NONE20260601035841444Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal Universityno-reply@journals.kantiana.ruImmanuel Kant Baltic Federal UniversitySlovo.ru: Baltic accent2225-53462686-898906012026132T. ZolyanS.0601202611Yu. M.Lotman0601202611Lotman, Yu. M., 1974. On the reduction and deployment of sign systems (On the problem of “Freudianism and Semiotic Cultural Studies”). In: Materialy 1-go Vsesoyuznogo (5-go) simpoziuma po vtorichnym modeliruyushchim sistemam [Materials of the 1st All-Union (5th) Symposium on Secondary Modeling Systems]. Tartu, pp. 100—108 (in Russ.).Lotman, Yu. M., 1977. Kul’tura kak kollektivnyi razum i problema iskusstvennogo razuma [Culture as a collective mind and the problem of artificial intelligence]. Moscow (in Russ.).Lotman, Yu. M., 1981а. Semiotics of culture and the concept of text. Trudy po znakovym sistemam. 12: Struktura i semiotika khudozhestvennogo teksta (Uchenye zapiski Tartuskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Vyp. 515) [Sign Systems Studies. 12: Structure and semiotics of a literary text (Scientific letters of The University of Tartu. Issue 515)], pp. 3—7 (in Russ.).Lotman, Yu. M., 1981б. Brain — text — culture — artificial intelligence. Semiotika i informatika [Semiotics and Informatics], 17. Moscow, pp. 13—17 (in Russ.).Lotman, Yu. M., 1981в. Rhetoric. Trudy po znakovym sistemam. 12: Struktura i semiotika khudozhestvennogo teksta (Uchenye zapiski Tartuskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Vyp. 515) [Sign Systems Studies. 12: Structure and semiotics of a literary text (Scientific letters of The University of Tartu. Issue 515)], pp. 8—28 (in Russ.).Lotman, Yu. M., 1982. Editorial: On the semiotic approach to the problem of intertextual relations. Trudy po znakovym sistemam. 15: Tipologiya kul’tury. Vzaimnoe vozdeistvie kul’tur (Uchenye zapiski Tartuskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Vyp. 576) [Sign Systems Studies. 15: The typology of culture. Mutual impact of cultures (Scientific letters of The University of Tartu. Issue 576)], pp. 3—9 (in Russ.).Lotman, Yu. M., 1983. Asymmetry and dialogue. Trudy po znakovym sistemam. 16: Tekst i kul’tura [Sign Systems Studies. 16: Text and culture]. Tartu, pp. 15—30 (in Russ.).Lotman, Yu. M., 1984. On semiosphere. Trudy po znakovym sistemam. 17: Struktura dialoga kak printsip raboty semioticheskogo mekhanizma [Sign Systems Studies. 17: The structure of the dialogue as the principle of the semiotic mechanism]. Tartu, pp. 5—23 (in Russ.).Lotman, Yu. M., 1989. Word and language in the culture of Enlightenment. In: I. E. Danilova, ed. Vek Prosveshcheniya: Rossiya i Frantsiya: materialy nauchnoi konferentsii “Vipperovskie chteniya — 1987” [The Age of Enlightenment: Russia and France: proceedings of the scientific conference “Vipper Readings — 1987”]. Moscow, pp. 6—18 (in Russ.).Lotman, Yu. M., 1999. Three text functions. In: Yu. M. Lotman, ed. Vnutri myslyashchikh mirov. Chelovek — tekst — semiosfera — istoriya [Inside thinking worlds. Man — text — semiosphere — history]. Moscow, pp. 11—22 (in Russ.).Lotman, Yu. M., 2000. Semiosfera. Kul’tura i vzryv. Vnutri myslyashchikh mirov. Stat’i. Issledovaniya. Zametki [The semiosphere. Culture and explosion. Inside the thinking worlds. Articles. Researches. Notes]. St. Petersburg (in Russ.).Salupere, S., 2017. O metayazyke Yuriya Lotmana: problemy, kontekst, istochniki [On Yurii Lotman’s Metalanguage: Problems, context, and sources]. Tartu (in Russ.).Zolyan, S. T., 1981. Semantic structure of a word in poetic speech. Izvestiya RAN. Seriya literatury i yazyka [The Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences: Studies in Literature and Language], 40 (6), pp. 509—520 (in Russ.).T. V.ChernigovskayaThe article explores the context important for the analysis of Lotman’s talk at the seminar on the problem of semiogenesis and functional specialization of cerebral hemispheres as a model of intellectual processes, which was held in Tartu. Forty years later, the author anal­yses changes in the viewpoints on the proposed model, taking into account the data of experi­mental neuroscience. The article emphasizes the fundamental value and topicality of Yuri Lotman’s ideas on the production of meaning in individual and cross-cultural space.0601202611Bakhtin, M. M., 1979. Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva [The aesthetics of verbal creativity]. Moscow (in Russ.).Balonov, L. Ya., Deglin, V. L., 1976. Slukh i rech’ dominantnogo i nedominantnogo polusharii [Hearing and speech of the dominant and non-dominant hemispheres]. Leningrad (in Russ.).Balonov, L. Ya., Deglin, V. L., Chernigovskaya, T. V., 1985. Functional asymmetry of the brain in the organization of speechactivity. In: Sensornye sistemy: Sensornye protsessy v asimmetrii polusharii [Sensory systems: Sensory processes in the asymmetry of the hemispheres]. Leningrad, pp. 99—114 (in Russ.).Bibler, V. S., 1975. Myshlenie kak tvorchestvo: vvedenie v logiku myslennogo dialoga [Thinking as creativity: an introduction to the logic of mental dialogue]. Moscow (in Russ.).Brodsky, J. A., 2002. Sochineniya [Works]. Yekaterinburg (in Russ.).Chernigovskaya, T., Natochin, Yu., Menshutkin, V., 2000. Principles of evolution of natural and computer languages and physiological systems. In: B. Bichakjian, T. Chernigovskaya, A. Kendon and A. Moeller, eds. “Becoming Loquens” — Bochum Publications in Evolutionary Cultural Semiotics. Vol. 1. Frankfurt а/M; Berlin; Bern; Bruxelles; New York; Oxford; Wien, pp. 211—236.Chernigovskaya, T. V., 1994. Cerebral lateralization for cognitive and linguistic abilities: neuropsychological and cultural aspects. In: J. Wind, A. Jonker, R. Allott, L. Rolfe, eds. Studies in Language Origins. Vol. 3. Amsterdam — Philadelphia, pp. 56—76.Chernigovskaya, T. V., 1996. Cerebral asymmetry — a neuropsychological parallel to semiogenesis. In: U. Figge and W. Koch, eds. Acta Coloquii. Bochum publications in Evolutionary Cultural Semiotics. Language in the Wurm Glaciation. Vol. 27, pp. 53—64.Chernigovskaya, T. V., 2012. Languages of consciousness: who reads neural network texts? In: Chelovek v mire znaniya: v chest’ 80-letiya akademika V. A. Lektorskogo [Man in the world of knowledge: in honor of the 80th anniversary of Academician V. A. Lektorsky]. Moscow, pp. 403—415 (in Russ.).Chernigovskaya, T. V., 2017. Cheshirskaya ulybka kota Shredingera: yazyk i soznanie [Cheshire smile of Schrödinger’s cat: language and mind]. Moscow (in Russ.).Chernigovskaya, T. V., 2021a. Neuroscience search for meaning: brain as barocсo? Voprosy filosofii [Problems of Philosophy], 1, pp. 17—26 (in Russ.).Chernigovskaya, T. V., 2021б. More on brain and semiosis: Can we find a point in neuronets? Voprosy filosofii [Problems of Philosophy], 6, pp. 5—13 (in Russ.).Chernigovskaya, T. V., Balonov, L. J., Deglin, V. L., 1983a. Bilingualism and brain functional asymmetry. Brain and Language, 20, pp. 195—216.Chernigovskaya, T. V., Balonov, L. J., Deglin, V. L., 1983b. Bilingualism and functional asymmetry of the brain. Trudy po znakovym sistemam. 16: Tekst i kul’tura (Uchenye zapiski Tartuskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Vyp. 635) [Sign Systems Studies. 16: Text and culture (Scientific letters of The University of Tartu. Issue 635)]. Tartu, pp. 62—83 (in Russ.).Chernigovskaya, T. V., Deglin, V. L., 1984. The problem of internal dialogism (neurophysiological study of language competence). Trudy po znakovym sistemam. 17: Struktura dialoga kak printsip raboty semioticheskogo mekhanizma (Uchenye zapiski Tartuskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Vyp. 641) [Sign Systems Studies. 17: Dialogue structure as a principle of operation of the semiotic mechanism (Scientific letters of The University of Tartu. Issue 641)]. Tartu, pp. 33—44 (in Russ.).Chernigovskaya, T. V., Deglin, V. L., 1986. Metaphorical and syllogistic thinking as a manifestation of the functional asymmetry of the brain. Trudy po znakovym sistemam. 19: Semiotika prostranstva i prostranstvo semiotiki (Uchenye zapiski Tartuskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Vyp. 720) [Sign Systems Studies. 19: Semiotics of space and space of semiotics (Scientific letters of The University of Tartu. Issue 720)]. Tartu, pp. 68—84 (in Russ.).Chernigovskaya, Т. V., 2020. Biology, environment, and culture: from animal communication to human language and cognition. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Filosofiya i konfliktologiya [Vestnik of Saint-Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies], 1, pp. 157—170.Ivanov, Vyach. Vs., 1978. Chet i nechet: asimmetriya mozga i znakovykh sistem [Even and Odd: Asymmetry of the Brain and Sign Systems]. Moscow (in Russ.).Ivanov, Vyach. Vs., 1979. Neurosemiotics of oral speech and functional asymmetry of the brain. Trudy po znakovym sistemam. 2: Semiotika ustnoi rechi (Uchenye zapiski Tartuskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Vyp. 481) [Sign Systems Studies. 2: Semiotics of oral speech. (Scientific letters of The University of Tartu. Issue 481)]. Tartu, pp. 121—142 (in Russ.).Ivanov, Vyach. Vs., 2004. Lingvistika tret’ego tysyacheletiya: voprosy k budushchemu [Linguistics of the Third Millennium: Questions for the Future]. Moscow (in Russ.).Jakobson, R., Santilli, K., 1980. Brain and Language: Cerebral Hemispheres and Linguistic Structure in Mutual Light. New York.Jakobson, R. О., 1985. Brain and language. In: Izbrannye raboty [Selected works]. Мoscow, pp. 270—286 (in Russ.).Kull, K., 1999. Towards biosemiotics with Yuri Lotman. Semiotica, 127 (1—4), pp. 115—131.Kull, K., 2001. Jakob von Uexküll: An introduction. Semiotica, 134 (1—4), pp. 1—59.Kull, K., Maran, T., 2022. Jury Lotman and life sciences. In: M. Tamm and P. Torop, eds. The Companion to Juri Lotman: A Semiotic Theory of Culture. London, pp. 461—475.Lotman, Yu. M., 1984. On semiosphere. Trudy po znakovym sistemam. 17: Struktura dialoga kak printsip raboty semioticheskogo mekhanizma (Uchenye zapiski Tartuskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Vyp.641) [Sign Systems Studies. 17: Dialogue structure as a principle of operation of the semiotic mechanism (Scientific letters of The University of Tartu. Issue 641)]. Tartu, pp. 5—23 (in Russ.).Lotman, Yu. M., 1999. Vnutri myslyashchikh mirov. Chelovek — tekst — semiosfera — istoriya [Inside thinking worlds. Man — text — semiosphere — history]. Moscow (in Russ.).Lotman, Yu. M., 2022. Lecture at Tartu State University, March 13, 1981. Slovo.ru: Baltic accent, 13 (2), pp. 10—23 (in Russ.).Lotman, Yu. M., Uspenskii, B. A., 1973. Myth — name — culture. In: Trudy po znakovym sistemam. 6. (Uchenye zapiski Tartuskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Vyp. 308) [Sign Systems Studies. 6. (Scientific letters of The University of Tartu. Issue 308)]. Tartu, pp. 282—303 (in Russ.).Luria, A. R., 1974. Ob istoricheskom razvitii poznavatel’nykh protsessov [On the historical development of cognitive processes]. Moscow (in Russ.).Luria, A. R., 1979. Yazyk i soznanie [Language and mind]. Мoscow (in Russ.).Manin, Yu. I., 2008. Matematika kak metafora [Mathematics as a metaphor]. Мoscow (in Russ.).Manin,Yu. I., 2012. Sova i Solntse [An Owl and the Sun] (in Russ.).Natochin, Yu., Chernigovskaya, T., 2020. From Archebiosis to Evolution of Organisms and Informational Systems. Biological Communications, 3, pp. 215—227.Raushenbakh, B. V., 2002. Geometriya kartiny i zritel’noe vospriyatie [The geometry of the picture and visual perception]. St. Petersburg (in Russ.).Torop, P., 2019. Russian Theory and Semiotics of Culture: History and Perspectives. Bakhtiniana: Revista de Estudos do Discurso, 14 (4), pp. 19—39.Tulviste, P., 1977. Type of Text and Type of Thinking (Notes on a Common Problem in Semiotics and Psychology). Trudy po romano-germanskoi filologii. T. 7, Literaturovedenie (Uchenye zapiski Tartuskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Vyp. 426) [Romano-Germanic Philology Studies. Vol. 7, Literary studies. (Scientific letters of The University of Tartu. Issue 426)]. Tartu, pp. 94—100 (in Russ.).Tulviste, P., 1981. Does specifically children’s verbal thinking exist? Voprosy Psychologii [The Issues Relevant to Psychology], 5, pp. 34—42 (in Russ.).Vygotsky, L. S., 1982—1984. Sobranie sochinenii: v 6 t. [Collected works: in 6 volumes]. Moscow (in Russ.).Zolyan, S. T., 2016. Yuri Lotman about the text: ideas, problems, perspectives. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie [New Literary Review], 3, pp. 130—139 (in Russ.).Zolyan, S. T., 2022. Yuri Lotman: On problems of language and linguistics. Voprosy Jazykoznanija [Topics in the study of language], 1, pp. 106—119 (in Russ.).S. T.ZolyanThe article discusses a possible development of Yuri Lotman’s concept of semiosphere by supplementing it with the idea of semio-poiesis. Analysis of the processes of origination, evo­lution and functioning of the genetic code makes it possible to describe the main mechanisms of these processes. The associations of material phenomena (in this case nucleotides and amino acids) led to the establishment of semiotic links, resulting in mechanisms of information stor­age and transmission, allowing the creation of stable life forms. The increasing complexity of organization leads to the crystallization of informational and semiotic origins. Semio-poiesis, a recursive autoreference of the semiotic system, becomes a form of organization of the bio­world, where such parameters as sense and purpose become determinative. Such an under­standing of these processes makes it possible to develop Lotman’s concept of the semiosphere and, firstly, to confirm his assumptions that semiosis can be preceded only by a previous se­miotic form, and, secondly, to show the original mechanisms of semiosphere self-organization and autonomous functioning. The very dualism of the genetic code, its simultaneous biochem­ical and linguosemiotic organization, and the processes of gene expression can be compared with what Lotman considered to be the basic principle of semiosphere functioning — the in­teraction of oppositely organized heterogeneous mechanisms.0601202611Barbieri, M., 1981. The Ribotype Theory on the Origin of Life. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 91, pp. 545—601.Barbieri, M., 2008. The Code Model of Semiosis: The First Steps Toward a Scientific Biosemiotics. The American Journal of Semiotics, 24 (1—3), pp. 23—37.Barbieri, M., 2012. Codepoiesis — the deep logic of life. Biosemiotics, 5 (3), pp. 297—299.Carter, Ch. W., Jr., Wills, P. R., 2021. Reciprocally-Coupled Gating: Strange Loops in Bioenergetics, Genetics, and Catalysis. Biomolecules, 11 (2), 265. doi: https://doi. org/10.3390/biom11020265.Chebanov, S. V., 1999. Biohermeneutics and hermeneutics of biology. Semiotica, 127 (1—4), pp. 215—226. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1999.127.1-4.215.Deacon, T., 2011. Incomplete Nature: How Mind Emerged from Matter. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Eigen, M., 1971. Self-organization of matter and the evolution of biological macromolecules. Naturwissenschaften, 58, pp. 465—523. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/ BF00623322.Hoffmann, G. W., 1975. The stochastic theory of the origin of the genetic code. Annual Review of Physical Chemistry, 26, pp. 123—144.Hoffmeyer, J., 1998. The Unfolding Semiosphere. In: G. van de Vijver, S. Salthe and M. Delpos, eds. Evolutionary Systems: Biological and Epistemological Perspectives on Selection and Self-Organization. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 281—293.Hoffmeyer, J., 2007. Semiotic scaffolding of living systems. In: M. Barbieri, ed. Introduction to Biosemiotics: The New Biological Synthesis. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 149—166.Kel’bert, O. Ya., Trunin, M. V. and Uspenskii, B. A., 2016. Yu. M. Lotman — B. A. Uspenskii. Perepiska 1964—1993 [Yu. M. Lotman — B. A. Uspensky. Correspondence 1964—1993]. Tallinn (in Russ.).Koonin, E. V., Novozhilov, A. S., 2017. Origin and Evolution of the Universal Genetic Code. Annual Review of Genetics, 51, pp. 45—62.Kotov, K., 2002. Semiosphere: A Chemistry of Being. Sign Systems Studies, 30 (1), pp. 41—55.Kotov, K., Kull, K., 2011. Semiosphere is the Relational Biosphere. In: C. Emmeche and K. Kull, eds. Towards a Semiotic Biology: Life is the Action of Signs. London: Imperial College Press, pp. 179—194.Kull, K., 1999. Towards biosemiotics with Yuri Lotman. Semiotica, 127, pp. 1—4.Kull, K., 2015a. A semiotic theory of life: Lotman’s principles of the universe of the mind. Studies in Ecocriticism, 19 (3), pp. 255—266. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/ 14688417.2015.1069203.Kull, K., 2015б. Evolution, choice, and scaffolding: Semiosisis changing its own building. Biosemiotics, 8, pp. 223—234. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-015-9243-2.Kull, K., Maran, T., 2021. Juri Lotman and Life Sciences. A Semiotic Theory of Culture. In: M. Tamm and P. Torop, eds. The Companion to Juri Lotman: A Semiotic Theory of Culture. London; New York: Bloomsbury Academic, pp. 461—475.Lewontin, R. C., 1983. The Organism as the Subject and Object of Evolution. Scientia, 77 (18), pp. 65.Lotman, M., 2002. Umwelt and Semiosphere. Sign Systems Studies, 30 (1), pp. 33—40.Lotman, Yu. M., 1984. On semiosphere. Trudy po znakovym sistemam [Sign Systems Studies], 17. Tartu, pp. 5—23 (in Russ.).Lotman, Yu. M., 1989. Culture as a subject and an object to itself. Wiener Slawistischer Almanach, 23, pp. 187—197 (in Russ.).Lotman, Yu. M., 1992. Brain — text — culture — artificial intelligence. In: Izbrannye stat’i: v 3 t. T. 1: Stat’i po semiotike i tipologii kul’tury [Selected articles: in 3 vols. Vol. 1: Articles on semiotics and typology of culture]. Tallinn: Alexandra, pp. 25—33 (in Russ.).Lotman, Yu. M., 1996. Vnutri myslyashchikh mirov. Chelovek — tekst — semiosfera — istoriya [Inside thinking worlds. Man — text — semiosphere — history]. Moscow (in Russ.).Lotman, Yu. M., 2000. Semiosfera [Semiosphere]. St. Petersburg (in Russ.).Lotman, Yu. M., 2022. Lecture at Tartu State University, March 13, 1981. Slovo.ru: Baltic accent, 13 (2), pp. 10—23 (in Russ.).Luhmann, N., 1990. Essays on self-reference. New York: Columbia University Press.Markoš, A., 2002. Readers of the Book of Life: Contextualizing Developmental Evolutionary Biology. Oxford University Press.Markoš, A., 2004. In the quest for novelty: Kauffman’s biosphere and Lotman’s semiosphere. Sign Systems Studies, 32 (1/2), pp. 309—327.Markoš, A., 2014. Biosphere as Semiosphere: Variations on Lotman. Sign Systems Studies, 42 (4), pp. 487—98.Maturana, H. R., Varela, F. J., 1980. Autopoiesis and cognition. Dordrecht: Reidel Publishing.Monod, J., 1971. Chance and Necessity: An Essay on the Natural Philosophy of Modern Biology. Fontana.Nöth, W., 2006. Yuri Lotman on metaphors and culture as self-referential semiospheres. Semiotica, 161, pp. 249—263. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/SEM.2006.065.Nöth, W., 2015. The topography of Yuri Lotman’s semiosphere. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 18 (1), pp. 11—26.Pattee, H., 2007. The necessity of biosemiotics: Matter-symbol complementarity. In: M. Barbieri, ed. Introduction to biosemiotics. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 115—132.Peirce Ch. S., 1976. Parts of Carnegie Application (L 75). In: Ch. S. Peirce, ed. The New Elements of Mathematics. Vol. 4: Mathematical Philosophy. Mouton Publisher, pp. 13—73.Peirce, Ch. S., 1933. Vol. 4: The simplest mathematics. In: Ch. Hartshorne and P. Weiss, eds. Collected papers: in 8 vols. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Prodi, G., 1988. Material bases of signification. Semiotica, 69 (3—4), pp. 191—242. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1988.69.3-4.191.Ratner, V. A., 2000. Chronicle of the Great Discovery: Ideas and Faces. Priroda [Nature], 6, pp. 22—30 (in Russ.).Wills, P. R., 2014. Genetic Information, Physical Interpreters and Thermodynamics; The Material-Informatic Basis of Biosemiosis. Biosemiotics, 7, pp. 141—165. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-013-9196-2.Wills, P. R., 2019. Reflexivity, coding and quantum biology. Biosystems, 185. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystems.2019.104027.Woese, C. R., 1969. Models for the Evolution of Codon Assignments. Journal of Molecular Biology, 43, pp. 235—240.Zolyan, S., 2021. On the context-sensitive grammar of the genetic code. Biosystems, 208, pp. 104497. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2021.104497.Zolyan, S., Zdanov, R., 2018. Genome as (hyper)text: From metaphor to theory. Semiotica, 6, pp. 1—18. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2016-0214.Zolyan, S. T., 2021а. Semiopoesis: Formation of Meaning in Molecular Genetics and Biosemiotics. Kritika i semiotika [Critique and Semiotics], 1, pp. 57—77 (in Russ.).Zolyan, S. T., 2021б. The Origin of the Genetic Code Sub Specie Semioticae. Metod: Moskovskii ezhegodnik trudov iz obshchestvovedcheskikh distsiplin [Method: Moscow Yearbook of Social Studies], 11, pp. 119—135 (in Russ.).Zolyan, S., 2022. From Matter to Form: the Evolution of the Genetic Code as Semio-Poiesis. Semiotica, 245, pp. 17—61. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2020-0088.G. L.TulchinskiiThe article presents a reflection on Yuri Lotman’s idea of reorienting semiotics from the analysis of structures to the analysis of texts and their binary diagogical nature. This idea allows correlating Lotman’s approach with Bakhtin’s concept of a continuous, meaning-generating dialogue. The juxtaposition of these approaches opens up new possibilities for ex­panding the semiotic analysis of the processes of meaning formation, metaphorization, the dynamics of culture, and the correlation of social and personal experience in these dynamics. The prospects of expanding the scope of the apparatus of semiotics, such as the narrative ap­proach, deep semiotics, and analysis of the dynamics of social institutionalization of sign structures, are revealed. This, in turn, opens up new horizons for the development of the theo­ry of meaning and understanding, the convergence and juxtaposition of semiotic and herme­neutic traditions, analytical philosophy and phenomenology, abstract modeling and the role of subjectivity (self-consciousness of self). Such extensions and perspectives realize the potential of semiotics as an effective conceptual platform of interdisciplinarity and convergence of sci­entific disciplines in understanding the ongoing transformations and responsible socio-cultural engineering.0601202611Aristotle, 1976. Sochineniya v chetyrekh tomakh. T. 1 [Works in four volumes. Vol. 1]. Moscow (in Russ.).Bakhtin, M. M., 1996. Sobranie sochinenii v semi tomakh [Collected works in seven volumes]. Moscow (in Russ.).Buber, M., 1993. Ya i Ty [I and Thou]. Moscow (in Russ.).Damasio, A., 2010. Self Comes to Mind: Constructing the Conscious Brain. Pantheon, 384 p.Emerson, C., 2022. Lotman and Bakhtin. In: M. Tamm and P. Torop, eds. The Companion to Juri Lotman: A Semiotic Theory of Culture. London; New York; Dublin: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc, pp. 78—90.Gusev, S. S., 1984. Nauka i metafora [Science and Metaphor]. Leningrad (in Russ.).Harari, Yu. N., 2019. Sapiens. Kratkaya istoriya chelovechestva [Sapiens. A Brief History of Humankind]. Moscow (in Russ.).Heidegger, M., 2015. Bytie i vremya [Being and time]. Moscow (in Russ.).Henrich, D., 2018. Myshlenie i samobytie. Chteniya o sub"ektivnosti [Thinking and being. Readings about subjectivity]. Moscow (in Russ.).Ivanov, Vyach. Vs., 1978. Chet i nechet: asimmetriya mozga i znakovykh sistem [Even and Odd: Asymmetry of the Brain and Sign Systems]. Moscow (in Russ.).Kripke, S., 1972. Naming and necessity. In: Semantics of natural language. Dordrecht.Kun, T., 2009. Struktura nauchnykh revolyutsii [The structure of scientific revolutions]. Moscow (in Russ.).Lakoff, J., Johnson, M., 2008. Metafory, kotorymi my zhivem [Metaphors we live by]. Moscow (in Russ.).Levinas, E., 2006. Put’ k drugomu [Way to another]. St. Petersburg (in Russ.).Lotman, Yu. M., 2022. Lecture at Tartu State University, March 13, 1981. Slovo.ru: Baltic accent, 13 (2), pp. 10—23 (in Russ.).Miall, D. S., ed., 1982. Metaphor: problems and perspectives. Brighton: Harvester press, 172 p.Ortony, A., ed., 1993. Metaphor and thought. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 696 p.Popovich, M. V., 1979. Ocherk razvitiya logicheskikh idei v kul’turno-istoricheskom kontekste [Sketch of the development of logical ideas in a cultural and historical context]. Kyiv (in Russ.).Russell, B., 1914. Problemy filosofii [Philosophy problems]. St. Petersburg (in Russ.).Russell, B., 1957. Chelovecheskoe poznanie: ego sfera i granitsy [Human cognition: its scope and boundaries]. Moscow (in Russ.).Schreider, Yu. A., 1965. On one model of the semantic theory of information. Problemy kibernetiki [Problems of Cybernetics], 13, pp. 233—240 (in Russ.).Tulchinskii, G. L., 1985. Factors of artistic culture dynamics. Sovetskoe iskusstvoznanie [Soviet art history], 19/83, Vol. 2. Moscow, pp. 220—248 (in Russ.).Tulchinskii, G. L., 1986. “New” theories of Truth and “naïve” semantics (On alternative theories of truth in modern logical semantics). Voprosy filosofii [Problems of Philosophy], 3, pp. 727—732 (in Russ.).Tulchinskii, G. L., 2018. The problem of meaning in Social Semiotics: deep semiotics as a conceptual extension of Social Semiotics. Slovo. ru: baltic accent, 9 (4), pp. 15—26 (in Russ.).Tulchinskii, G. L., 2019. Extensions of the Semiotic Analysis Capabilities: the Sources and Content of the “Deep Semiotics” Concept. Voprosy filosofii [Problems of Philosophy], 11, pp. 115—125 (in Russ.).Turner, V., 1983. Simvol i ritual [Symbol and ritual]. Moscow: Nauka (in Russ.).Zolyan, S. T., 2022. Yuri Lotman: On problems of language and linguistics. Voprosy Jazykoznanija [Topics in the study of language], 1, pp. 106—119 (in Russ.).I. B.MikirtumovThe author explores the meaning of proper names and other types of singular terms in the context of propositional attitudes, combining the problems of empty names, rigid designators and non-specific reading. An object in the attitudes can be given to the agent as such (de re), in the description (de dicto), as well as in several intermediate ways. From the analysis of the phe­nomenon of rigid designation, I move on to the theory of the object, where I consider two alterna­tives — strict, or Leibnizian, and weak. The first explains the actual non-existence by impossi­bility, the second — by occasionality. Here there are two ways of defining non-existent (fiction­al) objects — kinship and the counterpart relation, which are realized in frames that are different in their features. Nonspecific character is inherent in the kinship and counterpart relation in different ways. A special case is formed by hybrid worlds in which the real and the fictitious meet. The result of my analysis is five variants of a weakened de re reading of proper names and other singular terms in the context of attitudes. I describe their features, touching on the cogni­tive effect of narration, which operates with the appropriate attitudes.0601202611Geurts, B., 2017. Fictional Commitments. Theoretical Linguistics, 43 (1—2), pp. 53—60.Heim, I., 1983. File change semantics and the familiarity theory of definiteness. In: R. Bäuerle, Ch. Schwarze and A. von Stechow, eds. Meaning, Use and the Interpretation of Language. Berlin, pp. 164—190.Kamp, H., 2015. Using proper names as intermediary between labelled entity representations. Erkenntnis, 80, pp. 263—312.Kamp, H., Genabith, J. V., Reyle, U., 2003. Discourse representation theory. In: D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner, eds. Handbook of philosophical logic, 10. Heidelberg, pp. 125—394.Kripke, S., 1979. Puzzle about Belief. In: A. Margalit, ed. Meaning and Use. Synthese Language Library (Texts and Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy), 3. Dordrecht, pp. 239—283.Kripke, S., 1980. Naming and Necessity. Cambridge, МА.Kripke, S., 2011. Vacuous names and fictional entities. In: S. Kripke, ed. Philosophical troubles. Oxford, pp. 52—74.LaPorte, J. Rigid Designators. In: E. Zalta, ed. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available at: https://plato. stanford. edu/entries/rigid-designators [Accessed 10 September 2021].Leibniz, G. W., 1982. Reasoning about metaphysics. In: G. W. Leibniz, ed. Sochineniya v chetyrekh tomakh [Papers in four volumes], 1. Translated by V. P. Preobrazhenskii. Moscow, pp. 125—163 (in Russ.).Leibniz, G. W., 1984. Correspondence with Queen Sophia-Charlotte of Prussia and Kurfürstin Sophia. In: G. W. Leibniz, ed. Sochineniya v chetyrekh tomakh [Papers in four volumes], 3. Translated by V. P. Preobrazhenskii. Moscow, pp. 371—393 (in Russ.).Lewis, D., 1968. Counterpart Theory and Quantified Modal Logic. Journal of Philosophy, 65 (5), pp. 113—126.Lewis, D., 1978. Truth in fiction. American Philosophical Quarterly, 15, pp. 37—46.Maier, E., 2017. Fictional names in psychologistic semantics. Theoretical Linguistics, 43 (1—2), pp. 1—45.Méndez-Martinez, J. L., 2019. What Counts as “a” 174 Sound and How “to Count” a Sound. Synthesis philosophica, 67 (1), pp. 173—190.Mikirtumov, I. B., 2018. Semiotic facts. Logiko-filosofskie shtudii [Logical and philosophical studies], 16 (4), pp. 311—334 (in Russ.).Mikirtumov, I. B., 2020. The logic of the naming relation and identification. Logiko-filosofskie shtudii [Logical and philosophical studies], 18 (2), pp. 112—133 (in Russ.).Montague, R., 1973. The Proper Treatment of Quantification in Ordinary English. In: J. Hintikka, J. Moravcsik and P. Suppes, eds. Approaches to Natural Language. Dordrecht, pp. 221—242.Rami, D., Zimmermann, T. E., 2017. Imagination, Psychologistic Semantics, and the Paradox of Fictional Names. Theoretical Linguistics, 43 (1—2), pp. 71—80.Recanati, F., 2012. Mental files. Oxford.Recanati, F., 2017. Fictitious Anchors. Theoretical Linguistics, 43 (1—2), pp. 81—93.Schwager, M., 2011. Speaking of qualities. In: E. Cormany, S. lto and D. Lutz, eds. Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT), 19. New York, pp. 395—412.Sudo, Y., 2014. On De Re Predicates. Proceedings of WCCFL, 31, pp. 447—456.Tiskin, D., 2016. Aspects of naming and names of aspects. Vestnik SPbSU. Series 17. Philosophy. Confl ict studies. Culture studies. Religious studies, 4, pp. 75—84.R. E.BarashA. Yu.AntonovskiyThe article investigates the problem of the universally significant meaning of communi­cative messages. This framework problem implies answering more specific questions — is there a reality (correlative to the meaning of judgments) that would guarantee the universali­ty of the meanings of linguistic expressions; is there a reality behind moralizing or judgments of taste that ensures agreement on value judgments if they become the content of communica­tion. What provides the typical identity of mental states (thoughts, perceptions, representa­tions, sensations) in different individuals, when these states are thematized in communica­tion? Is there a typical correlation behind them in reality, which ensures the identity of men­tal states? The article posits that propositional attitudes act as “carriers” or frameworks of typical communicative environments, indirect contexts in which propositional content are localized as the main — intralingual — evolutionary mechanism that stabilizes key commu­nicative meanings. Indirect contexts produced in the language or the operators “I know that...”, “I hope that...”, “I remember that...”, “I want that…”, “I imagine that...” protect sentences from negation and make it possible to reproduce universally significant meanings.0601202611Barth, Fr., 1975. Ritual and Knowledge Among the Baktaman of New Guinea. New Haven: Yale University Press.Bühler, K., 1934. Sprachtheorie. Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Jena.Campbell, D., 1960. Blind variation and selective retentions in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychological Review, 67, pp. 380—400.Campbell, N. R., 1957. Foundations of Science. New York: Dover Publications.Delancey, C. S., 2007. Meaning Naturalism, Meaning Irrealism, and the Work of Language. Synthese, 154 (2), pp. 231—257.Gavrilets, S., 2004. Fitness Landscapes and the Origin of Species. Monographs in population biology, 41. Princeton University Press.Giddens, A., 1984. The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.Goodman, N., 1965. Fact, Fiction and Forecast. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Grice, H. P., 1989. Studies in the Way of Words. Harvard University Press.Habermas, J., 2003. On the Pragmatics of Communication. Cambridge: Polity Press.Kripke, S., 1982. Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language: An Elementary Exposition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Luhmann, N., 2004. Media kommunikatsii [Media communications]. Moscow: Logos (in Russ.).Luhmann, N., 2017. Evolution of science. Epistemology & Philosophy of Science, 51 (1), pp. 215—233.Miller, A., 2000. Horwich, Meaning and Kripke’s Wittgenstein. Philosophical Quarterly, 50 (199), pp. 161—174.Morris, M., 2006. Kripke on proper names. In: M. Morris, ed. An Introduction to the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge Introductions to Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 74—93.Putnam, H., 1967. Psychological Predicates. In: W. H. Capitan and D. D. Merrill, eds. Art, Mind, and Religion. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 37—48.Reicher, M., 2019. Nonexistent objects. In: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/nonexistent-objects/ [Accessed at 29 May 2021].Routly, R., 1980. Exploring Meinong’s Jungle and Beyond. Canberra: Research School of the Social Sciences.Russell, B., 1905. On Denoting. Mind, 14, pp. 479—493.Schutz, A., 1974. Der sinnhafte Aufbau der sozialen Welt. Eine Einleitung in die verstehende Soziologie. Frankfurt a/M: Suhrkamp.Smirnov, A. V., 2019. Is a Process-Based Logic Possible? Voprosy filosofii, 2, pp. 5—17 (in Russ.).Smirnov, A. V., 2019. Mind is a Capacity to Develop an Epistemic Chain. Voprosy filosofii, 2, pp. 48—60 (in Russ.).Suppe, F., 1974. The Search for Philosophic Understanding of Scientific Theories. In: F. Suppe, ed. The Structure of Scientific Theories. University of Illinois Press, pp. 221—260.Yu. A.DreyzisThe paper describes the practice of creating poetic texts on lects that possess a problemat­ic linguistic status. The author proposes using ‘topolect’ as a universal term for such entities, which allows them to be placed in a special category of language systems that occupy an in­termediate level between the standard and the rather homogeneous territorial dialects in a kind of multilingualism that is characterized by the distribution of functions between idioms. The analysis of the poetic tradition of topolects makes it possible to reveal some general pat­terns of text functioning for the texts on de facto normalized, but not subjected to strict standardization, semi-autonomous idioms. Different modes of correlating the oral and the written in these texts come in direct connection with the practice of recitation and other forms of the auditory existence of poetry. The introduction of new empirical material contributes to the reassessment of the problem of the oral and the written, since it demonstrates the non-equivalence of the oral and the spoken, and the written and the literary. The visually percepti­ble text in its written form is informatively not equivalent to the voiced version of the same text. Building relationships between ‘visual speech’ (in the form of a poetic text) and its sounding shows the evolution of topolect writing and metalanguage reflection of its authors.0601202611Babenko, N. S., Karpov, V. I., 2008. Dialect in the system of forms of language existence (to the history of the issue). In: Aktual’nye problemy nemetskoi ostrovnoi dialektologii (pamyati G. G. Ediga) [Actual problems of German island dialectology (in memory of G. G. Edig). Materials of the All-Russian Scientific and practical seminar (Krasnoyarsk, June 2—4, 2008)]. Krasnoyarsk, pp. 10—27 (in Russ.).Bai Jianhua, 1994. Language Attitude and the Spread of Standard Chinese in China. Language Problems and Language Planning, 18 (2), pp. 128—138.Baran, D., 2004. “Taiwanese Don’t Have Written Words”: Language Ideologies and Language Practice in a Taipei County High School. In: Proceedings of the Taiwan International Romanization Forum 2004 (2004 羅馬 字 國際 研討會 論文集). Tainan, pp. 35-1—35-10.Basistech, 2012. The Identification of Romanized Arabic in Online Communication. Available at: http://www.basistech.com/whitepapers/Identification-of-Romanized- Arabic-EN.pdf [Accessed: 18 April 2021].Bell, R. T., 1976. Sociolinguistics: Goals, Approaches and Problems. London.Blum, S. D., 2004. Good to Hear: Using the Trope of Standard to Find One’s Way in a Sea of Linguistic Diversity. In: Language Policy in the People’s Republic of China. Dordrecht, pp. 123—141.Borodina, M. A., 1982. Dialects or regional languages? (On the problem of the language situation in modern France). Voprosy Jazykoznanija [Topics in the study of language], 5, pp. 29—38 (in Russ.).Coulmas, F., 1991. Does the notion of diglossia apply to Japanese? Some thoughts and some documentation. Southwest Journal of Linguistics, 10 (1), pp. 125—142.Donaldson, W., 1989. The Language of the People: Scots Prose from the Victorian Revival. Aberdeen.Dreysis, Yu. A., 2020. Development of a Written Language for the Sounds of a Topolect: Initial Stage of Hong Kong Yue Formation. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Seriya 13. Vostokovedenie [Moscow University Bulletin. Series 13. Oriental Studies], 3, pp. 37—55 (in Russ.).Fang Xuejia 房学嘉, 1994. Kejia yuanliu tan’ao 客家源流探奥 [Survey on the Historical Roots of Hakka]. Guangzhou (in Chinese).Groves, J., 2008. Language or Dialect—or Topolect? A Comparison of the Attitudes of Hong Kongers and Mainland Chinese towards the Status of Cantonese. Sino-Platonic Papers, 179, pp. 1—103.Gukhman, M. M., 1985. Funktsional’naya stratifikatsiya yazyka [Functional stratification of language]. Moscow (in Russ.).Halliday, M., 1989. Spoken and Written Language. Oxford.Jiang Weiwen 蔣為文, 2005. Yuyan, rentung yu quzhimin 語言、認同與去殖民 [Language, Identity, and Decolonization]. Tainan (in Chinese).Kalgina, E. A., 2018. The Problem of “Language” vs. “Dialect”: Scots Language Variety in Modern Britain. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser.: Lingvistika i mezhkul’turnaya kommunikatsiya [Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: Linguistics and intercultural communication], 1, pp. 34—36 (in Russ.).Ota, K., 2005. An investigation of written Taiwanese: Master’s thesis. University of Hawai’i at Manoa.Mair, V. H., 1991. What Is a Chinese “Dialect / Topolect”? Reflections on Some Key Sino-English Linguistic terms. Sino-Platonic Papers, 29, pp. 1—31.Ostapenko, I. A., 1980. Nekotorye aspekty yazykovoi situatsii i osobennosti angliiskogo yazyka v Shotlandii [Some aspects of the language situation and peculiarities of the English language in Scotland]. Kalinin (in Russ.).Pauwels, A., 1986. Diglossia, immigrant dialects and language maintenance in Australia: the case of Limburgs and Swabian. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 7, pp. 13—30.Polyan, A. L., 2016. Poeticheskii tekst na “spyashchem” yazyke v usloviyakh mnogoyazychiya (na materiale poezii na ivrite III—XIX vv. n. e.) [Poetic text in a “sleeping” language in conditions of multilingualism (based on the material of poetry in Hebrew of III—XIX centuries AD)]. PhD thesis. Moscow (in Russ.).Razumova, L. V., 2010. The definition problem of the term “regional languages”. Uchenye zapiski Zabaikal’skogo gosudarstvennogo gumanitarno-pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. N. G. Chernyshevskogo [Scientific notes of the N. G. Chernyshevsky Trans-Baikal State Humanitarian Pedagogical University], 3, pp. 111—115 (in Russ.).Stewart, W. A., 1962. An Outline of Linguistic Typology for Describing Multilingualism. In: Study of the Role of Second Languages in Asia, Africa, and Latin America. Washington, DC, pp. 15—25.Stewart, W. A., 1968. A Sociolinguistic Typology for Describing National Multilingualism. In: Readings in the Sociology of Language. The Hague, pp. 531—545.Trudgill, P., 1974. Sociolinguistics: An Introduction. Middlesex, New York.Wardhaugh, R., 2000. An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. 3d ed. Beijing.Wolfram, W., 1998. Language Ideology and Dialect. Journal of English Linguistics, 26 (2), pp. 108—121.Yakhontov, S. E., 1980. Assessment of the degree of proximity of related languages. In: Teoreticheskie osnovy klassifikatsii yazykov mira [Theoretical foundations of the classification of the languages of the world]. Moscow, pp. 148—157 (in Russ.).Yang Xiufang 楊秀芳, 1994. Lun wen bai yi du 論文白異讀 [On the Differences Between the Literary and Colloquial Readings]. In: Wang Shumin xiansheng bashi shouqing lunwenji [Collection of Articles in Honor of the 80th birthday of Wang Shumin]. Taipei, pp. 823—849 (in Chinese).M. S.PotyominaThis article explores Reinhard Jirgl’s concept of literary writing, which uses linguistic and textual deconstruction, alphanumeric encoding, and intra- and intertextual strategies. Semiotic and discursive analyses allow identifying lexical, syntactic, and semantic elements of the structural and functional performativity of Jirgl’s texts. His prose exploits the enor­mous poetic potential of the alphanumeric code, the aesthetics of narrative simultaneity and hypertextuality, and the fragmentedness of the agent. The principle of aberrant text produc­tion helps the author stage the process of sense formation and brings to the fore the concept of hierarchical rule destruction, which applies to language, society, and reality. By deconstruct­ing syntax and orthography, Jirgl’s system of language and script generates new senses. It also compels the recipient to destroy customary mental matrices and analyse processes taking place in society.Narrative staging of Jirgl’s texts is performed to identify the main problems that student translators are faced with when decoding the writer’s prose. Rendering a contemporary fic­tional text into a different language requires paying attention to meaning construction and (de)construction, the extralinguistic context, and links and interactions between linguistic and social meanings. Moreover, it is necessary to explore connections between the performa­tive and narrative characteristics of utterances.New literary contexts and the alarmist forms of narrative peculiar to Jirgl’s writing urge the translator to develop specific professional skills and philological competencies.0601202611Baksakova, T., 2005. Creating a myth from the debris of daily life: Reinhard Jirgl and his stories of Blood, Sex & Death. Mitin zhurnal, 62, pp. 128—172 (in Russ.).Benjamin, W., 2011. On Language as Such and on the Language of Man. Early Writings. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Böttiger, H., 2011. Buchstaben-Barrikaden. Von Reinhard Jirgls Anfängen bis hin zu „Die Stile“- ein in sich stimmiger ästhetischer Kosmos. In: Text+Kritik, 189. München: Richard Boorberg Verlag, pp. 14—24.Danneman, K., 2009. Der blutig=obszön=banale 3-Groschen-Roman namens Geschichte. Gesellshafts- und Zivilisationskritik in den Romanen Reinhard Jirgls. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.De Winde, A., 2008. Palimpsest der Gespenster: Intertextualität, Genealogie und Spektralität im Werk von Reinhard Jirgl. PhD Dissertation. Leuven.De Winde, A., 2011. Das hatte ich mal irgendwo gelesen. Überlegungen zu Reinhard Jirgls Esseyismus. In: Text+Kritik, 189. München: Richard Boorberg Verlag, pp. 86—97.Demir, M. I., 2016. Poetologie der Ränder. Kulturpoetische Dimension performativer Schreibverfahren in Reinhard Jirgls Genealogie des Tötens. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.Eco, U., 1990. Interpretation and Overinterpretation: World, History, Texts. The Tanner lectures on human values. Cambridge: Cambridge University. Available at: https:// tannerlectures.utah.edu/_documents/a-to-z/e/Eco_91.pdf [Accessed 15 August 2021].Flüsser, V., 1992. Die Schrift. Hat Schreiben Zukunft? Frankfurt a/M.: Fischer Verlag.Golosovker, Ya. E., 1987. The imaginative absolute. In: Ya. E. Golosovker, ed. Logika mifa [The logic of the myth]. Moscow, pp. 114—165. (in Russ.).Grimm, E., 2007. Die Lebensläufe Reinhard Jirgls. Techniken des melotraumatischen Inszenierung. In: D. von Clarke and A. De Winde, eds. Reinhard Jirgl. Perspektiven, Lesearten, Kontexte. Amsterdam; New York: Rodopi, pp. 197—226.Henschel, G., 1999. Dreck u Speck u Kehricht. Über den Wotkünstler Reinhard Jirgl. Titanic, November 1999. Available at: https://www.titanic-magazin.de/heft/ 1999/november/henschel-schmirgl-jirgl/ [Accessed 15 August 2021].Jirgl, R., 1991. Im offenen Meer. Schichtungsroman. Hamburg; Zürich: Luchterhand.Jirgl, R., 2002. Das poetische Vermögen des alphanummerischen Codes in der Prosa. Essay. In: R. Jirgl, ed. Gewitterlicht. Hannover: Revonnah, pp. 78—84.Jirgl, R., 2008. Die wilde und die gezähmte Schrift. Eine Arbeitsübersicht. In R. Jirgl, ed. Land und Beute. Aufsätze aus den Jahren 1996 bis 2006. München: Carl Hansen Verlag, pp. 92—122.Kleinschmidt, E., 2006. Schreiblektüren. Zur transformativen Poetik H. C. Artmanns. In: E. von Kleinschmidt and W. Schmitz, eds. Sammeln und Lesen. Die Kölner H. S. Artmann- Sammlung Knupfe:. Lektüren. Köln: Universitäts und Stadtbibliothek, pp. 214—237.Magerski, Ch., 2001. Trostlose Landschaft mit Literat. Kritische Bemerkungen zum Versuch der Inszenierung einer literarischen Nullstunde nach 1989 am Beispiel Reinhard Jirgls. In: Glossen: German Literature and Culture after 1945, 13. Available at: http://www2.dickinson. edu/glossen/heft13/trostloselandschaft. html [Accessed 15 August 2021].Papst, S., 2011. Text-Theater. Zur Form der früheren Prosa Reinhards Jirgls. In: Text+Kritik, 189. München: Richard Boorberg Verlag, pp. 25—37.Seibt, G., 1995. Gehege des Absterbens. Reinhard Jirgls DDR-Metamorphosen. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, November 6, 105.L. G.DorofeevaThe article provides an overview of the VI International Scientific Seminar "Hagiog­raphy in the Russian Cultural Space", dedicated to the 200th anniversary of Fedor Dostoev­sky’s birth. The seminar was organized at the Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University on October 11—12, 2021. The main ideas and key points of the presentations of the plenary and section meetings are explored.0601202611