Eurasian Future of Russia: Alternating Integration and Disintegration Cycles
- DOI
- 10.5922/2079-8555-2016-4-1
- Pages
- 4-12
Abstract
Russia needs to fit into the international geopolitical and geo-economic landscape. The formation of this landscape is largely determined by alternating integration and disintegration cycles in the development of the world economy. The second global disintegration cycle that started in 2008 is expected to last 15—20 years. It will be followed by a new integration cycle, largely dependent on China (Pax Sinensis instead of Pax Americana). This change necessitates a number of steps: a significant strengthening of the Eastern vector in the development of Russia, the formation of the Moscow-Beijing-New Delhi triangle (Evgeny Primakov's idea) as well as providing access of energy-intensive and water-intensive goods from East Siberia by railway to the Chinese and Indian markets. Russia has expressed its interest in the construction of a railway from China to India. It will allow Russia to reduce transportation costs and use a potentially heavy transit traffic for the modernization of the Transsibirian railway. These steps could radically change the role of the Baltic exclave of Russia: from being a ‘window to Europe’ the region is to turn into the westernmost point of a infrastructure axis extending from east to west. The creation of such an axis, combined with a sharp fall in transportation costs will facilitate the access of energy-intensive and water-intensive goods from the Urals and Siberia to the Asian and European markets. The Kaliningrad region is increasingly taking on business facilitating functions, which used to be performed by the Soviet Baltic republics in the past. The region can play a more important role in the formation of Eurasia stretching from Shanghai to St. Petersburg (according to Dmitry Trenin), instead of the Europe from Lisbon to Vladivostok.
Reference
1. Bezrukov, L. A. 2016, Trans-Siberian Railway and the Silk Road: Global Infrastructure and Regional Development, Ekonomika i organizatsiya promyshlennogo proizvodstva, no. 7, p. 21—36. (In Russ.)
2. Inozemtsev, V. 2013, Spatial Economy: Air Vs. Rail, Vedomosti, 11.06.2013. (In Russ.)
3. Bordachev, T. V. (ed.), 2016, To the Great Ocean-4: Turn to the East. Preliminary Results and New Tasks. Report of the International Discussion Club "Valdai", 2016, May, Moscow, available at: http://ru. valdaiclub. com/files/12395/ (accessed 14.07.2016). (In Russ.)
4. Kaplan, R. D.2013, The Revenge of Geography. What the Maps Tells Us About Coming Conflicts and the Battle Against Fate, N. Y., Random House, 418 p.
5. Kolosovskiy, N. N. 2009, Future of Uralo-Kuznetsky Plant, Prostranstvennaya ekonomika, no. 4, p. 126—141. (In Russ.)
6. Mayergoyz, I. M. 1974, Uniqueness of an economical geographical location of the Soviet Far East and some challenges of its use in the long-term, Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Ser. V. Geografiya, no.4, p. 3—8. (In Russ.)
7. Pilyasov, A. N. 2009, I posledniye stanut pervymi: Severnaya periferiya na puti k ekonomike znaniya [And the last will become the first: The northern periphery on the way to knowledge economy], Moscow, 544 p. (In Russ.)
8. Sintserov, L. M. 2000, Long waves of global integration, Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnyye otnosheniya, no. 5, p. 56—64. (In Russ.)
9. Uralo-Kuzbas, 2009. In: Istoricheskaya entsiklopediya Sibiri [Historical encyclopedia of Siberia], T. 3, Novosibirsk, Ist. Naslediye Sibiri. (In Russ.)
10. Gusein-Zade, S. M., Tikunov, V. S. 2015, Visualisation in noneuclidean metrics, Hong Kong, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, 213 p.