The Baltic Region

2013 Issue №4(18)

Back to the list Download an article

Competitive effects of low trade barriers: evaluations for the Kaliningrad region



International trade is an important factor affecting competition in domestic markets. Considering the vastness of Russian territory, one can expect the pro-competitive effect to vary from region to region. This analysis tests the hypothesis that the unique geographical position and economic status of the Kaliningrad region contribute to the rapid development of international trade, which, in turn, exerts competitive pressure on regional prices. The study incorporates two major lines of analysis: a) a comparison of the international trade growth rates of different Russian regions; b) an assessment of the influence of Russian and European prices on the consumer price index as well as prices for particular tradable goods in the Kaliningrad region. Rosstat and Eurostat serve as the main data sources. To test their hypothesis, the authors use the methods of statistical and econometric analysis. The status of the free economic zone and unique geographic position of the Kaliningrad region do not result in high growth rates of international trade in the region, but rather lead to a structural shift towards import thus exerting additional competitive pressure on domestic prices. The analysis did not confirm the hypothesis about the considerable influence of European prices on the short run dynamics of the regional consumer prices index or prices for certain imported goods. Nevertheless, indirect evidence of competitive effects of foreign trade was found in the course of a comparative analysis of price levels in the regions of the Northwest Federal district: the cost of the standard set of consumer goods and services in the Kaliningrad region is lower than the level defined by the regional per capita income.


1. Avdasheva, S. B., Shastitko, A. E. 2010, Konkurentnaja politika: sostav, struktura, sistema [Competition policy: the composition, structure, system], Sovremennaja konkurencija [Modern competition], no. 19 (1), p. 5—20.
2. Golovanova, S. V. 2010, Signaly nesovershenstva konkurencii: rezul'taty analiza cen tovarov, vovlechennyh v mezhdunarodnuju torgovlju [Signals imperfect competition: an analysis of prices of goods involved in international trade], Sovremennaja konkurencija [Modern competition], no. 4(22), p. 11—25.
3. Edinaja mezhvedomstvennaja informacionno-statisticheskaja sistema Rossii (EMISS) [United interagency information-statistical system of Russia (EMISS)], available at: (accessed 1 August 2013).
4. Avdasheva, S. B., Golovanova, S. V. (eds.) 2009, Tendencii izmenenija struktury rossijskoj promyshlennosti v period jekonomicheskogo podema [Trends in the structure of Russian industry in the period of economic growth], Moscow, «Juridicheskij Dom «Justic-inform».
5. Shastitko, A. E. Pavlova, N. S. 2012, O sbalansirovannosti instrumentov konkurentnoj Politiki [On the balance of competition policy instruments], Bjulleten' konkurentnoj politiki LPKKP [Bulletin of competition policy LPKKP], no. 7, available at: (accessed 1 August 2013).
6. Dixit, A. 1983, International trade policy for oligopolistic industries, Conference Papers, The Royal Economic Society and The Association of University Teachers of Economics Brasenose College, Oxford.
7. Eurostat Statistics Database, available at: (accessed 1 August 2013).
8. Harrison, A. 1994, Productivity, imperfect competition and trade reform: theory and evidence, Journal of International Economics, no. 36, p. 53—73.
9. Helpman, A., Krugman, P. 1985, Market Structure and Foreign Trade, Cambridge, MIT Press.
10. Horstmann, I. J., Markusen, J. R. 1986, Up the average cost curve: inefficient entry and the new protectionism, Journal of International Economics, no. 20, p. 225—247.
11. Levinsohn, J. 1993, Testing the imports-as-market-discipline hypothesis, Journal of International Economics, no. 35, p. 1—22.
12. Lundin, N. 2004, Import Competition, Product Differentiation and Mark-Ups:—- Microeconomic Evidence from Swedish Manufacturing in the 1990s, Working paper, no. 195, FIEF, Trade Union Institute for Economic Research.
13. Roberts, M., Tybout, J. 1996, Industrial Evolution in Developing Countries, Oxford University Press.
14. Tybout, J. 2003, Plant- and Firm-Level Evidence on "New" Trade Theories. (Chapter 13, Volume 1). In: Handbook of International Trade, edited by K. E. Choi and J. Harrigan, Oxford, UK, Blackwell Publishing.
15. Venables, A. J. 1987, Trade and trade policy with differentiated products: a Chamberlinian-Ricardian model, Economic Journal, no. 97, p. 700—717.
16. Wilhelmsson, F. 2006, Market Power and European Competition in the Swedish Food Industry, Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, no. 7 (1), Article 7.