NONE20260604081338811Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal Universityno-reply@journals.kantiana.ruImmanuel Kant Baltic Federal UniversitySlovo.ru: Baltic accent2225-53462686-898906042026111S. T.ZolyanG. L.Tulchinskiy0604202611S. T.ZolyanM. V.IlyinŻ. R.SładkiewiczG. L.TulchinskiyThe roundtable discussed the key problems of meaning formation in narrative and per­formative practices. In free discussion, experts analysed various factors and parameters de­termining the meaningfulness of action and examined mechanisms for their interpretation. These mechanisms can be considered as manifestations of various modally different types of textualisation. Interpretation and textualisation make it possible to identify and describe the interaction between some causal and functional relations (‘meaning in life’) and their semiotic manifestation (‘meaning in the text’).0604202611Aristotle, 1983. Sochineniya v chetyrekh tomakh [Works in four volumes]. Vol. 4. Moscow: Mysl' (in Russ.).Barthes, R., 1994. Myth today. In: R. Barthes, ed. Izbrannye raboty: Semiotika. Poetika [Selected works: Semiotics. Poetics]. Moscow: Progress. pp. 72—130 (in Russ.).Weber, M., 1990. Basic sociological concepts. In: M. Weber, ed. Izbrannye proizvedeniya [Featured Works]. Moscow: Progress. pp. 602—643 (in Russ.).Zolyan, S. T., 2014. Semantika i struktura poeticheskogo teksta [The semantics and structure of the poetic text]. Vol. 2. URSS (in Russ.).Zolyan, S. T., 1994. Description of the regional conflict as a methodological problem. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya [Polis. Political Studies], 2, pp. 131—142 (in Russ.).Zolyan, S. T., 2012. The logic of preferences and conflict resolution (for example, the Karabakh conflict). In: M. V. Ilyin, ed. METOD: Moskovskii ezhegodnik trudov iz obshchestvovedcheskikh distsiplin [METHOD: Moscow Yearbook of Works from Social Studies]. Vol. 3. Moscow. pp. 39—67 (in Russ.).Zolyan, S. T., 2018. To the problem of meaning in social semiotics: Max Weber today. Slovo. ru: baltiс accent, 9 (4), pp. 27—42 (in Russ.).Lasswell, G., 2006. Language of Power. Politicheskaya lingvistika [Political Linguistics], 20, pp. 264—279 (in Russ.).Luman, N., 2004. Obshchestvo kak sotsial'naya sistema [Society as a social system]. Translated from German by A. Antonovsky. Moscow: Logos (in Russ.).Plutser-Sarno, A., 1999. The State Duma as a folk character: Parody, crying, confession and libel — genres of Russian politics. Logos, 9(19), pp. 65—79 (in Russ.).Porshnev, B. F., 2007. O nachale chelovecheskoi istorii. Problemy paleopsikhologii [On the Beginning of Human History. Problems of paleopsychology]. St. Petersburg: Aleteia (in Russ.).Hintikka, J., 1980. Semantics of propositional attitudes. In: J. Hintikka, ed. Logiko-epistemologicheskie issledovaniya. Sbornik izbrannykh statei [Logical and epistemological studies. Collection of selected articles]. Moscow: Progress. pp. 68—101 (in Russ.).Habrajska, G., 2005. Nakłanianie, perswazja, manipulacja językowa. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Litteraria Polonica, 7 (2), pp. 91—126.Hintikka, J., 1969. Models for Modalities. Selected Essays. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.Hintikka, J., 1975. The intentions of intentionality and other new models for modalities. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.Hintikka, J., 1972. The Semantics of Modal Notions and the Indeterminacy of Ontology. In: D. Davidson and G. Harman, eds. Semantics of Natural Language. Synthese. Vol. 40. Springer, Dordrecht.Galtung, J., 1977. Methodology and Ideology. Vol. 1: Essays in Methodology. Copenhagen: Christian Ejlers.Kiklewicz, A., 2015. Bełkot w komunikacji: próba klasyfikacji zjawisk. In: P. Lewiński, ed. Bełkot, czyli mowa ludzka pozbawiona sensu. Komunikacyjna funkcja wypowiedzi niejasnych. Olsztyn. p. 11—26.Kripke, S., 1980. Naming and Necessity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Kripke, S., 2013. Reference and Existence. N. Y.: Oxford University Press.Lewis, D., 1968. Counterpart Theory and Quantified Modal Logic. Journal of Philosophy, 65, pp. 113—126.Lewis, D., 1979. Attitudes De Dicto and De Se. Philosophical Review, 88, pp. 513—543.Searle, J. R., 1980. The Intentionality of Intention and Action. Сognitive Science, 4, pp. 47—70.Searle, J. R., 1995. The Construction of Social Reality. N. Y., The Free Press. A Division of Simon & Schuster Inc.S. V.GerasimovSince the British philosopher John Austin, narratives and performatives have been con­sidered as opposite concepts covered by the generic concept of speech act. At the same time, these concepts were separated according to whether a narrative, inducement, a description, or an imperative was present in the text. Similar to the narrative, the performative is created under pressure from various external factors associated with the system of public communica­tions, to which the author is exposed, and a multitude of reasons that reflect in his or her mind external processes. All these factors and influences transmute in the course of text crea­tion; the viewer/reader consumes ready-made information, which invariably bears an imprint of the author's habitus. When creating a text, the author conveys his or her desires and ex­presses his or her attitude to the chosen problem. This study aims to answers two questions. Can a narrative have at its core an explicit manipulative basis or a hidden motive? Can the picture of the world, which develops, inter alia, under the influence of narratives, serve as a pattern for decision-making by the viewer/reader? It is necessary to this end to identify the relationship between the performative and the narrative (there are several types of these rela­tionships). To answer the above question, the genesis of narratives is considered, possible nar­rative–performative combinations analysed, and the effects of performatives on the formation of the intentional component of the narrative established. The findings suggest that each nar­rative contains at least one performative and that the narrative is based on the performative and contains a manipulative component.0604202611Ageeva, N. A., 2015. Narration and anarrativity in the monodrama J. Pulinovich "Natasha dream". Nauchnyi dialog [Scientific dialogue], 12 (48), pp. 151—160 (in Russ.).Gerasimov, S. V., 2015. Closing the circle of manipulations. Filosofskie nauki [Philosophical Sciences], 5, pp. 34—41 (in Russ.).Gerasimov, S. V., 2017. Event as a managerial function of generating social reality. Chelovek. Kul'tura. Obrazovanie [Man. The culture. Education], 1 (23), pp. 68—83 (in Russ.).Husserl, E., 2011. Logicheskie issledovaniya. Ch.1: Issledovaniya po fenomenologii i teorii poznaniya [Logical research. Part 1: Studies in phenomenology and theory of knowledge]. Vol. 1. Translated from German by V. I. Molchanova. Moscow: Akademicheskij proekt (in Russ.).Genette, G., 1998. Boundaries of narrative. In: Z. Zhenett, ed. Figury [Figures]. Vol. 1. Moscow (in Russ.).Zinkevich, O. V., 2018. Localization as a process of linguistic transformation of the structure and content of a dynamic text. Izvestiya Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo ehkonomicheskogo universiteta [Proceedings of St. Petersburg State University of Economics], 3 (111), pp. 135—137 (in Russ.).Likhachev, D. S., 1993. The conceptosphere of the Russian language. Izvestiya RAN. Seriya lite-ratury i yazyka [The Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences: Studies in Literature and Language], 1, pp. 3—9 (in Russ.).Petukhov, V. V., 2012. Civil society and government: cooperation or confrontation. Vestnik Instituta sotsiologii [Bulletin of the Institute of Sociology], 5, pp. 240—246 (in Russ.).Proskurin, S. G., 2017. Linguocultural transfer: ideas about the world in ancient traditions. Kritika i semiotika [Criticism and semiotics], 1, pp. 220—232 (in Russ.).Russel, B., 2001. Istoriya zapadnoi filosofii: v 3 kn. [History of Western Philosophy: in 3 books]. Translated from English by V. V. Celishcheva. St. Petersburg (in Russ.).Tul'chinskii, G. L., 2018. Evaluative-emotional factors of sense-formation: normative value patterns of cultural narratives. Chelovek. Kul'tura. Obrazovanie [Man. The culture. Education], 4(30), pp. 165—175 (in Russ.).Tyupa, V. I., 2010. Dramaturgy as a type of utterance. Novyi filologicheskii vestnik [New Philological Bulletin], 3 (14), pp. 7—16 (in Russ.).West, D., 2015. Kontinental'naya filosofiya. Vvedenie [Continental Philosophy. Introduction]. Translated from English by D. Yu. Kralechkin. Moscow: Izdatel'skii dom «Delo» RANKhiGS (in Russ.).Hume, D., 1996. A treatise on human nature. In: D. Hume, ed. Sochineniya v 2 t. [Compositions in 2 volumes]. Vol. 1. Moscow: Mysl'. pp. 203—204 (in Russ.).Blank, A., 1999. "Why do new meanings occur? A cognitive typology of the motivations for lexical Semantic change". In: A. Blank and P. Koch, eds. Historical Semantics and Cognition. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. pp. 61—90.Gergen, K. J., 1997. Realities and relationships: soundings in social construction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.O. V.SokolovaThis paper explores hybrid texts as a special type of text that forms within ‘inter-discourse interaction’ and relates to the ‘convergence of discourses’. The analysis focuses on the interaction between avant-garde art and political discourses, which have been in close contact since the 20th century and have common typological features. The main methods used in this study are the linguistic pragmatic method, the linguistic poetic method, and discourse analysis. The article proposes a definition of hybridization and hybrid texts while distinguish­ing between the linguistic, genre, multimodal, and multimedia types of hybridization. Special cases of language hybrids are onomatopoeic hybrids, which are based on the sounds of hostili­ties; hybrid words formed with a hyphen or a connecting vowel; bifocal semantic hybrids; and hybrid syntactic constructions. Genre hybridization occurs in avant-garde art and poetic manifestos, decrees, and declarations. Multimodal hybrids include artistic-political texts in which a combination of codes (verbal, visual, auditory, kinesthetic, etc.) co-exists with a com­bination of various types of discourse. At the same time, each of the elements of a multimodal hybrid message refers simultaneously to both artistic and political reality. The multimedia type of hybridization includes texts that use innovative technologies and new media channels while combining several information transfer channels. This way, a new system of relation­ships is built and the possibility arises to create a new ‘total work of art’.0604202611Badiou, A., 2004. Delez. Shum bytiya [The noise of being]. Moscow (in Russ.).Barthes, R., 1994. Izbrannye raboty: Semiotika: Poetika [Selected Works: Semiotics: Poetics]. Moscow (in Russ.).Bakhtin, M. M., 1975. Voprosy literatury i estetiki [Literature and aesthetics issues]. Moscow (in Russ.).Bakhtin, M. M., 1972. Problemy poetiki Dostoevskogo [Problems of the poetics of Dostoevsky]. Moscow (in Russ.).Bakhtin, M. M., 2012. Sobranie sochineniy v semi tomakh. T. 3: Teoriya romana (1930—1961 gg.) [Collected Works in seven volumes. Vol. 3: Theory of the novel (1930—1961)]. Moscow (in Russ.).Benjamin, W., 1996. Proizvedenie iskusstva v epokhu ego tekhnicheskoy vosproizvodimosti [A work of art in the era of its technical reproducibility]. Moscow (in Russ.).Bürger, P., 2014. Teoriya avangarda [Avant-Garde Theory]. Moscow (in Russ.).Vinogradov, V. V., 1963. Stilistika. Teoriya poeticheskoy rechi. Poetika [Stylistics. Theory of poetic speech. Poetic]. Moscow (in Russ.).Gur'yanova, N. A., 2010. Avant-garde and ideology. Russian Literature, 67 (3—4), pp. 365—402 (in Russ.).Deleuze, G., 1998. Logika smysla [The logic of meaning]. Moscow (in Russ.).Dem'yankov, V. Z., 2002. Political discourse as a subject of political philology. Politicheskaya nauka. Politicheskiy diskurs: Istoriya i sovremennye issledovaniya [Political Science. Political discourse: History and modern research], 3, pp. 32—43 (in Russ.).Zlydneva, N. V., 2014. On the typology of hybridity: a bird-man in the poetics of the avant-garde. In: N. V. Zlydneva, ed. Gibridnye formy v slavyanskikh kul'turakh [Hybrid forms in Slavic cultures]. Moscow. pp. 8—18 (in Russ.).Zolyan, S. T., 2014. Semantika i struktura poeticheskogo teksta [Semantics and structure of a poetic text]. Moscow (in Russ.).Zolyan, S. T., 2016. Semiotics and pragmasemantics of political discourse. Politicheskaya nauka [Political Science], 3, pp. 47—76 (in Russ.).Ioffe, D., 2016. On the question of the radical aesthetics of the Second Russian avant-garde. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie [New Literary Review], 4, pp. 287—311 (in Russ.).Iriskhanova, O. K., 2014. Igry fokusa v yazyke: semantika, sintaksis i pragmatika defokusirovaniya [Games of focus in the language: semantics, syntax and pragmatics of defocusing]. Moscow (in Russ.).Iriskhanova, O. K., 2010. On language hybridization, lexical hybrids and focus of attention. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Moscow State Linguistic University], 603, pp. 27—44 (in Russ.).Kibrik, A. A., 2010. Multimodal Linguistics. In: A. Kibrik, et al., eds. Kognitivnye issledovaniya [Cognitive Studies]. Vol. 4. Moscow (in Russ.).Kojève, A., 2003. Vvedenie v chtenie Gegelya [Introduction to the reading of Hegel]. Moscow (in Russ.).Kreydlin, G. E., 2002. Neverbal'naya semiotika: Yazyk tela i estestvennyy yazyk [Nonverbal semiotics: Body language and natural language]. Moscow (in Russ.).Kukuy, I., 2014. The supertale of V. Khlebnikov “Zangezi” as a hybrid text. In: N. V. Zlydneva, ed. Gibridnye formy v slavyanskikh kul'turakh [Hybrid forms in Slavic cultures]. Moscow. pp. 227—236 (in Russ.).Lotman, Yu., 1992. Izbrannye stat'i: v 3 t. [Selected articles: in 3 volumes]. Tallinn (in Russ.).Mayakovskiy, V. V., 2019. Voyna i yazyk: stat'i, zametki i dr. [War and language: articles, notes, etc.]. St. Petersburg (in Russ.).Mayakovskiy, V. V., 1955. Polnoe sobranie sochineniy: V 13 t. 1955—1961. T. 1. Stikhotvoreniya, tragediya, poemy i stat'i 1912—1917 godov [Complete works: In 13 volumes. 1955—1961. Vol. 4. Poems of 1922, poems, propaganda and essays of 1922—1923]. Moscow (in Russ.).Mayakovskiy, V. V., 1957. Polnoe sobranie sochineniy: V 13 t. 1955—1961. T. 4. Stikhotvoreniya 1922 goda, poemy, agitlubki i ocherki 1922—1923 godov [Complete Works: In 13 volumes. 1955—1961. Vol. 4. Poems of 1922, poems, propaganda and essays of 1922—1923]. Moscow (in Russ.).Pound, E., 2000. Putevoditel' po kul'ture [Cultural Guide]. Moscow (in Russ.).Pozner, R., 2015. Ratsional'nyy diskurs i poeticheskaya kommunikatsiya: metody lingvisticheskogo, literaturnogo i filosofskogo analiza [Rational discourse and poetic communication: methods of linguistic, literary and philosophical analysis]. Tomsk (in Russ.).Rossomakhin, A. A., ed., 2019. Prikaz Revvoensoveta № 279 "K pyatiletiyu Krasnoy Armii". 2019. Antologiya avangardistskikh prikazov i dekretov 1917—1924 godov. Prikaz kak literaturnyy zhanr: ot futuristov do nichevokov. [Order of the Revolutionary Military Council No. 279 "On the Fiveth Anniversary of the Red Army". Anthology of avant—garde orders and decrees of 1917—1924. Prikaz as a literary genre: from futurists to nicknames]. St. Petersburg (in Russ.).Rancière, J., 2007. Razdelyaya chuvstvennoe [Sharing the sensual]. Moscow (in Russ.).Rykov, A., 2019. Politika avangarda [Politics of the avant-garde]. Moscow (in Russ.).Sériot, P., 1999. Russian language and analysis of Soviet political discourse, analysis of nominalizations. In: P. Serio, ed. Kvadratura smysla [Squaring the meaning]. Moscow. pp. 337—383 (in Russ.).Silant'ev, I. V., 2006. Gazeta i roman: ritorika diskursnykh smesheniy [Newspaper and novel: rhetoric of discourse mixes]. Moscow (in Russ.).Smirnov, I. P., 2000. Megaistoriya. K istoricheskoy tipologii kul'tury [Megahistory. To the historical typology of culture]. Moscow (in Russ.).Sokolova, O. V., (in press) War and language in Italian futurism, Russian cubofuturism and British vorticism (cognitive-discursive approach]. Kritika i semiotika [Criticism and semiotics], 2 (in Russ.).Sokolova, O. V., 2015. Diskursy aktivnogo vozdeistviya: teoriya i tipologiya [Discourses of active influence: theory and typology]. PhD Abstract. Moscow (in Russ.).Sokolova, O. V., 2018. Republic of Fume: between the aesthetic campaign and the political work of art. Kommunikativnye issledovaniya [Communicative Studies], 3, pp. 155—171 (in Russ.).Stepanov, Yu. S., 1985.V trekhmernom prostranstve yazyka (Semioticheskie problemy lingvistiki, filosofii i iskusstva) [In the three-dimensional space of the language (Semiotic problems of linguistics, philosophy and art)]. Moscow (in Russ.).Fateeva, N. A., 2007. Intertekst v mire tekstov: kontrapunkt intertekstual'nosti [Intertext in the world of texts: the counterpoint of intertextuality]. Moscow (in Russ.).Feshchenko, V. V., 2018. Literaturnyy avangard na lingvisticheskikh povorotakh [Literary avant-garde on linguistic turns]. Moscow (in Russ.).Feshchenko, V. V. and Koval', O. V., 2014. Sotvorenie znaka. Ocherki o lingvoestetike i semiotike iskusstva [Creation of the sign. Essays on linguoesthetics and semiotics of art]. Moscow (in Russ.).Phillips, L. J. and Jorgensen, M. V., 2004. Diskurs—analiz. Teoriya i metod [Discourse analysis. Theory and Method]. Kharkov (in Russ.).Hansen-Löve, O. A., 2016. Intermedial'nost' v russkoy kul'ture. Ot simvolizma k avangardu [Intermediality in Russian culture. From symbolism to the forefront]. Moscow (in Russ.).Khlebnikov, V., 2001. Sobranie sochinenii v 6 t. [Collected Works in 6 vols]. Vol. 2. Moscow (in Russ.).Chernyavskaya, V. E., 2009. Lingvistika teksta: Polikodovost', intertekstual'nost', interdiskursivnost' [Linguistics of the text: Polycoding, intertextuality, inter-discursiveness]. Moscow (in Russ.).Chubarov, I. M., 2014. Kollektivnaya chuvstvennost': Teorii i praktiki levogo avangarda [Collective Sensuality: Theories and Practices of the Left Avant-Garde]. Moscow (in Russ.).Chubarov, I. M., 2018. Media theory of Walter Benjamin and the Russian left avant-garde: newspaper, radio, cinema. Logos, 28 (1), pp. 233—260 (in Russ.).Chukhrukidze, K. K., 1999. Pound & £. Modeli utopii XX veka [Pound & £. Models of the utopia of the 20th century]. Moscow (in Russ.).Yakobson, R. O., 1978. On the linguistic aspects of translation. Voprosy teorii perevoda v zarubezhnoy lingvistike [Questions of translation theory in foreign linguistics]. Moscow (in Russ.).Yampol'skiy, M. B., 2004. Fiziologiya simvolicheskogo. Kn. 1. Vozvrashchenie Leviafana: Politicheskaya teologiya, reprezentatsiya vlasti i konets Starogo rezhima. [The physiology of the symbolic. Book 1. The Return of Leviathan: Political Theology, Representation of Power, and the End of the Old Regime]. Moscow (in Russ.).Bakhtin, M. M., 1981. The Dialogic Imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press.Bataille, G., 1970. L'obelisque. In: G. Bataille, ed. Oeuvres completes. Vol. 1. Paris: Gallimard.Blast. 1914. Vol. 1.D’Annunzio, G., 1920. La Carta del Carnaro. Available at: http://www.dircost. unito.it/cs/pdf/19200000_Carnaro_DAnnunzio_ita.pdf [Accessed 22 August 2019].D'Annunzio, G., 1939. Il Fuoco. Rome.D'Annunzio, G., 1947. Prose di ricerca, di lotta, di comando, di conquista, di tormento, d'indovinazione, di liberazione, di favole, di giochi, di baleni. In 3 vols. Vol. 1. Verona: Mondadori.Derrida, J., 1990. Le Problème de la genèse dans la philosophie de Husserl. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Derrida, J., 2010. Voice and Phenomenon. Introduction to the Problem of the Sign in Husserl's Phenomenology. Northwestern University Press.Dijk, T. A. van., 1997. What is political discourse analysis? In: J. Blommaert, C. Bulcaen, eds. Political linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. pp. 11—52.Duranti, A., 1997. Polyphonic discourse: overlapping in Samoan ceremonial greetings. Text — Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 17 (3), pp. 349—381.Ert, G. van, 1994. Empty Air: Ezra Pound's World War Two Radio Broadcasts. Past Imperfect, 2, pp. 47—72.Fairclough, N., 2010. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London.Fauconnier, G. and Turner, M., 1996. Blending as a Central Process in Grammar. In: A. Goldberg, ed. Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language. Stanford. pp. 113—130.Genette, G., 1982. Palimpsestes: La litterature au second degre. Paris.Goldberg, R., 1979. Performance: Live Art, 1909 to the Present. New York.Heibach, Ch., 2011. Avant-garde theater as total artwork? Media-theoretical reflections on the historical development of performing art forms. In: A.K Finger and D. Follett, eds. The aesthetics of the total artwork: on borders and fragments. Baltimore.Humphrey, C., 1988. A Serious Character: The Life of Ezra Pound. Boston.Jay, M., 2010. The virtues of mendacity: on lying in politics. Charlottesville, London.Kamberelis, G. and Wehunt, M. D., 2012. Hybrid discourse practice and science learning. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 7(3), pp. 505—534.Kochnitzky, L., 1921. Fiume et son Prophète. Le Flambeau, 1.Kramer, A., 2018. Geographies of Futurism: Mapping the First Avant-Garde. In: J. London, ed. One Hundred Years of Futurism: Aesthetics, Politics, and Performance. Bristol & Chicago. pp. 49—78.Kress, G. and Leeuwen, Th. van., 2001. Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. Oxford.Ledeen, M., 1977. The first Duce, D’Annunzio at Fiume. Johns Hopkins University Press.Marinetti, F. T., 1915. Guerra sola igiene del mondo. Milano.Marinetti, F. T., 1914. Sintesi futurista della guerra. Nilano.Marinetti, F. T. Teoria e invenzione futurista. Milano: Arnoldo Mondadori Editore.McLuhan, M., 1964. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. Mentor, New York.Nancy, J.-L., 2000. War, Right, Sovereignty — Techne. In: N. Jean-Luc, ed. Being Singular Plural. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Pêcheux, M., 1982. Language, Semantics, and Ideology. New York.Perloff, M., 1986. The Futurist Moment: Avant-Garde, Avant Guerre, and the Language of Rupture. Chicago.Pound, E., 1914. Vorticism. Fortnightly Review, 96(1), pp. 461—471. Available at: http://fortnightlyreview.co.uk/vorticism/#fnref-4914-4 [Accessed 30 June 2019].Pound, E., 1978. «Ezra Pound Speaking». Radio Speeches of World War II. In: L. W. Doob, ed. Contributions in American Studies. Vol. 37. Westport, Connecticut — London, England.Puchner, M., 2006. Poetry of the Revolution: Marx, Manifestos, and the Avant-gardes. Princeton.Saunders, D., 2002. Literacy and the Common Law. A Polytechnical Approach to the History of Writings of the Law. Available at: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/ GriffLawRw/2002/5.pdf [Accessed 5 August 2019].Shaw-Miller, S., 2014. Opsis Melos Lexis: Before and Around the Total Work of Art. In: J. H. Rubin and O. Mattis, eds. Rival Sisters, Art and Music at the Birth of Modernism, 1815—1915. pp. 37—51.Sinagra, A., 2009. Lo statuto della Reggenza Italiana del Carnaro: tra storia, diritto internazionale e diritto costituzionale: atti del convegno Università degli Studi di Roma "La Sapienza". Milano: Giuffrè Editore.Tonini, P., 2011. Gabriele D’Annnunzio e l’impresa fiumana. Gussago.G. M.ZeldovichThis paper discusses a discourse grounding strategy that has not been described before. It is shown that the fragments of a literary text that are perceived as impressive, aphoristic, etc., tend to have a set of recurrent features. Firstly, in such fragments, there often is mutual re­flectedness of meanings (it emerges in metaphors, similes, parallelisms, or juxtapositions of contradictory notions). Second, mutual reflectedness goes through pronounced detrivializa­tion, i.e it is emphasised using special means, one of which is the ostentatious intricacy of the text usually achieved through amphiboly, or intended ambiguity. Thirdly, there is usually a strong anaphoric link between such fragments and the preceding text, i. e. a link between sub­jects and/or objects (this does not exclude adjunct-based links). Fourthly, the type of discourse relation between such fragments and the previous text is highly predictable. The main conclu­sion drawn in the article is that the described set of properties, which is instrumental in discourse grounding, is widely used in literature, on the one hand, and it is much more complex than the grounding devices earlier studied by narratology.0604202611Zel'dovich, G. M., 2015. About One Way of Marking Discourse Perspective in Lyric Poetry. Composition and referential links, or Where P. Hopper and S. Thompson go wrong. Linguistica Copernicana, 12, pp. 245—270 (in Russ.).Zel'dovich, G. M., 2016a. The Golden Ratio and Composition of the Lyric Text. Wiener Slawistischer Almanach, 78, pp. 95—148 (in Russ.).Zel'dovich, G. M., 2016b. On discourse relationships in lyric poetry. Wiener Slawistischer Almanach, 89 (in Russ.).Zel'dovich, G. M., 2018a. The composition of the lyric poem and the "tightness" of the verse: Typological richness of information as a marker of foreground in the lyric text. In: E. V. Maslii and A. V. Kardashova, eds. Lyudmila Savchenko. Dusha vosplamenennaya [Lyudmila Savchenko. Inflamed soul]. Kharkov, pp. 287—346 (in Russ.).Zel'dovich, G. M., 2018b. Integrity of author’s consciousness as a sign of foreground in a lyric poem. Linguistica Copernicana, 15, pp. 323—353 (in Russ.).Asher, N., Lascarides, A., 2003. Logics of Conversation. Cambridge.Bogusławski, A., 1977. Problems of the Thematic-Rhematic Structure of Sentences. Warsaw.Fleischman, S., 1990. Tense and Narrativity: From Medieval Performance to Modern Fiction. Austin.Givón, T., 1979. From discourse to syntax: Grammar as a processing strategy. In: T. Givón, ed. Discourse and Syntax. Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 12. N. Y., etc. pp. 81—112.Hopper, P. and Thompson, S., 1980. Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language, 56 (2), pp. 251—299.Hopper, P. and Thompson, S., eds., 1982. Studies in Transitivity. Syntax and Semantics 15. N. Y., etc.Jasinskaja, E., 2009. Pragmatics and Prosody of Implicit Discourse Relations. Ph. D. Tübingen.Prince, E., 1981. Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. In: P. Cole, ed. Radical Pragmatics. N. Y. pp. 223—256.Ruytenbeek, N., 2017. The comprehension of indirect requests: Previous work and future directions. In: I. Depraetere and R. Salkie, eds. Semantics and Pragmatics: Drawing a Line. Springer, pp. 293—322.Yu. V.DomanskiiUsing an excerpt from Stanisław Lem’s Solaris, this article explores the idea that, in a literary text, a fictional world and the world of physical reality may interact to form such a reality that can paradoxically turn out to be more real than what we believe to be the actual reality. It is also shown that the fictional world realized in a literary text may bring the reader to certain conclusions about the world in which he or she lives. Thus, even if literature is in­capable of affecting reality, it can change the way the latter is perceived. A fictional world is not just a reality — it is a reality of a higher order.0604202611Aristotle, 2017. Poetika. Ritorika [Poetics. Rhetoric]. St. Petersburg (in Russ.).Bakhtin, M., 1994. To the philosophy of action. In: M. Bakhtin, ed. Raboty 20-kh godov [The work of the 20s]. Kiev (in Russ.).Domanski, Y. V., 2018a. The art world and the real world. In: M. M. Golubkov, et al., eds. Russkaya literatura ХХ—ХХI vekov kak literaturnyi protsess (problemy teorii i metodologii izucheniya): Materialy VI Mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii [Russian literature of the XX—XXI centuries as a literary process (problems of theory and methodology of study): Proceedings of the VI International Scientific Conference]. Moscow, 18—19 December 2018. pp. 21—25 (in Russ.).Domanski, Y. V., 2018b. The art world and physical reality. Vestnik RGGU. Seriya «Istoriya. Filologiya. Kul'turologiya. Vostokovedeniye» [Bulletin of the RSUH. Series «History. Philology. Culturology. Oriental Studies»], 2 (35), pp. 59—69 (in Russ.).Lem, S., 2018. Solaris: roman [Solaris: the novel]. Moscow (in Russ.).Cervantes Saavedra, M. de., 2017. Khitroumnyy idal'go Don Kikhot Lamanchskiy [The cunning hidalgo Don Quixote of La Mancha]. St. Petersburg (in Russ.).Wilde, O., 2017. Portret Doriana Greya: roman [Portrait of Dorian Gray: the novel]. St. Petersburg (in Russ.).Fedorov, F. P., 1988. Romanticheskiy khudozhestvennyy mir: prostranstvo i vremya [Romantic art world: space and time]. Riga (in Russ.).Fomenko, I. V. and Fomenko, L. P., 1998. The art world and the world in which the author lives. Literaturnyy tekst: problemy i metody issledovaniya [Literary text: problems and research methods], 4, pp. 3—9 (in Russ.).Chudakov, A. P., 2015. Lozhitsya mgla na staryye stupeni: Roman-idilliya [The haze lies on the old steps: the novel-idyll]. Moscow (in Russ.).Ż. R.SładkiewiczK.WielądekThis paper discusses intertextual and intervisual tools for creating the past — present — future dialogic axis in urban practices, using the example of graffiti and inscriptions in Gdansk and Kaliningrad. The authors describe the urban space as an object of research, give a definition of the urban inscription, characterize the semiotic nature of the latter, consider ter­minology problems relating to the category of intertextuality, and broadly interpret the inter­texteme as a tool in the ‘past — present — future’ dialogical space in the urban narrative. The study relies on rich empirical material. In summing up the features of semantic formation in the narrative urban practices, the authors conclude that the urban inscription is a symbolical­ly organized space in which the interpreter deals with signs of various semiotic systems and employs cultural meanings and conventions expressed in both verbal and graphic forms. The recognizability of intertextemes in both authentic and modified forms contributes to the at­tractivity of the urban text and its dialogical nature.0604202611Arutyunova, N. D., 1990. Diskurs. In: V. N. Yartsev, ed. Lingvisticheskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar' [Linguistic Encyclopedic Dictionary]. Moscow. pp. 136—137 (in Russ.).Bakhtin, M. M., 1986. Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva [Aesthetics of verbal creativity]. Moscow (in Russ.).Boltyanskii, G. M., 1925. Lenin i kino [Lenin and cinema]. Moscow. Leningrad (in Russ.).Glazychev, V. L., 2008. Urbanistika [Urban Studies]. Moscow (in Russ.).Gudkov, D. B., 2003. Teoriya i praktika mezhkul'turnoy kommunikatsii [Theory and practice of intercultural communication]. Moscow (in Russ.).Gudkov, D. B., Krasnykh, V. V., Zakharenko, I. V. and Bagaeva, D. V., 1997. Cognitive base and precedent phenomena in the system of other units and in communication. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 9. Filologiya [Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 9. Philology], 4, pp. 106—117 (in Russ.).Dmitrieva, O. A. and Mironova, O. S., 2015. Linguocultural specificity of urban inscriptions. Filologicheskiye nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktyki [Philological Sciences. Questions of theory and practice], 12-1 (54), pp. 74—76 (in Russ.).Zarubina, A. B., 2018. Urban discourse in the aspect of multidisciplinary discourse practice as a driver of positive changes in the urban communicative environment. Filologicheskiy aspekt [Philological Aspect], 11 (43), pp. 172—181 (in Russ.).Zemlyanova, L. M., 1999. Zarubezhnaya kommunikativistika v preddverii informatsionnogo obshchestva: tolkovyi slovar' terminov i kontseptsii [Foreign communication science on the eve of the information society: explanatory dictionary of terms and concepts]. Moscow (in Russ.).Karaulov, Yu. N., 1987. Russkiy yazyk i yazykovaya lichnost' [Russian language and linguistic personality]. Moscow (in Russ.).Kiklevich, A., 2018. “Obrabotat' napil'nikom…”. Analysis of use one case text. Russkoye obozreniye [Russian Studies Review], 4 (164), pp. 175—198 (in Russ.).Kuzmina, N. A., 2011. Intertextuality and precedence as basic cognitive categories of media discourse. Mediaskop [MediaScope]. Available at: http://www.mediascope. ru/node/755 [Accessed July 31, 2019] (in Russ.).Litvin, F. A., 2000. Reproducible Texts as a Means of Speech Impact. In: O. V. Vysochina, ed. Rechevoye vozdeystviye [Speech Impact]. Voronezh—Moscow. pp. 58—59 (in Russ.).Kozhevnikova, V. M. and Nikolaev, P. A., eds., 1987. Literaturnyy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar' [Encyclopedic Literary Dictionary]. Moscow (in Russ.).Mokienko, V. M. and Sidorenko, K. P., 1999. Slovar' krylatykh slov i vyrazheniy Pushkina. [Dictionary of winged words and expressions of Pushkin]. St. Petersburg (in Russ.).Parshin, P. B., 2001. Types, functions and sources of intertext in mass communication. In: M. N. Volodina and M. L. Remneva, eds. Yazyk sredstv massovoy informatsii kak ob"yekt mezhdistsiplinarnogo issledovaniya [Language of the media as an object of interdisciplinary research]. Moscow. pp. 84—85 (in Russ.).Polukhina, K. S., 2017. On the essence of the concept of “urban space”. Nauchnyy al'manakh [Scientific almanac], 2—2 (28), pp. 361—362 (in Russ.).Porozov, R. Yu., 2011. Visual as the dominant of modern culture. Politicheskaya lingvistika [Political Linguistics], 2 (36), pp. 219—221 (in Russ.).Ilyin, I. P., ed. Postmodernizm. Slovar' terminov [Postmodernism. Glossary of Terms]. Avaliable at: https://postmodernism.academic.ru [Accessed: July 31, 2019] (in Russ.).Preobrazhensky, S. Yu., 1989. On the typology of intertextual relations: allusion and citation. In: S. Yu. Preobrazhensky, ed. Russkaya al'ternativnaya poeziya XX veka [Russian alternative poetry of the XX century]. Moscow. pp. 43—47 (in Russ.).Rozin, V. M., 2006. Vizual'naya kul'tura i vospriyatiye. Kak chelovek vidit i vosprinimayet mir [Visual culture and perception. How a person sees and perceives the world]. Moscow. (in Russ.).Sidorenko, K. P., 1998. Tsitaty iz «Yevgeniya Onegina» A. S. Pushkina v tekstakh raznogo zhanra [Quotes from “Eugene Onegin” A. S. Pushkin in texts of various genres]. St. Petersburg (in Russ.).Sladkevich, J. R., 2013. Politicheskiy fel'yeton v svete teorii rechevogo vozdeystviya [Political feuilleton in the light of the theory of speech influence]. Gdańsk (in Russ.).Sladkevich, J. R., 2019. Media image of San Escobar in the space of fictional worlds: a sociosemiotic perspective. Slovo. ru: baltic accent, 2, pp. 73—103 (in Russ.).Smetanina, S. I., 2002. Media-tekst v sisteme kul'tury (dinamicheskie protsessy v yazyke i stile zhurnalistiki kontsa XX veka) [Media text in the cultural system (dynamic processes in the language and style of journalism at the end of the 20th century)]. Saint-Petersburg (in Russ.).Suprun, A. E., 1998. Reminiscences in newspaper texts. In: I. F. Ukhvanova-Shmygova, ed., Metodologiya issledovaniy politicheskogo diskursa: aktual'nyye problemy soderzhatel'nogo analiza obshchestvenno-politicheskikh tekstov [Methodology for the study of political discourse: actual problems of a meaningful analysis of socio-political texts]. Minsk. Vol. 1. pp. 142—149 (in Russ.).Chernyavskaya, V. E., 2014. Lingvistika teksta. Lingvistika diskursa [Linguistics of the text. Linguistics discourse]. Moscow (in Russ.).Barker, Ch., 2005. Studia kulturowe. Teoria i praktyka. Krakow.Bergström, B., 2009. Komunikacja wizualna. Warsaw.Bierwiaczonek, K., 2018. Miejskie przestrzenie publiczne i ich społeczne znaczenia — próba systematyzacji. Przegląd Socjologiczny, 67 (1), pp. 25—48.Burzyńska, A., 2006. Kulturowy zwrot teorii. In: M. Markowski and R. Nycz., eds. Kulturowa teoria literatury. Główne pojęcia i problemy. Krakow. pp. 41—91.Chlebda, W., 1991. Elementy frazematyki. Wprowadzenie do frazeologii nadawcy. Opole.Chlebda, W., ed., 2010. Na tropach reproduktów. W poszukiwaniu wielowyrazowych jednostek języka. Opole.Chlebda, W., 2005. Szkice o skrzydlatych słowach: interpretacje lingwistyczne. Opole.Chlebda, W., 2005. Reprodukty na warsztacie (1). In: W. Chlebda, ed. Na tropach reproduktów. W poszukiwaniu wielowyrazowych jednostek języka. Opole. pp. 7—14.Chudzik, A., 2005. Inskrypcje w przestrzeni miejskiej: studium pragmalingwistyczne: (na przykładzie napisów krakowskich z lat 2003—2005). Krakow.Cobel-Tokarska, M., 2011. Przestrzeń społeczna: świat — dom — miasto. In: A. Firkowska-Mankiewicz, T. Kanash and E. Tarkowska, eds. Krótkie wykłady z socjologii. Przegląd problemów i metod. Warsaw. pp. 45—62.Fairclough, N., 1995. Critical Discourse Analysis: the Critical Study of Language. London.Golka, M., 2009. Pamięć społeczna i jej implanty. Warsaw.Hutcheon, L., 2007. Teoria parodii. Lekcja sztuki XX wieku. Krakow.Jalowiecki, B., 2000. Encyklopedia socjologii. Vol. 3. Warsaw.Kalaga, W., 2001. Mgławice dyskursu. Podmiot, tekst, interpretacja. Krakow.Kaznowski, M., 2018. Mur(al)owe podwoje do przeszłości — murale jako nośniki kultury historycznej na przykładzie wybranych prac w południowo-wschodniej Polsce. Zeszyty Naukowe Towarzystwa Doktorantów UJ. Nauki Społeczne, 23(4), pp. 203—245.Kowalski, Ł., 2012. Narzędzie badania przestrzeni publicznej małych miast na przykładzie Skawiny. Człowiek, społeczeństwo, przestrzeń, 2, pp. 61—83.Kula, M., 2002. Nośniki pamięci historycznej. Warsaw.Maciejczak, Z., Murale jako nośniki pamięci w przestrzeni miejskiej. Studium przypadku warszawskiego osiedla Muranów. Available at: http://www.otwarta.org/wp-content/ uploads/2016/06/Esej-ZM.pdf [Accessed 11 July 2019].Niżyńska, A., 2011. Street art jako alternatywna forma debaty publicznej w przestrzeni miejskiej. Warsaw.Szalewska, K., 2017. Urbanalia: miasto i jego teksty: humanistyczne studia miejskie. Gdansk.Szpociński, A., 2014. Nośniki pamięci, miejsca pamięci. Sensus Historiae, 17 (4), pp. 17—26.Szumiło, M., 2017. Murale w gdańskiej przestrzeni miejskiej. In: Z. Dymarski, ed. Człowiek i miasto. Gdańszczanie między starą a nową tożsamością. Gdansk. pp. 85—102.Szymańska, W., 2011. Percepcja i użytkowanie przestrzeni publicznej w średnim mieście. Człowiek w przestrzeni publicznej miasta, XXIV Konwersatorium Wiedzy o Mieście, 15, pp. 179—190.Utracka, D., 2018. Parodie transmedialne. Tekst kultury jako kod nomadyczny. In: A. Kiklewicz and A. Dudziak, eds. Nomadyzm i nomadologia: rozważania i analizy. Olsztyn. pp. 77—101.