feb 14, available at: http://www.economist.com/news/briefing/21643222-who-backs-putin-and-why-kremlins-pocket (accessed 18.12.2016).
10. National Security Concept Of The Russian Federation, 2000, availab le at: http://www.mid.ru/en/foreign_policy/official_documents/-/asset_publisher/CptICkB6BZ29/content/id/589768(accessed 18.12.2016).
11. Juncker came to St. Petersburg Forum "build bridges", 2016, BBC (Russia), June 16, available at: http://www.bbc.com/russian/news/2016/06/160616_russia_juncker (accessed 18.12.2016). (In Russ.)
12. Brockell, G. 2016, A transcript of Donald Trump’s meeting with The Washington Post editorial board, The Washington Post, 21 March 2016, available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/wp/2016/03/21/a-transcript-of-donald-trumps-meeting-with-the-washington-post-editorial-board/ (accessed 18.12.2016).
13. Adler, E., Barnett, M. 1998, Security Communities, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
14. Adriatic-Baltic-Black sea initiative. A triangle of stronger partnership, 2015, Newsletter of the Office of the President of the Republic of Croatia, no. 2.
15. Andersson, J. 2015, Defence: solidarity, trust and threat perception, European Union Institute for Security Studies, July 2015. Available at: http://www.iss.europa.eu/uploads/media/Alert_33_Transatlantic_defence.pdf(accessed 21.11.2016).
16. Bekić, J., Funduk, M., 2016, The Adriatic-Baltic-Black Sea Initiative as the revival of “Intermarium”, IRMO Brief, no. 2, available at: http://www.irmo.hr/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/IRMO-Brief-2-2016.pdf (accessed 21.11.2016).
17. Buzan, B., Waever, O. 2003, Regions and Powers. The Structure of International Security, New York, Cambridge University Press.
18. Corbyn’s Nato comments echo flak from Trump and across Europe, 2016, The Financial Times, 19 August 2016, available at: https://www.ft.com/content/ce6f413a-660c-11e6-8310-ecf0bddad227 (accessed 21.11.2016).
19. Decade Forecast: 2015—2025, 2015, Stratfor, 23 February, available at: https://www.stratfor.com/forecast/decade-forecast-2015-2025 (accessed 21.11.2016).
20. Deutsch, K. W., Burrell, S. A., Kann, R. 1957, Political Community and the North Atlantic Area: International Organization in the Light of Historical Experience, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.
21. Krishnadev C. 2016, Donald Trump's Choice for National Security Adviser Has One Priority: Combatting 'Radical Islamic Terrorism', The Atlantic, 18 November 2016, available at: http://www.theatlantic.com/news/archive/2016/11/michael-flynn-trum-national-security-adviser/508115/ (accessed 18.12.2016).
22. Laats, J. M. 2015, Ilves: Russia will not attack Baltic nations, Eesti Rahvusringhääling, 14 December 2015, available at: http://news.err.ee/v/politics/1b199f58-abaf-4769-88ec-90556a955687/ilves-russia-will-not-attack-baltic-nations (accessed 15.12.2016).
23. Full Speech: President-Elect Donald Trump "THANK YOU" Rally in Cincinnati, Ohio, 2015, Clearing House, 05 December 2016, availablr at: http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article45976.htm (accessed 05.12.2016).
24. Friedman G., «Europe: Destined for Conflict?», 2016, Global Affairs Press, May 23, available at: https://globalaffairspress.com/2016/05/23/the-chicago-council-on-global-affairs-george-friedman-europe-destined-for-conflict/ (accessed 11.10.2016).
25. Many NATO Countries Reluctant to Use Force to Defend Allies, 2015, PewResearchCentre, 08 June 2015, available at: http://www.pewglobal.org/2015/06/10/nato-publics-blame-russia-for-ukrainian-crisis-but-reluctant-to-provide-military- aid/russia-ukraine-report-46/ (accessed 16.12.2016).
26. Minister: Poland Wants NATO-Russia Deal Scrapped, 2015, Agence France-Presse, November 25, available at: http://www.defensenews.com/story/defense/2015/11/25/minister-poland-wants-nato-russia-deal-scrapped/76395554/ (accessed 15.12.2016).
27. Pristatyta Rusijos sulaikymo strategija Baltijos regione, 2015, Bernardinai. lt, available at: http://www.bernardinai.lt/straipsnis/2015-11-13-pristatyta-rusijos-sulaikymo-strategija-baltijos-regione/137271 (accessed 21.11.2016).
28. Stoicescu, K. 2015, Russian threat to Security in the Baltic Sea Region, RKK ICDS, October 6, available at: http://www.icds.ee/publications/article/the-russian-threat-to-security-in-the-baltic-sea-region/ (accessed 21.11.2016).
29. Bajarnas, E., Haab, M., Viskne, I. 1995, The Baltic States: security and defence after independence, Chaillot Papier, no. 19.
30. Heilbrunn, J. 2015, The Interview: Henry Kissinger, The National Interest, 19 August, available at: http://nationalinterest.org/feature/the-interview-henry-kissinger-13615?page=3 (accessed 15.12.2016).