NONE20260529213504114Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal Universityno-reply@journals.kantiana.ruImmanuel Kant Baltic Federal UniversitySlovo.ru: Baltic accent2225-53462686-898905292026102P.SteinerDecision science is a relatively new discipline: the product of a cross-pollination among mathematics, psychology, economy and a few other branches of knowledge. It studies how humans make their choices and purports to provide a “rational framework for choosing be­tween alternative courses of action when the consequences resulting from this choice are im­perfectly known.” In and of itself decision science is a vast field of intersecting theories and methodologies that I will exploit only in a limited manner—as it applies to particular views on literary production. My paper deals with the theories of Viktor Shklovsky and Iurii Tynianov outlining how these two members of the Petersburg “Society for the Study of Poetic Language”(OPOIAZ) conceived of the writer as a rational agent pursuing a specific goal, and of the means at his/her disposal to attain it. Their approaches, I will illustrate, correspond well to two specific types of rationality: “instrumental” and “bounded.” To conclude, I will juxta­pose the Formalists’ conceptualization of poetic creativity to Mikhail Bachtin’s view on the subject arguing that the way he conceives of the strategies available to the literary author fit the label of “interactive rationality.”0529202611V. V.MalashchenkoThe article describes the main features of the hagiographic genre in the Life of Alexander from Plutarch’s Comparative Biographies. I use the comparative, reverse and structural-semantic methods to analyse the biography of Alexander the Great, the images of the protago­nist and the narrator, the unreality and the deification of the protagonist. There is a certain typological convergence between bios as a genre and Plutarch’s ancient biographies. This convergence is reflected in the structure of Alexander’s biography, which is built according to a certain model, a plot-scheme pattern, and includes Alexander’s birth, childhood, upbring­ing, adolescence, maturity, his victories, lifetime deification and death. The correlation of the two genre forms helps to reveal and explore the biographic image of Plutarch’s main character as well as his human fate, the aim of life and the freedom of choice. These aspects are reflected in the hagiographic genre. I analyse the similarities and differences of the narrative strategies employed since the narrative (non-diegetic narrator) in the hagiography genre is clearly relat­ed to the non-diegetic “multiple” narrator of Plutarch's biography. I argue that the genre of ancient biography with its topos of private life and its entertaining and instructive functions serves as a nutrient substrate for the formation of the genre of bios.0529202611Averintsev, S. S., 1994. Good Plutarch tells about heroes, or happy marriage of a biographical genre and moral philosophy. In: Plutarkh. Sravnitel'nye zhizneopisaniya: v 2 t. [Plutarch. Comparative biographies: in 2 tons]. Vol. 1. Moscow: Izdatel'stvo «Nauka». pp. 637—653 (in Russ.).Averintsev, S. S., 1973. Plutarkh i antichnaya biografiya: k voprosu o meste klassika zhanra v istorii zhanra [Plutarch and ancient biography: to the question about the place of the classic of the genre in the history of the genre]. Moscow: «Nauka» (in Russ.).Averintsev, S. S., n. d. Pochemu Evangeliya — ne biografii? [Why are the Gospels not biographies?]. Available at: https://azbyka.ru/otechnik/Sergej_Averincev/pochemu- evangelija-ne-biografii/ [Accessed 12 November 2018] (in Russ.).Bakhtin, M. M., 1979. Author and hero in aesthetic activity. In: M. M. Bakhtin, ed. Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva [Aesthetics of verbal creativity]. Moscow: Iskusstvo. pp. 7—180 (in Russ.).Bitsilli, P. M., 1995. Elementy srednevekovoi kul'tury [Elements of medieval culture]. Vol. XXVIII. St. Petersburg: Mifril (in Russ.).Zhivov, V. M., 1994. Svyatost': kratkii slovar' agiograficheskikh terminov [Holiness: A short dictionary of hagiographic terms]. Moscow: «Gnozis» (in Russ.).Avdiev, V. I., Pikus, N. N., eds., 1962. Istoriya Drevnei Gretsii [History of ancient Greece]. M. oscow: «Vysshaya shkola» (in Russ.).Levek, P., 1989. Ellinisticheskii mir [Hellenistic world]. Moscow: Nauka. Glavnaya redaktsiya vostochnoi literatury (in Russ.).Nikulina, E. N., 2008. Agiologiya: kurs lektsii [Hagiology: a course of lectures]. Moscow: PSTGU. Available at: URL: https://azbyka.ru/otechnik/Zhitija_svjatykh/ agiologija/ [Accassed 14 November 2018].Popova, T. V., 1975. Antichnaya biografiya i vizantiiskaya agiografiya [Antique biography and Byzantine hagiography]. Antichnost' i Vizantiya. Moscow: «Nauka» (in Russ.).Plutarkh, A., 1994. Plutarkh. Sravnitel'nye zhizneopisaniya: v 2 t. [Plutarch. Comparative biographies: in 2 vol.]. Vol. 2. Moscow: Izdatel'stvo «Nauka» (in Russ.).A. A.VaskinevichI analyse three hagiographic poems written by Konrad von Würzburg, a German poet of the XIII century. The poems describe the lives of Saint Alexis, a Man of God, Saint Pantaleon and Pope Sylvester. These saints are worshipped both by the Catholic and the Orthodox churches. Special attention is paid to Konrad von Wurzburg’s concept of ‘genre’, its essential features and the reader’s perception of hagiographic texts. I hold that German medieval writ­ers tended to create spiritual literature in a poetic form. I define the terms, which according to Ger­man tradition, characterize hagiography as a genre in the medieval epoch and compared them with the notion used by Konrad von Würzburg. I examine the peculiarities of the text structure, the functions of the prologue and the epilogue and analyse a number of specific features typical of the plot of the above-mentioned hagiographic poems. Conrad von Würs­burg’s outstanding merit lies in the establishment of hagiographic canons in German litera­ture.0529202611Gugnin, J. A., 2003. Tvorchestvo Konrada Würzburgskogo v kontekste nemeckoj literatury XIII veka [Works of Konrad von Würzburg in the context of German literature of the XIII century]. Moscow, Novopolock (in Russ.).Achnitz, W., 2000. Ein mære als Bîspel. Strickers Verserzählung “Der kluge Knecht”. In: V. Honemann, T. Tomasek, eds, Germanistische Mediävistik. Münster: LIT. pp. 177—204.BMZ = Mittelhochdeutsches Wörterbuch, 1854—1866. Mit Benutzung des Nachlasses von Georg Friedrich Benecke ausgearbeitet von Wilhelm Müller und Friedrich Zarncke. Vol. 3. Leipzig. Available at: http://woerterbuchnetz.de/cgi-bin/WBNetz/wbgui_ py?mode=Volltextsuche&hitlist=&patternlist=&lemid=BN00438&sigle=BMZ [Accessed 22 November 2018].Coxon, S., 2001. The Presentation of Authorship in Medieval German Narrative Literature 1220—1290. New York: Oxford University Press.Griese, S., 2013. Heilige Helden in Konrads von Würzburg Legenden. In: Geistliche Literatur des Mittelalters und der Frühen Neuzeit. Frankfurt am Main. pp. 55—67.Grimm, W., ed., 1841. Konrads von Würzburg Silvester. Göttingen: Dieterische Buchhandlung.Jackson, T. R., 1983. The Legends of Konrad von Würzburg. Form, Content, Function. Erlangen: Palm & Enke.Hennig, B., 2001. Kleines Mittelhochdeutsches Wörterbuch. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Horsfall, W., Stock, M., 2017. Konrad von Wuerzburg — A Bibliography. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/1807/76860 [Accessed 1 April 2017].von Gandersheim, H., 1998. Dulcitus. Abraham. Zwei Dramen. Stuttgart: Reclam. pp. 47—49.von Würzburg, K., 1898. Das Leben des heiligen Alexius. Berlin: Mayer & Müller.von Würzburg, K., 1925. Die Legenden. I (Silvester). Halle: Niemeyer.von Würzburg, K., 1926. Die Legenden: II (Alexius). Halle: Niemeyer.von Würzburg, K., 1999. Heinrich von Kempten. Der Welt Lohn. Das Herzmaere. Stuttgart: Reclam.von Würzburg, K., 1974. Pantaleon. Hg. W. Woesler. Tübingen: Niemeyer.von Würzburg, K., 2008. Pantaleon: Bereinigter diplomatischer Abdruck und Übersetzung. Hg. Th. Neukirchen. Berlin: Erich Schmidt.Paul, H., ed., 1984. Germanische Literaturgeschichte. Vol.1. Stuttgart: Magnus.Wahl, H. M., 1997. Die Jakobserzählungen. Berlin, New York: Gruyter.Wehrli, M., 1997. Geschichte der deutschen Literatur im Mittelalter. Stuttgart: Reclam.N. V.PisarThe article explores lexemes stemming from Rus. бог- (god), which were used in the texts of the XV—XVII centuries. This stem expressed the concept of God and was used as a means of characterization of objects, phenomena, etc. The material of the analysis was taken from the texts of the XV—XVII centuries, which are a valuable source of information for the study of the system of values of Slavs, based on the axiology of Christian dogmas. The aim of this re­search is to identify the specificity of these lexemes, their interconnection as well as their re­latedness to the concept of God. I defined a number of semantic criteria, according to which the studied lexical group forms various paradigms. I argue that there is quantitative hetero­geneity in the use of lexemes with the stem бог- (God) in the XV—XVII centuries. This het­erogeneity was expressed in the dominance of the lexeme analysed over others. The identified lexemes are grouped according to the following semantic features: designation of people relat­ed to God, characteristics of the activity of a specific historical personality, an abstract con­cept, an object or a phenomenon of that time, or a polysemantic word. This large group of lexemes consists of the words characterizing a person, an object or a phenomenon on the basis of the following attributes — 'worthy of God's praise, '(not) worthy of praise', 'possessing Divine wisdom', 'following the path of God', etc. I argue that lexemes with the stem бог- (God) in the texts of the XV-XVII centuries are parts of a broader paradigm of 'conforming to the standards of Christian dogmas, positively assessed vs not corresponding to the standards, negatively assessed”. This assessment forms the basis of the axiology of the Christian doctrine.0529202611Likhachev, D. S., ed., 1997. Biblioteka literaturyi Drevney Rusi [Library of literature of ancient Russia]. St. Petersburg. Available at: http://lib.pushkinskijdom.ru/Default. aspx?tabid=2070 [Accessed 5 September 2018] (in Russ.).Belyaev, A. E., ed., 1904. Jitie protopopa Avvakuma, im samim napisannoe [Life of Protopopus Avvakum, written by him]. Saint-Petersburg. Available at: https://dlib. rsl.ru/viewer/01003718646#?page=1 [Accessed 5 September 2018] (in Russ.).Kadlubovskiy, A. P., 1902. Ocherki po istorii drevnerusskoy literatury zhitiy svyatykh: 1—5 [Essays on the history of ancient literature of the lives of the saints: 1—5]. Warsaw. Available at: https://dlib.rsl.ru/01003704953[Accessed 5 September 2018] (in Russ.).Krys'ko, V. B., ed., 1975. Slovar russkogo yazyika XI-XVII vv. [Dictionary of the Russian language XI—XVII centuries]. Moscow (in Russ.).Sreznevskii, I. I., 1893. Slovar drevnerusskogo yazyika: v 3 t. [Old Russian Dictionary: 3 volumes]. St. Petersburg (in Russ.).Vasmer, M., 1964. Etimologicheskiy slovar russkogo yazyika: v 4 t. [Etymological dictionary of the Russian language: 4 vol.). Vol. 1. Moscow (in Russ.).Chernykh, P. Ya., 1993, Istoriko-etimologicheskiy slovar sovremennogo russkogo yazyika: v 2 t. [Historical and etymological dictionary of the modern Russian language: 2 vol.]. Vol. 1. Moscow (in Russ.).Chernysheva, M. I., 2017. Imenovaniya Bogoroditsy v drevnerusskoy pis'mennosti: Okolo 500 leksicheskikh yedinits s ob"yasneniyami i kommentariyami [Names of the Virgin in ancient Russian writing: About 500 lexical units with explanations and comments]. Moscow (in Russ.).Chernysheva, M. I., 2015. Uhodyashchie slova, uskol'zayushchie smysly: istoriko-leksikologicheskie issledovaniya [Outgoing words, elusive meanings: historical and lexicological research]. Available at: http://j-spacetime.com/actual%20content/t10v1/t10 v1_PDF/2227-9490e-aprovr_e-ast10-1.2015.71.pdf [Accessed 5 September 2018] (in Russ.).Trubachev, O. N., ed., 1974. Etimologicheskiy slovar slavyanskih yazyikov. Praslavyanskiy leksicheskiy fond [Etymological dictionary of Slavic languages. Slavonic lexical fund]. Vol. 2. Moscow (in Russ.).A. A.DavidenkoThe author analyses the role of the main characters’ names — Lev, Lyuda and Arkady — in the novel Parade by N. Kononov. The multilanguage anagrammatic code is chosen as a research technique: anagramming (in some cases with a transition from one language to an­other) allows the author to identify hidden meanings consciously or subconsciously used by the writer. N. Kononov resorts to language game throughout his novel and shows the connec­tion between the name Lev and the semantics of physicality and personality traits. Describing his characters, the writer uses a number of images: the king of all animals, the cowardly lion, etc. The multilanguage anagrammatic code highlights the connection of the name of the pro­ta­gonist with the two key concepts of the novel — love (LEV = LoVE) and death. Similarly, this code works with the names of Lyuda (‘ludus’ as ‘game’ in Latin; Lev playing with Lyuda — ‘homo ludens’). The name Arkady is semantically associated with death in the expression ‘et in Arcadia ego’. The names of the characters in the novel are the key to the understanding of the threefold structure of the text. The short form of the name Arkady (Adya = Ad (Hell) + I) refers to Hell as one of the three parts of the Universe in the Catholic religion, followed in the text by Paradise and Purgatory. The author concludes that the names perform a text-generating function and reveal the encrypted information inherent in the text.0529202611Dmitrovskaya, M. A., 2015. The vegetative code in the story “Amnesia of Anastasia” by Nikolay Kononov. 2. Ob ovse — oba vse! IKBFU's Vestnik: Philology, pedagogy, and psychology, 8, pp. 39—45 (in Russ.).Dmitrovskaya, M. A., 2014. If the Muse of Clio: the story of the human soul and the history of peoples in the novel “Flaneur” by Nikolay Kononov. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie [New literary review], 4(128), pp. 266—284 (in Russ.).Dmitrovskaya, M. A., Degtyarenko, K. A., 2016. "Full paragraph" (key concepts in the works of Nikolay Kononov). Kritika i semiotika [Critique and semiotics], 1, pp. 205—226 (in Russ.).Dmitrovskaya, M. A., Dementev, I. O., 2013. Undertaker Adrian (subtext and pretext of the novel “Flaneur” by Nikolay Kononov). IKBFU's Vestnik: Philology, pedagogy, and psychology, 8, pp. 58—63 (in Russ.).Kononov, N., 2015. PARAD: Roman [PARADE: the novel]. Moscow (in Russ.).Makhov, A. E., 2006. HOSTIS ANTIQUUS: Kategorii i obrazy srednevekovoj hristianskoj demonologii. Opyt slovarya [HOSTIS ANTIQUUS: Categories and images of medieval Christian demonology. Essay of handbook]. Moscow (in Russ.).Huizinga, J., 1997. Homo ludens; Stat'i po istorii kul'tury [Homo ludens; The articles on the history of culture]. Moscow (in Russ.).Jäckel, D., 2006. Der Herrscher als LöwD. A.MalevanayaThe story «The Source of Injury» by Nikolay Kononov is as a psychoanalytic report that has a therapeutic effect for the narrator. The characteristics of the three main characters are con­sidered in terms of their alchemical symbolism. This point of view makes it possible to identify the psychological function of each character as a reflection of a certain aspect of their psyche. Ovechin, whose image is dominated by the solar symbolism, appears as a projection of Ego and of momentary consciousness. Olya, who is associated with the images of the moon and air, appears as a projection of the Anima, which refers to the subconscious. The narrator and his character play the role of the conscious part of the psyche abiding behind the momen­tary consciousness. Although the narrative is evidently about a mental illness, a split person­ality in the state of psychosis, it still structures past events and their analytical understand­ing, leading to their strictly individual perception.0529202611Kononov, N., 2012. Source of injuries. In: N. Kononov, ed. Saratov: rasskazy [Saratov: stories]. Moscow (in Russ.).Konstantinov, A. V., 2007. The archetypes of transformation in alchemy. In: S. V. Pakhomov, ed. Filosofiya, religiya i kul'tura stran Vostoka: mater. nauch. konf. [Philosophy, Religion, and Culture of Eastern Countries: Conference Proceedings]. St. Petersburg, 7—10 February 2007. St. Petersburg: Izd-vo S.-Peterb. un-ta. pp. 746—754 (in Russ.).Polishchuk, D., 2003. Control Kononova. Novyi mir [New World], 2, pp. 162—168 (in Russ.).Ushakov, D. N., ed., 1995. Tolkovyi slovar' russkogo yazyka: v 4 t. [Explanatory dictionary of the Russian language: 4 vol.]. Available at: http://ushdict.narod.ru [Accessed 15 March 2018] (in Russ.).von Franz, M.-L., 2017. Alkhimiya: vvedenie v simvolizm i psikhologiyu [Alchemy: an introduction to symbolism and psychology]. Moscow (in Russ.).Eliade, M., 1998. Aziatskaya alkhimiya. Sbornik esse [Asian alchemy. Collection of essays]. Moscow (in Russ.).Jung, K. G., 1996. Struktura psikhiki i protsess individuatsii [The structure of the psyche and the process of individuation]. Moscow (in Russ.).Zh. R.SladkevichThe article deals with the process of structuring the concept of the fictitious state of San Escobar from the perspective of social semiotics, including the broadly understood context and media environment for constructing the image. The creation of the internet memes was in­spired by a lapsus linguae of the Polish Minister of Foreign Affairs Witold Waszczykowski. Major changes in the communicative space, the dominance of digital media resources and multimodal messages, the hegemony of visual culture and the increased impact of the social factor on the specifics of linguistic transformations contribute to the growing popularity of social semiotic studies. In the theoretical part of the paper, I give a brief analysis of the evolu­tion of the concept of "context" in linguistics from the perspective of systemic functional gram­mar, cognitivism, social semiotics and multimodal discourse analysis. The analytical part of the article explores the constructed media image of the fictitious state of San Escobar through the prism of the following contexts: situational-medial, cultural-cognitive, linguistic, inten­tional and socio-economic. Summing up the specifics of the formation of meaning in narrative social practices, I draw conclusions about the recontextualization of Mikhail Bakhtin's ideas concerning the polyphonic nature of language and communication.0529202611Ageyeva, R. A., 1990. Strany i narody: Proiskhozhdeniye nazvaniy [Countries and Peoples: Origin of Names]. Moscow (in Russ.).Ayzenberg, M., 1997. Power of darkness quotes. Znamya [Banner], 2, pp. 214—221 (in Russ.).Arutyunova, N. D., 1990. Discourse. In: V. N. Yarceva, ed. Lingvisticheskij enciklopedicheskij slovar’ [Linguistic Encyclopedic Dictionary]. Moscow. pp. 136—137 (in Russ.).Bakhtin, M. M., 1986. Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva [Aesthetics of verbal creativity]. Moscow (in Russ.).Belovodskaya, А., 2016. On the issue of the media image analysis methodology (on the example of the corpus of Internet memes expressing the Putin media-concept). Przegląd Rusycystyczny, 4 (156), pp. 118—131 (in Russ.).Bershidskiy, L., 2013. Moskva pokhozha na Mordor, Ukraina — na stranu hobbitov [Moscow is like Mordor, Ukraine is like a hobbit country]. Available at: https:// censor.net.ua/resonance/240801/moskva_pohoja_na_mordor_ukraina_na_stranu_ hobbitov [Accessed 19 August 2018] (in Russ.).Bochkareva, N., 2016. 4 strany, kotorye ne sushchestvujut [4 countries that do not exist]. Available at: http://fb.ru/post/destinations/2016/2/8/4077 [Accessed 19 August 2018] (in Russ.).Verbitskiy, А. А., 1990. Aktivnoe obuchenie v szkole: kontekstnyj podkhod [Active schooling: a contextual approach]. Moscow (in Russ.).Vinogradov, V. V., 1977. The main types of lexical meanings of the word. In: Leksikologiya I leksikografiya. Izbr. trudy [Lexicology and lexicography. Fav. works]. Moscow (in Russ.).Galinskaya, T., 2013. The concept of the media image and the problem of its reconstruction in modern linguistics. Vestkik OGU [Bulletin of OGU], 11(160), pp. 91—94 (in Russ.).Glinka, K., Teoriya yumora [Theory of Humor]. Available at: https://scorcher.ru/neuro/neuro_sys/laughter/laughter5.php [Accessed 19 August 2018] (in Russ.).El'mslev, L., 1960. Prolegomena to the theory of language. Novoe v lingvistike [New in linguistics], 1 (in Russ.).El'nitskii, L. A., 1962. Drevneishie okeanskie plavaniya [The oldest ocean swimming]. Moscow (in Russ.).Zheltukhina, M. R., 2000. Komicheskoye v politicheskom diskurse (na materiale nemeckogo I russkogo yazykov) [Comic in political discourse (on the material of German and Russian languages)]: Ph. D. Volgograd State Pedagogical University (in Russ.).Zagibalova, M. A., 2008. Phenomen karnavalizacii sovremennoj kultury [The phenomenon of carnivalization of modern culture]: PhD. Tula State Pedagogical University (in Russ.).Zalevskaya, A. A., 1999. Vvedenie v psikholingvistiku [Introduction to Psycholinguistics]. Moscow (in Russ.).Zerchaninova, T. Ye., 2006. Sociologiya. Slovar’ [Sociology. Vocabulary]. Ekaterinburg, Available at: http://voluntary.ru/dictionary/1107 [Accessed 19 August 2018] (in Russ.).Ilyin, M. V., 2016. What can an analysis of performatives give? Politicheskaya nauka [Political science], 4. pp. 262—270 (in Russ.).Ionov, A., 2018. Putevoditel’ po vymyshlennym stranam Marvel: Vakanda, Latveriya, dalee vezde [Marvel fictional countries guide: Wakanda, Latteria, then everywhere]. Available at: https://www.mirf.ru/worlds/marvel-strany-wakanda-latveria [Accessed 19 August 2018] (in Russ.).Kwyat, A., 2013. Mediam as an instrument of political PR: cognitive approach. Reklama i PR [Advertising and PR], 1. Available at: http://www.mediascope.ru/ node/1254 [Accessed 19 August 2018] (in Russ.).Knyazev, А. А., 2002. Enciklopedicheskiy slovar’ SMI [Encyclopedic dictionary of media]. Moscow. Available at: http://voluntary.ru/dictionary/1105/word/kontekst [Accessed 19 August 2018] (in Russ.).Kondratov, A. M., 1987. Atlantidy pyati okeanov [Atlantis of the Five Oceans]. Leningrad (in Russ.).Kondratov, A. M., 1988. Atlantidy ishchite na shel’fe [Atlantis look on the shelf]. Leningrad (in Russ.).Konopleva, T. V., 2013. Psychology of information perception: perception of news about the world of politics in the media space. Psikholog [Psychologist], 5. Available at: http://e-notabene.ru/psp/article_9247.html#8 [Accessed 19 August 2018] (in Russ.).Kubryakova, Ye. S., 1995. The evolution of linguistic ideas in the second half of the XX century. In: Yu. S. Stepanov, ed. Yazyk i kultura konca XX veka [Language and culture of the end of the XX century]. Moscow (in Russ.).Lakoff, G., 1988. Thinking in the mirror of classifiers. Novoe v zarubezhnoj lingvistike [New in foreign linguistics], 23, pp. 12—52 (in Russ.).Losev, A. F., 1982. Znak. Simvol. Mif [Sign. Symbol. Myth]. Moscow (in Russ.).Maslova, V. A., 2008. Kognitivnaya lingvistika [Cognitive linguistics]. Minsk (in Russ.).Mozhejko, M. A., 2001. Context. In: Novejshij philosiphskij slovar’ [Newest Philosophical Dictionary]. Minsk (in Russ.).Morton, A. L., 1956. Anglijskaya utopiya [English utopia]. Moscow (in Russ.).Myrkin, V. Ya., 1978. Types of contexts. Communicative context. Philologicheskiye nauki [Philology], 1, pp. 95—100 (in Russ.).Panina, M. A., 1996. Komicheskoe i yazykovye sredstva yego vyrazheniya [Comic and language means of expression]. PhD. Moscow State Linguistic University (in Russ.).Propp, V. Ya., 1986. Istoricheskie korni volshebnoj skazki [The historical roots of the fairy tale]. Leningrad (in Russ.).Sladkevich, Zh., 2018. I will not say anything, but again I will say something: the aberration content of public discourse from the perspective of meaning generation (categories of meaningfulness and meaninglessness). In: Zh. Sladkevich, A. Klimkevich, eds. Perswazja językowa w różnych dyskursach. Vol. 3. Gdańsk (in print) (in Russ.).Khimik, V. V., 2004. Bolshoj slovar’ russkoj ekspressivnoj razgovornoj rechi [Large dictionary of Russian colloquial expressive speech]. St. Petersburg, Available at: http:// www.philology.ru/linguistics2/khimik-04.htm [Accessed 01 febrary 2017] (in Russ.).Chernyavskaya, V. Ye., 2003. Discourse. In: M. N. Kozhina, ed. Stilisticheskij enciklopedicheskij slovar’ russkogo yazyka [Stylistic encyclopedic dictionary of the Russian language]. Moscow (in Russ.).Shejgal, Ye. I., 2004. Semiotika politicheskogo duskursa [Semiotics of political discourse]. Moscow (in Russ.).Yarceva, V. N., 2002. Lingvisticheskij enciklopedicheskij slovar’ [Linguistic Encyclopedic Dictionary]. Moscow (in Russ.).Awdiejew, A., Habrajska, G., 2004. Wprowadzenie do gramatyki komunikacyjnej. Vol. 1. Łask.Badyda, E., Warda-Radys, L., 2017. Santo Subito, Bimberro Grande i Pico de Waszczykowski (2017 m) — wykreowany w przestrzeni Internetu fikcyjny kraj San Escobar (wpływ kontekstu na strukturę pojęcia). In: Media, biznes, kultura. Dziennikarstwo i komunikacja społeczna. pp. 93—106.Bartmiński, J., 2001. O językowym obrazie świata Polaków końca XX wieku. In: S. Dubisz and S. Gajda, eds. Polszczyzna XX wieku. Ewolucja i perspektywy rozwoju. Warszawa. pp. 27—53.Duszak, A., 2014. Dyskurs w badaniach kontekstu społecznego. In: P. Stalmaszczyk and P. Cap, eds. Pragmatyka, retoryka, argumentacja. Obrazy języka i dyskursu w naukach humanistycznych. Kraków. pp. 227—244.Eggins, S., Martin, J., 2001 (1997). Gatunki I rejestry dyskursu. In: T. van Dijk, ed. Dyskurs jako struktura i proces. Warszawa, pp. 24—39.Fairclough, N., 2003. Analysing Discourse. Textual Analysis for Social Research. London.Fairclough, N., 1995. Critical Discourse Analysis: the Critical Study of Language. London.Fairclough, N., 1989. Language and Power. London.Grice, P., 1975. Logic and Conversation. In: P. Cole, J. Morgan, eds. Speech Acts. Syntax and Semantics. New York. pp. 41—58.Halliday, M. A. K., 1985. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London.Halliday, M. A. K., 1978. Language as a Social Semiotic. The social interpretation of Language and Meaning. London.Halliday, M. A. K., 1967. Notes on Transitivity and Theme in English. Journal of Linguistics, 3, pp. 50—77.Hintikka, J., 1992. Eseje logiko-filozoficzne. Warszawa.Iedema, R., 2003. Multimodality, Resemiotization: Extending the Analysis of Discourse as Multi-Semiotic Practice. Visual Communication, 2 (1). pp. 14—26.Kiklewicz, A., 2012. Czwarte królestwo. Język a kontekst w dyskursach współczesności. Warszawa.Kress, G., 2010. Multimodality. A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London — New York.Kress, G., Leeuwen, van T., 2001. Multimodal discourse. The modes and media of contemporary communication. London.Maćkiewicz, J., 1999. Kategoryzacja a językowy obraz świata. In: J. Bartmiński, ed. Językowy obraz świata 12. Lublin. pp. 47—55.Maćkiewicz, J., 2016. Jak można badać komunikację medialną? — perspektywa odbiorcy. Studia Medioznawcze, 2, pp. 25—35.Martin, J., 1992. English Text. Amsterdam.McLuhan, M., 2001. Galaktyka Gutenberga. In: Wybór tekstów. Poznań.Searle, J., 2010. Making the Social World. Oxford.Searle, J., 1969. Speech Acts. An Essay of the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge.Searle, J., 1995. The construction of social reality. New York.Sieńko, A., 2017. Polskie firmy oszalały na punkcie San Escobar. Ich pomysły zadziwiają kreatywnością. Available at: http://innpoland.pl/132213,polskie-firmy-oszalaly- na-punkcie-san-escobar-ich-pomysly-zadziwiaja-kreatywnoscia [Accessed 20 June 2018].Skudrzyk, А., 2005. Czy zmierzch kultury pisma? O synestezji i analfabetyzmie funkcjonalnym. Katowice.Słobodzian, M., Globalizacja — szansa czy konieczność? Available at: http://www. edukacja.edux.pl/p-10757-globalizacja-szansa-czy-koniecznosc.php [Accessed 04 April 2018].Szpunar, M., 2010. Nowe media a paradygmat kultury uczestnictwa. In: M. Graszewicz, J. Jastrzębski, eds. Teorie komunikacji i mediów 2. Wrocław. pp. 251—262.Szczerek, Z., 2017. Niech żyje San Escobar! Między Molvanią a San Sombrero. Available at: https://www.polityka.pl/tygodnikpolityka/swiat/1690342,1,niech-zyje-san- escobar.read [Accessed 19 June 2018].Taylor, A., 2017. San Escobar: How Poland’s foreign minister helped create a fake country. Washington Post. Available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/ worldviews/wp/2017/01/11/san-escobar-how-polands-foreign-minister-helped-crea te-a-fake-country/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.60f54f8bd5e8 [Accessed 22 June 2018].van Dijk, T., 2008. Discourse and Context. Cambridge.van Dijk, T., 1980. Macrostructures. New York.van Dijk, T., 2009. Society and Discourse. How Social Contexts Influence Text and Talk. Cambridge.van Leeuwen, T., 2005. Introducing Social Semiotics. London — New York.Wang, W., Liu, W., 2015. Critical Discourse Analysis of New Reports on China’s Bullet-Train Crash. Studies in Literature and Language, 10(2), pp. 1—8.Wikariak, S., 2017. San Escobar już nie dla wszystkich. Trwa walkę o markę. Available at: http://gospodarka.dziennik.pl/news/artykuly/545460,san-escobar-marka-patent- [Accessed 23 June 2018].Zwierzchowski, M., 2017. San Escobar — Waszczykowski odkrył nowy kraj, internet oszalał. Available at: https://www.polityka.pl/tygodnikpolityka/ludzieistyle/1690154, 1,san-escobar--waszczykowski-odkryl-nowy-kraj-internet-oszalal.read [Accessed 19 June 2018].L. G.Dorofeeva0529202611Dorofeeva, L. G., 2018. The II International Scientific Seminar “Hagiography in the Russian Cultural Space”. Slovo. ru: The Baltic accent, 9(1), pp. 103—108 (in Russ.).Pervushin, M. V., 2018. Thousand and Thirty Years of Holy Russia: On Russian Holiness through the Prism of Statistics. Blagovestnik. Izdanie Klaipedskogo blagochiniya Pravoslavnoi Tserkvi v Litve [Blagovestnik. Publication of Klaipeda Prosperity of the Orthodox Church in Lithuania], 11, pp. 5—8 (in Russ.).Toporov, V. N., 1995. Svyatost' i svyatye v russkoi dukhovnoi kul'ture: v 2 t. [Holiness and Saints in Russian Spiritual Culture: in 2 volumes]. Vol. 1. Moscow: Shkola: «Yazyki russkoi kul'tury» (in Russ.).Fedotov, G. P., 1990. Svyatye Drevnei Rusi [Saints of Ancient Russia]. Moscow: Mosk. rabochii (in Russ.).