The Baltic Region

2012 Issue №3(13)

Back to the list Download an article

The methodological features of managing the value of companies introducing "green" innovations



Although it is a common assumption that innovations are one of the most important factors of economic development, there is a need to review some provisions of innovation methodology so that new fundamental values are taken into account more fully. Most recent business models are based on the depletion of natural environment, whose potential has been almost exhausted. It is necessary to introduce new ideas that are of use for society and create values for companies. One way of achieving this goal is “green” (environmental) innovations. The next decade is expected to see a rapid growth in environmental innovations. Their organization and management will require modern — and adequate to the objectives set —technologies. One of those is the quest for value methodology. To date, the quest for value methodology has given rise to several conceptual approaches, which can be used to evaluate the effectiveness of environmental innovations. This article discusses the advantages and disadvantages of major approaches. The author comes to a conclusion that that the modern theory and practice of corporate finance still lacks a generally accepted approach to assessing the value of companies that explicitly takes into account the impact of environmental factors on the cost. The article outlines the basic theoretical frameworks for the formation of such approach.


1. Arrow, K. and al. 1999, Managing Ecosystem Resources, Beijer Discussion Paper Series, no. 122, Stockholm, The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, p. 1—22.
2. Daly, H. E., Cobb, J. B. 1990, For the Common Good, London, Green Print Publishing, 95 p.
3. Hanna, S. S., Jentoft, S. 1996, Human Use of the Natural Environment: An Overview of Social and Economic Dimensions, Rights to Nature: Cultural, Economic, Political and Ecological Principles of Institutions for the Environment, Washington,
D. C., Island Press, p. 35—36.
4. Mendelsohn, R., Olmstead, S. 2009, The Economic Valuation of Environmental Amenities and Disamenities: Methods and Applications, Annual Review of Environment and Resources, p. 325—347.
5. Mnatsakanyan, A. G., Harin, A. G. 2012, O nekotoryh osobennostjah primenenija koncepcii upravlenija stoimost'ju dlja kompanij, dejatel'nost' kotoryh osnovana na ispol'zovanii prirodnyh resursov [Some features of the concept of cost management for companies whose activities are based on the use of natural resources], Finansy i kredit [Finance and credit], no. 1(481), p. 12—20.
6. Nidumolu, R., Prahalad, C. K., Rangaswami, M. R. 2009, Why Sustainability Is Now the Key Driver of Innovation, Harvard Business Revue. Reprint, available at: (accessed 10 April 2012).

7. Nidumolu, R., Prahalad, S. K., Rangaswamy, M. R. 2011, Jekologija — zolotaja zhila dlja biznesa [Ecology — a gold mine for business], Harvard Business Review (Russia), available at: (accessed 15 May 2012).
8. Reid, A., Miedzinski, M. 2008, Sectoral Innovation Watch in Europe: Eco-Innovation (Final report), SYSTEMATIC Innovation Panel on ecoinnovation for sectoral innovation watch, available at: (accessed 7 May 2012).
9. George Soros on the Clean-Energy Economy, 2008, The New York Times, 14 October 2008, available at: http://green. blogs. nytimes. com/2008/10/14/george-soroson-the-green-energy-economy/ (accessed 5 May 2011).
10. Sterlingov, I. 2011, «Zeljonaja» tehplatforma nagotove [«Green» ready tehplatforma], Nauka i tehnologija Rossii: jelektronnoe izdanie [Science and technology in Russia: electronic edition], 07.07.2011, available at: (accessed 12 May 2011).
11. Green Growth & Eco-Innovation, OECD: Green innovation, available at:,3746,en_2649_34499_40695077_1_1_1_1,00.html (accessed 15 September 2011).
12. Clean Energy Trends 2012 (Report), 2012, The Clean Tech Market Authority, available at: (accessed 15 May 2012).
13. The business of sustainability: McKinsey Global Survey results, 2011, McKinsly Quarterly, available at: (accessed 17 May 2012).
14. Dow Jones Sustainability Indexes in Collaboration with SAM, available at: (accessed 17 May
15. NERAX Eco — semejstvo jekologicheskih fondovyh indeksov [NERAX Eco — a family of stock indexes of environmental], Nezavisimoe Jekologicheskoe Rejtingovoe Agentstvo [Independent Ecological Rating Agency], available at: (accessed 17 May 2012).
16. Sostojalsja kruglyj stol «Indeks ustojchivogo razvitija — Buduwee social'no otvetstvennogo investirovanija v Rossii» [Round table «Index of Sustainable Development — The Future of socially responsible investing in Russia»], 2011, Rossijskij sojuz promyshlennikov i predprinimatelej [The Russian Union of Industrialists and Entrepreneurs], 21.07.2011, available at: http://рспп.рф/news/view/987 (accessed 16 May 2012).
17. Moskovskaja shkola upravlenija «Skolkovo» [Moscow School of Management «Skolkovo»], 2011, 27 June, available at: (accessed 17 May 2012).