NONE20260529204719298Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal Universityno-reply@journals.kantiana.ruImmanuel Kant Baltic Federal UniversitySlovo.ru: Baltic accent2225-53462686-89890529202611BoardEditorial0529202611V. I.GaltsovThis article describes differences and contradictions in identifying the subject of Kaliningrad regional history. Some researchers and media interpret the term ‘Kaliningrad regional history’ as the history of the region per se and others as the whole scope of local history. The ‘History of West Russia: The Kaliningrad Region’, a secondary school discipline taught since 2006, presents an interesting case. The subject of the Kaliningrad regional history has no single definition since it is a matter of politics rather than historiography. The inability to produce such a definition stems from the uniqueness of the region’s geographical position and history. The region’s history was used extensively in the Soviet time for political and ideological purposes. The current confrontation between Russia and the West lends new urgency to the problem of teaching local history, ninety percent of which is the history of a territory that once belonged to Germany — today, a pillar of the EU and a member of NATO. The author examines whether it is reasonable to draw on international experience in patriotic education. The subject ‘History of West Russia: The Kaliningrad Region’ was taken off the school timetable. The article stresses the need to teach a course on East Prussian history and proposes to treat it as the regional aspect of universal history.05292026111. Adamov, B. N., Bespalov, V. A., Gal'tsov, V. I. et al., 2011. Bol'shoi entsiklopedicheskii slovar' Kaliningradskoi oblasti [The Big Encyclopedic Dictionary of the Kaliningrad Region] / ed. by V. N. Maslov. Kaliningrad.2. Gal'tsov, V. I., Yusupov, V. S., Kulakov, V. I. et al., 1996. Vostochnaya Prussiya. S drevneishikh vremen do kontsa vtoroi mirovoi voiny [East Prussia. From ancient times to the end of the Second World War]. Kaliningrad.3. Kretinin, G. V., 2007. Istoriya Zapadnoi Rossii. Kaliningradskaya oblast': Uchebnometodicheskoe posobie dlya uchitelei obshcheobrazovatel'nykh shkol. 6—7 klassy [History of Western Russia. Kaliningrad region’s: Educational handbook for secondary school teachers. 6—7 klasses] / ed. by A. P. Klemeshev. Moscow.4. Birkovskii V. G., Soroka, Z. N., Gal'tsova, S. P. et al., 1986. Istoriya Kaliningradskoi oblasti (1951—1965): Uchebnoe posobie dlya studentov-istorikov Kaliningradskogo universiteta [The history of the Kaliningrad region (1951—1965): A manual for students-historians of the Kaliningrad University]. Kaliningrad.5. Birkovskii, V. G., Gordeev, I. A., Zaboenkova, A. S., 1984. Istoriya kraya (1945—1950): Uchebnoe posobie dlya studentov-istorikov Kaliningradskogo universiteta [The history of the region (1945—1950): A manual for students-historians of the Kaliningrad University]. Kaliningrad.6. Kaliningradskaya oblastnaya Duma. Ofitsial'noe internet-predstavitel'stvo [Kaliningrad Regional Duma. Official web-site]. Available at: http://duma39.ru/region/ history. php [Accessed 16 April 2017].7. Przhezdomskii, A. S., ed., 2006. Kenigsberg — Kaliningrad, 1255—2005: entsiklopedicheskii spravochnik [Koenigsberg — Kaliningrad, 1255—2005: encyclopedic reference book]. Kaliningrad.8. Klemeshev, A. P., Kostyashov, Yu. V., Fedorov, G. M., 2007. Istoriya Zapadnoi Rossii. Kaliningradskaya oblast': uchebnoe posobie dlya shkol'nikov. 10—11 klassy [History of Western Russia. Kaliningrad region’s: Educational handbook for pupils]. Moscow.9. Klemesheva, M. A., 1991. Ocherki istorii kraya [Essays on the history of the region]. Kaliningrad.10. Kretinin, G. V., 2007. Istoriya Zapadnoi Rossii. Kaliningradskaya oblast': uchebnoe posobie dlya shkol'nikov. 8—9 klassy [History of Western Russia. Kaliningrad region’s: Educational handbook for secondary school teachers. 8—9 klasses] / ed. by A. P. Klemeshev. Moscow.11. Gal'tsova, S. P., Gordeev, I. A., Efremov, L. A. et al., 2005. Letopis' Kaliningradskoi oblasti [Annals of the Kaliningrad Region] / ed. by V. N. Maslov. Kaliningrad.12. Matyushin, G. N., 1987. Istoricheskoe kraevedenie [Historical study of local lore]. Moscow.13. Kretinin, G. V., Bryushinkin, V. N., Gal'tsov, V. I. et al., 2002. Ocherki istorii Vostochnoi Prussii [Essays on the History of East Prussia]. Kaliningrad.14. Pravitel'stvo Kaliningradskoi oblasti. Ofitsial'nyi portal [Government of the Kaliningrad region. Official portal]. Available at: https://gov39.ru/region/history.php [Accessed 16 April 2017].15. Zhukov, E. M., ed., 1968. Sovetskaya istoricheskaya entsiklopediya [Soviet Historical Encyclopedia]. Moscow. Vol. 11: Pergam — Renuven.16. Galtsova, S., 1994. Die Geschichte des Kaliningrader Gebietes in der sowjetischen Forschung. Nordost-Archiv, 3, p. 499.V. N.MaslovPart of East Prussia was ceded to the Soviet Union after the defeat of Nazi Germany. As a result, the local toponymy changed completely. The author analyses the documents from the State Archive of the Russian Federation, the Russian State Archives of Socio- Political History, and the State Archive of the Kaliningrad Region to trace the Russianisation of German toponyms. The decision to establish workers’ settlements in the Kaliningrad region was discussed in September 1946 — July 1947. Local authorities sought to create more settlements of the kind. However, the RSFSR leadership insisted on the establishment of one resort settlement and four workers’ villages. Numerous toponyms were proposed, many of them were changed several times. The only geographic name that was approved immediately by the Government of the RSFSR was Znamensk, since it incorporated the semantic root znamya (banner). The ideologically laden Komsomolsk was replaced with Zheleznodorozhny as a reference to the fact that most residents worked at the railway station. Another settlement was named Tchaikovsky but then was given the ideologically laden name Pionersky.05292026111. The Kaliningrad Regional Council of People's Deputies and its executive committee. Gosudarstvennyi arkhiv Kaliningradskoi oblasti (GAKO) [State Archive of the Kaliningrad region], F. R-297.2. Office of Civil Affairs of the Kaliningrad Region. GAKO [State Archive of the Kaliningrad region], F. R-298.3. Council of Ministers of the RSFSR. Gosudarstvennyi arkhiv Rossiiskoi Federatsii (GARF) [State Archive of the Russian Federation], F. A-259.4. The Supreme Soviet of the RSFSR. GARF [State Archive of the Russian Federation], F. A-385.5. O rabochikh poselkakh: Postanovlenie VTsIK i SNK RSFSR ot 27 sentyabrya 1926 g. [On the workers' settlements: Resolution All-Russian Central Executive Committee and Council of People's Commissars of the RSFSR of September 27, 1926]. Available at: http://istmat.info/node/22721[Accessed 10 April 2015].6. Central Committee of the CPSU (1898, 1903—1991). Rossiiskii gosudarstvennyi arkhiv sotsial'no-politicheskoi istorii (RGASPI) [Russian State Archive of Social and Political History], F. 17.A. S.NovikovThis article analyses Yu. N. Ivanov’s novel In a Besieged City, which was inspired by the author’s battlefield memories. Yu. N. Ivanov pictures the city as he saw it in April 1945. It is shown how descriptions of the works of architecture and art contribute to the artistic understanding of the history of Königsberg. The literary text based on what the author saw and experienced helps him to not only immerse himself in the past and relive it but also rewrite the past and change it to fit his concept of it.05292026111. Gosudarstvennyi arkhiv Kaliningradskoi oblasti (GAKO) [State Archive of the Kaliningrad region], F. R-1183, aids 1.2. Gavrilov, V. N., 2000. Tankmen went ahead. Yantarnyi krai [Amber region], 28 yanvarya.3. Zdorov, A., 1973. In the name of life. Kaliningradskaya Pravda [Kaliningrad truth], 11 maya.4. Ivanov, Yu. N., 1973. In the besieged city. Kaliningradskii komsomolets [Kaliningrad Komsomolets], 114—152.5. Ivanov, Yu. N., 1989. Pyataya versiya: ischeznuvshie sokrovishcha. Poisk. Fakty i predpolozheniya [The fifth version: the disappeared treasure. Search. Facts and Assumptions]. Moscow.6. Ivanov, Yu. N., 2006. Tantsy v krematorii [Dances in the crematorium]. Kaliningrad.7. Peretyaka, N. P., 2016. Prichaly Yuriya Ivanova [Berths of Yuri Ivanov]. Moscow.8. Lasch, O., 1976. So fiel Königsberg. Stuttgart.V.V.MalashchenkoA comparative analysis of the existence of the main characters in Yuri Ivanov’s Dances in the Crematorium and Michael Wieck’s The Decline of Königsberg demonstrates clear typological convergences. The common toposphere is Königsberg/Kaliningrad, which incorporates a wide range of toponym types and subtypes — the district of Amalienau, Hufen- Allee, Alte Pillauer Landstraße, Paradeplatz, Nordbahnhof, Tiergarten, Luisenwahl, Kneiphof, Pregel, Schlossteich to name just a few. The urbanonyms denoting the main characters’ places of residence are Lawsker Allee and Steffeckstraße (Ivanov) and Steinmetzstraße (Wieck). The works share common themes — memory, faith, physical constraints, the freedom of human spirit, moral and amorality, personal and collective responsibility, and the evil of totalitarian regimes and racial hatred. The analysis shows common motifs in the works, those of destiny, desperate situations, ordeals, and suffering. The texts have a similar structure combining reminiscences of the main characters with interactions between the past and the present. However, the two authors approach the problem of the existence of the main characters differently. Ivanov’s character associates the topos of the city with life and hope while Wieck’s character — with death and disillusionment. Nevertheless, both texts convey the authors’ humanistic attitude to the human being and the world.05292026111. Berdyaev, N. A., 1995. Tsarstvo dukha i tsarstvo kesarya [The Kingdom of Spirit and the Kingdom of Caesar]. Moscow.2. Vik, M., 2004. Zakat Kenigsberga. Svidetel'stvo nemetskogo evreya [Sunset of Koenigsberg. Evidence of a German Jew]. St. Petersburg; Potsdam.3. Gaidenko, P. P., 1994. Man and history in the existential philosophy of Karl Jaspers. In: Yaspers, K. Smysl i naznachenie istorii [Meaning and purpose of history]. Moscow. pp. 5—26.4. Gil'manov, V. Kh., 2010. Problemy regional'noi literatury: «kenigsbergskii tekst» kak predmet khudozhestvennogo opyta: uchebnoe posobie [Problems of regional literature: the "Koenigsberg text" as a subject of artistic experience: a textbook]. Kaliningrad.5. Ivanov, Yu. N., 2015. Tantsy v krematorii: desyat' epizodov kenigsbergskoi zhizni [Dances in crematorium: ten episodes of Koenigsberg life]. Kaliningrad.6. Yaspers, K., 1994. Smysl i naznachenie istorii [Meaning and purpose of history]. Moscow.Y. V.KrivosheevCrimea holds a very special place in the biography of B. D. Grekov (1882—1953), an outstanding Russian historian and a fellow of the Soviet Academy of Sciences. Crimea was his long-standing research interest and a place of work and leisure. Some of his years spent in Crimea were very productive, and others were hard and lean. This article presents archive materials and other publications to analyse the stages and episodes of the scholar’s life and oeuvre in Crimea.05292026111. Office of the Federal Security Service of Russia for St. Petersburg and the Leningrad region, Arсhive №P 49829. T. 1: Po obvineniyu Vvedenskogo A. A. i drugikh [Vol. 1: On charges of Vvedensky A. A. and others].2. Bukhert, V. G., 1994. Letters from B. D. Grekov to S. D. Sheremetev. Otechestvennye arkhivy [Native archives], 3.3. Gorskaya, N. A., 1999. Boris Dmitrievich Grekov. Moscow.4. Grekov, B. D., 1929. "The Tale of Bygone Years" about the campaign of Prince Vladimir to Korsun. Izvestiya Tavricheskogo obshchestva istorii, arkheologii i etnografii [News of the Tauride Society of History, Archeology and Ethnography], 3.5. Grekov, B. D., 1939. The history of the ancient Slavs and Russia in the works of Academician V. G. Vasilievsky. Vestnik drevnei istorii [Bulletin of Ancient History], 1.6. Grekov, B. D., 1940. The significance of S. A. Zhebelev's work "The Last Move and the Scythian Uprising on Bhaipuri" for the History of Our Country. Vestnik drevnei istorii [Bulletin of Ancient History], 1.7. Grekov, B. D., Bromlei, Yu. V., 1952. The study of history of Crimea. Vestnik AN SSSR [Bulletin of the USSR Academy of Sciences], 8.8. Dubrovskii, A. M., 2005. Istorik i vlast': istoricheskaya nauka v SSSR i kontseptsiya istorii feodal'noi Rossii v kontekste politiki i ideologii (1930—1950-e gg.) [The historian and power: historical science in the USSR and the concept of the history of feudal Russia in the context of politics and ideology (1930—1950s)]. Bryansk.9. Pashuto, V. T., ed., 1982. Issledovaniya po istorii i istoriografii feodalizma. K 100-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya akademika B. D. Grekova [Studies on the history and historiography of feudalism. To the 100th anniversary of the birth of Academician B. D. Grekov]. Moscow.10. Krivosheev, Yu. V., 2016. Boris Dmitrievich Grekov and the “case of academicians”. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Istoriya [Bulletin of St. Petersburg University. History], 4.11. Mavrodin, V. V., 1968. Boris Dmitrievich Grekov (1882—1953). Leningrad.12. Paneyakh, V. M., 2001. About the case of B. D. Grekov. Otechestvennaya istoriya [Native history], 4.13. Sporov, D. B., ed., 2002. Correspondence of S. V. Veselovsky and V. D. Grekov (May 1929 — December 1930). Arkheograficheskii ezhegodnik za 2001 god [Archaeographic Yearbook 2001]. Moscow.14. Filimonov, S. B., 2004. Khraniteli istoricheskoi pamyati Kryma [Keepers of the historical memory of the Crimea]. Simferopol.15. Filimonov, S. B., 2006. Intelligentsiya v Krymu (1917—1920): poiski i nakhodki istochnikoveda [Intellectuals in Crimea (1917—1920). Simferopol.16. Filimonov, S. B., 2010. Iz proshlogo russkoi kul'tury v Krymu: poiski i nakhodki istorika-istochnikoveda [From the past of the Russian culture in Crime: the search and findings of a historian-sources’ analyst]. Simferopol.17. Formozov, A. A., 2004. Russkie arkheologi v period totalitarizma. Istoriograficheskie ocherki [Russian archeologists in the era of totalitarism. Historiographic essays]. Moscow.18. Shunkov, V. I., 1952. Boris Dmitrievich Grekov (Creative way). In: V. P. Volgin, ed. Akademiku Borisu Dmitrievichu Grekovu ko dnyu semidesyatiletiya: sbornik statei [To academician Boris Dmitrievich Grekov on the day of his seventieth birthday: collection of articles]. Moscow.L. M.BondarevaThis article examines the concept of cultural memory. Special attention is paid to historiographical texts as a means of representation of cultural memory. The author analyses and compares theories describing relations between historiographical and literary texts. Such relations are based on the fiction/non-fiction opposition. It is concluded that the aesthetic component assumes significance in structuring historiographical texts.05292026111. Assmann, A., Assmann J., 1994. Das Gestern im Heute. Medien und soziales Gedächtnis. In: K. Merten, S. J. Schmidt, S. Weissenberg, eds. Die Wirklichkeit der Medien. Eine Einführung in die Kommunikationswissenschaft. Opladen. pp. 114—140.2. Burke, P., 1991. Geschichte als soziales Gedächtnis. In: A. Assmann, D. Harth, eds. Mnemosyne. Formen und Funktionen der kulturellen Erinnerung. Frankfurt am Main. pp. 289—304.3. Ernst, U., 1993. Ars memorativa und Ars poetica in Mittelalter und Früher Neuzeit. Prolegomena zu einer mnemonistischen Dichtungstheorie. In: J. J. Berns, W. Neubeck, eds. Ars memorativa: zur kulturgeschichtlichen Bedeutung der Gedächtniskunst 1400—1750. Tübingen. pp. 73—100.4. Harth, D. Historik und Poetik. Plädoyer für ein gespanntes Verhältnis. In: H. Eggert, ed. Geschichte als Literatur: Formen und Grenzen der Repräsentation von Vergangenheit. Stuttgart. pp. 12—23.5. Nünning, A., ed., 1998. Metzler-Lexikon Literatur- und Kulturtheorie: Ansätze — Personen — Grundbegriffe. Stuttgart; Weimar.6. Moses, St., 1993. Eingedenken und Jetztzeit — Geschichtliches Bewußtsein im Spätwerk Walter Benjamins. In: A. Haverkamp, R. Lachmann, eds. Memoria — vergessen und erinnern. München. pp. 385—405.7. Nünning, A., 1998. Historiographie als identitätsbildender Interdiskurs: Versuch einer funktionsgeschichtlichen Gattungsbestimmung am Beispiel der Werke von Catharine Macaulay. In: B. Bauer, W. G. Müller, eds. Staatstheoretische Diskurse im Spiegel der Nationalliteraturen von 1500 bis 1800. Wiesbaden. pp. 481—508.8. Rüsen, J., 1990. Rhetorik und Ästhetik der Geschichtsschreibung: Leopold von Ranke. In: H. Eggert, ed. Geschichte als Literatur: Formen und Grenzen der Repräsentation von Vergangenheit. Stuttgart.9. Sprandel, R., 1994. Chronisten als Zeitzeugen: Forschungen zur spätmittelalterlichen Geschichtsschreibung in Deutschland. Köln; Weimar; Wien.10. Stocker, P., 1998. Theorie der intertextuellen Fallstudien. Paderborn; München; Wien; Zürich.A. I.VaskinevichThis article revisits the traditional perspective on realism as a prevalent trend in the European literature at the end of the 19th century. The author examines the perception of the concept of realism at the end of the 18th century (Friedrich Schiller) and in the 1850s (Champfleury and Duranty). It is stressed that Stendhal and Balzac did not associate themselves with realism and Flaubert objected to being called a realist. The author emphasizes the diversity of schools, trends, and literary techniques in the European literature of the second part of the 19th century.05292026111. Bodler, Sh., 1986. Ob iskusstve [About art]. Moscow.2. Solov'eva, N. A., Golovenchenko, A. F., Petrash E. G., eds., 1990. Zarubezhnaya literatura XIX veka. Realizm. Khrestomatiya istoriko-literaturnykh materialov [Foreign literature of the twentieth century. Realism. Chrestomathy of historical-literary materials]. Moscow.3. Zolya, E., 1966. Sobranie sochinenii [Collected works]. Moscow. Vol. 24.4. Ovsyannikov, M. F., ed., 1967. Istoriya estetiki. Pamyatniki esteticheskoi mysli [History of aesthetics. Monuments of aesthetic thought]. Moscow. Vol. 3.5. Marks, K., Engel's, F., 1965. Sochineniya [Works]. Moscow. Vol. 37.6. Mikhailov, A. V., 1997. The problems of analyzing the restructuring of realism in the literature of the XIX century. In: Mikhailov, A. V. Yazyki kul'tury [Languages of Culture]. Moscow. pp. 43—111.7. Vaskinevich, A. I., ed., 2003. Theoretical aesthetics of German realism. Brief anthology. Baltiiskii filologicheskii kur'er [Baltic philological courier], 2.8. Flober, G., 1984. O literature, iskusstve, pisatel'skom trude [About literature, art, literary work]. Moscow.9. Champfleury, 1857. Le réalisme. Paris.E. M.ReguretskayaMyths and history are different but related forms of consciousness. They date back to the archaic and new periods of world history. New forms of synthesis between history and myths translated in the ‘mythical-historical imagery’ of the 20th-century art. For the first time in the history of world culture, modernism has created a synthesis between the seemingly divergent elements — history and myths. This article analyses Schulz’s short story ‘Spring’ in the context of Franz Kafka’s mythological oeuvre — ‘The Great Wall of China’ and The Trial. The presence of mythical-historical images in their works is a common impulse, which creates a space for versatile mythopoetic interpretations shared by the two authors. The article examines the autonomy and synthesis of myths and history.05292026111. Toporov, V. N., 2014. History and myths. In: Mifologiya. Stat'i dlya mifologicheskikh entsiklopedii [Mythology. Articles for the mythological encyclopedias]. Moscow. Vol. 1.2. Berdyaev, N. A., 1990. Smysl istorii. Opyt filosofii chelovecheskoi sud'by [The meaning of history. Experience of the philosophy of human destiny]. Moscow.3. Berdyaev, N. A., 1990. Krizis iskusstva [Crisis of art]. Moscow.4. Stavitskii, A. M., 2013. Mifologizatsiya ukrainskoi istorii: smysl i zadachi [Mythologization of history of Ukraine: its sense and tasks]. Available at: http:// rusprostranstvo.com/?p=115 [Accessed 03 March 2017].5. Tsygankov, A. S., 2014. Social identity and mytho-history: transformational changes in the content of mythology. Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta [Proceedings of the Saratov University], 14(3—1), pp. 61—64.6. Yakovleva, E. L., 2010. Mythological symbol as a specific category of culture. Vestnik Samarskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Samara State University], 7(81), pp. 160—165.7. Shul'ts, B., 2000. Sanatorii pod Klepsidroi [Sanatorium near Clepsydra]. St. Petersburg.8. Knigin, I. A., 2006. Slovar' literaturnykh terminov [Dictionary of literary terms]. Available at: http://litterms.ru/[Accessed 03 March 2017].9. Kafka, F., 2002. Protsess [Process]. St. Ptersburg.10. Kafka, F., 2005. Kak stroilas' kitaiskaya stena [How the Chinese wall was built]. Moscow.E. E.RyabchikovaThis article analyses the problems addressed in Evelyn Waugh’s novel Scoop, through the prism of imagology — the study of cultural stereotypes as presented in literature. Within the ideational structure of the novel, the author analyses the theory of négritude, which holds that the African civilisation plays a special role in the world. It is concluded that the négritude philosophy is expressed in the novel through grotesque and the theory of négritude should be analysed in the context of philosophical and historical categories of civilization and barbarism.05292026111. Andreev, I. L., 1999. Is the African a "European on the contrary"? Voprosy filosofii [Questions of philosophy], 11, pp. 49—66.2. Berdnikova, I. V., 2006. Ideino-filosofskaya osnova i kul'turno-khudozhestvennye konteksty rannikh romanov Ivlina Vo [The ideological-philosophical basis and cultural- artistic contexts of the early novels of Evelyn Waugh]. Cand. philol. sci. diss. Omsk.3. Prokhorov, A. M., ed., 1973. Bol'shaya sovetskaya entsiklopediya [Great Soviet Encyclopedia]. Moscow. Vol. 49.4. Vo, I., 2010. Sensatsiya [Sensation]. Moscow.5. Vysotskaya, N. I., 2005. Africa in search of identity. Vostok [East], 3, pp. 50—60.6. Dormidonova, T. Yu., 2008. Grotesque as a literary problem. Izvestiya RGPU im. A. I. Gertsena [News of the A. I. Herzen RSPU], 51, pp. 40—44.7. Korneev, M. Ya., 2002. Metaphysics, aesthetics and comparativistics of Leopold Sedar Senghor. In: Yu. N. Solonin, B. G. Sokolov, L. Yu. Sokolova, eds. Razmyshleniya o filosofii na perekrestke vtorogo i tret'ego tysyacheletii: sbornik k 75-letiyu professora M. Ya. Korneeva [Reflections on philosophy at the intersection of the second and third millennium: a collection for the 75th birthday of Professor M. Ya. Korneev]. St. Petersburg. pp. 256—277.8. Mann, Yu. V., 1966. O groteske v literature [About grotesque in literature]. Moscow.9. Nikolaev, D. P., 1977. Satira Shchedrina i realisticheskii grotesk [Satire of Shchedrin and the realistic grotesque]. Moscow.10. Sazonova, T. P., 2005. The theory of "comic automatism" by A. Bergson in the art system of Evelyn Waugh. Vestnik OGPU [Bulletin of the OSPU], 2, pp. 49—51.11. Khantington, S. F., 2003. Stolknovenie tsivilizatsii [Clash of civilizations]. Moscow.12. Yamshchikov, D. V., 2006. Nonclassical paradigms of modernization in the global era: Afro-Asian scenarios. Vestnik Tyumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Sotsial'no-ekonomicheskie i pravovye issledovaniya [Bulletin of the Tyumen State University. Socio-economic and legal research], 2, pp. 130—139.13. Waugh, Ev., 2000. Scoop: a novel about journalists. London.M. N.KonnovaThis article is an attempt to expose and analyse the chronotopical structure of Boris Pasternak's poem ‘Neogliadnost’/’Spanlessness’, written in 1944. The axiological meaning of spatiotemporal images in the poet's Weltanschauung is evaluated within a broader context of Russian language and culture. It is argued that the poem’s key value-laden motif, victory, is introduced in the text in three temporal domains. Two of them — the planes of the historical past and present — belong to the sphere of time. They are intrinsically linked by their reference to the metaphysical realm of eternity.05292026111. Ganichev, V., 2001. Admiral Ushakov. Historical novel. Roman-zhurnal XXI vek [Novel-magazine XXI century], 6, pp. 8—105.2. Dal', V., 1956. Tolkovyi slovar' zhivogo velikorusskogo yazyka [Explanatory dictionary of the living Great Russian language]. Moscow.3. D'yachenko, G., priest, 2007. Polnyi tserkovno-slavyanskii slovar' [Full Church Slavic dictionary]. Moscow.4. Simonov, K., Vysotskii, V., Okudzhava, B. et al., 2015. Zhdi menya: stikhotvoreniya [Wait for me: poems]. Moscow.5. Zholkovskii, A. K., 2011. Poetika Pasternaka: Invarianty, struktury, interteksty [Pasternak's Poetics: Invariants, Structures, Intertexts]. Moscow.6. Krasheninnikova, E., 1997. Bits about Pasternak. Novyi mir [New world], 1. Available at: http://magazines.russ.ru/novyi_mi/1997/1/krashen-pr.html [Accessed 02 June 2015].7. Kutkovoi, V. S., 2011. Semantic features of color in the icon "Holy Trinity" of the Monk Andrei Rublev. In: L. G. Dorofeeva et al., eds. Andrei Rublev i mir russkoi kul'tury: k 650-letiyu rozhdeniya [Andrei Rublev and the world of Russian culture: to the 650th anniversary of his birth]. Kaliningrad. pp. 52—60.8. Mel'nikova, L. V., 2002. Russkaya Pravoslavnaya Tserkov' v Otechestvennoi voine 1812 goda [Russian Orthodox Church in the Patriotic War of 1812]. Moscow.9. Ozhegov, S. I., Shvedova, N. Yu., 1995. Tolkovyi slovar' russkogo yazyka [Explanatory dictionary of the Russian language]. Moscow.10. Pasternak, B., 1992. Letters to Jacqueline de Pruayar. Novyi mir [New world], 1, pp. 127—189.11. Pasternak, B., 1998. Izbrannoe. T. 1: Stikhotvoreniya i poemy [Selected works. Vol.1: Pieces of poetry and poems]. St. Petersburg.12. Pasternak, E. B., 1997. Boris Pasternak. Biografiya [Boris Pasternak. Biography]. Moscow.13. Petrukhina, E. V., 2009. Russkii glagol: kategorii vida i vremeni (v kontekste sovremennykh lingvisticheskikh issledovanii) [Russian verb: categories of species and time (in the context of modern linguistic research).]. Moscow.14. Holy righteous warrior Feodor (Ushakov, F. F., admiral of the the Russian fleet), 2001. Zhitie, sluzhba [Life, service]. Kiev.15. Fasmer, M., 1987. Etimologicheskii slovar' russkogo yazyka [Etymological dictionary of the Russian language]. Moscow. Vol. 3.16. Shmelev, I. S., 2001. Dusha Rodiny: Izbrannaya proza [Soul of the Motherland: Selected Prose]. Moscow.I. G.ChernenokThis article discusses the potential of the linguistic persona theory in the linguistic studies of Kant’s texts. Linguistic Kant studies is a scientific discipline focusing on the language of Kant's works. Such a study can be either independent or integrated int a logicalphilosophical analysis. The author emphasizes Kant’s contribution to the German philosophical and scientific discourse of the Enlightenment and summarizes current findings on the philosopher’s style and language. It is shown that the analysis of Kant’s linguistic creativity (new terms, syntactic models, utterance structures, communicative speech structure, modality, text generation mechanisms, metaphors, and pragmatics) can be paired with the study of the verbal-semantic, cognitive, and motivational levels of the philosopher’s linguistic persona. The author stresses the importance of the linguistic investigations of philosophical texts for an in-depth interpretation of their philosophical content.05292026111. Serebrennikov, B. A., 1988. Rol' chelovecheskogo faktora v yazyke. Yazyk i myshlenie [The role of the human factor in the language. Language and Thinking]. Moscow.2. Novodranova, V. F., 2009. Category of linguistic personality in language for special purposes. In: I. Yu. Ieronova et al., eds. Pelevinskie chteniya —2009 [Pelevin Readings — 2009]. Kaliningrad. pp. 71—77.3. Kalinnikov, L. A., 1983. Postulates of practical reason in the light of the Kantian philosophy of history. In: L. A. Kalinnikov, ed. Kantovskii sbornik [Kant's collection]. Kaliningrad. pp. 12—26.4. Vorländer, K., 1977. Immanuel Kant. Hamburg.5. Gulyga, A. V., 2001. Nemetskaya klassicheskaya filosofiya [German classical philosophy]. Moscow.6. Koptsev, I. D., 1993. Kant i problemy lingvistiki filosofskogo teksta [Kant and problems of linguistics of the philosophical text]. Cand. philol. sci. diss. thesis. St. Petersburg.7. Paul'sen, F., 1905. Immanuil Kant. Ego zhizn' i uchenie [Immanuel Kant. His life and teachings]. St. Petersburg.8. Fischer, E., 1950. Kants Stil in der Kritik der reinen Vernunft nebst Ausführungen über ein neues Stilgesetz auf historisch-kritischer und psychologischer Grundlage. Würzburg.9. Admoni, V. G., 1973. Puti razvitiya grammaticheskogo stroya v nemetskom yazyke [Ways of development of the grammatical structure of the German language]. Moscow.10. Kant, I., 1980. Traktaty i pis'ma [Treatises and letters]. Moscow.11. Lauter, J., 1966. Untersuchungen zur Sprache von Kants „Kritik der reinen Vernunft“. Köln.12. Chernenok, I. G., 2005. Sposoby vyrazheniya argumentatsii v etiko-filosofskom diskurse I. Kanta (na materiale proizvedenii «Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten», «Kritik der praktischen Vernunft», «Metaphysik der Sitten») [Ways of expressing arguments in the ethical-philosophical discourse of I. Kant (on the material of works «Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten», «Kritik der praktischen Vernunft», «Metaphysik der Sitten»). Cand. philol. sci. diss. Kaliningrad.13. Chernenok, I. G., 2008. "Freedom": a concept and an image in the critical discourse of I. Kant. In: E. Yu. Vaganova et al., eds. Aktual'nye problemy lingvistiki, pedagogiki i metodiki prepodavaniya inostrannykh yazykov — 2008 [Actual problems of linguistics, pedagogy and methods of teaching foreign languages — 2008]. Kaliningrad, pp. 66—74.T. F.KuzennayaThis article examines Old Russian literary texts of the ancient period from the perspective of the origin and development of the Slavic given names stemming from both Old Russian roots and loanwords. The author analyses two- and three-part male and female given names and examines their phonetic adaptation in Old Russian. Citations are selected from the Russian National Corpus.05292026111. Likhachev, D. S., 1997. The greatness of ancient literature. In: D. S. Likhachev, ed. Biblioteka literatury Drevnei Rusi [Library of the Ancient Rus literature]. St. Petersburg. Vol. 1, p. 9.2. Podol'skaya, N. V., 1978. Slovar' russkoi onomasticheskoi terminologii [Dictionary of Russian onomastic terminology] / ed. by A. V. Superanskaya. Moscow.3. Superanskaya, A. V., 2007. Imya — cherez veka i strany [Name — through centuries and countries]. Moscow.4. Uspenskii, F. B., Litvina, A. S., 2006. Vybor imeni u russkikh knyazei v X — XVI vv.: Dinasticheskaya istoriya skvoz' prizmu antroponimiki [The choice of the name of Russian princes in the X—XVI centuries: Dynastic history through the prism of anthroponymics]. Moscow.5. Natsional'nyi korpus russkogo yazyka [Russian National Corpus]. Available at: http://www.ruscorpora.ru/ [Accessed 24 April 2017].6. Biblioteka literatury Drevnei Rusi [Library of the Ancient Rus literature]. Available at: http://lib.pushkinskijdom.ru[Accessed 24 April 2017].N. V.PisarThis article considers the use of the Vladyka lexeme to denote God the Father, Jesus Christ, and human rulers in the Ostromir Gospels with a Greek translation. The author analyses the semantics of the Church Slavonic lexemes as an equivalent to the paired Greek words, the way the matching Greek lexemes were selected, and the effect of semantic inconsistencies on the formation of the idea of the ruler in the consciousness of Slavs. The study employs the methods of etymological, lexicographical, lexical-semantic analysis, as well as methods of modern comparative studies. The author identifies the integral and differential significance contained in the semantics of the paired Church Slavonic and Greek lexemes. This helps to determine the effect of the identified semantic differences on the variations in the Christian perception of God by ancient Greeks and Slavs, as regards the differentiation between the functions of God the Father and Jesus Christ. The author examines to what degree the semantic differences affected the emergence of the Slavic idea of the human ruler as a vicar of God on Earth.05292026111. Alekseev, A. A., 2013. Ostromirovo Evangelie i vizantiisko-slavyanskaya traditsiya Svyashchennogo Pisaniya [Ostromir Gospel and the Byzantine-Slavic tradition of the Holy Scripture]. Available at: http://www.nlr.ru/exib/Gospel/ostr/alexeev.html [Accessed 01 December 2016].2. Alekseeva, E. A., 2001. Semanticheskie osobennosti leksiki, svyazannoi s oboznacheniem ob"ektov kul'turnoi simvoliki (na primere simvola Bog v russkoi i frantsuzskoi lingvokul'turakh) [Semantic features of vocabulary associated with the designation of objects of cultural symbolism (on the example of the symbol of God in Russian and French linguocultures)]. Cand. philol. sci. diss. thesis. Saratov.3. Apresyan, Yu. D., 1995. Izbrannye trudy. T. 1: Leksicheskaya semantika; Sinonimicheskie sredstva yazyka [Selected works. Vol. 1: Lexical semantics; Synonyms of the language]. Moscow.4. Veisman, A. D., 1899. Grechesko-russkii slovar' [Greek-Russian dictionary]. St. Petersburg.5. Kuznetsova, V,N., ed., 2012. Grechesko-russkii slovar' Novogo Zaveta: Per. Kratkogo grechesko-angliiskogo slovarya Novogo Zaveta Barkli M. N'yumana [Greek-Russian Dictionary of the New Testament: Trans. A short Greek-English dictionary of the New Testament by Barkley M. Newman]. Moscow.6. Vostokov, A. Kh., ed., 1843. Ostromirovo Evangelie 1056—1057 goda. S prilozheniem grecheskogo teksta Evangelii i s grammaticheskimi ob"yasneniyami [The Ostromir Gospel of 1056—1057. With application of Greek text of the Gospels and with grammatical explanations]. St. Petersburg.7. Preobrazhenskii, A. G., 2010. Etimologicheskii slovar' russkogo yazyka [Etymological Dictionary of the Russian Language]. Moscow.8. Sreznevskii, I. I., 1989. Materialy dlya slovarya drevnerusskogo yazyka [Materials for the Dictionary of Old Russian language]. Moscow.9. Fasmer, M. R., 1964—1975. Etimologicheskii slovar' russkogo yazyka [Etymological Dictionary of the Russian Language]. Moscow.10. Shanskii, N. M., 1982. Kratkii etimologicheskii slovar' russkogo yazyka [Brief etymological dictionary of the Russian language]. Moscow.11. Shukurov, R. M., 1999. The name and power on Byzantine Ponte (foreign accepted for own). In: R. M. Shukurov, ed. Chuzhoe: opyty preodoleniya. Ocherki iz istorii kul'tury Sredizemnomor'ya: sb. st. [Foreign: experiences of overcoming. Essays from the history of Mediterranean culture: a collection of articles]. Moscow. pp. 194—237.12. Frisk, H., 1960. Griechisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. Heidelberg.I. N.LukyanenkoThis article deals with the historical realia as markers of the national and historical identity of the country of the target language. Realia make it possible to reconstruct selected aspects of the national character and study the axiology of modern native speakers. The analysis of non-equivalent, background and connotative lexis in the course of language acquisition stimulates reflection on extralinguistic (historical) information and thus contributes to cultural competences.05292026111. Vereshchagin, E. M., Kostomarov, V. G., 1990. Yazyk i kul'tura: Lingvostranovedenie v prepodavanii russkogo yazyka kak inostrannogo [Language and Culture: Linguistic Studies in Teaching Russian as a Foreign Language]. Moscow.2. Vereshchagin, E. M., Kostomarov, V. G., 1980. Lingvostranovedcheskaya teoriya slova [Linguistic and regional studies theory of words]. Moscow.3. Gogol', N. V., 1952. Vechera na khutore bliz Dikan'ki [Evenings on a Farm Near Dikanka]. Moscow.4. Miloslavskaya, S. K., 2012. Russkii yazyk kak inostrannyi v istorii stanovleniya evropeiskogo obraza Rossii [Russian as a foreign language in the history of the becoming of European image of Russia]. Moscow.5. Prokhorov, Yu. E., Sternin, I. A., 2006. Russkie: kommunikativnoe povedenie [Russians: communicative behavior]. Moscow.6. Ozhegov, S. I., 1984. Slovar' russkogo yazyka [Dictionary of Russian language]. Moscow.7. Prokhorova, Yu. E., ed., 2007. Rossiya. Bol'shoi lingvostranovedcheskii slovar' [Russia. The great linguistic and regional studies dictionary]. Moscow.BoardEditorial0529202611