NONE20260601035829121Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal Universityno-reply@journals.kantiana.ruImmanuel Kant Baltic Federal UniversitySlovo.ru: Baltic accent2225-53462686-898906012026122A.SimskyA. V.KravchenkoA. S.DruzhininThe genesis of time is explained in the spirit of constructivism combined with the activity approach to cognition. The cardinal temporal categories of present, past, and future are dis­cussed in terms of action-thoughts understood as elementary units of activity whose structure is determined by linguistic semiosis. Husserl’s tripartite model of the phenomenology of time (prime perception, retention, protention) is applied to the analysis of the subject’s experience of his actions. It is demonstrated that, while our lived present is composed of the actually per­formed actions, our past and future are constructed by reflexive action-thoughts in the cogni­tive domain of language. It is emphasized that the construction of a temporal sequence that unites what is and what already or still is not, is possible only in linguistic semiosis. The analogy with Husserl’s tripartite structure of the time-consciousness flow helps elucidate the triad ‘present-past-future’ as an instance of the epistemological trap of language: ‘past’ and ‘future’ are mental constructs that belong to the present just as any other act of thinking.0601202611Arendt, H., 1998. The Human Condition. Chicago.Arutunova, N. D., 1999. Yazyk i mir cheloveka [Language and the Human World]. Moscow (in Russ.).Augustine of Hippo, 1992. Ispoved'. Istoriya moikh bedstvii [Confessions of St. Augustine]. Moscow (in Russ.).Auletta, G., 2011. Cognitive Biology: Dealing with information from bacteria to minds. Oxford.Bedny, G. and Karwowski, W., 2007. A Systemic-Structural Theory of Activity. Boca Raton, FL.Bergson, H., 2004. Matter and Memory. New York.Bernstein, N. A., 1990. Fiziologiya dvizhenii i aktivnost' [Physiology of Movement and Activity]. Moscow (in Russ.).Bridgman, P. W., 1958. The Logic of Modern Physics. Vol. 3. New York.Chomsky, N., 1975. Reflections on Language. New York.Damasio, A. 1994. Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. New York.Damasio, A., 1999. The Feeling of What Happens: Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness. New York.Dennett, D. 1996. Kinds of Minds: Toward an Understanding of Consciousness. New York, NY.Deutsch, D., 1997. The Fabric of Reality. London.Druzhinin, A. S., 2020. Construction of irreality: an enactive-constructivist stance on counterfactuals. Constructivist Foundations, 16(1), pp. 69—80.Everett, D., 2008. Don’t Sleep! There are Snakes: Life and language in the Amazon jungle. New York.Fasmer, M., 1986. Etimologicheskii slovar' russkogo yazyka [Etymological dictionary of the Russian language]. Vol. 1. Moscow (in Russ.).Gallagher, S. and Varela, F. J., 2003. Redrawing the map and resetting the time: Phenomenology and the cognitive sciences. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 33(sup1), pp. 93—132.Gallagher, S., 2005. How the Body Shapes the Mind. Oxford.Gendlin, E., 1997. How philosophy cannot appeal to experience, and how it can. In: D. M. Levin, ed. Language Beyond Postmodernism: Saying and thinking in Gendlin’s philosophy. Evanston, pp. 3—41.Glasersfeld, E. von, 1995. Radical Constructivism: a way of knowing and learning. Bristol.Goldsmith, J. and Woisetschlaeger, E., 1982. The logic of the English progressive. Linguistic Inquiry, 13(1), pp. 79—89.Guénon, R., 1945. Le règne de la quantité et les signes des temps. Paris.Heidegger, M., 1927. Sein und Zeit. Tübingen.Husserl, E., 1991. On the Phenomenology of the Consciousness of Internal Time. Translated by J. Brough. Dordrecht.Järvilehto, T., 1998. The theory of the organism-environment system: I. Description of the theory. Integrative Physiological and Behavioral Science, 33, pp. 317—330.Koshelev, A. D., 2018. Ocherki evolyutsionno-sinteticheskoi teorii yazyka [Essays on the Evolutionary-Synthetic Theory of Language]. Moscow (in Russ.).Kravchenko, A. V., 1996. Yazyk i vospriyatie: Kognitivnye aspekty yazykovoi kategorizatsii [Language and Perception: Cognitive Aspects of Language Categorization]. Irkutsk (in Russ.).Kravchenko, A. V., 2009. On traditions, linguistics, and a cognitive approach. In: N. K. Riabtseva, ed. Gorizonty sovremennoi lingvistiki: traditsii i novatorstvo [The Horizons of Modern Linguistics: Tradition and Novelty]. Moscow, pp. 51—65 (in Russ.).Kravchenko, A. V., 2015. Cognitive-semiotic grammar. In: A. A. Kibrik and A. D. Koshelev, eds. Yazyk i mysl': sovremennaya kognitivnaya lingvistika [Language and Thought: Contemporary Cognitive Linguistics]. Moscow. pp. 574—594 (in Russ.).Kravchenko, A. V., 2016. The epistemological trap of language. Tomsk State University Journal of Philology, 3(41), pp. 14—26 (in Russ.).Kravchenko, A. V., 2017. "Consciousness" as an ecological concept. Noosfernye issledovaniya [Noosphere studies], 2, pp. 5—16 (in Russ.).Kravchenko, A. V., 2019a. Information technology and cognitive development: an ecolinguistic perspective. Journal of Psycholinguistics, 4(42), pp. 76—91 (in Russ.).Kravchenko, A. V., 2019b. How exotic is the ‘immediacy of experience principle’ in Pirahã? Siberian Journal of Philology, 1, pp. 148—160 (in Russ.).Kravchenko, A. V., 1990. Towards a cognitive theory of tense and aspect. Filologicheskije nauki [Studies in Philology], 6, pp. 81—90 (in Russ.).Kravchenko, A. V., 2018. On the implicit observer in grammar: aspect. In: L. M. Liashchova, ed. The Explicit and the Implicit in Language and Speech. Newcastle upon Tyne, pp. 12—34.Kravchenko, A. V., 2020. Linguistic semiosis and human cognition. Constructivist Foundations, 15(3), pp. 285—287.Kuhn, T. S., 1977. The Essential Tension: Selected studies in scientific tradition and change. Chicago.Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M., 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York.Lektorsky, V. A., 2018. Constructive realism as a modern form of epistemological realism. Voprosy filosofii, 23(2), pp. 18—22 (in Russ.).Leonov, A. A. and Lebedev, V. I., 1971. The Psychological Aspects of Activities in Space Flight [Psychological features of the activities of astronauts]. Moscow (in Russ.).Leontiev, A. N., 1975. Activity. Consciousness. Personality [Activity. Consciousness. Personality]. Moscow (in Russ.).Mach, E., 1975. The Analysis of Sensations. New York.Maturana, H. R., 1970. Biology of cognition. BCL Report # 9.0. University of Illinois. Urbana, 1970.Maturana, H. R., 1978. Biology of language: The epistemology of reality. In: G. Miller and E. Lenneberg, eds. Psychology and Biology of Language and Thought: Essays in honor of Eric Lenneberg. New York, pp. 27—63.Maturana, H. R., 1978. Ontology of observing: The biological foundations of self-consciousness and of the physical domain of existence. In: Texts in cybernetic theory: conference workbook (American Society for Cybernetics Conference, 18—23 October 1988. Felton, pp. 4—53.Maturana, H. R., 1984. The tree of knowledge: the biological roots of human understanding. Boston.Maturana, H. R., 1990. The biological foundations of self-consciousness and the physical domain of existence. In: Beobachter: Konvergenz der Erkenntnistheorien? Munich, pp. 47—117.Maturana, H. R., 1995. Biology of Cognition. In: V. V. Petrov, ed., Jazyk i intellect [Language and intelligence]. Moscow, pp. 95—142 (in Russ.).Maturana, H. R., 2001 Drevo poznaniya [Tree of knowledge]. Moscow (in Russ.).Maturana, H. R., 2012. Reflections on my collaboration with Francisco Varela. Constructivist Foundations, 7, pp. 155—164.Maturana, H. R., Mpodozis, J. and Letelier J. C., 1995. Brain, language, and the origin of human mental functions. Biological Research, 28, pp. 15—26.Mesulam, M., 1982. Slowly progressive aphasia without generalized dementia. Annals of Neurology, 11(6), pp. 592—598.Morris, C. W., 1938. Foundations of the theory of signs. In: O. Neurath, R. Carnap and C. W. Morris, eds. International Encyclopedia of Unified Science. Vol. 1, Part 2. The Chicago, pp. 1—59.Noë, A., 2006. Action in Perception. Cambridge & London.Okhotsimsky, A. D., 2018a. Thought actions as the basis of mental work. Voprosy kul'turologii [Questions of cultural studies], 8, pp. 28—40 (in Russ.).Okhotsimsky, A. D., 2018b. Thought actions as the basis of mental work. Voprosy kul'turologii [Questions of cultural studies], 9, pp. 29—41 (in Russ.).Piaget, J. 1977. Recherches sur l'abstraction reflechissante. Vol. 1, 2. Paris.Piaget, J., 1970. Genetic Epistemology. New York.Rizzolatti, G. and Sinigaglia, C., 2010. The functional role of the parieto-frontal mirror circuit: interpretations and misinterpretations. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11, pp. 264—274.Rubinstein, S. L., 1940. Osnovy obshchei psikhologii [Fundamentals of General Psychology]. Moscow (in Russ.).Schmidt, R. A. and Lee, T. D., 1999. Motor Control and Learning: A behavioral emphasis. Leeds.Shchedrovitsky, G. P., 1995. Izbrannye trudy [Selected works]. Moscow (in Russ.).Steffe, L. P., 2007. Radical constructivism: A scientific research program. Constructivist Foundations, 2(2-3), pp. 41—49.Stewart, J., Gapenne O. and Di Paolo, E. A., eds., 2011. Enaction: Toward a new paradigm for cognitive science. Cambridge, MA.Thompson, E., 2007. Mind and Life. Cambridge, MA.Urban, P., 2016. Foregrounding the relational domain — phenomenology, enactivism and care ethics. Horizon, 5(1), pp. 171—182.Varela, F. J., 1987. Laying down a path in walking. In: W. I. Thompson, ed. Gaia: A way of knowing. Political implications of the new biology. Hudson, NY, pp. 48—64.Varela, F. J., Thompson, E. and Rosh, E., 1991. The Embodied Mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, MA.Vygotsky, L. S., 1934. Myshlenie i rech' [Thought and Language]. Moscow (in Russ.).Ward, D., Silverman, D. and Villalobos, M. 2017. Introduction: The varieties of enactivism. Topoi, 36, pp. 365—375.Wittgenstein, L., 1922. Tractatus logico-philosophicus, London.Zahavi, D., 2003. Inner time-consciousness and pre-reflective self-awareness. In: D. Welton, ed. The New Husserl: A critical reader. Bloomington, pp. 157—180.S. V.GerasimovThe article deals with the dynamic interaction of events and narratives. As a result of this interaction, stable links ‘events-narratives’ appear; they influence the formation and transformation of social and cultural processes in society. Event-narrative links form the basis of the system of norms and values of society. The corpus of ‘event-narrative’ links creates be­havioural patterns, serves as a motivator for members of society, a cause and reason for ac­tions and an initiator of terraced events that inevitably occur as a response to events in reali­ty. The emerging connections ‘event — narrative — action (special event)’ represent a system with a controlled feedback. Depending on a change in the factors of the occurrence and course of events, such a system can both enhance and reduce the result and consequences of events. In these systems, an event triggers social and cultural processes and creates social reality.0601202611Bakhtin, M. M., 1990. Tvorchestvo Fransua Rable i narodnaja kul'tura Srednevekov'ja i Renescansa [Francois Rabelais' creativity and folk culture of the Middle Ages and Renaissance]. Moscow (in Russ.).Bakhtin, M. M., 1997—2012. Sobranie sochinenij [Collected Works]. Moscow (in Russ.).Bridgman, P. W., 1934. A Physicist’s Second Reaction to Mengenlehre. Scripta Mathematica, 2, pp. 101—117; 224—234.Buharin, S. N. and Cyganov, V. V., 2007. Metody i tehnologii informacionnyh vojn [Methods and technologies of information warfare]. Moscow (in Russ.).Deleuze, G., 1998. Logika smysla [The logic of meaning]. Translated from French by Ya. I. Svirsky. Ekaterinburg (in Russ.).Frazer, J. G., 2006. Zolotaya vetv'. Issledovanie magii i religii [Golden bough. Study of magic and religion]. Translated from English by M. K. Ryklina. Moscow (in Russ.).Gerasimov S. V., 2017. Event as a managerial function of generating social reality. Chelovek. Kul'tura. Obrazovanie [Human. Culture. Education], 1 (23), pp. 68—83 (in Russ.).Gerasimov, S. V. and Tereshhenko, P. A., 2020. Storytelling of political leaders as an instrument of symbolic politics. Diskurs [Discourse], 6 (3), pp. 5—20 (in Russ.).Gerasimov, S. V. and Tul'chinskij, G. L., 2018. Events as a Semantic Basis for the Construction of Reality: Prospects for the Transition to a Dynamic Ontology. Slovo.ru: Baltic accent, 9(3), pp. 5—25 (in Russ.).Gerasimov, S. V., 2013. Closing the circle of manipulation. Filosofskie nauki [Philosophical Sciences], 5, pp. 34—41 (in Russ.).Gerasimov, S. V., 2015. Closing the circle of manipulation. Filosofskie nauki [Philosophical Sciences], 5, pp. 34—41 (in Russ.).Gerasimov, S. V., 2019. Construction of social reality: narratives and performances. Chelovek. Kul'tura. Obrazovanie [Human. Culture. Education], 4 (34), pp. 9—23 (in Russ.).Gerasimov, S. V., 2020. Formation of a narrative from a performative in public communications. Slovo.ru: Baltic accent, 11 (1), pp. 34—49 (in Russ.).Hoffman, F. G., 2009. Hybrid warfare and challenges. Joint Force Quarterly, 52, pp. 34—39.Husserl, E., 2001. Kartezianskie razmyshleniya [Cartesian reflections]. St. Petersvurg (in Russ.).Kant, I., 2002. Spor fakul'tetov [Faculty dispute]. Translated from German by T. G. Arzakanyan, I. D. Koptsev and M. I. Levina. Kaliningrad (in Russ.).Landauer, R., 1996. The Physical Nature of Information. Physics Letters. A, 217 (4—5), pp. 188—193.Lotman, M. Ju., 1970. Struktura khudozhestvennogo teksta [The structure of artistic text]. MMoscow (in Russ.).Magun, A. V., 2008. Otritsatel'naya revolyutsiya: k dekonstruktsii politicheskogo sub"ekta [Negative revolution: towards the deconstruction of the political subject]. St. Petersburg (in Russ.).Malinova, O.Yu., 2015. Aktual'noe proshloe: Simvolicheskaya politika vlastvuyushchei elity i dilemmy rossiiskoi identichnosti [Current Past: Symbolic Politics of the Ruling Elite and the Dilemmas of Russian Identity]. Moscow (in Russ.).Pocheptsov, G. G., 2018. Propaganda 2.0 [Advocacy 2.0]. Kharkov (in Russ.).Taylor, R. S., 1962. The Process of Asking Questions. American Documentation, 13, pp. 391—396.Tomashevskii, B. V., 1996. Teoriya literatury. Poetika: ucheb. posobie [Literature theory. Poetics: textbook]. Moscow (in Russ.).Tul'chinskii, G. L., 2012. Culture as a resource and a barrier to innovative development. Innovatsii [Innovation], 5, pp. 74—79 (in Russ.).Tul'chinskii, G. L., 2015. Historical memory in symbolic politics and information wars. Filosofskie nauki [Philosophical Sciences], (5), pp. 24—33 (in Russ.).Tul'chinskii, G. L., 2018. Evaluative and emotional factors of meaning formation: normative and value patterns of cultural narratives. Chelovek, kul'tura, obrazovanie [Human, culture, education], 4 (30), pp. 175—193 (in Russ.).Tul'chinskii, G. L., 2020. Filosofiya postupka: samoopredelenie lichnosti v sovremennom obshchestve [Philosophy of action: self-determination of personality in modern society]. St. Petersburg (in Russ.).Tul'chinskii, G. L., Gerasimov, S. V. and Lokhina, T. E., 2019. Menedzhment spetsial'nykh sobytii v sfere kul'tury: ucheb. posobie [Management of special events in the field of culture: textbook]. Vol. 5. St. Petersburg (in Russ.).Vorob'ev, O. Ju., 2007. Jeventologija [Eventology]. Krasnoyarsk (in Russ.).A. ALisenkovaThe article analyses the impact of digital technologies on storytelling. By creating new information streams of personalised stories with open storylines in the virtual media envi­ronment, the author shares the process of writing a story with other participants in the digital world. The interaction between the author and the audience is transformed under the influ­ence of the hypertext system of cross-references. Each participant in this creative process acts not only as a co-creator, but also as a co-author of many narratives. The narratives, which translate personalized evaluative and often pseudo-expert opinions into the public space, are becoming increasingly emotional to the detriment of the content. Constantly increasing the information flow and immersing its participants in the interactive world of emotional collec­tive meta-narratives composed of fragments of individual stories, the users build a single digi­tal content. By labelling their stories, they relate them to large thematic clusters of homogene­ous information, including their individual experiences in a single space of collective story­telling. Participating in the process of constant co-creation, users construct their own virtual world, filling it with micro-narrative stories of collective creativity, subsequently living inde­pendently in the digital space. The artificially created virtual information environment is constantly multiplying due to the reproduction of hypertextual stories by all participants of storytelling and, as a result, it begins to reproduce itself.0601202611Barthes, R., 1989. Izbrannye raboty: Semiotika: Poetika [Selected works: Semiotics: Poetics]. Translated from French by G. K. Kosikov. Moscow (in Russ.).Eco, U., 2005. Rol' chitatelya: issledovaniya po semiotike teksta [The role of the reader: studies in the semiotics of the text]. St. Petersburg (in Russ.).Enikeev, A. A., 2016. The problem of reading and writing in the context of poetics and pragmatics of the philosophical text. Nauchnyi zhurnal KubGAU [Scientific Journal of KubGAU], 122, pp. 867—887 (in Russ.).Jenkins, G., 2019. Konvergentnaya kul'tura. Stolknovenie starykh i novykh media [Convergent culture. The clash of old and new media]. Translated from English by A. V. Gasilina. Moscow (in Russ.).Jenkins, H., 2007. Transmedia Storytelling 101. Available at: http://henryjenkins. org/blog/2007/03/transmedia_storytelling_101.html [Accessed 9 December 2020].Jenkins, H., 2011. Transmedia storytelling and entertainment. An annotating syllabus. Continuum. Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, 24 (6), pp. 43—58.Lévy, P., 2001, Cyberculture. Minneapolis.McKee, R., 2013. Istoriya na million dollarov: Master-klass dlya stsenaristov, pisatelei i ne tol'ko [A Million Dollar Story: A Masterclass for Screenwriters, Writers and More]. Moscow (in Russ.).Moshkina, O. B., 2014. Internet as an interactivity training. Vestnik Buryatskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Buryat State University], 14 (2), pp. 111—114 (in Russ.).Orekhov, S. I., 2002. Poisk virtual'noi real'nosti: monografiya [Search for virtual reality: monograph]. Omsk (in Russ.).Sumskaya, A. S., 2016. Transmedia storytelling in marketing PR communications. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Chelyabinsk state University], 13 (395), pp. 117—124 (in Russ.).S. T.ZolyanIn this article, we continue to address the mechanisms of presenting oneself as another and another as oneself. In this regard, non-trivial features of the semantics of a proper name are described. Based on the analysis of contexts of inappropriate use of a name in a situation of imposture, described in Pushkin's tragedy Boris Godunov, the author considers semiotic mechanisms of transformation and assignment of identity. The article shows that Pushkin's intuition allowed him to see the problems that arose in the analytical philosophy of the name of the second half of the 20th century. Pushkin consistently creates contexts in which the con­ditions of acceptability or unacceptability of deviating uses are tested. On the one hand, these features allow the author to offer an additional, logical and semantic dimension for the inter­pretation of the tragedy Boris Godunov. On the other hand, they significantly clarify the ex­isting theories of the proper name, showing their possible non-trivial, and in some cases, prob­lematic consequences. Simultaneously, the logical-semantic analysis makes it possible to iden­tify the mechanisms of imposture and the communicative conditions for its success.0601202611Arkannikova, M. S., 2009. Imposture as an object of socio-political analysis. Filosofskie nauki [Philosophical Sciences], 12, pp. 27—44 (in Russ.).Benveniste, E., 1974. Obshchaya lingvistika [General linguistics]. Moscow (in Russ.).Chistov, V. K., 1996. Russkie narodnye sotsial'no-utopicheskie legendy XVII—XVIII vv. [Russian folk socio-utopian legends of the 17th—18th centuries]. Moscow (in Russ.).Hintikka, J., 1972. The Semantics of Modal Notions and the Indeterminacy of Ontology. In: D. Davidson and G. Harman, eds. Semantics of Natural Language. Synthese. Vol. 40. Dordrecht.Hoffmann, E. T. A., 1994. Serapion brothers. In: A. A. Gugnina, ed. «Serapionovy brat'ya» v Petrograde: antologiya [The Serapion Brothers in Petrograd: Anthology]. Moscow, pp. 41—596 (in Russ.).Kripke, S., 198. Naming and Necessity. Cambridge, МА.Lewis, D., 1968. Counterpart Theory and Quantified Modal Logic. Journal of Philosophy, 65 (5), pp. 113—126.Lewis, D., 1973. Counterfactuals. Oxford.Litvina, A. F. and Uspenskii, F. B., 2020a. «Se yaz rab Bozhii...» Mnogoimennost' kak faktor i fakt drevnerusskoi kul'tury [«Behold the servant of God...» Multiple names as a factor and fact of ancient Russian culture]. St. Petersburg (in Russ.).Litvina, A. F. and Uspenskii, F. B., 2020b. The real and imaginary names of Boris Godunov. Slověne, 9 (1), pp. 185—231 (in Russ.).Orwell, J., 1984. Oruell Dzh. «1984» i esse raznykh let: roman i khudozhestvennaya publitsistika [Orwell J. «1984» and essays of different years: a novel and artistic journalism]. Translated by V. Golysheva. Moscow, pp. 22—220 (in Russ.).Pushkin, A. S., 1828—1831. Poln. sobr soch.: v 16 t. [Complete works: in 16 volumes]. Vol. 14: Correspondence. Moscow; Leningrad (in Russ.).Pushkin, A. S., 1979. Secluded house on Vasilievsky. In: Poln. sobr soch.: v 10 t. [Complete works: in 10 volumes]. Vol. 9. Leningrad, pp. 351—373 (in Russ.).Ricœur, P., 1976. Interpretation theory: discourse and the surplus of meaning. Texas.Skrynnikov, R. G., 1990. Samozvantsy v Rossii v nachale XVII veka. Grigorii Otrep'ev [Impostors in Russia at the beginning of the 17th century. Grigory Otrepiev]. Novosibirsk (in Russ.).Smirnov, I. P., 2004. Imposture and philosophy of the name. Zvezda [Star]. Available at: https://zvezdaspb.ru/index.php?page=8&nput=35 [Accessed 10 September 2020] (in Russ.).Szvák, G., ed., 2010. Samozvantsy i samozvanchestvo v Moskovii: materialy mezhdunarodnogo nauchnogo seminara [Impostors and impostors in Muscovy: international scientific seminar proceedings]. 25 May 2009. Budapest (in Russ.).Tul'chinskii, G. L., 1996. Samozvanstvo. Fenomenologiya zla i metafizika svobody [Imposture. The phenomenology of evil and the metaphysics of freedom]. St. Petersburg (in Russ.).Tul'chinskii, G. L., 2020a. Filosofiya postupka: samoopredelenie lichnosti v sovremennom obshchestve [Philosophy of action: self-determination of personality in modern society]. St. Petersburg (in Russ.).Tul'chinskii, G. L., 2020b. Argumentum ad morti in the discourse of violence; semantics and pragmatics of «radical» argumentation. Slovo.ru: Baltic accent, 11 (4), pp. 58—64 (in Russ.).Uspenskii, B. A., 1994. Tsar and impostor: a cultural phenomenon. In: Izbrannye Trudy [Selected Works]. Vol. 1. Moscow, pp. 75—109 (in Russ.).Uspenskii, B. A., 1996. Change of Names in Russia and a Historical and Semiotic Perspective. In: Izbrannye Trudy [Selected Works]. Vol. 2. Moscow, pp. 187—202 (in Russ.).Wittgenstein, L., 1958. Philosophical investigations. Translated by G. E. M. Anscombe. Oxford.Wittgenstein, L., 2003. Philosophical research. In: M. Müller et al., eds. Yazyki kak obraz mira [Languages as an image of the world]. Moscow; St. Petersburg, pp. 220—546 (in Russ.).Zolyan, S. T., 1988a. «I» of the poetic text: semantics and pragmatics. In: Tynyanovskii sbornik [Tynyanov collection]. Vol. 3. Riga (in Russ.).Zolyan, S. T., 1988b. «Here I am all...» — to the analysis of «Hamlet» by Boris Pasternak. Daugava, 11, pp. 97—104 (in Russ.).L. V.BoykoA. K.GulinaProviding space for elucidating key translational issues is not a mundane practice but a privilege only hand-picked texts enjoy, philosophical writings among them. The challenge of translating philosophical discourse is widely recognized but scarcely explored. In this article, translation of philosophical texts is regarded as a procedure of knowledge transfer from one intellectual space into another and of knowledge-making through reconceptualization of key terms. This process is made partly observable in various types of notes — a special cluster of additional information known as translational peritext where translators are given an oppor­tunity to explicate their decisions made in the course of translation. Among translation hur­dles in philosophical discourse are technical terms which are often either in­vented or re-conceptualized by the scholar and then need to be re-contextualized by the trans­lator. Seeking to reflect on translation as a heuristic process, this paper will focus on the reso­lution of the potential cognitive dissonance and the translator’s justification of sense-oriented strategies in dealing with such key concepts as ‘connoisseur’, ‘grace’, ‘sublime’, and ‘je ne sçai quoi’ in the translation of the seminal work on the philosophy of aesthetics Analysis of Beauty by the celebrated 18th century English artist William Hogarth.0601202611Angelone, E., 2010. Uncertainty, Uncertainty Management, and Metacognitive Problem Solving in the Translation Task. In: G. M. Shreve and E. Angelone, eds. Translation and Cognition. Amsterdam, pp. 17—40.Avtonomova, N., 2020. Philosophy, Translation, “Untranslatability”: Cultural and Conceptual Aspects. In: D. M. Spitzer, ed. Philosophy’s Treason: Studies in Philosophy and Translation. Wilmington, pp. 87—110.Boyko, L., Chugueva, K. and Gulina, A., 2021. Peritext in the English-Russian Translation of William Hogarth’s Analysis of Beauty: A Case Study. Slovo. ru: Baltic Accent, 12 (1), pp. 34-49.Cassin, B., Apter, E., Lezra, J. and Wood, M. et al., 2014. Dictionary of Untranslatables: A Philosophical Lexicon. Princeton; Oxford.Cooper, J. and Carlsmith, K., 2001. Cognitive Dissonance. In N. J. Smelser and P. B. Baltes, eds. International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Oxford: Elsevier Science Ltd. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/01802-7 [Accessed 10 October 2020].Cowan, B., 2004. An Open Elite: The Peculiarities of Connoisseurship in Early Modern England. Modern Intellectual History, 1(2), pp. 151—183.Crane, G. R., 1995. Perseus Digital Library. Available at: https://www. perseus. tufts. edu/hopper/ [Accessed 10 October 2020].Deane-Cox, S., 2012. The Framing of a Belle Infidèle: Paratexts, Retranslations and Madame Bovary. Essays in French Literature and Culture, 49, pp. 79—96.Festinger, L. A., 1957. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford.Ghosh, P., 2001. Translation as a Conceptual Act. Max Weber Studies, 2(1), pp. 59—63.Halverson, S. L., 2010. Cognitive Translation Studies: Developments in Theory and Method. In: G. M. Shreve and E. Angelone, eds. Translation and Cognition. Amsterdam, pp. 349—369.Han, J.-M., 2005. On Annotation in Translation. In: E. Hung, ed. Translation and Cultural Change. John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 183—189.Heller, L. and Payne, C., transl., 2019. Where does Philosophy Take Place in Translation? Reflections on the Relevance of Microstructural Translation Units within Philosophical Discourse. Chronotopos — A Journal of Translation History, 1 (1), pp. 147—172.Hogarth, W., 1936. Analiz krasoty [Beauty analysis]. Translated by A. A. Sidorov. Moscow (in Russ.).Hogarth, W., 1987. Analiz krasoty [Beauty analysis]. Translated by L. Melkova. Leningrad (in Russ.).Hogarth, W., 2010. “To see with our own eyes”: Hogarth between native empiricism and a theory of "beauty in form". William Hogarth: The analysis of beauty (London: Printed by John Reeves for the Author, 1753). FONTES. Available at: http://archiv. ub. uni-heidelberg. de/artdok/1217/1/Davis_Fontes52.pdf [Accessed 1 October 2020].Lessing, G. E. 1853. Laokoön oder Über die Grenzen der Malerei und Poesie. In: G. E. Lessing, ed. Laocoon: An Essay on the Limits of Painting and Poetry. The Johns Hopkins University Press.Malukova, O., 2016. Contemporary Philosophical Discourse: Conceptualization of Traditional Notions “Technique and Technology”. Credo New. Available at: http:// www.intelros.ru/readroom/credo_new/do4-2016 [Accessed 11 October 2020] (in Russ.).Michel, J. B., Shen, Y. K., Aiden, A. P., Veres, A., Gray, M. K. and Pickett, J. P. et al., 2011. Quantitative analysis of culture using millions of digitized books (With Supporting Online Material). Science, 331(6014), pp. 176—182.Minchenkov, A., 2019. Translating a Scientific Text into English: Cognitive Perspective. The Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, 7(1), pp. 71—84.Monk, S., 1944. A Grace Beyond the Reach of Art. Journal of the History of Ideas, 5 (2), pp. 131—150.Olohan, M. and Salama-Carr, M., 2011. Translating Science. The Translator, 17(2), pp. 179—188.Parks, G., 2004. The Translation of Philosophical Texts. International Journal of Translation, 8, pp. 1—10.Rée, J., 2001. The Translation of Philosophy. New Literary History, 32 (2), pp. 223—257.Ricœur, P., 2004. Sur la traduction. Paris.Rozina, R. I., 1988. On the Comments. In: V. P. Grigoriev, ed. Problemy strukturnoj lingvistiki 1984 [Issues of Structural Linguistics 1984]. Moscow, pp. 259—267 (in Russ.).Schögler, R., 2018. Translation in the Social Sciences and Humanities: Circulating and Canonizing Knowledge. Alif Journal of Comparative Poetics, 38, pp. 62—90.Shulga, E. N., 2002. Kognitivnaya germenevtika [Cognitive Hermeneutics]. Moscow (in Russ.).Voskoboinik, G. D. and Efimova, N. N., 2007. Obshchaya kognitivnaya teoriya perevoda: kurs lektsii [General cognitive theory of translation: a course of lectures]. Irkutsk (in Russ.).Whitehead, A. 2012. Moonless Moons and a Pretty Girl: Translating Ikkyū Sōjun. In: L. Foran, ed. Translation and Philosophy. Oxford ; Bern ; Berlin ; Bruxelles ; Frankfurt a/M ; N. Y. ; Wien, pp. 53—63.N. V.RunovaT. V.FurmenkovaN. Yu.LinevichRapid development of concepts in modern sociology leads to the emergence of a large number of neological terms. Currently, the academic language of Russian sociology sees an active expansion of foreign language terminology and translated terms reflecting changes in the English-language social picture of the world. However, the lack of consistency in intra-lingual and inter-lingual translation of new terms may complicate the understanding of this terminology by representatives of multilingual academic schools. This study aims to analyse modern English sociological terms and translated borrowings in Russian, to explore their form and conceptual content in two languages, the degree of their conventionality in the sci­entific thesaurus of multilingual sociological schools and the possibility of an adequate trans­fer of terminological meaning from English into Russian. The authors view the sociological term as a cognitive, linguistic and cultural phenomenon, and study its synchronic and dia­chronic variability. The article is an attempt to illuminate the problem from a purely linguis­tic and translation point of view and to point out the need for combining efforts to systematise and harmonise the English and Russian terminologies of sociology.0601202611Achkasov, A. and Kazakova, T., 2018. Terminology translation as a palliative concept. Philological studies. Theoretical and practical issues, 7—1 (85), pp. 102—106 (in Russ.).Bursina, O., 2014. Terminologiya sotsial'noi raboty: struktura, semantika i funktsionirovanie (na materiale angloyazychnoi literatury dlya sotsial'nykh rabotnikov) [Terminology of social work: structure, semantics and functioning (the case of English-language publications for social workers)]. Ph. D. Saint Petersburg (in Russ.).Cabré, M. T., 1999. Terminology: theory, methods, and applications. Amsterdam ; Philadelphia.Chernetskii, Yu., 2015. Development of the system of basic sociological concepts in the late XX — early XXI centuries. Sotsiologiya: teoriya, metody, marketing [Sociology: theory, methodology, marketing], 2, pp. 96—111 (in Russ.).Faber Benítez, P., 2009. Cognitive shift in terminology and specialized translation. In: A. Vidal and J. Franco, eds. Monographs in Translation and Interpreting. A (Self-) Critical Perspective of Translation Theories. pp. 107—143.Grinev-Grinevich, S., 2008. Terminovedenie [Terminological studies]. Moscow (in Russ.).Kravchenko, S. A., 2002. Sociologicheskij enciklopedicheskij anglo-russkij slovar' [Sociological encyclopedic English-Russian dictionary]. Мoscow (in Russ.).Kravchenko, S. A., 2002. Sociologicheskij enciklopedicheskij anglo-russkij slovar' [Sociological encyclopedic English-Russian dictionary for special purposes]. Мoscow (in Russ.).Kravchenko, S. A., 2003. Sociologicheskij enciklopedicheskij anglo-russkij slovar' [Sociological encyclopedic English-Russian dictionary for beginners: 7 dictionaries]. Мoscow (in Russ.).Kravchenko, S. A., 2004. Sociologicheskij enciklopedicheskij anglo-russkij slovar' [Sociological encyclopedic English-Russian dictionary. More than 10000 entries]. Мoscow (in Russ.).Kravchenko, S. A., 2011. Slovar' novejshej sociologicheskoj leksiki: teorii, ponyatiya, personalii (s anglijskimi ekvivalentami) [Dictionary of the latest sociological terminology: theories, concepts, personalities (with English equivalents)]. Moscow (in Russ.).Kravchenko, S. A., 2012. Sociologicheskij tolkovyj anglo-russkij slovar' [Sociological English-Russian dictionary]. Moscow (in Russ.).Kravchenko, S. A., 2013. Sociologicheskij tolkovyj russko-anglijskij slovar' [Sociological Russian-English dictionary]. Moscow (in Russ.).Kravchenko, S. A., 2019. The Complicated Dynamics of Russian Sociology: Effects of the “Vector of Time”. Gumanitarii yuga Rossii [Humanitarians of the South of Russia], 8(1), pp. 33—55 (in Russ.).Kravchenko, S. A., ed., 2019. Slovar' novejshej sociologicheskoj leksiki s anglijskimi ekvivalentami [Dictionary of the latest sociological terminology with English equivalents]. Moscow (in Russ.).Kravchenko, S., 2000. The Encyclopedic English-Russian Sociological Dictionary. Lewiston, New York.Leichik, V., 2007. Terminovedenie: predmet, metody, struktura [Terminology: subject, methodology, structure]. Vol. 3. Moscow (in Russ.).Lipovetsky, G., 2005. Hypermodern Times. Cambridge.Lubskii, A., 2015. The specificity of sociological discourse in Russia. Sotsial'no-gumanitarnye znaniya [Social and humanitarian knowledge], 9, pp. 128—135 (in Russ.).Maikova, T., 2016. The main criteria for selecting terminological vocabulary in the development of a lexicographic model of the English-language sociological terminology. RUDN Bulletin, series Theory of language, Semiotics, Semantics, 2, pp. 165—174 (in Russ.).Maiorova-Shcheglova, S., 2011. Sotsiologicheskij tezaurus: problema zaimstvovanij i neologizmov [Sociological thesaurus: the problem of borrowings and neologisms]. Available at: http://ecsocman. hse. ru/data/2011/10/21/1267240311/Maiorova.pdf [Accessed 15 September 2020] (in Russ.).Nacional'nyj standart Rossijskoj Federacii. Prakticheskoe rukovodstvo po socioterminologii [National standard of the Russian Federation. Practical guidelines for socio-terminology]. GOST Р 55140-2012. ISO/TR 22134:2007 IDT. Available at: http:// docs.cntd.ru/document/1200104389 [Accessed 28 September 2020] (in Russ.).Sager, J., 1990. A Practical Course in Terminology Processing. Amsterdam.Temmerman, R., 2000. Towards New Ways of Terminology Description: The Socio-cognitive Approach. Amsterdam.Wallerstein, I., 1981. Concepts in the social sciences: Problems of translation. In: M. Rose, ed. Translation Spectrum: Essays in Theory and Practice. Albany.P.Legurska0601202611Boyadzhiev, T., 2016. D. Veselinov, A. Angelova. Dictionary of French words in the Bulgarian language in six volumes. Volume 1, A-B, Volume 2. Sofia, University Publishing House, 2015. 508 + 531 p. Sopostavitelnoe iazykoznanie [Comparative Linguistics], 1, pp. 109—113 (in Bulgarian).Legurska, P., 2013. Semantic Systems of Languages and Ways of their Cataloging (for Comparative Purposes). In: M. Drinov, ed. 70 godini balgarska akademichna leksikografiya [70 years of Bulgarian academic lexicography]. Sofia (in Bulgarian).Morkovkin, V. V. and Morkovkina, A. V., 1997. Russkie agnonimy: Slova, kotorye my ne znaem [Russian Agnonyms: Words We Don't Know]. Moscow (in Russ.).Vesselinov, D., 2009. Frenskata leksika v romana „Tyutyun“ [The Words of French Origin in the Novel "Tobacco"]. Sofia (in Bulgarian).Vesselinov, D., 2015. Theoretical Foundations of the Dictionary of French Words in the Bulgarian Language. In: D. Vesselinov and A. Angelova., eds. Rechnik na frenskite dumi v balgarskiya ezik v shest toma [Dictionary of French Words in the Bulgarian Language in Six Volumes]. Vol. 1. Sofia, pp. 5—37 (in Bulgarian).Vesselinov, D., 2016. Teoretichen model za kumulativno leksikografirane na dumi ot chuzhd proizhod v balgarskiya ezik [Theoretical model for cumulative lexicography of words of foreign origin in the Bulgarian language]. Sofia (in Bulgarian).Zalizniak, A. A., 2001. Semantic derivation in synchronicity and diachrony: the project “Catalog of semantic transitions”. Voprosy iazykoznaniia [Questions of linguistics], 2, pp. 13—25 (in Russ.).M.Yordanova0601202611