The Baltic Region

2016 Issue №1

Back to the list Download an article

The US ballistic missile defence policy in the Baltic and Nordic regions



This article examines the implications of the deployment of the US ballistic missile defense (BMD) system in the Baltic and Nordic regions. These implications are to be considered to ensure Russia’s military security. Using the structural-functional method, the authors analyse the internal structure of the US BMD in Europe, stages of its implementation, and its influence on the military equilibrium in the region. Being similar to other regional missile defence systems of the Pentagon, BMD in Europe increases the offensive capabilities of the US armed forces and its allies and in doing so, it stops performing a purely defensive mission declared by Washington. It is stressed that the deployment of mobile sea- and land-based BMD elements in the Baltic Sea region and Nordic countries will inevitably destabilize the strategic situation and may lead to a new round of arms race in the region. The efficacy of BMD in Europe is evaluated from the perspective of military technology. The system’s potential threats to Russia’s military security and its armed forces are assessed. The article considers measures to enhance national security that could be taken by Russia provided the US plans to deploy BMD in Europe are fully implemented.


1. Arbatov, А. 2014, Protivoraketnye debaty: v poiskah soglasijaа [Missile debate: in search of consensus], Voenno-promyshlennyj kurier [Military-Industrial Courier], available at: (accessed 12.10.2014).
2. Astrovsky, N. 2013, FRG prizyvaet Pol'shu otkazat'sja ot EvroPRO [Germany calls on Poland to abandon the European missile defense], available at: (accessed 10.09.2015).
3. Konishev V. N., Sergunin A. A. 2014, Voennaja bezopasnost' Arktiki [Military security of the Arctic], Nacional'nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost' [National interests priorities and safety], p. 56—64, available at: (accessed 12.07.2014).
4. Gensek NATO privetstvuet reshenie Niderlandov osnastit' sudna radarami [The NATO Secretary General welcomes the decision by the Netherlands to equip the radar vessel]. 2011, RIA Novosti [RIA News], available at: (accessed 05.07.2014).
5. Dworkin, V. Z. 2011, PRO i bezopasnost' v Arktike [Missile defense and security in the Arctic]. In: Arktika: zona mira i sotrudnichestva [Arctic: Zone of Peace and Cooperation], Moscow, p. 75—86.
6. Desjat' let bez dogovora po PRO: problema protivoraketnoj oborony v rossijsko-amerikanskih otnoshenijah [Ten years without an agreement on missile defense: the problem of missile defense in US-Russian relations], 2012, Moscow.
7. Interv'ju s Ju. Solomonovym [Interview with Yu. Solomon], 2011, Vozdushno-kosmicheskaja oborona [Aerospace defense], no. 6 (63), p. 85—86.
8. Kozin, V. P. 2013, Jevoljucija protivoraketnoj oborony SShA i pozicija Rossii (1945-2013) [The evolution of the US and Russian missile defense position (1945-2013)], Moscow, 365 p.
9. Kozin, V. 2013, PRO SShA: «restrukturizacija», no ne v interesah Rossii [US missile defense system, "restructuring", but not in Russia's interests], Nezavisimoe voennoe obozrenie [Independent Military Review], available at: (accessed 05.05.2013).
10. Kommentarij MID Rossii po povodu vstuplenija v silu soglashenija mezhdu SShA i Pol'shej o razmeshhenii v Pol'she amerikanskoj protivoraketnoj bazy [Note the Russian Foreign Ministry regarding the entry into force of the agreement between the United States and Poland on the deployment in Poland of American anti-missile base], 2015, Ministerstvo inostrannyh del Rossijskoj Federacii [The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation], available at:!OpenDocument (accessed 09.11.2015).
11. Konishev, V. N., Sergunin, А. А. 2012, Novaja voennaja doktrina Baraka Obamy i nacional'nye interesy Rossii [The new military doctrine of Barack Obama and Russia's national interests], Nacional'nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost' [National interests priorities and safety], no. 14 (155), p. 2—9.
12. Konishev, V. N., Sergunin, А. А. 2012, O novoj voennoj doktrine B. Obamy [A new military doctrine Obama], Problemy nacional'noj strategii [Problems of National Strategy], no. 3, p. 98—113.
13. Konishev, V. N., Sergunin, А. А. 2015, Perspektivy razvitija nacional'noj sistemy protivoraketnoj oborony SShA [Prospects of development of the US national missile defense system], Nacional'nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost' [National interests priorities and safety], no. 33, p. 45—56.
14. Konishev, V. N., Sergunin, А. А. 2015, SShA i sozdanie sistem PRO na Blizhnem i Srednem Vostoke [The United States and the establishment of the missile defense systems in the Middle East], Azija i Afrika segodnja [Asia and Africa today], no. 11, p. 18—24.
15. Lyovkin, I. M., Shatskaya, V. I. 2012, Assessment of the efficiency of Russian response to the implementation of US missile defence deployment concept in Europe, no. 1, p. 28—43. DOI:
16. RF v kol'ce "druzej": Shvecija i Finljandija zadumalis' o chlenstve v NATO [Russia in the ring "friends": Sweden and Finland are thinking about NATO membership], 2014, Ria Novosti, available at: // (accessed 10.10.2015).
17. Ryabov, K. 2012, Amerikanskaja PRO i jadernoe sderzhivanie [The US missile defense and nuclear deterrence], Nacional'naja bezopasnost' Rossii, SShA i drugih stran mira [The national security of Russia, the USA and other countries], available at: (accessed 13.07.2015).
18. Hramchihin, А. 2011, Neprikrytyj morskoj rubezh. Kolichestvo korablej PRO u Rossii i SShA nesravnimo [Undisguised maritime boundary. The number of missile ships from Russia and the United States incomparably], Flot — XXI vek  [Fleet — XXI Century], available at: (accessed 01.06.2014).
19. Baltic Fears: NATO debates directing missile shield against Russia, 2014, Spiegel online, available at: (accessed 18.10.2014).
20. Denmark. Missile Defense Advocacy Alliance, 2014, available at: (accessed 23.07.2014).
21. Denmark Will Join NATO’s Missile Defense Syste, 2014, available at: (accessed 19.10.2014).
22. DOD News Briefing on Missile Defense from the Pentagon, 2014, available at: (accessed 12.12.2014).
23. Dodge M. U. S. Missile Defense Policy After Russia’s Actions in Ukraine, 2014, available at: (accessed 14.06.2014).
24. Iran Talks Won't Change U. S. Missile Plans in Europe, Kerry Says, 2014, available at: (accessed 03.12.2014).
25. Khoo, N., Steff, R. 2014, This Program Will Not Be a Threat to Them. In: Ballistic Missile Defense and U. S. Relations With Russia And China, Defense & Security Analysis, Vol. 30, no. 1, p. 17—28.
26. Le Mière, C., Mazo, J. 2013, The Arctic As A Theatre Of Military Operations. In: Arctic Opening: Insecurity and Opportunity, adelphy Papaers, London, p. 77—100.
27. Making Sense of Ballistic Missile Defense: An Assessment of Concepts and Systems for U. S. Boost-Phase Missile Defense in Comparison to Other Alternatives Committee, 2012, Washington, 282 p.
28. National Security Strategy, 2015, Washington, 29 p.
29. NATO official: Russia now an adversary, 2014, available at: (accessed 10.08.2014).
30. Quadrennial Defense Review 2014, 2014, Washington: Department of Defense, 64 p.
31. Rasmussen, A. 2015, NATO’s New Frontier, available at: (accessed 12.11.2015).
32. Readout of Inaugural Video Teleconference Between Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel and Russian Minister of Defense Sergey Shoygu, 2015, U. S. Department of Defense, available at: (accessed 10.09.2015).
33. Secretary of Defense Speech. Munich Security Conference, 2015, US Department of Defense, available at: (accessed 14.11.2015).
34. The Threat, 2015, Ballistic Missile Proliferation, available at: // (accessed 14.10.2015).
35. Weisgerber, M. 2014, U. S. Ready To Assist Poland With Indigenous Missile Defense System, available at: =2014302010028 (accessed 14.10.2015).