<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<doi_batch xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.crossref.org/schema/5.3.1" xmlns:jats="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/JATS1" xmlns:fr="http://www.crossref.org/fundref.xsd" xmlns:ai="http://www.crossref.org/AccessIndicators.xsd" version="5.3.1"><head><doi_batch_id>NONE</doi_batch_id><timestamp>20260531214955643</timestamp><depositor><depositor_name>Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University</depositor_name><email_address>no-reply@journals.kantiana.ru</email_address></depositor><registrant>Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University</registrant></head><body><journal><journal_metadata><full_title>Slovo.ru: Baltic accent</full_title><issn media_type="print">2225-5346</issn><issn media_type="electronic">2686-8989</issn></journal_metadata><journal_issue><publication_date media_type="print"><month>05</month><day>31</day><year>2026</year></publication_date><journal_volume><volume>1</volume></journal_volume><issue>1</issue></journal_issue><journal_article publication_type="full_text"><titles><title>Events as a semantic framework for the construction of reality: the prospects of a transition to a dynamic ontology</title></titles><contributors><person_name sequence="first" contributor_role="author"><given_name>S. V.</given_name><surname>Gerasimov</surname></person_name><person_name sequence="additional" contributor_role="author"><given_name>G. L.</given_name><surname>Tulchinskiy</surname></person_name></contributors><jats:abstract><jats:p>Events are the main element in the formation and presentation of a worldview across all the research disciplines in the humanities and other sciences. Cognising and understanding reality requires the consideration and construction of data, descriptions, correlations, and narratives, to all of which concrete events are the key. In this article, we analyse the connection between an event and reality, with a special focus on social events in the context of management. Such an approach does not confine us to descriptions. On the contrary, we can benefit from considering the phenomena in the context of opportunities for the constructive transformation of reality. We address three major problems. The first problem concerns the possibility of a dynamic description of the nature of events. In this context, we justify a transition to a constructive-dynamic ontological paradigm. We identify the functions of an event that consists in the creation, management, and destruction or reality. We demonstrate the need for a constructive model of a special event—a model taking into account the temporal factor in the development of reality. The second problem concerns the development of theoretical (mathematical) tools to describe such dynamics. In this connection, we identify the mathematical semantics of event processes. To build the necessary model, we use the methods of maxima/ minima and infinitesimal calculus and carry out an analysis of the threshold values of the event function. The third problem is the verification of the model and the description of its possible applications. In this context, we demonstrate how this model can be used in forecasting and developing special events, including those in interactive mode.</jats:p></jats:abstract><publication_date media_type="print"><month>05</month><day>31</day><year>2026</year></publication_date><pages><first_page>1</first_page><last_page>1</last_page></pages><citation_list><citation key="1"><unstructured_citation>Aristotle, 2006. Мetafizika [Metaphysics]. Moskva, Institut filosofii, teologii i istorii sv. Fomy (in Russ.).</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="2"><unstructured_citation>Badiou, A., 2005. Metapolitika: mozhno li myslit' politiku? [Metapolitics: Is it possible to think politics?]. Moscow, Logos (in Russ.).</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="3"><unstructured_citation>Gerasimov, S.V., 2015. Closing the circle of manipulation. Filosofskie Nauki [Philosophical Sciences], 5, pp. 34-41 (in Russ.).</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="4"><unstructured_citation>Zolyan, S.T., 2017а. “One and the same" historical event. Semantics and pragmatics. In: E.I. Pivovar, ed. Gumanitarnyye chteniya RGGU — 2016 [Readings in Humanities in RSUH — 2016]. Moscow, pp. 438-462 (in Russ.).</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="5"><unstructured_citation>Zolyan, S.T., 2017б. "Repeatability" of events in historical discourse: semantics and pragmatics. In: Reprezentatsiya sobytiy. Integrativnyy podkhod s pozitsiy kognitivnykh nauk [Representation of events. An Integrative approach from the standpoint of cognitive sciences]. Moscow, Yazyki slavyanskoy kul'tury, pp. 186-208 (in Russ.).</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="6"><unstructured_citation>L'Hôpital, G.F., 1935. Analiz beskonechno malykh [Analysis of infinitesimal]. Moskva; Leningrad: Gostekhteorizdat (in Russ.).</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="7"><unstructured_citation>Spinoza, B., 1999. Sochinenija v 2 tomakh [Works. In 2 volumes]. Vol. 2. St. Petersburg, Nauka (in Russ.).</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="8"><unstructured_citation>Tulchinskii, G.L., 2001. Ideas: sources, dynamics and logical content. In: Istorija idej kak metodologija gumanitaenykh issledovanij [History of ideas as a methodology for humanitarian research]. St. Petersburg, Tsentr istorii idej, pp. 28-58 (in Russ.).</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="9"><unstructured_citation>Tulchinskii, G.L., 2017. Explanation in political science: constructivism vs positivism. Publichnaja Politika [Public Policy], 1, pp. 76-98 (in Russ.).</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="10"><unstructured_citation>Heidegger, M., 1997. Bytie i vremja [Being and Time]. Moscow, Ad Marginem (in Russ.).</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="11"><unstructured_citation>Euler, L., 1961. Vvedenie v analiz beskonechno malykh [Introduction to the analysis of infinite]. Vol. 1. Moscow, GI Fizmatlit (in Russ.).</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="12"><unstructured_citation>Acemoglu, D., Robinson, J.A., 2012. Why Nations Fail. The Origins of Power, Prosperity and Poverty. N.Y.: Crown Business.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="13"><unstructured_citation>Bergson, H., 1946. The Creative Mind: An Introduction to Metaphysics. New York: Philosophical Library.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="14"><unstructured_citation>Dijk, Т. van., 1998. Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="15"><unstructured_citation>Galtung, J., 1977. Essays in methodology. Vol. 1: Methodology and ideology. Copenhagen: Christian Ejlers.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="16"><unstructured_citation>Habermas, J., 2001. On the pragmatics of social interaction: Preliminary studies in the theory of communicative action. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="17"><unstructured_citation>Hempel, С.G., 2000. Science, Explanation, and Rationality. New York: Oxford University Press.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="18"><unstructured_citation>McCloskey, D., 1998. The Rhetoric of Economics. University of Wisconsin Press.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="19"><unstructured_citation>North, D., 2005. Understanding the Process of Economic Change. Princeton University Press.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="20"><unstructured_citation>Taleb, N.N., 2007. The Black Swan. The Impact of the Highly Improbable. New York: Random House.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="21"><unstructured_citation>Thaler, R.H., Sunstein C.R., 2008. Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness. Yale University Press.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="22"><unstructured_citation>Whitehead, A.N., 1947. Essays in Science and Philosophy. London: Philosophical Library.</unstructured_citation></citation></citation_list></journal_article><journal_article publication_type="full_text"><titles><title>Ontological taxonomy as a means to inventory the elements of the semantic metalanguage of cognitive analysis (based on E. V. Rakhilina’s monograph Cognitive Analysis of Object Names (Semantics and Collocations))</title></titles><contributors><person_name sequence="first" contributor_role="author"><given_name>S. A.</given_name><surname>Krylov</surname></person_name></contributors><jats:abstract><jats:p>In this work, I address the problems of inventorying the semantic metalanguage used in cognitive analysis to describe the meaning and collocation characteristics of object names. I establish correlations between elements of the semantic metalanguage to explain the meanings of linguistic units and speech sections in E. V. Rakhilina’s monograph Cognitive Analysis of Object Names (Semantics and Collocations) (Rakhilina 2010). I focus on the units of the semantic metalanguage, i. e. words and phrases denoting phenomena of reality. Such words and phrases comprise the lexicon of the metalanguage used in the semantic reflection of the author of semantic descriptions. The inventory of the semantic elements follows the alphabetical clustering principle. The ‘ontological taxonomy’ covers clusters, at the apex of which are the denominations of fragments of the world (reality) reflected by the internal aspect of linguistic units. These denominations are expressed by nouns with generic meanings: ‘object’, ‘container’, ‘surface’, etc. For brevity, I focus only on the third element — the ontological taxonomy. The result of the study — the ontological taxonomy of the researcher’s metalanguage — is presented in the appendix in the form of a dictionary.</jats:p></jats:abstract><publication_date media_type="print"><month>05</month><day>31</day><year>2026</year></publication_date><pages><first_page>1</first_page><last_page>1</last_page></pages><citation_list><citation key="1"><unstructured_citation>Rakhilina, E. V., 2010. Kognitivnyi analiz predmetnykh imen (semantika i sochetaemost') ["Cognitive analysis of subject names (semantics and compatibility)]. Vol. 2. Moscow, Azbukovnik (in Russ.).</unstructured_citation></citation></citation_list></journal_article><journal_article publication_type="full_text"><titles><title>Lexical explicators of the modality of necessity in the Old and New Testament (the Synodal translation into Russian)</title></titles><contributors><person_name sequence="first" contributor_role="author"><given_name>N. V.</given_name><surname>Pisar</surname></person_name></contributors><jats:abstract><jats:p>In this article, I explore one of the elements of situational modality, namely, the microfield of the modality of necessity. I consider the use of lexical modifiers of the modality of necessity in the Old and New Testament. The aims of this study are to identify similarities and differences in the use of lexemes explicating the microfield in the biblical texts and to produce a comparative analysis of modal meanings of objective-subjective and objective necessity expressed through relevant lexemes. Another objective is to assess the influence of the meanings of necessity on the semantic orientation of the biblical texts manifested in the difference between the precepts of the Old and New Testament. I employ the field approach and use both universal research methods and the methods and techniques of the functional-semantic, etymological, and contextual analysis, etc. The main finding of this study is that the semantic content of lexical modifiers of the modality of necessity in the New Testament differs from that in the Old Testament. In the Old Testament texts, necessity is perceived primarily as a legal and social law, whereas in the New Testament it is understood as a moral duty. This contributes to the Christian idea of the existence of a legal and social law and a higher, moral law, which are not always identical. Using the findings of this study, I describe the formation of the division between the spiritual and social aspects of duty in human consciousness and identify the causes of contradictions between the spiritual and social duty.</jats:p></jats:abstract><publication_date media_type="print"><month>05</month><day>31</day><year>2026</year></publication_date><pages><first_page>1</first_page><last_page>1</last_page></pages><citation_list><citation key="1"><unstructured_citation>Vaulina, S.S., 2003. About the modality of the old Russian text. In: Tekst v lingvodidakticheskom aspekte. Materialy nauchno-prakticheskogo seminara [Text in the linguisticdidactic aspect. Proceedings of scientific-practical seminar]. Kaliningrad, pp. 276-284 (in Russ.).</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="2"><unstructured_citation>Vaulina, S.S., 1988. Evolyutsiya sredstv vyrazheniya modal'nosti v russkom yazyke (XI-XVII vv.) [Evolution of means of expression of modality in the Russian language (XI-XVII centuries)]. Leningrad (in Russ.).</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="3"><unstructured_citation>Ivanova, N.A., 2015. Incentive modality as a mechanism of formation of universal values (on the material of Russian and English translations of biblical idioms). Vestnik Baltijskogo federal'nogo universiteta im. I. Kanta. Seriya: Filologiya, pedagogika, psihologiya [Bulletin of the I. Kant Baltic Federal University. Series: Philology, Pedagogy, Psychology], 2, pp. 133-139 (in Russ.).</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="4"><unstructured_citation>Ozhegov, S.I., Shvedova, N.U., eds, 2006. Tolkovyj slovar' russkogo yazyka [Explanatory dictionary of the Russian language]. Moscow (in Russ.).</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="5"><unstructured_citation>Evgenyeva, A.P., ed., 1985-1988. Slovar' russkogo yazyka v 4 tt [Dictionary of the Russian language in 4 volumes]. Moscow (in Russ.).</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="6"><unstructured_citation>Chernyshev, V.I., ed., 1950-1965. Slovar' sovremennogo russkogo literaturnogo yazyka: v 17 tt [Dictionary of modern Russian literary language: 17 volumes]. Moscow, Leningrad (in Russ.).</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="7"><unstructured_citation>Ushakov, D.N., ed., 1935-1940. Tolkovyj slovar' russkogo yazyka: v 4 tt [Explanatory dictionary of Russian language: in 4 volumes]. Moscow (in Russ.).</unstructured_citation></citation></citation_list></journal_article><journal_article publication_type="full_text"><titles><title>V. The hagiographic topic in I. S. Shmelev’s novel The Inexhaustible Chalice</title></titles><contributors><person_name sequence="first" contributor_role="author"><given_name>O. L.</given_name><surname>Kochetkova</surname></person_name><person_name sequence="additional" contributor_role="author"><given_name>Yu.</given_name><surname>Gaponova</surname></person_name></contributors><jats:abstract><jats:p>In this article, we discuss the hagiographic topics in I. S. Shmelev’s novel The Inexhaustible Chalice, which are expressed through different components of the novel’s literary structure — ranging from the individual traits of the main character, Ilya Sharonov, to twists of the plot and the milestones of his biography. We maintain that in terms of the genre this novel resembles both the lives of the righteous and the lives of the venerable. The novel conforms to the canons of hagiographic texts because of the presence of a righteous character, whose image is built in accordance with the traditional paradigm of the positive qualities of a saint. Other reasons for such conformity include the biographical topic, namely, a stable set of events and facts, affecting the life and fate of the character, and such structural plot elements as the character’s dreams and visions, as well as signs and miracles, which testify to his initiation into sacred knowledge and visions. The topic of the ‘angelic image’, which is manifested in the character’s physical resemblance to an angel, also contributes to the conformity with the hagiographic canon.</jats:p></jats:abstract><publication_date media_type="print"><month>05</month><day>31</day><year>2026</year></publication_date><pages><first_page>1</first_page><last_page>1</last_page></pages><citation_list><citation key="1"><unstructured_citation>Angely [Angels], 1987. Tokarev, S.A. (ed.). Mify narodov mira. Entsiklopediya. (V 2 tomakh) [Myths of the peoples of the world. Encyclopedia. (In 2 volumes)]. Vol. 1. Moscow, pp. 76-79 (in Russ.).</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="2"><unstructured_citation>Bocharov, S.G., 1985. O khudozhestvennykh mirakh [On the artistic worlds]. Moscow (in Russ.).</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="3"><unstructured_citation>Dorofeeva, L.G., 2014. A humble person in the hagiography of Ancient Rus. Germenevtika drevnerusskoi literatury [Hermeneutics of Old Russian Literature], 16-17, pp. 9-388 (in Russ.).</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="4"><unstructured_citation>Ilyin, I.A., 2000. Sobranie sochinenii. Perepiska dvukh Ivanov (1927-1934) [Collected Works. Correspondence of two Ivan (1927-1934)]. Moscow (in Russ.).</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="5"><unstructured_citation>Keler, L., 1972. I. S. Shmelev about himself and about others. In: N. Poltoratsky, ed. Russkaya literatura v emigratsii [Russian literature in exile]. Pittsburgh (in Russ.).</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="6"><unstructured_citation>Lebedev, N.V., 1994. Pochitanie svyatykh. Kratkii slovar' agiograficheskikh terminov [Veneration of the saints. A Brief Dictionary of Hagiographic Terms]. Moscow. Available at: http://interpretive.ru/dictionary/445/word/%CF%FO%EE%EB%EE%E3 [Accessed 25 November 2017].</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="7"><unstructured_citation>Lisitsyna, O., 2014. Ikonografiya angelov [Iconography of the angels]. Available at: http://www.pravmir.ru/lektsiya-olgi-lisitsyinoy-ikonografiya-angelov-video/ [Accessed 25 November 2017].</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="8"><unstructured_citation>Lyapin, D.A., 2014. System of symbols in the "Life of Sergius of Radonezh". Istoriya v podrobnostyakh [History in details], 5(47), pp. 22-28 (in Russ.).</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="9"><unstructured_citation>Nikulina, E.N., 2008. Naznachenie zhitiya svyatogo. Zhitiinyi kanon [Appointment of the life of the saint. The Life Canon]. Available at: https://religion. wikireading.ru/%D0%9D%D0%B8%D0%BA%D1%83%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B0%20%D0%95%20%D0%9D-kng [Accessed 25 November 2017].</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="10"><unstructured_citation>Rudi, T.R., 2003. «Imitatio angeli»: (problems of the typology of the hagiographic topic). Russkaya literatura [Russian literature], 2, pp. 48-59 (in Russ.).</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="11"><unstructured_citation>Selyanskaya, O.V., 2001. The artistic world of Russian Orthodoxy in the novel IS. Shmeleva "The Inexhaustible Chalice". Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki [Bulletin of the Tambov University. Series: The humanities], 5(23), pp. 109-111 (in Russ.).</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="12"><unstructured_citation>Sobolev, N.I., 2012. From the creative history of I. Shmelev's story "The Inexhaustible Chalice". Problemy istoricheskoi poetiki [Problems of historical poetics], 10, pp. 328-340 (in Russ.).</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="13"><unstructured_citation>Tatarkin, V.I., 2011. Vozvrashchayas' v istokam khristianskogo ucheniya [Returning to the origins of the Christian teaching]. Tyumen (in Russ.).</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="14"><unstructured_citation>Shmelev, I.S., 1998. Neupivaemaya chasha [Inexhaustible chalice]. Vol. 1, pp. 379-436 (in Russ.).</unstructured_citation></citation></citation_list></journal_article><journal_article publication_type="full_text"><titles><title>Between faith and disbelief: the theme of life and death in Yu. N. Ivanov’s novel Dances in the Crematory: Ten Episodes from the Life of Königsberg</title></titles><contributors><person_name sequence="first" contributor_role="author"><given_name>V. V.</given_name><surname>Malashchenko</surname></person_name></contributors><jats:abstract><jats:p>In exploring the themes of life and death in Yu. N. Ivanov’s novel Dances in the Crematory, I carry out a structural-semantic analysis of the fragmentary chronotope and the ideational- thematic and plot-compositional levels of the novel. I demonstrate that the principle of fragmentarity is utilised by the author to the full extent across the novel, primarily, in its chronotope. The latter is closely connected with the fragmentary-discrete structure of human consciousness and memory, including the spiritual memory, which secures the most vivid events and episodes from the life of the main character in the textual space of the novel. I prove that, at the ideational-thematic level, the principle of fragmentarity is manifested in the novel in the form of a series of antithesis themes and binary oppositions (peace/war, life/death, god/evil, love/hate, faith/disbelief, God/devil), which reveal the author’s worldview and integrate semantically different dimensions of the novel — subjective, psychological, moral, philosophical, and fictional ones. These oppositions emphasise the novel’s leitmotif (the metaphor of the road as a person’s life journey) and its central moral-philosophical idea and dilemma — the tragic fate of a person who has chosen the independent path of overcoming death with life. I stress the correlation between the themes of life and death, which gravitate in the novel towards a difficult, yet clear victory of life over death. I trace how the autobiographical character- narrator gradually turns to God and faith. I prove that, in the novel’s poetics, the author uses such a technique as the compression of the plot and the idea into two symbolic metaphors — the dance in the crematory and the zoo, which stand for resurrection and the triumph of life in the tragic space of Königsberg/Kaliningrad — a city devastated by the war.</jats:p></jats:abstract><publication_date media_type="print"><month>05</month><day>31</day><year>2026</year></publication_date><pages><first_page>1</first_page><last_page>1</last_page></pages><citation_list><citation key="1"><unstructured_citation>Berdyaev, N.A., 1995. Tsarstvo dukha i tsarstvo kesarya [The kingdom of the spirit and the kingdom of Caesar]. Moscow (in Russ.).</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="2"><unstructured_citation>Ivanov, Yu.N., 2015. Tantsy v krematorii: desyat' epizodov kenigsbergskoi zhizni [Dances in crematorium: ten episodes of Königsberg life]. Kaliningrad (in Russ.).</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="3"><unstructured_citation>Ilyin, I.A., 1993. The path of spiritual renewal. In: I.A. Ilyin. Put' k ochevidnosti [The way to evidence]. Moscow, pp. 134-403 (in Russ.).</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="4"><unstructured_citation>Losskii, N.O., 1994. Bog i mirovoe zlo [God and world evil]. Moscow (in Russ.).</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="5"><unstructured_citation>Trubetskoy, E.N., 1994. Smysl zhizni [Meaning of life]. Moscow (in Russ.).</unstructured_citation></citation></citation_list></journal_article><journal_article publication_type="full_text"><titles><title>Age-related characteristics of English, American, and Russian compliments</title></titles><contributors><person_name sequence="first" contributor_role="author"><given_name>N. A.</given_name><surname>Kurakina</surname></person_name></contributors><jats:abstract><jats:p>In this article, I identify and analyse the linguistic features of the generation and perception of compliments by people of different age identities from English, American and Russian cultures. Language is not the same across different age groups, which necessitates a thorough examination of age-related parameters in language and the identification of semiotic markers of age identity. The promising area of linguistic research — social semiotics — lends an urgency to such a study. To achieve the goal of the research, I employ the methods of contextual analysis and semantic and pragmatic interpretation. The qualitative calculations ensure the relevance of the study, which takes into account the intentional and stylistic features of compliments and reactions to compliments. The need to study these aspects is explained by the orientation of compliments towards effective communication. A typology of intentions and reactions shows that cultural differences between representatives of the English, American, and Russian national identities are clearly manifested in language. As to intentions, people with a mature English identity gravitate towards politeness, those with mature American identity towards praise, and those with mature Russian identity towards praise and flattery. An analysis of linguistic material demonstrates that compliments made by people with a mature age identity differ from those made by younger persons. Younger people are more prone to make compliments in informal communication than persons with mature age identity are. Compliments made by members of each age group have certain specific features. The findings of the study can be employed in the Stylistics and Pragmalinguistics courses, which is the practical outcome of the research.</jats:p></jats:abstract><publication_date media_type="print"><month>05</month><day>31</day><year>2026</year></publication_date><pages><first_page>1</first_page><last_page>1</last_page></pages><citation_list><citation key="1"><unstructured_citation>Vakhtin, N.V., Golovko, E.V., 2004. Sotsiolingvistika i sotsiologiya yazyka. Gender. Yazyk i vozrast [Sociolinguistics and sociology of language. Gender. Language and age]. Available at: http://socling.genlingnw.ru/arc/11.pdf [Accessed 3 September 2014].</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="2"><unstructured_citation>Erofeev, V.V., 1990. Russkaya krasavitsa [The Russian Beauty]. Available at: http://royallib.ru/read/erofeev_viktor/russkaya_krasavitsa.html#0 [Accessed 3 September 2014].</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="3"><unstructured_citation>Kononov, N., 2004. Nezhnyi teatr [Gentle Theater]. Moscow (in Russ.).</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="4"><unstructured_citation>Kunin, V., 2000. Mika i Al'fred [Mika and Alfred]. St. Petersburg (in Russ.).</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="5"><unstructured_citation>Kunin, V. Rebro Adama [The Edge of Adam]. Available at: http://lib.misto. kiev.ua/KUNINV/rebro.txt [Accessed 21 November 2013].</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="6"><unstructured_citation>Kurakina, N.A., 2017. Dialective features of pragmatic completions of representatives of english urbanist identity. In: Dinamika vzaimootnoshenii razlichnykh oblastey nauki sovremennykh usloviyakh. Sbornik trudov konferentsii [Dynamics of relationships of various sciences of science in modern conditions. Conference proceedings]. Ufa, 13 November 2017, pp. 144-147 (in Russ.).</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="7"><unstructured_citation>Kurakina, N.A., 2016. Pragmaticheskii aspekt komplimentarnykh vyskazyvanii (na materiale anglo-amerikanskoi khudozhestvennoi literatury) [A pragmatic aspect of complimentary statements (on the material of Anglo-American fiction)]. Ph.D. Kaliningrad (in Russ.).</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="8"><unstructured_citation>Leontovich, O.A., 2013. Russkie i amerikantsy: paradoksy mezhkul'turnogo obshcheniya [Russian and Americans: the paradoxes of intercultural communication]. Available at: http://uchebilka.ru/kultura/5291/index.html?page=17 [Accessed 3 September 2014].</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="9"><unstructured_citation>Miklyaeva, A.V., Rumyantseva, P.V., 2008. Sotsial'naya identichnost' lichnosti: soderzhanie, struktura, mekhanizmy formirovaniya [Social identity of the person: content, structure, formation mechanisms]. Available at: http://humanpsy.ru/miklyaeva/soc_ident_02 [Accessed 10 October 2015].</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="10"><unstructured_citation>Pelevin, V., 2011. Ananasnaya voda dlya prekrasnoi damy [Pineapple water for a beautiful lady]. Available at: http://www.pelevin.info/pelevin_253_0.html. Accessed 10 October 2015].</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="11"><unstructured_citation>Barnes, J., 2005. Arthur and George. Available at: http://www.e-reading.biz/bookreader.php/84985/Barnes_-_Arthur_%26_George.html [Accessed 5 September 2015].</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="12"><unstructured_citation>Foer, J.S., 2002. Everything is illuminated. NY: Houghton Mifflin Company. Available at: http://www.reflexionesmarginales.com/biblioteca/15/Documentos/ Jonathan_</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="13"><unstructured_citation>Safran_Foer:Everything_is_%20illuminated.pdf [Accessed 5 September 2015].</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="14"><unstructured_citation>Jardine, Q., 1994. Skinner’s Trail. London: Headline Book Publishing.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="15"><unstructured_citation>Moyes, J., 2012. Me before you. Available at: sachinbhattarai.files.wordpress.com [Accessed 8 September 2015].</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="16"><unstructured_citation>Steel, D., 2005. Toxic bachelors. Available at: http://rattythegameworm.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/danielle-steel-toxic-bachelors.pdf [Accessed 21 September 2015].</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="17"><unstructured_citation>Yates, R., 1961. Revolutionary Road. Available at: https://vk.com/doc16932426_246424216?hash=1563faa5c9995a63c2&amp;dl=cd7764d0c13f8e83b0 [Accessed 23 September 2015].</unstructured_citation></citation></citation_list></journal_article><journal_article publication_type="full_text"><titles><title>Discursive practices of the Russian diaspora in Estonia: language contacts</title></titles><contributors><person_name sequence="first" contributor_role="author"><given_name>E. I.</given_name><surname>Kostandi</surname></person_name></contributors><jats:abstract><jats:p>In this article, I use the concept of discursive practices to consider the speech practices of the Russian diaspora of Estonia. The findings of the study suggest the existence of an invariant discourse generated by an exemplary member of the diaspora. Such a discourse has formal (borrowings, code-switching, etc.), semantic (referential shifts, semantically re-oriented vocabulary, etc.), and pragmatic features. The results of the diasporic speech analysis show that the key components of a typical diasporic discourse are the following ones: spatial-temporal localization (space: Estonia — Russia —the West relations; significant locations, space in the past and today (the empire, the Republic of Estonia, the Soviet Union); information space; time: historical periods, dates, holidays; time in information space, etc.), linguistic reflections (metalinguistic units denoting co-existence, knowledge, language acquisition, etc.), evaluations (objects of evaluation, types of evaluation) and self-identification (ethnic, denominational, cultural, socio-economic). The above is not only characteristic of the diasporic speech. These components also describe the worldview of language users belonging to the diaspora and their naïve linguistic conceptualisation of reality. Within the typical diasporic discourse, I distinguish a metalinguistic discourse that rests on discursive practices stemming from language contacts. These practices were described in part earlier. In this article, I summarize my earlier findings on the topic and analyse new material.</jats:p></jats:abstract><publication_date media_type="print"><month>05</month><day>31</day><year>2026</year></publication_date><pages><first_page>1</first_page><last_page>1</last_page></pages><citation_list><citation key="1"><unstructured_citation>Arutyunova, N.D., 1998. Discourse. In: V.N. Yartseva, ed. Bol'shoi entsiklopedicheskii slovar' [Great encyclopedic dictionary]. Moscow. pp. 136-137 (in Russ.).</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="2"><unstructured_citation>Kostandi, E.I., 2011. Nomination and references-problems of choice in a foreign language environment. In: Humaniora: Lingua Russica. Trudy po russkoi i slavyanskoi filologii. Lingvistika. XIV. Razvitie i variativnost' yazyka v sovremennom mire [Humaniora: Lingua Russica. Works on Russian and Slavic philology. Linguistics. XIV. The development and variability of language in the modern world]. Tartu, pp. 142-159 (in Russ.).</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="3"><unstructured_citation>Kostandi, E.I., Kulmoya, I.P., 2013. About the Russian language of modern Estonia. In: Russkii yazyk zarubezh'ya [Russian language Abroad]. St. Petersburg, pp. 85-106 (in Russ.).</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="4"><unstructured_citation>Kostandi, E.I., 2015a. The category of temporality in "everyday" language: the comparative aspect. In: Rusistica Latviensis 5. Slavica—2015: filoloģija spētījumi. Riga, pp. 79-85 (in Russ.).</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="5"><unstructured_citation>Kostandi, E.I., 2015б. Specificity of discursive practices in the situation of language contacts. In: Ezhegodnik finno-ugorskikh issledovanii [Yearbook of Finno-Ugrian Studies]. Vol. 2. Izhevsk, pp. 29-40 (in Russ.).</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="6"><unstructured_citation>Kostandi, E.I., 2016a. Typical text of the diaspora: the cognitive aspect. In: Rusistika i sovremennost' [Russian Studies and Modernity]. Riga, pp. 273-280 (in Russ.).</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="7"><unstructured_citation>Kostandi, E.I., 2016б. Metalanguage discourse of the diaspora: invariant and variants. In: W poszukiwaniu tożsamości językowej. Vol. I. Gdansk (in Russ.).</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="8"><unstructured_citation>Kostandi, E.I., 2016в. Bilingual texts: "your" and "someone else's". In: Acta Slavica Estonica. Vol. VIII. Tartu. pp. 78-88 (in Russ.).</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="9"><unstructured_citation>Kostandi, E.I., 2016г. Typical discourse of the diaspora: language selfidentification. In: Kul'turnyi landshaft Pogranich'ya: proshloe, nastoyashchee, budushchee [The cultural landscape of the Borderlands: past, present, future]. Pskov, pp. 115-121 (in Russ.).</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="10"><unstructured_citation>Külmoja, I., 2000. Specific features of the language of the Russian diaspora in Estonia. In: Trudy po russkoi i slavyanskoi filologii. Lingvistika. Novaya seriya. III. Yazyk diaspory: problemy i perspektivy [Works on Russian and Slavic philology. Linguistics. New episode. III. Diaspora Language: Problems and Perspectives]. Tartu, pp. 84-93 (in Russ.).</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="11"><unstructured_citation>Külmoja, I., 2009. Speech of the Russian Diaspora in Estonia: Development Trends. In: Humaniora: LinguaRussica. Trudy po russkoi i slavyanskoi filologii. Lingvistika. XII. Aktivnye protsessy v russkom yazyke metropolii i diaspory [Humaniora: LinguaRussica. Works on Russian and Slavic philology. Linguistics. XII. Active processes in the Russian language of the metropolis and the diaspora]. Tartu, pp. 11-28 (in Russ.).</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="12"><unstructured_citation>Palikova, O.N., 2013. Informal geographical lexicon as a linguistic sign of the territorial community of people (On the material of urban slang and island dialect). In: Acta Slavica Estonica. III. Slavica Tartuensia X. Slavistika v Estonii i za ee predelami [Acta Slavica Estonica. III. Slavica Tartuensia X. Slavic Studies in Estonia and beyond]. Tartu, pp. 84-97 (in Russ.).</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="13"><unstructured_citation>Pan'kin, V.M., Filippov A.V., 2013. Yazykovye kontakty. Kratkii slovar' [Language contacts. Short Dictionary]. Moscow (in Russ.).</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="14"><unstructured_citation>Serne, A.Ya., 2003. Discursive practices. In: Sotsiologiya. Entsiklopediya [Sociology. Encyclopedia]. Minsk (in Russ.).</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="15"><unstructured_citation>Sokolova, O., 2013. Russkaya neofitsial'naya urbanonimiya goroda Tartu [Russian unofficial urbanism of the city of Tartu]. Available at: http://dspace.ut.ee/handle/10062/36201 [Accessed 12 January 2018].</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="16"><unstructured_citation>Külmoja, I., ed., 2000. Trudy po russkoi i slavyanskoi filologii. Lingvistika. Novaya seriya. III. Yazyk diaspory: problemy i perspektivy [Works on Russian and Slavic philology. Linguistics. New episode. III. Diaspora Language: Problems and Perspectives]. Tartu (in Russ.).</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="17"><unstructured_citation>Külmoja, I., ed., 2002. Trudy po russkoi i slavyanskoi filologii. Lingvistika. Novaya seriya. VI. Problemy yazyka diaspory [Works on Russian and Slavic philology. Linguistics. New episode. VI. Problems of the Diaspora Language]. Tartu (in Russ.).</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="18"><unstructured_citation>Shchedneva, V.P., 2011. Characteristics of the modern Estonian-Russian translation of utilitarian official business texts. In: Rusistika i sovremennost' [Russian Studies and Modernity]. Riga, pp. 540-545 (in Russ.).</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="19"><unstructured_citation>Szadneva, V.P., 2015. Regional variants of Russian speech in the aspect of linguistic reflection (on the material of metalanguage commentaries on Internet forums).In: Rusistica Latviensis 5. Slavica — 2015: filoloģija spētījumi. Riga, pp. 112-120 (in Russ.).</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="20"><unstructured_citation>Külmoja, I., ed., 2009. Humaniora: Lingua Russica. Aktivnye protsessy v russkom yazyke metropolii i diaspory. Trudy po russkoi i slavyanskoi filologii. Lingvistika XII [Humaniora: Lingua Guska. Active processes in the Russian language of the metropolis and the diaspora. Works on Russian and Slavic philology. Linguistics XII]. Tartu (in Russ.).</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="21"><unstructured_citation>Zabrodskaja, A., (2009). Russian-Estonian Language Contacts: Grammatical Aspects of Language Use and Change. Tallinn.</unstructured_citation></citation></citation_list></journal_article></journal></body></doi_batch>
