NONE20260602144308608Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal Universityno-reply@journals.kantiana.ruImmanuel Kant Baltic Federal UniversitySlovo.ru: Baltic accent2225-53462686-898906022026101ZolyanS.0602202611GambierY.0602202611ChestermanA.Translation Studies has branched out into a heterogeneous interdiscipline during the past few decades. This development is not only the result of the emergence of different kinds of translation practices, research questions and new technologies, but also of different epistemo­logical and ontological assumptions about the object of study. Four major areas are outlined: linguistic, cultural, cognitive and sociological. Connections between them are briefly dis­cussed, but the main tendency has been one of fragmentation. Perhaps this does not matter?0602202611Abdallah, K., 2012. Translators in Production Networks. Reflections on agency, quality and ethics. Joensuu: Publications of the University of Eastern Finland.Arrojo, R., 2002. Lessons learned from Babel. Target, 14 (1), pp. 137—143.Bartsch, R., 1987. Norms of Language. London: Longman.Bassnett, S. and Lefevere, A., 1996. Constructing Cultures. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Chesterman, A., 1997. Memes of Translation. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Chesterman, A., 2005. Consilience in Translation Studies. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, 51, pp. 19—32.Chesterman, A., 2008. On explanation. In: A. Pym et al. (eds.). Beyond Descriptive Studies. Investigations in homage to Gideon Toury. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 363—379.Chesterman, A., 2009. The Name and Nature of Translator Studies. Hermes, 42, pp. 13—22.Chesterman, A. and Arrojo, R., 2000. Shared ground in Translation Studies. Target, 12 (1), pp. 151—160.Delabastita, D., 2003. Translation Studies for the 21st century. Trends and perspectives. Génesis. Revista cientifica do ISAI, 3, pp. 7—24, available at: http://www. academia.edu/4222581/Translation_Studies_for_the_21st_century_Trends_and_ perspectives (accessed 8 August 2018).Ehrensberger-Dow, M. and O’Brien, S., 2015. Ergonomics of the Translation Workplace: Potential for Cognitive Friction. Translation Spaces, 4 (1), pp. 98—118.Fenton, S. and Moon, P., 2002. The translation of the Treaty of Waitangi: a case of disempowerment. In: M. Tymoczko and E. Gentzler (eds.). Translation and Power. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, pp. 25—44.Gambier, Y. and Munday, J., 2014. A conversation between Yves Gambier and Jeremy Munday about transcreation and the future of the professions. Cultus: the Intercultural Journal of Mediation and Communication, 7, pp. 20—36.Gambier, Y. and van Doorslaer, L. (eds.), 2016. Border Crossings. Translation Studies and Other Disciplines. Amsterdam: Benjamins.García, A. M., Mikulan Е., Ibáñez, А., 2016. A neuroscientific toolkit for translation studies. In: R. M. Martín (ed.). Reembedding Translation Processing Research. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 21—46.Gile, D., 2005. Liberal arts and empirical science. European Society for Translation Studies, available at: http://www.est-translationstudies.org/resources/research_ issues_index.html (accessed 22 June 2018).Gorlée, D. L., 1994. Semiotics and the Problem of Translation: With Special Reference to the Semiotics of Charles S. Peirce. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Gutt, E.-A., 1991. Translation and Relevance. Cognition and context. London: Routledge.Halverson, S., 1998. Concepts and Categories in Translation Studies. Bergen: University of Bergen.Harris, B., n. d. Blog on Unprofessional Translation, available at: http://unprofes sionaltranslation.blogspot.fi (accessed 23 June 2018).Jääskeläinen, R., 2002. Think-aloud protocol studies into translation. An annotated bibliography. Target, 14 (1), pp. 107—136.Kaindl, K., 2004. Übersetzungswissenschaft im interdisziplinären Dialog. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Kinnunen, T. Koskinen, К. (eds.), 2010. Translators’ Agency. Tampere: Tampere University Press, available at: http://urn.fiurn:isbn:978-951-44-8082-9 (accessed 23 June 2018).Krings, H. P., 1986. Was in den Köpfen von Übersetzern vorgeht: eine empirische Untersuchung zur Struktur des Übersetzungsprozesses an fortgeschrittenen Französischlernern. Tübingen: Narr.Leppihalme, R., 2000. Foreignizing strategies in drama translation. The case of the Finnish Oleanna. In: A. Chesterman, N. Gallardo San Salvador and Y. Gambier (eds.). Translation in Context. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 153—162.Malmkjær, K., 2000. Relative stability and stable relativity. Target, 12 (2), pp. 341—345.Mauranen, A. and Kujamäki, P. (eds.), 2004. Translation Universals. Do they Exist? Amsterdam: Benjamins.Muñoz, M. R., 2014. A blurred snapshot of advances in translation process research. MonTI, Special Iss. 1: Minding Translation, pp. 49—84, available at: https:// dti.ua.es/es/documentos/monti/monti-especial-1-portada-indice.pdf (accessed 23 June 2018).Pym, A., 2003. Localization and the humanization of technical discourse. Across Languages and Cultures, 4 (2), pp. 205—216.Pym, A., 2016. Translation Solution Types for Many Languages — Histories of a Flawed Dream. London: Bloomsbury.Reiß, K. and Hans, J. V., 1984. Grundlegung einer Allgemeinen Translationstheorie. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Risku, H., 2014. Translation process research as interaction research: From mental to socio-cognitive processes. MonTI, Special Iss. 1: Minding Translation, pp. 331—353.Rojo Lopez, A. M. and Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. (eds.), 2013. Cognitive Linguistics and Translation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Rushdie, S., 1992. Imaginary Homelands: Essays and Criticism 1981—1991. London: Granta.Snell-Hornby, M., Pöchhacker, F. and Kaindl, K. (eds.), 1994. Translation Studies: An Interdiscipline. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Snell-Hornby, M., 2006. The Turns of Translation Studies. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Toury, G., 1995. Descriptive Translation Studies and Beyond. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Tymoczko, M., 2004. Difference in similarity. In: S. Arduini and R. Hodgson (eds.), Similarity and Difference in Translation. Rimini: Guaraldi, pp. 27—43.Wilson, E. O., 1998. Consilience. The Unity of Knowledge. London: Little, Brown and Company.Wolf, M. and Fukari, A. (eds.), 2007. Constructing a Sociology of Translation. Amsterdam: Benjamins.PiętaH.This article concerns indirect translation (ITr), understood broadly as translation of translation, and has the aim of facilitating systematic research on this long-standing, widespread yet underexplored phenomenon. The article thus provides an overview of some of the main patterns in ITr practice and research and explores suggestions for related future studies. The overview follows the ‘Five W’s and One H’ approach. The what question concerns terminological and conceptual issues related to ITr and explores the relevance of systematic studies on ITr. The who question considers the profile of agents involved in ITr processesas well as the profile of ITr researchers. The where question relates to the spatial dimension of ITr as well as to the geographic spread of ITr research. The when question concerns the time coordinates of ITr practice as well as the diachronic evolution of ITr studies. The why questions looks into the motivations for ITr and into the historical neglect in the Translation Studies discipline. Finally, the how question considers selected details of ITr processes as well as the methods used in identifying most probable mediating texts and languages. The article ends with a brief consideration of prospects for research on ITr training. The what question concerns terminological and conceptual issues related to ITr and explores the relevance of systematic studies on ITr. The who question considers the profile of agents involved in ITr processes as well as the profile of ITr researchers. The where question relates to the spatial dimension of ITr as well as to the geographic spread of ITr research. The when question concerns the time coordinates of ITr practice as well as the diachronic evolution of ITr studies. The why questions looks into the motivations for ITr and into the historical neglect in the Translation Studies discipline. Finally, the how question considers selected details of ITr processes as well as the methods used in identifying most probable mediating texts and languages. The article ends with a brief consideration of prospects for research on ITr training.0602202611Assis Rosa, A., Pięta, H. and (eds.), 2017a. Indirect Translation: Theoretical, Methodological and Terminological Issues. Special Issue of Translation Studies, 10 (2), pp. 113—132.Assis Rosa, A., Pięta, H. and Maia, R. B., 2017b. Theoretical, Methodological and Terminological Issues regarding Indirect Translation: An Overview. Translation Studies, 10 (2), pp. 113—132.Boulogne, P., 2009. The French Influence in the Early Dutch Reception of F. M. Dostoevsky’s Brat’ja Karamazovy: A Case Study. Babel, 55 (3), pp. 264—284.Cronin, M. (in press). Interview by Rita Bueno Maia. Cadernos de Tradução.Dollerup, C., 2000. Relay and Support Translations. In: A. Chesterman, N. Gallardo and Y. Gambier (eds.). Translation in Context: Selected Contributions from the EST Congress. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 17—26.Frank, A. P., 2004. Translation Research from a Literary and Cultural Perspective: Objectives, Concepts and Scope. In: H. Kittel et al. (eds.). Übersetzung. Translation. Traduction. Ein internationals Handbuchzur Über setzungforschung. An international encyclopedia of translation studies. Encyclopédie internationale de la recherche sur la traduction. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 790—851.Gambier, Y., 1994. La retraduction, retour et détour. Meta, 39 (3), pp. 413—417.Gambier, Y., 2003. Working with Relay: An Old Story and a New Challenge. In: L. Pérez González (ed.). Speaking in Tongues: Language across Contexts and Users. València: Universitat de València, pp. 47—66.Gambier, Y. and van Doorslaer, L., 2004. Translation Studies Bibliography. TSB, available at: http://benjamins.com/online/tsb/ (аccessed 10 October 2018).Gambier, Y., 2018. Concepts of translation. In: L. D’hulst and Y. Gambier (eds.). A History of Modern Translation Knowledge. Sources, concepts, effects. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 19—38.Gasparov, M., 2001. The interlinear and the measure of accuracy. In: M. Gasparov. O russkoi poezii. Analizy. Interpretatsii. Kharakteristiki [On Russian Poetry: Analyzes, Interpretations, Characteristics]. Moscow: Azbuka, pp. 363—372.Genette, G., 1997. Paratexts: thresholds of interpretation. Transl. by J. Lewin. Cambridge UP.Grigaravičiūte, I. and Gottlieb, H., 1999. Danish Voices, Lithuanian Voice-over. The Mechanics of Non-Synchronous Translation. Perspectives. Studies in translatology, 7 (1), pp. 41—80.Heilbron, J., 1999. Towards a sociology of translation. Book translations as a cultural world-system. European Journal of Social Theory, 2 (4), pp. 429—444.Ivaska, L., 2016. Uncovering the Many Source Texts of Indirect Translations: Indirect Translations of Modern Greek Prose Literature into Finnish 1952—2004. In: 8th European Society for Translation Studies Congress. Aarhus, Denmark, 15—17 September 2016.Ivaska, L., 2018. Three Methods to Uncover the de facto source language(s) of translations.” In: “Culture and Technology” — The European Summer University in Digital Humanities. Leipzig, Germany, 17—27 July 2018.Jianzhong, X., 2003. Retranslation: necessary or unnecessary. Babel, 49 (3), pp. 193—202.Kuhiwczak, P., 2008. How postcolonial is post-communist translation? University of Warwick, available at: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/121/ (accessed 22 September 2017).Maia, R. B., 2010. Of how Lázaro de Tormes and the Devil upon two sticks entered Portugal and the way the presented themselves. In: X. M. Dasilva (ed.). Perfiles de la traducción hispano-portuguesa III. Vigo: Editorial Academia del Hispanismo, pp. 99—114.Maia, R. B., Pięta, H. and Torres-Simón, E., 2018a. Bringing indirect translation into translator training. In: “Translation and cultural sustainability“ Conference. Salamanca, Spain, 28—30 November 2018.Maia, R. B., Pięta, H. and Assis, A., 2018b. Unleashing the potential of indirect translation. In: “Publishing in Translation Studies“ Conference. Antwerp, Belgium, 7—8 September 2018.Maia, R. B., Pacheco Pinto, M. and Ramos Pinto, S., 2015. Translation Studies in Portugal and Interview with João Ferreira Duarte. In: R. B. Maia, M. Pacheco Pinto and S. Ramos Pinto (eds.). How Peripheral Is the Periphery? Translating Portugal Back and Forth: Essays in Honour of João Ferreira Duarte. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars. pp. 319—331.Marin-Lacarta, M., 2008. Indirect translation of contemporary Chinese fiction into Spanish: syndrome or disease? 1611: A Journal of Translation History, 2 (2), аvailable at: http://www.traduccionliteraria.org/1611/art/marin.htm(аccessed 10 September 2017).Marin-Lacarta, M., 2017. Indirectness in literary translation: Methodological possibilities. Translation Studies, 10 (2), pp. 133—149.Pięta, H., 2012. Patterns in (In)directness: An Exploratory Case Study in the External History of Portuguese Translations of Polish Literature (1855—2010). Target, 24 (2), pp. 310—337.Pięta, H., 2016. On Translation between (Semi)peripheral Languages: External History of Polish Literature Translated into European Portuguese as a Case in Point. Translator, 22 (3), pp. 354—377.Pięta, H., 2017. Theoretical, Methodological and Terminological Issues in Researching Indirect Translation: A Critical Annotated Bibliography. Translation Studies, 10 (2), pp. 198—216.Pięta, H. (in press). On the role of indirect literary translation in the construction of the conflicting images of communist Poland in para-fascist Portugal. Target.Pięta, H. and Maia, R. B., 2015. Integrating Indirect Translation into the Academic Education of Future Generations of Translators across Europe: A Lisbon Model. In: Translating Europe Forum. Brussels, Belgium, 29—30 October 2015.Pym, A., 2011. Translation Research Terms: A Tentative Glossary for Moments of Perplexity and Dispute. In: A. Pym (ed.). Translation Research Projects 3. Tarragona: Intercultural Studies Group, pp. 75—100.Ringmar, M., 2007. Roundabout Routes: Some Remarks on Indirect Translations. In: F. Mus (ed.). Selected Papers of the CETRA Research Seminar in Translation Studies 2006. Leuven: CETRA, pp. 1—17.Ringmar, M., 2012. Relay Translation. In: Y. Gambier and L. van Doorslaer (eds.). Handbook of Translation Studies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 141—144.Sala, I. G., Sanz Roig, D. and Zaboklicka, B. (eds.), 2014. Traducció indirecta en la literatura catalana [Indirect translation in Catalan literature]. Lleida: Punctum.Schultze, B., 2014. Historical and Systematical Aspects of Indirect Translation in the de Gruyter Handbuch Übersetzung — HSK.26.1-3: Insight and Impulse to Further Research. Zeitschrift für Slavistic, 59 (4), pp. 507—518.Špirk, J., 2014. Censorship, Indirect Translation and Non-Translation: The (Fateful) Adventures of Czech Literature in 20th-Century Portugal. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Toury, G., 1995. A Lesson from Indirect Translation. In: Descriptive Translation Studies and beyond. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 161—178.Tyulenev, S., 2010. Through the Eye of the Needle of the Most Proletarian Language. mTm, 2, pp. 70—89.Venuti, L., 1995. The Translator’s Invisibility: A History of Translation. London: Routledge.Vanechkova, G., 1978. The interlinear: intermediate between author and translator. Československá rusistika, 23 (1), pp. 10—14.Washbourne, K., 2013. Nonlinear Narratives: Paths of Indirect and Relay Translation. Meta, 58 (3), pp. 607. doi: 10.7202/1025054ar.Witt, S., 2013. The Shorthand of Empire: ‘Podstrochnik’ Practices and the Making of Soviet Literature. Ab Imperio, 3, pp. 155—190.Witt, S., 2017. Institutionalized intermediates: Conceptualizing Soviet practices of indirect literary translation. Translation Studies, 10 (2), pp. 166—182.Zaborov, P., 1963. “The mediating literature” in the history of Russian-Western literary relations. In: M. P. Alekseev (ed.). Mezhdunarodnye sviazi russkoi literatury [International relations of Russian literature]. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Akademii Nauk, pp. 64—85.Zaborov, P., 2011. Die Zwischenübersetzung in der Geschichte der russischen Literatur. In: H. Kittel et al. (eds.). Übersetzung. Translation. Traduction. Ein internationals Handbuch zur Übersetzungforschung. An International Encyclopedia of Translation Studies. Encyclopédie internationale de la recherche sur la traduction. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 2066—2073.Ehrensberger-DowM.The translation process can be regarded as a complex system involving many agents, organizational factors such as workflow, communication processes, project management, job security, and translator status. Environmental factors in the physical sense (e. g. lighting, temperature, air quality, space) as well in the broader sense of the role of translation and translators in the economy and society as a whole can also influence the process. Viewing translation from an ergonomic perspective can provide an appropriate framework to understand the impact of such factors on the demanding bilingual activity that translators engage in. Because their work requires close attention and concentration, translators have to exert energy and ultimately cognitive resources to compensate for the distraction of any physical discomfort, delays in computer responsiveness, or frustration with organizational problems. In this article, the relevance of ergonomics and the implications of putting the translator and their translation processes in focus are discussed in light of recent research.0602202611Baethge, A. and Rigotti, T., 2010. Arbeitsunterbrechungen und Multitasking: Ein umfassender Überblick zu Theorien und Empirie unter besonderer Berücksichtigung von Altersdifferenzen. Dortmund: Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin.Beale, R. and Peter, C. (eds.), 2008. Affect and Emotion in HCI. Berlin: Springer.Bevan, N., 1982. Psychological and ergonomic factors in machine translation. In: V. Lawson (ed.). Practical Experience of Machine Translation. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing, pp. 75—78.Cadwell, P., Castilho, S., O’Brien, S. and Mitchell, L., 2016. Human factors in machine translation and post-editing among institutional translators. Translation Spaces, 5 (2), pp. 222—243.Canfora, C. and Ottmann, A., 2015. Risikomanagement für Übersetzungen. Trans-kom, 8 (2), pp. 314—346.CCOHS, 2011. Office Ergonomics Safety Guide. 6th ed. Hamilton, ON: CCOHS.Chesterman, A., 2009. The name and nature of translator studies. Hermes — Journal of Language and Communication Studies, 42, pp. 13—22.Chesterman, A., 2013. Models of what processes? Translation and Interpreting Studies, 8 (2), pp. 155—168.Clark, A. and Chalmers, D. J., 2010. The extended mind. Reprinted. In: R. Menary, ed. The Extended Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 27—41.Ehrensberger-Dow, M., Hunziker Heeb, A., Massey, G., Meidert, U., Neumann, S. and Becker, H., 2016. An international survey of the ergonomics of professional translation. ILCEA, 27, available at: https://journals.openedition.org/ilcea/4004 (аccessed 22 September 2018).Ehrensberger-Dow, M. and Jääskeläinen, R., 2019 (in press). Forthcoming. Ergonomics of translation: methodological, practical and educational implications. In: H. V. Dam, M. N. Brøgger and K. K. Zethsen (eds.). Moving Boundaries in Translation Studies. Zethsen. London: Routledge.Ehrensberger-Dow, M. and Massey, G., 2014. Cognitive ergonomic issues in professional translation. In: J. W. Schwieter and A. Ferreira, eds. The Development of Translation Competence: Theories and Methodologies from Psycholinguistics and Cognitive Science. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars, pp. 58—86.Ehrensberger-Dow, M. and Massey, G., 2017. Socio-technical issues in professional translation practice. Translation Spaces, 6 (1), pp. 104—121.Ehrensberger-Dow, M. and O’Brien, S., 2015. Ergonomics of the translation workplace: Potential for cognitive friction. Translation Spaces, 4 (1), pp. 98—118.ELIA, 2018. Language Industry Survey — Expectations and Concerns of the European Language Industry 2018. Brussels: European Language Industry Association, аvailable at: https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/2017_language_industry_survey_report_ en.pdf (аccessed 22 September 2018).Englund Dimitrova, B. and Ehrensberger-Dow, M., 2016. Cognitive space: Exploring the situational interface. Translation Spaces, 5 (1), pp. 1—19.Gile, D., 2009. Basic Concepts and Models for Interpreter and Translator Training. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Grass, T., 2011. “Plus” est-il synonyme de “mieux”? Logiciels commerciaux contre logiciels libres du point de vue de l’ergonomie. ILCEA. 14: Traduction et Ergonomie, аvailable at: https://journals.openedition.org/ilcea/1052 (аccessed 10 October 2018).Hansen, G., 2006. Erfolgreich übersetzen. Entdecken und Beheben von Störquellen. Tübingen: Narr Francke Attempto.Ijmker, S., Huysmans, M. A., Blatter, B. M., van der Beek, A. J., van Mechelen, W. and Bongers, P. M., 2007. Should office workers spend fewer hours at their computer? A systematic review of the literature. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 64, pp. 211—222.Jastrzebowski, W., 2006. An outline of ergonomics, or the science of work based upon the truths drawn from the science of nature. In: W. Karwowski (ed.). International Encyclopedia of Ergonomics and Human Factors, Vol. 3. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. 129—141.Kinnunen, T. and Koskinen, K. eds., 2010. Translators' Agency. Tampere: Tampere University Press.Lavault-Olléon, E., 2011a. L’ergonomie, nouveau paradigme pour la traductologie. ILCEA. 14: Traduction et Ergonomie, аvailable at: https://journals.openedition. org/ilcea/1078?lang=en.html (аccessed 15 October 2018).Lavault-Olléon, E., 2011b. Une introduction à la problématique “Traduction et Ergonomie”. ILCEA. 14: Traduction et Ergonomie, аvailable at: https://journals. openedition.org/ilcea/1118 (аccessed 15 October 2018).Licht, D. M., Polzella, D. J. and Boff, K., 1989. Human Factors, Ergonomics, and Human Factors Engineering: An Analysis of Definitions. CSERIAC-89-01. Dayton, OH: CSERIAC.Meidert, U., Neumann, S., Ehrensberger-Dow, M. and Becker, H., 2016. Physical ergonomics at translators’ workplaces: Findings from ergonomic workplace assessments and interviews. ILCEA, 27, аvailable at: https://journals.openedition.org/ ilcea/3996 (аccessed 20 October 2018).Menary, R., 2013. The extended mind. In: H. Pashler (ed.). Encyclopedia of the Mind. Thousand Oaks: SAGE, pp. 335—338.Mesa-Lao, B., 2014. Gaze behaviour on source texts: An exploratory study comparing translation and post‐editing. In: S. O’Brien, L. Winther Balling, M. Carl, M. Simard and L. Specia (eds.). Post-Editing of Machine Translation: Processes and Applications. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars, pp. 219—245.Muñoz Martín, R., 2009. Typos and co. In: S. Göpferich, A. L. Jakobsen and I. M. Mees (eds.). Behind the Mind. Methods, Models and Results in Translation Process Research. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur Press, pp. 167—189.Muñoz Martín, R., 2010. On paradigms and cognitive translatology. In: G. M. Shreve and E. Angelone (eds.). Translation and Cognition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 169—187.Muñoz Martín, R., 2012. Just a matter of scope. Mental load in translation process research. Translation Spaces, 1, pp. 169—178.Muñoz Martín, R. (ed.), 2016a. Reembedding Translation Process Research. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Muñoz Martín, R., 2016b. Processes of what models? On the cognitive indivisibility of translation acts and events. Translation Spaces, 5 (1), pp. 145—161.Norros, L. and Savioja, P., 2007. Towards a theory and method for usability evaluation of complex human-technology systems. Activités, 4 (2), pp. 143—150.O’Brien, S., 2012. Translation as human-computer interaction. Translation Spaces, 1, pp. 101—122.O’Brien, S., Ehrensberger-Dow, M., Hasler, M. and Connolly, M., 2017. Irritating CAT tool features that matter to translators. Hermes — Journal of Language and Communication in Business, 56, pp. 145—162.O’Brien, S., O’Hagan, M. and Flanagan, M., 2010. Keeping an eye on the UI design of translation memory: How do translators use the “concordance” feature? In: W. P. Brinckman and M. Neerincx (eds.). Proceedings of the 28th European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics. Delft: Delft University of Technology, pp. 187—190.Olohan, M., 2011. Translators and translation technology: The dance of agency. Translation Studies, 4 (3), pp. 342—357.Pym, A., 2011. What technology does to translating. Translation & Interpreting, 3 (1), pp. 1—9.Pym, A., 2013.Translation skill-sets in a machine-translation age. Meta, 58 (3), pp. 487—503.Pym, A., 2015.Translating as risk management. Journal of Pragmatics, 85, pp. 67—80.Risku, H., 2002. Situatedness in Translation Ttudies. Cognitive Systems Research, 3, pp. 523—533.Risku, H., 2014. Translation process research as interaction research: From mental to socio-cognitive processes. MonTI. Special Iss., 1, pp. 331—353.Robbins, P. and Aydede, M. (eds.), 2008. The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Salvendy, G., 2012. Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics. 4th ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Taravella, A. and Villeneuve, A. O., 2013. Acknowledging the needs of computer-assisted translation tools users: The human perspective in human-machine translation. The Journal of Specialised Translation, 19, pp. 62—74.Teixeira, C. S.C., 2014. The Impact of Metadata on Translator Performance: How Translators Work with Translation Memories and Machine Translation. Ph. D. Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona.Teixeira, C. and O’Brien, S., 2017. Investigating the cognitive ergonomic aspects of translation tools in a workplace setting. Translation Spaces, 6 (1), pp. 79—103.Vink, P. and Kantola, J., 2011. Advances in Occupational, Social, and Organizational Ergonomics. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.GambierY.Reception of translated texts has thus far received relatively scant, uneven attention in Translation Studies, even though reception studies theories have been applied in the last decades, first to literary translation and then touching upon other areas and text types. This chapter reports on audiovisual translation in particular, exploring the very concepts of audience and reception. Adjacent concepts are also discussed, all having a bearing on the approach and the methodology, and all chosen for the investigation of reception. Last but not least, the article discusses the opportunities and challenges of interdisciplinarity which has brought, is bringing, and may continue to bring advances to the study of the reception of audiovisual texts in translation.0602202611Abdallah, K., 2012. Translators in Production Networks. Reflections on Agency, Quality and Ethics. Ph. D. Joensuu: University of Eastern Finland.Bourdieu, P.,1971. “Le marché des biens symboliques”. Année Sociologique, 22, pp. 49—126.Bourdieu, P., 1979. La distinction. Critique sociale du jugement [Distinction. A social critique of the judgment of taste. Cambridge]. Translated into English by R. Nice, 1984. MA: Harvard UP.Brooker, W. and Jermyn, D., eds., 2003. The Audience Studies Reader. London/New York: Routledge.Caffrey, C., 2009. Relevant abuse? Investigating the effects of an abusive subtitling procedure on the perception of TV anime using eye tracker and questionnaire. Ph. D. Dublin City University.Chaume, F., 2004. Film Studies and Translation Studies: Two disciplines at Stake in Audiovisual Translation. Meta, 49(1), pp. 12—24.Chesterman, A., 1998. Causes, translations, effects. Target, 10(2), pp. 201—230.Chesterman, A., 1993. From ‘is’ to ‘ought’: Laws, norms and strategies in Translation Studies. Target, 5(1), pp. 1—20.Chesterman, A., 2007. Bridge concepts in translation sociology. In: M. Wolf and A. Fukari, eds. Constructing a Sociology of Translation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. pp. 171—183.De Linde, Z. and Key, N., 1999. The semiotics of subtitling. Manchester: St Jerome.Di Giovanni, E., ed., 2011. Between text and receiver: Translation and accessibility. Entre texto y receptor: traducción y accessibilidad. Bern: P. Lang.Di Giovanni, E. & Gambier Y., eds., 2018. Reception Studies and Audiovisual Translation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Fox, W., 2016. Integrated titles: An improved viewing experience? In: S. Hansen-Schirra and S. Grucza, eds. Eye-tracking and Applied Linguistics. Berlin: Language Science Press. pp. 5—30.Gambier, Y., 2002. Les censures dans la traduction audiovisuelle. TTR, 15(2), pp. 203—222.Gambier, Y., 2009. Challenges in research on audiovisual translation. Translation Research Project 2. Available at: http://isg. urv. es/publicity/isg/publications/ trp_2_2009/chapters/gambier. pdf [Accessed 15 September 2018].Jiménez-Crespo, M. A., 2017. Crowdsourcing and Online Collaborative Translations. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Kovačič, I., 1995. Reception of subtitles. The non-existent Ideal viewer. Translatio (Nouvelles de la FIT/FIT Newsletter), 14(3—4), pp. 376—383.Künzli, A. and Ehrensberger-Dow, M., 2011. Innovative Subtitling: A Reception Study. In: C. Alvstad, A. Hild and E. Tiselius, eds. Methods and Strategy of Process Research. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. pp. 187—200.Lavaur, J-M and Bairnstow, D., 2011. Languages on the screen: Is film comprehension related to viewers’ fluency and to the language in the subtitles. International Journal of Psychology, 46(6), pp. 455—462.Miquel Iriarte, M., 2017. The Reception of Subtitling for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing. Ph. D. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.O’Hagan, M. R.S., 2016. Crazy Japanese subtitles? Shedding light on the impact of impact captions with a focus on research methodology. In: S. Hansen- Schirra and S. Grucza, eds. Eye-tracking and Applied Linguistics. Berlin: Language Science Press. pp. 31—58.Perego, E., 2016. History, Development, Challenges and Opportunities of Empirical Research in AVT. Across Languages and Cultures, 17(2), pp. 155—162.Romero-Fresco, P., 2015. The Reception of Subtitles for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing in Europe. Bern: Peter Lang.Suojanen, T., Koskinen, K. & Tuominen, T., eds., 2015. User-centered Translation. London/New York: Routledge.Taylor, C., 2003. Multimodal transcription in the analysis, translation and subtitling of Italian films. The Translator, 9(2). pp. 191—205.Tuominen, T., 2012. The art of accidental reading and incidental listening: An empirical study on the viewing of subtitled films. Ph. D. University of Tampere.DavierL.News translation has been investigated more systematically since the mid-2000s. Since then, it has kept pushing the boundaries of translation studies by asking such questions as the following: Can we study multilingual practices that do not necessarily have an identified source text? If so, what do we analyze and compare? Can we call these practices ‘translation’? How do we integrate multimodality into our traditionally textual analyses? This article formulates tentative answers based onrecent publications in the field. It calls for sustained research in the reception of news translation and with cognitive methods, as well as intensified exchanges with audiovisual translation.0602202611Baker, M., 2006. Translation and Conflict: A Narrative Account. London: Routledge.Bassnett, S., 2005. Bringing the News Back Home: Strategies of Acculturation and Foreignisation. Language and Intercultural Communication, 5(2), pp. 120—130. 10.1080/14708470508668888.Bielsa, E. and Bassnett, S., 2009. Translation in Global News. London, New York: Routledge.Bouko, C., et al., (in press) Being a Journalist in a Multilingual Country: Representations of Dutch among Belgian French-Speaking Journalists. Multilingua: Journal of Cross-Cultural and Interlanguage Communication.Cadwell, P., 2015. Translation and Trust: A Case Study of How Translation Was Experienced by Foreign Nationals Resident in Japan for the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake. Ph. D. School of Applied Language and Intercultural Studies, Dublin City University.Caimotto, M.C., (in press) Transediting Trump: The Inaugural Speech Reported in Italy. In: L. Davier and K. Conway, eds. Journalism and Translation in the Era of Convergence. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Caimotto, M.C. and Gaspari, F., 2018. Corpus-Based Study of News Translation: Challenges and Possibilities. Across Languages and Cultures, 19(2), pp. 205—220. 10.1556/084.2018.19.2.4.Conway, K., 2008. A Cultural Studies Approach to Semantic Instability: The Case of News Translation. Linguistica Antverpiensia, 7, pp. 29—43.Conway, K., 2011. Everyone Says No: Public Service Broadcasting and the Failure of Translation. Montreal, etc.: McGill-Queen's University Press.Conway, K., 2012. A Conceptual and Empirical Approach to Cultural Translation. Translation Studies, 5(3), pp. 264—279. 10.1080/14781700.2012.701938.Conway, K., What Is the Role of Culture in News Translation? A Materialist Approach. Perspectives: Studies in Translatology, 23(4), pp. 521—535. 10.1080/0907676X.2015.1026833.Conway, K. and Vaskivska, T., 2010. Consuming News Translation: The New York Times Online and the 'Kremlin Rules' Experiment. Across Languages and Cultures, 11(2), pp. 233—253. 10.1556/Acr.11.2010.2.6.Cortés Zaborras, C. and Hernández Guerrero, M. J., eds., 2005. La traducción periodística. Cuenca: Ediciones de la Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha.Darwish, A., 2010. Translation and News Making in Contemporary Arabic Television. Victoria: Writescope.Davier, L., 2014. The Paradoxical Invisibility of Translation in the Highly Multilingual Context of News Agencies. Global Media and Communication, 10(1), pp. 53—72. 10.1177/1742766513513196.Davier, L., 2017. Les enjeux de la traduction dans les agences de presse. Lille: Presses universitaires du Septentrion.Davier, L., (in press) Technological Convergence Threatening Translation and the Cultural Other: The Professional Vision of Francophone Journalists in Canada. In: L. Davier and K. Conway, eds. Journalism and Translation in the Era of Convergence. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Davier, L., and Conway, K., (in press) Introduction: Journalism and Translation in the Era of Convergence. In: L. Davier and K. Conway, eds. Journalism and Translation in the Era of Convergence. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Davier, L., and van Doorslaer, L., 2018. Translation without a Source Text: Methodological Issues in News Translation? Across Languages and Cultures, 19(2). 10.1556/084.2018.19.2.6.Davier, L., van Doorslaer, L. and Schäffner, C., 2018. The Methodological Remainder in News Translation Research: Outlining the Background. Across Languages and Cultures, 19(2).Deuze, M., 2004. What Is Multimedia Journalism? Journalism Studies, 5(2), pp. 139—152. 10.1080/1461670042000211131.Ehrensberger-Dow, M. and Perrin, D., 2013. Applying a Newswriting Research Approach to Translation. Target: International Journal on Translation Studies, 25(1), pp. 77—92. 10.1075/target.25.1.07ehr.Gagnon, C., 2012. La visibilité de la traduction au Canada en journalisme politique: Mythe ou réalité? Meta: journal des traducteurs, 57(4), pp. 943—959. 10.7202/1021226ar.Gagnon, C., 2013. Traduction et politique canadienne: Quel est le rôle des journalistes entre 1942 et 1995? Meta: journal des traducteurs, 58(3), pp. 522—541. 10.7202/1025049ar.Gagnon, C., Boulanger, P.-P. and Kalantari, E., 2018. How to Approach Translation in a Financial News Corpus? Across Languages and Cultures, 19(2), pp. 221—240. 10.1556/084.2018.19.2.5.Gambier, Y., 2010. Media, information et traduction à l'ère de la mondialisation. In: R.A. Valdéón, ed. Translating Information. Oviedo: Universidad de Oviedo. pp. 13—30.Gendron, P., Conway, K. and Davier, L., (in press) News Translation on the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation’s English and French Websites. In: L. Davier and K. Conway, eds. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Gentzler, E., 2017. Translation and Rewriting in the Age of Post-Translation Studies. New York: Routledge.Gottlieb, H., 2010. English-Inspired Post-9/11 Terms in Danish Media. In: R. Valdeón, ed. Translating Information. Oviedo: Ediuno. pp. 125—150.Hernández Guerrero, M. J., 2005. La traducción de los géneros periodísticos. In: C.C Zaborras and M.J.H. Guerrero, eds. La traducción periodística. Cuenca: Ediciones de la Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha.Hernández Guerrero, M. J., 2008. Los artículos de opinión traducidos en la prensa escrita: El trasvase transcultural de la opinion. In: M.J.H. Guerrero and S. Peña Martín, eds. La traducción factor de cambio. Bern: Peter Lang. pp. 93—114.Hernández Guerrero, M. J., 2010. Traducción y periodismo. Bern: Peter Lang.Hernández Guerrero, M. J., 2010. Las noticias traducidas en el diario El Mundo: El trasvase transcultural de la información. In: R.A. Valdeón, ed. Translating Information. Oviedo: Universidad de Oviedo. pp. 51—85.Hernández Guerrero, M. J., 2011. Presencia y utilización de la traducción en la prensa española. Meta: Translators' Journal, 56(1), pp. 101—118. 10.7202/1003512ar.Hernández Guerrero, M. J., 2012. La traducción al servicio de una línea editorial: La primavera árabe en el diario El País. Meta: Translators' Journal, 57(4), pp. 960—976.Holland, R., 2006. Language(S) in the Global News: Translation, Audience Design and Discourse (Mis)Representation. Target: International Journal on Translation Studies. 18(2), pp. 229—259.Holland, R., 2013. News Translation. In: C. Millán and F. Bartrina, eds. The Routledge Handbook of Translation Studies. London: Routledge. pp. 332—346.Jacobs, G. and Tobback, E., 2013 Is Language a News Value in Belgium? Journalism Studies, 14(3), pp. 407—422.Kang, J.-H., 2007. Recontextualization of News Discourse: A Case Study of Translation of News Discourse on North Korea. The Translator, 13(2), pp. 219—242. 10.1080/13556509.2007.10799239.Kang, J.-H., 2012. Translating Mad Cow Disease: A Case Study of Subtitling for a Television News Magazine. Meta: Translators’ Journal, 57(2), pp. 439—463. 10.7202/1013955ar.Károly, K., 2012. News Discourse in Translation: Topical Structure and News Content in the Analytical News Article. Meta: Translators' Journal, 57(4), pp. 884—908. 10.7202/1021223ar.Kwieciñski, P., 1998. Translation Strategies in a Rapidly Transforming Culture: A Central European Perspective. The Translator, 4(2), pp. 183—206. 10.1080/13556509.1998.10799019.Li, D., 2006. Translators as Well as Thinkers: Teaching of Journalistic Translation in Hong Kong. Meta: Translators' Journal, 51(3), pp. 611—619. 10.7202/013566ar.Matsushita, K., (in press) Globalization of the Emerging Media Newsroom: Implications for Translation and International News Flow in the Case of Buzzfeed Japan. In: L Davier and K. Conway, eds. Journalism and Translation in the Era of Convergence. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.NT&T, 2018. News, Text and Talk. Available at: http://www. newstalktext. org/ [Accessed 14 September 2018].Orengo, A., 2005. Localising News: Translation and the 'Global-National' Dichotomy. Language and Intercultural Communication, 5(2), pp. 168—187. 10.1080/1470847050866889.Palmer, J., 2011. News Gathering and Dissemination. In: M. Baker and G. Saldanha, eds. Routledge Encyclopedia of Translation Studies. London: Routledge. pp. 186—189.Pan, L., 2014.Investigating Institutional Practice in News Translation: An Empirical Study of a Chinese Agency Translating Discourse on China. Perspectives: Studies in Translatology, 22(4), pp. 547—565. 10.1080/0907676X.2014.948888.Perrin, D., 2013. The Linguistics of Newswriting. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Perrin, D., Ehrensberger-Dow, M. and Zampa, M., 2017. Translation in the Newsroom: Losing Voices in Multilingual Newsflows. Journal of Applied Journalism and Media Studies, 6(3), pp. 463—483. 10.1386/ajms.6.3.463_1.Pym, A., 2004. The Moving Text: Localization, Translation and Distribution. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Pym, A. and Matsushita, K., 2018. Risk Mitigation in Translator Decisions. Across Languages and Cultures, 19(1), pp. 1—18. 10.1556/084.2018.19.1.1.Quandt, T. and Singer, J.B., 2009. Convergence and Cross-Platform Content Production. In: K. Wahl-Jorgensen and T. Hanitzsch, eds. The Handbook of Journalism Studies. New York, London: Routledge. pp. 130—144.Quinn, S., 2005. Convergence's Fundamental Question. Journalism Studies, 6(1), pp. 29v38. 10.1080/1461670052000328186.Scammell, C.N., 2016. Putting the Foreign in News Translation: A Reader-Response Investigation of the Scope for Foreignising the Translation Strategies of the Global Agencies. Ph. D. King’s College London.Schäffner, C., 2005. Bringing a German Voice to English-Speaking Readers: Spiegel International. Language and Intercultural Communication, 5(2), pp. 154—167. 10.1080/14708470508668891.Schäffner, C., 2012. ‘The Prime Minister Said...’: Voices in Translated Political Texts. Synaps: Fagspråk, Kommunikasjon, Kulturkunnskap, 22, pp. 3—25.Schäffner, C., 2012. Rethinking Transediting. Meta: Translators' Journal, 54(4), pp. 866—883. 10.7202/1021222ar.Sidiropoulou, M., 2004. Linguistic Identities through Translation, Approaches to Translation Studies. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Stetting, K., 1989. Transediting: A New Term for Coping with the Grey Area between Editing and Translating. In: Graham et al., eds. Proceedings from the Fourth Nordic Conference for English Studies. Caie, Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen. pp. 371—382.Tesseur, W., 2013. Amnesty International's Language Strategy Put into Practice: A Case Study of the Translation of Press Releases. In: G. González Núñez, Y. Khaled and T. Voinova, eds. Emerging Research in Translation Studies: Selected Papers of the Cetra Research Summer School 2012. pp. 1—17.Tesseur, W., 2014a. Institutional Multilingualism in Ngos: Amnesty International's Strategic Understanding of Multilingualism. Meta: Translators' Journal, 59(3), pp. 557—577. 10.7202/1028657ar.Tesseur, W., 2014b. Transformation through Translation: Translation Policies at Amnesty International. Ph. D. Aston University.Tian, D. and Chao, C.-C., 2012. Testing News Trustworthiness in an Online Public Sphere: A Case Study of the Economist's News Report Covering the Riots in Xinjiang, China. Chinese Journal of Communication, 5(4), pp. 455—474. 10.1080/17544750.2012.723388.Tsai, C., 2005. Inside the Television Newsroom: An Insider's View of International News Translation in Taiwan. Language and Intercultural Communication, 5(2), pp. 145—153. 10.1080/14708470508668890.Tsai, C., 2006. Translation through Interpreting: A Television Newsroom Model. Translation in Global News, University of Warwick.Tsai, C., 2010. News Translator as Reporter. In: C. Schäffner and S. Bassnett, eds. Political Discourse, Media and Translation. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars. pp. 178—197.Valdeón, R.A., 2005. The CNNenespañol News. Perspectives: Studies in Translatology, 13(4), pp. 255—267. 10.1080/09076760608668996.Valdeón, R.A., 2007. Ideological Independence or Negative Mediation: Bbc Mundo and Cnn En Español's (Translated) Reporting of Madrid's Terrorist Attacks. In: M. Salama-Carr, ed. Translating and Interpreting Conflict. Amsterdam: Rodopi. pp. 99—118.Valdeón, R.A., 2015a. Fifteen Years of Journalistic Translation Research and More. Perspectives: Studies in Translatology, 23(4), pp. 634—662. 10.1080/0907676X.2015.1057187.Valdeón, R.A., 2015b. (Un)Stable Sources, Translation and News Production. Target: International Journal on Translation Studies, 27(3), pp. 440—453. 10.1075/target.27.3.07val.van Doorslaer, L., 2010a. The Double Extension of Translation in the Journalistic Field. Across Languages and Cultures, 11(2), pp. 175—188. 10.1556/Acr.11.2010.2.3.van Doorslaer, L., 2010b. Journalism and Translation. In: Y. Gambier and L. van Doorslaer, eds. Handbook of Translation Studies. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. pp. 180—184.van Rooyen, M., 2011. A Mediation Model for the Translation of Radio News Texts in a Multicultural Newsroom. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 29(1), pp. 17—29.van Rooyen, M., 2018. Investigating Translation Flows: Community Radio News in South Africa. Across Languages and Cultures, 19(2).van Rooyen, M., (in press) Tracing Convergence in the Translation of Community Radio News. In: L. Davier and K. Conway, eds. Journalism and Translation in the Era of Convergence. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Xia, L., 2016. News Translation in Cankao Xiaoxi in China: Manipulation, Institutionalisation, and Power. Ph. D. University of Sydney.RussoM.0602202611Aston, G., 2015. Learning phraseology from speech corpora. In: A. Lenko-Szymanska and A. Boulton, eds. Multiple affordances of language corpora for data-driven learning. Amsterdam: Benjamins. pp. 65—84.Aston, G., 2018. Acquiring the language of interpreters: A Corpus-based Approach. In: M. Russo, C. Bendazzoli, and B. Defrancq, eds. Making Way in Corpus-based Interpreting Studies. Springer Nature Switzerland. pp. 83—96.Baker, M., 1993. Corpus linguistics and translation studies. Implications and applications. In: M. Baker, G. Francis and E. Tognini-Bonelli, eds. Text and Technology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. pp. 233—250.Bendazzoli, C., 2012. From international conferences to machine-readable corpora and back: An ethnographic approach to simultaneous interpreter-mediated communicative events. In: F. Straniero Sergio and C. Falbo, eds. Breaking Ground in Corpus-based Interpreting Studies. Peter Lang AG. pp. 91—117.Bendazzoli, C., 2018. Corpus-based Interpreting Studies: Past, Present and Future Developments of a (Wired) Cottage Industry. In: M. Russo, C. Bendazzoli, and B. Defrancq, eds. Making Way in Corpus-based Interpreting Studies. Springer Nature Switzerland. pp. 1—19.Bendazzoli, C., Sandrelli, A. and Russo, M., 2011. Disfluencies in simultaneous interpreting: A corpus-based analysis. In: A. Kruger, K. Wallmachand and J. Munday, eds. Corpus-based Translation Studies: Research and Applications. New York, Continuum. pp. 282—306.Bendazzoli, C., Russo, M. and Defrancq, B., eds., 2018. New Findings in Corpus-based Interpreting Studies. InTRALinea, 20. Available at: http://www. intralinea. org/current (аccessed 23 September 2018).Bernardini, S., Ferraresi, A. and Miličević, M., 2016. From EPIC to EPTIC — Exploring simplification in interpreting and translation from an intermodal perspective. Target, 28(1), pp. 58—83.Bernardini, S. and Russo, M., 2018.Corpus Linguistics, Translation and Interpreting. In: K. Malmkjær, ed. Routledge Handbook of Translation Studies and Linguistics. London, Routledge. pp. 342—356.Bernardini, S., Ferraresi, A., Russo, M., Collard, C. and B. Defrancq., 2018. Building Interpreting and Intermodal Corpora: A How to for a Formidable Task. In: M. Russo, C. Bendazzoli, and B. Defrancq, eds. Making Way in Corpus-based Interpreting Studies. Springer Nature Switzerland. pp. 21—42.Cencini, M., 2002. On the importance of an encoding standard for corpus-based interpreting studies: Extending the TEI scheme’. CULT2K. InTRALinea. Available at: www. intralinea. org/specials/article/1678 (аccessed 23 September 2018).Collados Aís, Á., Fernández Sánchez, M.M., Iglesias Fernández, E., Pérez-Luzardo, J. Pradas Macías, E.M.. Stévaux, E., Blasco Mayor, M.J. and Jiménez Ivars A., 2004. Presentación de Proyecto de Investigación sobre Evaluación de la Calidad en Interpretación Simultánea (Bff2002—00579). Actas del IX Seminario Hispano-Ruso de Traducción e Interpretación. Moscú/Moscow: Universidad Estatal Lingüística de Moscú. MGLU. pp. 3—15.Defrancq, B., 2015.Corpus-based research into the presumed effects of short EVS. Interpreting, 17(1), pp. 26—45.Defrancq, B., Plevoets, K. and Magnifico, C., 2015. Connective markers in interpreting and translation: Where do they come from? Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics, 3, pp. 195—222.House, J., Meyer B. and Schmidt, T., 2012. CoSI-A Corpus of Consecutive and Simultaneous Interpreting. In: T. Schmidt and K. Wörner, eds. Multilingual Corpora and Multilingual Corpus Analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. pp. 295—304.Hu, K. and Tao, Q., 2013. The Chinese-English conference interpreting corpus: Uses and limitations. Meta, 58(3), pp. 626—642.Kajzer-Wietrzny, M., 2018. Interpretese vs. Non-native Language Use: The Case of Optional That. In: M. Russo, C. Bendazzoli and B. Defrancq, eds. Making Way in Corpus-based Interpreting Studies. New Frontiers in Translation Studies. Springer, Singapore. pp. 97—114.Laviosa, S., 1998. Core patterns of lexical use in a comparable corpus of English narrative prose. Meta, 43(4), pp. 557—570.Lobascio, M., 2017. Genitive variation and unique items hypothesis in simultaneous interpreting from Italian into English. An intermodal study based on EPIC. MA Dissertation. University of Bologna.Magnifico, C. and Defrancq, B., 2016. Impoliteness in interpreting: a question of gender? Translation and Interpreting, 8(2), pp. 26—45.Magnifico, C. and Defrancq B., 2017. Hedges in conference interpreting: The role of gender. Interpreting, 19(1), pp. 21—46.Monti, C., Bendazzoli, C., Sandrelli, A. and Russo, M., 2005. Studying directionality in simultaneous interpreting through an electronic corpus: EPIC (European Parliament Interpreting Corpus). Meta, 50(4). Available at: http://www. erudit. org/revue/meta/2005/v50/n4/019850ar. pdf (аccessed 23 September 2018).Niemants, N., 2015. Transcription. In: F. Pöchhacker, ed. Routledge encyclopedia of interpreting studies. London: Taylor & Francis. pp. 421—422.Pöchhacker, F. ed., 2015. Routledge Encyclopedia of Interpreting Studies. London, Routledge.Russo, M., Bendazzoli, C. and Sandrelli, A., 2006. Looking for lexical patterns in a trilingual corpus of source and interpreted speeches: Extended analysis of EPIC (European Parliament Interpreting Corpus). Forum, 4(1), pp. 221—254.Russo, M., 2010. Reflecting on interpreting practice: Graduation theses based on the European Parliament Interpreting Corpus (EPIC). In: L. Zybatow, ed. Translationswissenschaft — Standund Perspektiven. Innsbrucker Ringvorlesungenzur Translationswissenschaft VI (ForumTranslationswissenschaft, Band 12). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. pp. 35—50.Russo, M., 2011. Text processing patterns in simultaneous interpreting (Spanish-Italian): A corpus-based study. In: I. Ohnheiser, W. Pöckl and P. Sandrini, eds. Festschrift in Honour of Prof. Lew Zybatow Translation — Sprachvariation — Mehrsprachigkeit. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. pp. 83—103.Russo, M., 2016. Orality and Gender: A corpus-based study on lexical patterns in simultaneous interpreting. In: C. Calvo and N. Spinolo, eds. Translating orality/La traducción de la oralidad. pp. 307—322.Russo M., 2018. Speaking patterns and gender in the European Parliament Interpreting Corpus. A quantitative study as a premise for qualitative investigations. In: M. Russo, C. Bendazzoli, and B. Defrancq, eds. Making Way in Corpus-based Interpreting Studies. Springer Nature Switzerland, pp. 115—131.Russo, M., Bendazzoli, C., Sandrelli A. and Spinolo N., 2012. The European Parliament Interpreting Corpus (EPIC): Implementation and developments. In: F. Straniero Sergio and C. Falbo, eds. Breaking ground in corpus-based Interpreting Studies. Frankfurt a. M.: Peter Lang. pp. 35—90.Russo, M., Bendazzoli, C. and Defrancq, B. eds., 2018. Making Way in Corpus-based Interpreting Studies. Series: New Trends in translation Studies. Singapore: Springer.Sandrelli, A., 2012. Introducing FOOTIE (Football in Europe): Simultaneous interpreting in football press conferences. In: F. Straniero Sergio and Falbo, C., eds. Breaking Ground in Corpus-based Interpreting Studies. Peter Lang AG. pp. 119—153.Sandrelli, A., Bendazzoli, C. and Russo, M., 2010. European Parliament Interpreting Corpus (EPIC): Methodological issues and preliminary results on lexical patterns in SI. International Journal of Translation, 22(1—2), pp. 165—203.Seleskovitch, D., 1975. Langage, Langues et Mémoire. Etude de la Prise de Notes en Interprétation Consécutive. Paris: Minard.Setton, R., 2011. Corpus-based Interpreting Studies (CIS): Overview and prospects. In: A. Kruger, K. Wallmach, and J. Munday, eds. Corpus-Based Translation Studies. Research and Applications. New York: Continuum. pp. 33—75.Shlesinger, M., 1998. Corpus-based Interpreting Studies as an Offshoot of Corpus-based Translation Studies. Meta, 43(4), pp. 486—493.Shlesinger, M., 2009. Towards a definition of Interpretese. An intermodal, corpus-based study. In: G. Hansen, A. Chesterman and H. Gerzymisch-Arbogast, eds. Efforts and Models in Interpreting and Translation Research.A tribute to Daniel Gile. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. pp. 237—253.Shlesinger, M. and Ordan, N., 2012. More spoken or more translated? Exploring a known unknown of simultaneous interpreting, Target, 24(1), pp. 43—60.Straniero Sergio, F., 2013. Norms and quality in media interpreting: The case of Formula One press-conferences. The Interpreters’ Newsletter, 12, pp. 135—174.Straniero Sergio, F. and Falbo, C. eds., 2012. Breaking Ground in Corpus-Based Interpreting Studies. Bern: Peter Lang.Tohyama, H., Ryu, K., Mastubara, S., Kawaguchi, N. and Inagaki, Y., 2004. Simultaneous Interpreting Corpus. Proceedings of Oriental COCOSDA. Available at: http://slp. itc. nagoya-u. ac. jp/web/papers/2004/Oriental-COCOSDA2004_tohyama. pdf (аccessed 23 September 2018).Vuorikoski, A.R., 2004. A Voice of Its Citizens or a Modern Tower of Babel? The Quality of Interpreting as a Function of Political Rhetoric in the European Parliament. Tampere: Tampere University Press. Available at: http://tampub. uta. fi/handle/10024/67348 (аccessed 23 September 2018).Vuorikoski, A.R., 2012. Fine-tuning SI quality criteria: Could speech act theory be of any use? In: C.J. Kellett Bidoli, ed. Interpreting across Genres: Multiple Research Perspectives. Trieste: EUT. pp. 152—170.Wallmach, K., 2000. Examining simultaneous interpreting norms and strategies in a South African legislative context: A pilot corpus analysis. Language Matters, 31(1), pp. 198—221.Wang, B., 2012. Interpreting strategies in real-life interpreting: Corpus-based description of seven professional interpreters’ performance. Translation Journal, 16(2). Available at: http://translationjournal. net/journal/60interpreting.htm (аccessed 23 September 2018).Wang, B. and Zou, B., 2108. Exploring Language Specificity as a Variable in Chinese-English Interpreting. A Corpus-Based Investigation. In: M. Russo, C. Bendazzoli, and B. Defrancq, eds. Making Way in Corpus-based Interpreting Studies. Springer Nature Switzerland. pp. 65—82.