NONE20260607034601451Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal Universityno-reply@journals.kantiana.ruImmanuel Kant Baltic Federal UniversityKantian Journal0207-69182310-370106072026402A. ChalyV.V. LugovoyS.S. PopovaV.G. PushkarskyA.S. ZilberA.This is a review of the main research achievements of Professor L. A. Kalinnikov presented in his articles and monographs. The theoretical issues of Kantianism considered in Kalinnikov’s works include the problem of cognisability of “the thing in itself” and noumenal affection, the character of systematicity in Kant’s philosophy and the methodology of its interpretation. Cycles of articles are devoted to the reception of Kant’s ideas in the philosophical and poetic work of V. S. Solovyov, Kant’s impact on A. S. Pushkin, A. A. Fet, and E. T. A. Hoffmann. These topics are elaborated in the monographs Immanuel Kant in Russian Poetry (2008), E. T. A. Hoffmann and I. Kant (2012), The Philosophical and Poetic Worldview of A. A. Fet: the Impact of I. Kant and A. Schopenhauer (2016), Pushkin and Kant. The Poet and Philosophy (2018), The Philosophical System of Kant. Conception and Outcomes (2021). L. A. Kalinnikov’s works form an impressive and original part of contemporary Russian Kantiana.0607202611Dementev, I. O., 2013. Book Review: L. A. Kalinnikov. E. T. A. Gofman i I. Kant. Preodolenie romantizma [E. T. A. Hoffmann and I. Kant. Transcending Romanticism]. IKBFU’s Vestnik, 6, pp. 159-164. (In Rus.)Kalinnikov, L. A., 1985. The Concepts of “Thing in General” and “Thing in Itself” and their Role in Kant’s System of “Criticism”. Kantian Journal, 1(10), pp. 4-11. (In Rus.)Kalinnikov, L. A., 1989. Interpretation and Principles. Kantian Journal, 1(14), pp. 81-90. (In Rus.)Kalinnikov, L. A., 1993. Vl. Solovyov and I. Kant: Ethical Convergencies and Divergencies. Kantian Journal, 1(17), pp. 101-116. (In Rus.)Kalinnikov, L. A., 1994. Vl. Solovyov and I. Kant: Ethical Convergencies and Divergencies. II. Human-Godness or God-Humanity? Kantian Journal, 1(18), pp. 45-58. (In Rus.)Kalinnikov, L. A., 1995. Concept of “Sofia” and its Possible Correlates in a Rationally Constructed System of Philosophy (Vladimir Solovyev and Immanuel Kant). Kantian Journal, 1(19), pp. 40-60. (In Rus.)Kalinnikov, L. A., 2008. Immanuil Kant v russkoj pojezii (filosofsko-jesteticheskie jetjudy) [Immanuel Kant in Russian Poetry (Philosophical-Aesthetic Essays)]. Moscow: Kanon+ ROOI “Reabilitatsia”. (In Rus.)Kalinnikov, L. A., 2012. E. T. A. Gofman i I. Kant. Preodolenie romantizma [E. T. A. Hoffmann and I. Kant. Transcending Romanticism]. Kaliningrad: Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University Press. (In Rus.)Kalinnikov, L. A., 2013. A. A. Fet and Kant’s Starry-Moral Theme in Russian Philosophical Lyrics. Kantian Journal, 1(43), pp. 46-62. (In Rus.)Kalinnikov, L. A., 2014a. A. A. Fet as a Theorist and a Practitioner of Pure Art and the Problem of the Nature of Poetry. Kantian Journal, 1(47), pp. 38-58. (In Rus.)Kalinnikov, L. A., 2014b. Kant’s Philosophical System and the Principles of Its Interpretation. Kantian Journal, 3(49), pp. 1-18. (In Rus.)Kalinnikov, L. A., 2016a. Kant’s Fundamental Idea of State Law in Pushkin’s “Boris Godunov”. Kantian Journal, 4 (58), pp. 7-23. (In Rus.)Kalinnikov, L. A., 2016b. Filosofsko-pojeticheskoe mirovozzrenie A. A. Feta: vlijanie I. Kanta i A. Shopengaujera [The Philosophical and Poetic Worldview of A. A. Fet. The Influence of I. Kant and A. Schopenhauer]. Kaliningrad: IKBFU Press. (In Rus.)Kalinnikov, L. A., 2018a. The Nature of Transcendental Philosophy and Its Forms. In: S. L. Katrechko and A. A. Shiyan, eds. 2018. Transcendental’nyj povorot v sovremennoj filosofii (3): priroda (specifika) transcendental’noj filosofii: tezisy mezhdunarodnogo nauchnogo seminara [The Transcendental Turn in Contemporary Philosophy (3): the Nature (Specificity) of Transcendental Philosophy. Proceedings of International Seminar]. Moscow: GAUGN Press, pp. 11-13. (In Rus.)Kalinnikov, L. A., 2018b. A. S. Pushkin i I. Kant. Pojet i filosofija [Pushkin and Kant. The Poet and Philosophy]. Kaliningrad: IKBFU Press. (In Rus.)Kalinnikov, L. A., 2019a. I. Kant’s “Metaphysics of Morals” in “The Captain’s Daughter”. Voprosy Literatury, 3, pp. 105-140. (In Rus.)Kalinnikov, L. A., 2019b. The Nature and Specificity of Kant’s Transcendental Philosophy. In: S. L. Katrechko and A. A. Shiyan, eds. 2019. Transcendental’nyj povorot v sovremennoj filosofii (4): transcendental’naja metafizika, jepistemologija i filosofija nauki, teologija i filosofija soznanija: tezisy mezhdunarodnogo nauchnogo seminara [The Transcendental Turn in Contemporary Philosophy (4): Transcendental Metaphysics, Epistemology and the Philosophy of Mind. Proceedings of International Seminar]. Moscow: GAUGN Press, pp. 42-46. (In Rus.)Kalinnikov, L. A., 2019c. Kant’s System as the Development of Ideological Intentions of the Enlightenment. In: N. A. Dmitrieva and V. A. Chaly, eds. 2019. 12th Kant-Readings. Kant and the Ethics of Enlightenment: Historical Roots and Contemporary Relevance: Proceedings of the International Conference. Kaliningrad: IKBFU Press, pp. 41-42.Kalinnikov, L. A., 2021. Filosofskaja sistema Kanta. Zamysel i itogi [The Philosophical System of I. Kant. Conception and Outcomes]. Kaliningrad: IKBFU Press.Kant, I., 1991. An Answer to The Question: ‘What Is Enlightenment?’ In: I. Kant, 1991. Political Writings, edited by H. S. Reiss. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 54-60.Kant, I., 2001. Critique of the Power of Judgment. Edited by P. Guyer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Konev, V., 2013. A Book about the Life of Kant’s Ideas (L. A. Kalinnikov. E. T. A. Hoffmann and I. Kant. Transcending of Romanticism). Kantian Journal, 2013, 3(45), pp. 112-114. (In Rus.)Lotman, Yu. M., 1995. Roman v stikhakh Pushkina “Eugene Onegin” [Pushkin’s Novel in Verse Eugene Onegin]. St. Petersburg: Iskusstvo. (In Rus).Pushkin, A., 1981. Eugene Onegin: a Novel in Verse. Translated from the Russian, with a commentary, by V. Nabokov. In 4 Volumes. Volume 1. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Pushkin, A., 2007. Mozart and Salieri. In: A. Pushkin, 2007. Boris Godunov and Other Dramatic Works. Translated with notes by J. E. Falen. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 121-132.Solovyov, V. S., 1988. Kant’s Formal Principle of Morality — Presentation and Evaluation with Critical Comments about Empirical Ethics. In: Solovyov, V. S., 1988. Sochineniya [Works]. Moscow: Mysl’, pp. 549-580 (In Rus.).Zilber, А. S., 2008. Book Review: L. A. Kalinnikov. Immanuel Kant in Russian Poetry (Philosophical-Aesthetic Essays). Moscow: Kanon+ ROOI “Reabilitatsia”, 2008. Kantian Journal, 2(28), pp. 132-135. (In Rus.)XiLuoThe aim of this research is to explore what relations self-affection bears to the intuitions of inner sense. I propose that self-affection makes some contribution to formal intuitions and empirical consciousness by arguing that the functions of self-affection consist respectively in conceptualising and conscious-making. I begin by examining Kant’s concept of inner sense and point out that inner sense as a receptive faculty depends on self-affection. In so doing, I emphasise that self-affection includes both a pure and an empirical aspect which corresponds to Kant’s distinction between the transcendental synthesis of imagination and the empirical synthesis of apprehension. Then, I focus on the pure aspect and argue that the conceptualising function involved in the pure self-affection is decisive for the generation of formal intuition. In particular, I explain why the formal intuition of time depends on the intuition of space and how it is constituted by drawing a line. After that, I turn to analysing the empirical aspect of self-affection and show that by virtue of the empirical synthesis of apprehension one is aware of both the empirical contents of representations and the mental actions performed on them, whereby I suggest that this empirical conscious-making function can be understood as an act of distinguishing from a mereological point of view.0607202611Allais, L., 2015. Manifest Reality. Kant’s Idealism and his Realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Allison, H. E., 2004. Kant’s Transcendental Idealism: An Interpretation and Defense. New Haven & London: Yale University Press.Allison, H. E., 2015. Kant’s Transcendental Deduction. An Analytical-Historical Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Bader, R. M., 2017. Inner Sense and Time. In: A. Gomes and A. Stephenson, ed. 2017. Kant and the Philosophy of Mind: Perception, Reason, and the Self. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 124-137.Baum, M., 1986. Deduktion und Beweis in Kants Transzendentalphilosophie. Königstein: Athenäum.Baumanns, P., 1981. Kants Begriff des inneren und äußeren Sinnes. In: G. Funke, Hg. 1981. Akten des 5. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses Mainz 4.-8. April 1981. Band I/1. Bonn: Bouvier, S. 91-102.Blomme, H., 2017. Die Rolle der Anschauungsformen in der B-Deduktion. In: G. Motta und U. Thiel, Hg. 2017. Immanuel Kant — Die Einheit des Bewusstseins. Berlin: De Gruyter, S. 75-88.Bondeli, M., 2018. Kant über Selbstaffektion. Basel: Colmena.Brandt, R., 1987. Eine neu aufgefundene Reflexion Kants „Vom inneren Sinne“ (Loses Blatt Leningrad 1). In: R. Brandt und W. Stark, Hg. 1987. Neue Autographen und Dokumente zu Kants Leben, Schriften und Vorlesungen. Hamburg: Felix Meiner, pp. 1-30.Caimi, M., 2012. The Logical Structure of Time According to the Chapter on the Schematism. Kant-Studien, 103(4), pp. 415-428.Van Cleve, J., 1999. Problems from Kant. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Düsing, K., 1980. Objektive und subjektive Zeit. Untersuchungen zu Kants Zeittheorie und zu ihrer modernen kritischen Rezeption. Kant-Studien, 71(1), S. 1-34.Dyck, C. W., 2006. Empirical Consciousness Explained: Self-Affection, (Self-) Consciousness and Perception in the B-Deduction. Kantian Review, 11(1), pp. 29-54.Enskat, R., 2020. Kant über Sein und Zeit und Denken und Sein. Selbsterkenntnis durch Selbstaffektion. Kantian Journal, 39(3), S. 7-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.5922/0207-6918-2020-3-1Friedman, M., 1992. Kant and the Exact Sciences. Cambridge (Mass.) & London: Harvard University Press.Gibbons, S., 1994. Kant’s Theory of Imagination: Bridging Gaps in Judgment and Experience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Ginsborg, H., 2008. Was Kant a Nonconceptualist? Philosophical Studies, 137(1), pp. 65-77.Haag, J., 2007. Erfahrung und Gegenstand. Das Verhältnis von Sinnlichkeit und Verstand. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.Hanna, R., 2001. Kant and the Foundations of Analytic Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Heidemann, D. H., 2001. Innerer und äußerer Sinn. Kants Konstitutionstheorie empirischen Selbstbewusstseins. In: V. Gerhardt, R. P. Horstmann und R. Schumacher, Hg. 2001. Kant und die Berliner Aufklärung. Berlin und New York: De Gruyter, S. 305-313.Horstmann, R. P., 2018. Kant’s Power of Imagination. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Jáuregui, C., 2006. Auto-Affection and Synthesis of Reproduction. Kant-Studien, 97(3), pp. 369-381.Kitcher, P., 2011. Kant’s Thinker. New York: Oxford University Press.Klemme, H. F., 1996. Kants Philosophie des Subjekts: systematische und entwicklungsgeschichtliche Untersuchungen zum Verhältnis von Selbstbewusstsein und Selbsterkenntnis. Hamburg: Meiner.Kraus, K., 2019. The Parity and Disparity between Inner and Outer Experience in Kant. Kantian Review, 24(2), pp. 171-195.Locke, J., 1975. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Longuenesse, B., 1998. Kant and the Capacity to Judge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.McDowell, J., 1994. Mind and World. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press.Michel, K., 2003. Untersuchungen zur Zeitkonzeption in der Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Berlin und New York: De Gruyter.Mohr, G., 1991. Das sinnliche Ich. Innerer Sinn und Bewußtsein bei Kant, Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.Nakano, H., 2011. Selbstaffektion in der transzendentalen Deduktion. Kant-Studien, 102(2), S. 213-231.Rohs, P., 2001. Bezieht sich nach Kant die Anschauung unmittelbar auf Gegenstände? In: V. Gerhardt, R. P. Horstmann und R. Schumacher, Hg. 2001. Kant und die Berliner Aufklärung. Akten des IX. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses, Band 2. Berlin: De Gruyter, S. 214-228.Rosefeldt, T., 2000. Das logische Ich. Kant über den Gehalt des Begriffes von sich selbst. Berlin und Wien: Philo.Rosefeldt, T., 2006. Kants Ich als Gegenstand. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, 54, S. 277-293.Schäfer, R., 2019. Die Zeit der Einbildungskraft — Die Rolle des Schematismus in Kants Erkenntnistheorie. Kant-Studien, 110(3), S. 437-462.Schmitz, F., 2015. On Kant’s Conception of Inner Sense: Self-Affection by the Understanding. European Journal of Philosophy, 23(2), pp. 1044-1063.Sellars, W., 1978. The Role of the Imagination in Kant’s Theory of Experience. In: H. W. Johnstone, ed. 1978. Categories: A Colloquium. Jr. University Park: Pennsylvania State University.Shoemaker, S., 1994. Self-Knowledge and “Inner Sense”. Lecture I: The Object Perception Model. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 54(2), pp. 249-269.Strawson, P. F., 1982. Imagination and Perception. In: R. Walker, ed. 1982. Kant on Pure Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 82-99.Thiel, U., 1997. Varieties of Inner Sense — Two Pre-Kantian Theories. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 79(2), pp. 58-79.Vaihinger, H., 1892. Kommentar zu Kants Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Band 2. Stuttgart: Spemann.Valaris, M., 2008. Inner Sense, Self-Affection, & Temporal Consciousness in Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. Philosophers’ Imprint, 8(1), pp. 1-18.Wenzel, C. H., 2005. Spielen nach Kant die Kategorien schon bei der Wahrnehmung eine Rolle? Kant-Studien, 96(4), S. 407-426.Wolff, M., 2006. Empirischer und transzendentaler Dualismus. Zu Rolf-Peter Horstmanns Interpretation von Kants Paralogismen. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, 54(2), S. 265-275.Wunsch, M., 2007. Einbildungskraft und Erfahrung bei Kant. Berlin: De Gruyter.Young, J. M., 1988. Kant’s View of Imagination. Kant-Studien, 79(2), pp. 140-164.A. K.SudakovThe metaphysical layer of what can be called philosophical Christology in Kant’s treatise on religion reflects his idea of the embodiment of the archetype of moral perfection. Kant raises the problem of the ontology of the ideal in the shape of the question about the conditions that make actual experience possible: the ideal of holiness resides in reason, i. e. in the human being, but the dominance of radical evil over the human will puts it out of human reach either in thought or in practice. For rational thought it is more natural to imagine the practical reality of the archetype as the embodiment of the authentic man proceeding from God. Using the Gospel narrative about Jesus, Kant interprets the human nature of the archetype in the light of his general notions about the properties of this nature. It is widely believed that Kant’s ethical theology eliminates the divine nature of the archetype by stating that an entirely holy will cannot be a moral example for the infirm human will. Kant however says, merely as a critical philosopher, that there are not enough rational grounds for thinking divine nature. Rational philosophy can think the archetype of perfection only as its pure and whole moral attitude through all the maxims and acts. Philosophy would transcend its boundaries if it claimed more and expected recognition of the prototypical theology of the ideal as the content of church faith. But it is not by chance that Kant sets forth the philosophical theory of the archetype as the content of faith in the subjunctive mood. According to Kant, the preaching of the divine character of the archetype as extra-philosophical supplement of the paradoxes and symbols of philosophical theology is only possible on condition that this statutory preaching does not obstruct the overall aspiration toward the actualisation of the pure moral attitude. If these conditions are observed the philosopher and the biblical theologian remain each with their theologies and within their rights.0607202611Belov, V. N. and Fahrudinova, Je. R., 2017. I. Kant on Religion, Faith, God and Church. Kantian Journal, 36(1), pp. 30-40. (In Rus.)Di Censo, J., 2013. The Concept of Urbild in Kant’s Philosophy of Religion. Kant-Studien, 104(1), pp. 100-132. https://doi.org/10.1515/kant-2013-0007Firestone, C. L., 2012. A Response to Critics of In Defense of Kant’s Religion. Faith and Philosophy, 29(2), pp. 193-209. https://doi.org/10.5840/faithphil201229219Firestone, C. L. and Jacobs, N., 2008. In Defense of Kant’s Religion. Foreword by N. Wolterstorff. Bloomington & Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Jacobs, N., 2006. Kant’s Prototypical Theology: Transcendental Incarnation as a Rational Foundation for God-Talk. In: C. L. Firestone and S. R. Palmquist, eds. 2006. Kant and the New Philosophy of Religion. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. 124-140.Jacobs, N., 2012. A Reply to Critics of In Defense of Kant’s Religion. Faith and Philosophy, 29(2), pp. 210-228. https://doi.org/10.5840/faithphil201229220Kant, I., 1998a. Critique of Pure Reason. Translated and edited by P. Guyer and A. W. Wood. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.Kant, I., 1998b. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Translated and edited by M. Gregor. Cambridge-New York: Cambridge University Press.Kant, I., 2009. Religion within the Bounds of Bare Reason. Translated by W. S. Pluhar, Introduction by S. R. Palmquist. Indianapolis & Cambridge: Hackett.Kireevsky, I., 1998. On the Necessity and Possibility of New Principles in Philosophy. In: A. Khomiakov and I. Kireevsky, 1998. On Spiritual Unity: A Slavophile Reader. Translated and edited by B. Jakim and R. Bird. New York: Lindisfarne Books, pp. 233-274.McCarthy, V. A., 1986. Quest for a Philosophical Jesus: Christianity and Philosophy in Rousseau, Kant, Hegel, and Schelling. Macon (GA): Mercer University Press.Michalson, G. E., Jr., 1999. Kant and the Problem of God. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Michalson, G. E., Jr., 2012. In Defense of Not Defending Kant’s Religion. Faith and Philosophy, 29(2), pp. 181-192. https://doi.org/10.5840/faithphil201229218Palmquist, S. R., 2012. Could Kant’s Jesus be God? International Philosophical Quarterly, 52(4), pp. 421-437. https://doi.org/10.5840/ipq201252443Pasternack, L., 2015. Kant’s ‘Appraisal’ of Christianity: Biblical Interpretation and the Pure Rational System of Religion. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 53(3), pp. 485-506. https://doi.org/10.1353/hph.2015.0042Rosenkranz, K., 1987. Geschichte der Kant’schen Philosophie. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Sala, G., 2007. „Est Deus in nobis“. Überlegungen zu einer revolutionierenden Interpretation des Gottespostulats in Kants Kritik der praktischen Vernunft. Philosophisches Jahrbuch, 114(1), pp. 117-137.Sudakov, A. K., 2008. “True Self”: Reason as Freedom in Kantian Ethical Personalism. Philosophy and Culture, 3, pp. 61-75. (In Rus.)Sudakov, A. K., 2020. Ethico-Theology without Postulates: Questioning the Prehistory of Kant’s Philosophical Theology. RUDN Journal of Philosophy, 24(4), pp. 637-656. (In Rus.)A. L.SakkettiN. A.Dmitrieva0607202611Anon., 1914. Formular List of the Service of Alexander Liverievich Sakketti, a titular councillor attached to the Ministry of National Education. Compiled to 17 May 1914. [manuscript] Ministry of Public Education Collection, 733. Inventory 155, Folder 1087, Sheet 92. St. Petersburg: Russian State Historical Archive (RGIA). (In Rus.)Dmitrieva, N. A., 2007. Russkoe neokantianstvo: “Marburg” v Rossii. Istoriko-filosofskie ocherki [Russian Neo-Kantianism: “Marburg” in Russia. Historical and Philosophical Essays]. Moscow: ROSSPEN. (In Rus.)Kolerov, M. A., 2018. Hermann Cohen: Russian Obituaries from 1918. Kantian Journal, 37(2), pp. 58-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.5922/0207-6918-2018-2-4.Rezvykh, T. M., 2014. Petersburg Philosophical Society and the Journal “Mysl” (1921—1923): New Documents. In: M. A. Kolerov and N. S. Plotnikov, eds. 2014. Studies in Russian Intellectual History [10]. Yearbook for 2010—2011. Moskau: Modest Kolerov, pp. 479-492. (In Rus.)Reznichenko, A. I., 2017. “Symphonic Personality” and “Labour Artel”: L. P. Karsavin in 1918—1922. In: O. A. Dovgopolova and A. A. Kamenskikh, eds. 2017. Gumanitarnaja nauka v Rossii i perelom 1917 goda: ekzistencial’noe izmerenie [Humanitarian Science in Russia and the Turning Point of 1917: An Existential Dimension]. St. Petersburg: Aletheia, pp. 97-108. (In Rus.)Savenko, G. V., 2002. Aleksandr Liverievich Sakketti. Proceedings of Higher Educational Institutions. Pravovedenie, 5, pp. 232-241. (In Rus.)Sakketti, A. L., 1914. Curriculum vitae. [manuscript] Ministry of Public Education Collection, 733. Inventory 155, Folder 1087, Sheet 96. St. Petersburg: Russian State Historical Archive (RGIA). (In Rus.)Sakketti, A. L., 1918. Philosophy of Hermann Cohen. [manuscript] E. L. Radlov Collection, 626. Folder 126. 30 sheets oversized (35,0 × 22,0). Moscow: Russian National Library, Manuscript Department. (In Rus.)Shilov, L. A., 1999. Belyaev Viktor Andrianovich. In: Sotrudniki RNB — deyateli nauki i kul’tury. Biograficheskii slovar’ [Russian National Library Staff — Figures in Science and Culture. Biographical Dictionary], Volume 2. St. Petersburg: RNB, pp. 91-94. Available at: Russian National Library (Accessed 25 August 2020). (In Rus.)J.KarlssonProf. Deng Xiaomang’s translations of the Critique of the Power of Judgment (2002), the Critique of Practical Reason (2003), and the Critique of Pure Reason (2004), were the first Chinese editions of Kant’s three Critiques translated in their entirety from the German originals. This interview tracks his scholarship, placing it within the broader scope of historical and contemporary Kant scholarship in China. Among the topics addressed, the reception of Kantian philosophy among the so called “New Confucians”, as well as the utility of Kantian thought as a tool for the reformation of traditional Confucian culture, are given considerable attention. Professor Deng also shares some thoughts on the process of translating classical German philosophical texts into Chinese and provides an overview of his scholarship as a translator and thinker.0607202611Deng, X., 1992. 思辨的张力: 黑格尔辩证法新探 Sibian de zhangli: Heige’er bianzhengfa xintan [The Prestress of Speculation — New Explorations of Hegel’s Dialectic]. Changsha: 湖南教育出版社 Hunan daxue chubanshe [Hunan Educational Press].Deng, X., 1998. 灵魂之旅 Linghun zhi lü [Journey of the Soul]. Wuhan: 湖北人民出版社 Hubei renmin chubanshe [Hubei People’s Press].Deng, X. 2001. 新批判主义 Xin pipan zhuyi [New Criticism]. Beijing: 北京大学出版社 Beijing daxue chubanshe [Peking University Press].Deng, X., 2005. 徜徉在思想的密林里 Paihuai zai sixiang de milin li [Wanderings in the Thicket of Thought]. Jinan: 山东友谊出版社 Shandong youyi chubanshe [Shandong Friendship Press].Deng, X., 2006. 康德哲学的当代意义 Kangde zhexue de dangdai yiyi [The Significance of Kantian Philosophy Today]. In: D. Xiaomang, 2006. 康德哲学讲演录 Kangde zhexue jiangyanlu [Lectures on Kantian Philosophy]. Guilin: 广西师范大学出版社 Guangxi shifan daxue chubanshe [Guangxi Normal University Press], pp. 222-226.Deng, X., 2007. 中西文化比较十一讲 Zhong Xi wenhua bijiao shiyi jiang [Eleven Lectures on Cultural Comparison between China and the West]. Changsha: 湖南教育出版社 Hunan jiaoyu chubanshe [Hunan Educational Press].Deng, X., 2008a. 人论三题 Renlun san ti [Three Inquiries into the Human Being]. Chongqing: 重庆大学出版 Chongqing chubanshe [Chongqing University Press].Deng, X., 2008b. 我怎么学起哲学来 Wo zenme xueqi zhexue lai [How I First Got Started with Philosophy]. In: 新批判主义 Xin pipan zhuyi [New Criticism]. Beijing: 北京大学出版社 Beijing daxue chubanshe [Peking University Press], pp. 356-363.Deng, X., 2009a. 灵之舞 Ling zhi wu [Dance of the Spirit]. Shanghai: 上海文艺出版社 Shanghai wenyi chubanshe [Shanghai Literature and Art Publishing House].Deng, X., 2009b. 人之境 Ren zhi jing [Man’s Mirror]. Shanghai: 上海文艺出版社 Shanghai wenyi chubanshe [Shanghai Literature and Art Publishing House].Deng, X., 2010. 纯粹理性批判句读 Chuncui lixing pipan judu [A Commentary of Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason]. Beijing: 人民出版社 Renmin chubanshe [People’s Publishing House].Deng, X., 2012. 康德道德形而上学奠基句读 Daode xing’ershangxue dianji judu [A Commentary of Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals]. Beijing: 人民出版社 Renmin chubanshe [People’s Publishing House].Deng, X., 2014a. Eleven Lectures on Cultural Comparison between China and the West. Translated by C. Peng. Nottingham: Aurora Publishing LLC.Deng, X., 2014b. 世纪之风: 中国当代文化批判与人文建构 Shiji zhi feng: Zhongguo dangdai wenhua pipan yu renwen jiangou [Wind of the Century: Criticism of Contemporary Chinese Culture and Humanistic Construction]. Wuhan: 湖北人民出版社 Hubei renmin chubanshe [Hunan People’s Press].Deng, X., 2014-17. 黑格尔《精神现象学》句读 Heigeer “Jingshen xianxiangxue” judu [A Commentary of Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit], Vol. 1-10. Beijing: 人民出版社 Renmin chubanshe [People’s Publishing House].Deng, X., 2017. 哲学起步 Zhexue qibu [Starting out with Philosphy]. Shanghai: 商务印书馆 Shangwu yinshuguan [Commercial Press].Deng, X., 2018. 论康德哲学对儒家伦理的救赎 Lun Kangde zhexue dui rujia lunli de jiushu [Discussing Kantian Philosophy as a Salvation for Confucian Ethics]. 探索与争鸣 Tansuo yu Zhengming [Exploration and Contention], 2, pp. 64-70.Deng, X., 2019. 康德《实践理性批判》句读 Kangde “Shijian lixing pipan” judu [A Commentary of Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason]. Beijing: 人民出版社 Renmin chubanshe [People’s Publishing House].Hegel, G. W. F., 1950. 小逻辑 Xiao luoji [Little Logic]. Translated by H. Lin. Shanghai: 商务印书馆 Shangwu yinshuguan [Commercial Press].Kant, I., 1957. 纯粹理性批判 Chuncui lixing pipan [Critique of Pure Reason]. Translated (from English) by G. Lan. Hong Kong: 三联书店 Sanlian shudian [Joint Publishing].Kant, I., 1960. 实践理性批判 Shijian lixing pipan [Critique of Practical Reason]. Translation (from English) by W. Guanyun. Beijing: 商务印书馆 Shangwu yinshuguan [Commercial Press].Kant, I., 1964. 判断力批判 Panduanli pipan [Critique of th Power of Judgment]. Translation by B. Zong and Z. Wei. Beijing: 商务印书馆 Shangwu yinshuguan [Commercial Press].Kant, I., 1983. 纯粹理性之批判 Chuncui lixing zhi pipan [Critique of Pure Reason]. Translated by Z. Mou. Taipei: 台湾学生书局 Taiwan xuesheng shuju [Taiwan Student Book Company].Kant, I., 1987. 实用人类学 Shiyong renleixue [Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View]. Translated by X. Deng. Chongqing: 重庆出版社 Chongqing chubanshe [Chongqing Press].Kant, I., 1988. 自然科学的形而上学基础 Ziran kexue de xing’ershangxue jichu [Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science]. Translated by X. Deng. Hong Kong: 三联书店 Sanlian shudian [Joint Publishing].Kant, I., 1997. 单纯理性限度内的宗教 Danchun lixing xiandu nei de zongjiao [Religion within the Limits of Reason Alone]. Translation by Q. Li. Xianggang: 道风书社 Daofeng shushe [Logos and Pneuma Press].Kant, I., 2000. 纯粹理性批判 Chuncui lixing pipan [Critique of Pure Reason]. Translated by Z. Wei. Wuhan: 华中师范大学出版社 Huazhong shifan daxue chubanshe [Huazhong Normal University Press].Kant, I., 2001. 康德三大批判精粹 Kangde san da pipan jingcui [Main Sections of Kant’s Three Critiques]. Translated by Z. Yang and X. Deng. Beijing: 人民出版社 Renmin chubanshe [The People’s Press].Kant, I., 2002. 判断力批判 Panduanli pipan [Critique of the Power of Judgment]. Translation by X. Deng. Beijing: 人民出版社 Renmin chubanshe [People’s Publishing House]. Kant, I., 2003. 实践理性批判 Shijian lixing pipan [Critique of Practical Reason]. Translation by X. Deng. Beijing: 人民出版社 Renmin chubanshe [People’s Publishing House].Kant, I., 2004a. 纯粹理性批判 Chuncui lixing pipan [Critique of Pure Reason]. Translated by X. Deng. Beijing: 人民出版社 Renmin chubanshe [People’s Publishing House].Kant, I., 2004b. 纯粹理性批判 Chuncui lixing pipan [Critique of Pure Reason]. Translated by Q. Li. Beijing: 中国人民大学出版社 Zhongguo renmin daxue chubanshe [China Renmin University Press].Kant, I., 2010. 康德著作全集 Kangde zhuzuo quanji [Collected Works of Kant], Volumes 1-9. Edited by Q. Li. Beijing: 中国人民大学出版社 Zhongguo renmin daxue chubanshe [China Renmin University Press].Kemp Smith, N., 2000. 康德《纯粹理性批判》解义 Kangde “Chuncui lixing pipan” jieyi [A Commentary to Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason]. Translation by Z. Wei. Wuhan: 华中师范大学出版社 Huazhong shifan daxue chubanshe [Huazhong Normal University Press]. Lenin, V., 1964. Left wing Communism: an Infantile Disorder. In: V. Lenin, 1964. Collected Works, Volume 31. Moscow: Progress Publishers, pp. 17-118.Li, Z., 2007. 批判哲学的批判：康德述评 Pipan zhexue de pipan: Kangde shuping [Critique of Critical Philosophy: A Review of Kant]. Hong Kong: 三联书店 Sanlian shudian [Joint Publishing].Yang, Z. and Deng, X., 2001. 康德《纯粹理性批判》指要 Kangde “Chuncui lixing pipan” zhiyao [Introduction to Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason]. Beijing: 人民出版社 Renmin chubanshe [People’s Publishing House].M. D.EvstigneevThis review of contemporary discussions of Kantian philosophy of mathematics is timed for the publication of the essay Kant’s Philosophy of Mathematics. Volume 1: The Critical Philosophy and Its Roots (2020) edited by Carl Posy and Ofra Rechter. The main discussions and comments are based on the texts contained in this collection. I first examine the more general questions which have to do not only with the philosophy of mathematics, but also with related areas of Kant’s philosophy, e. g. the question: What is intuition and singular term? Then I look at more specific questions, e. g.: What is the subject of arithmetic and what is the significance of diagrams in mathematical reasoning? As a result, the reader is presented with a fairly complete overview of modern discussions which can be used as an introduction to the problem field of Kant’s philosophy of mathematics.0607202611Allison, H. E., 1973. A Historical-Critical Introduction. In: H. E. Allison, ed. 1973. The Kant-Eberhard Controversy; An English translation together with supplementary materials and a historical-analytic introduction of Immanuel Kant’s: On a Discovery According to which any new Critique of Pure Reason has been Made Superfluous by an Earlier. Baltimore, London: The Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 1-104.Allison, H. E., 2004. Kant’s Transcendental Idealism: An Interpretation and Defense. 2nd ed. New Haven, London: Yale University Press.Baumgarten, A., 1773. Acroasis logica. 2nd ed. Halle: Hemmerde.Beck, L. W., 1955. Can Kant’s Synthetic Judgments Be Made Analytic? Kant-Studien, 47(1-4), pp. 168-181.Beck, L. W., 1956. Kant’s Theory of Definition. The Philosophical Review, 65(2), pp. 179-191.Beth, E. W., 1956. Über Lockes “Allgemeines Dreieck”. Kant-Studien, 48, pp. 361-380.Brittan, G., 2020. Continuity, Constructibility, and Intuitivity. In: C. J. Posy and O. Rechter, ed. 2020. Kant’s Philosophy of Mathematics; Volume I: The Critical Philosophy and Its Roots. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 181-199.Brittan, G., 1978. Kant’s Theory of Science. Princeton: Princeton University Press,Capozzi, M., 1981. Kant on Mathematical Definition. In: D. M. L. Chiara, ed. 1981. Italian Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 423-452.Capozzi, M., 2020. Singular Terms and Intuitions in Kant: A Reappraisal. In: C. J. Posy and O. Rechter, ed. 2020. Kant’s Philosophy of Mathematics; Volume I: The Critical Philosophy and Its Roots. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 103-125.Carson, E., 1997. Kant on Intuition in Geometry. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 27(4), pp. 489-512.Carson, E., 2009. Hintikka on Kant’s mathematical method. Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 250(4), pp. 435-449.Carson, E., 2020. Arithmetic and the Conditions of Possible Experience In: C. J. Posy, O. Rechter, ed. 2020. Kant’s Philosophy of Mathematics; Volume I: The Critical Philosophy and Its Roots. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 231-247.Cassirer, E., 1907. Kant und die moderne Mathematik. (Mit Bezug auf Bertrand Russells und Louis Couturats Werke über die Prinzipien der Mathematik). Kant-Studien, 12, pp.1-49.Crusius, C., 1766. Entwurf der notwendigen Vernunftwahrheiten, wifern sie den zufälligen entgegen gesetzt werden. 3. Auflage. Leipzig: J. F. Gleditschens Buchhandlung.Descartes, R., 1985. Principles of Philosophy. In: J. Cottinghanm, R. Stoothoff, ed. 1985. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes. Vol. 1. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 177-292.Dunlop, K., 2014. Arbitrary combination and the use of signs in mathematics: Kant’s 1763 Prize Essay and Its Wolffian Background. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 44(5-6), pp. 658-685.Dunlop, K., 2020. Kant and Mendelssohn on the Use of Signs in Mathematics. In: C. J. Posy and O. Rechter, ed. 2020. Kant’s Philosophy of Mathematics; Volume I: The Critical Philosophy and Its Roots. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 15-34.Falkenstein, L., 2004. Kant’s intuitionism: a commentary on the transcendental aesthetic. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Ferrarin A., 2006. Lived Space, geometric Space in Kant. Studi Kantiani, 19, pp. 11-30.Friedman, M., 1998. Kant and the Exact Sciences. Cambridge MA, London: Harvard University Press.Friedman, M., 2019. Henry Allison and the B-Deduction. [online] Available at: [Accessed: 15. May 2019].Friedman, M., 2020. Space and Geometry in the B Deduction. In: C. J. Posy and O. Rechter, ed. 2020. Kant’s Philosophy of Mathematics; Volume I: The Critical Philosophy and Its Roots. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 200-228.Hanna, R., 2003. Mathematics for Humans: Kant’s Philosophy of Arithmetic Revisited. European Journal of Philosophy, 10(3), pp. 328-352.Heis, J., 2014. Kant (vs. Leibniz, Wolff and Lambert) on Real Definitions in Geometry. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 44(5-6), pp. 605-630.Heis, J., 2020. Kant on Parallel Lines: Definitions, Postulates, and Axioms. In: C. J. Posy and O. Rechter, ed. 2020. Kant’s Philosophy of Mathematics; Volume I: The Critical Philosophy and Its Roots. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 157-180.Hintikka, J., 1981. Kant’s Theory of Mathematics Revisited. Philosophical Topics, 12(2), pp. 201-215.Hintikka, J., 1984. Kant’s transcendental Method and his Theory of Mathematics. Topoi, 3(2), pp. 99-108.Hintikka, J., 1991. Knowledge and the Known. Historical Perspectives in Epistemology. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 126-134.Hintikka J., 1992. Kant on the Mathematical Method. In: C. J. Posy, ed. 1992. Kant’s Philosophy of Mathematics. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 21-42.Hintikka J., 2020. Kant’s Theory of Mathematics: What Theory of What Mathematics? In: C. J. Posy and O. Rechter, ed. 2020. Kant’s Philosophy of Mathematics; Volume I: The Critical Philosophy and Its Roots. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 85-102.Hogan D., 2009. Three Kinds of Rationalism and the Non-Spatiality of Things in Themselves. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 47(3), pp. 355-382.Hogan D., 2013. Metaphysical Motives of Kant’s Analytic — Synthetic Distinction. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 51(2), pp. 267-307.Hogan D. Kant and the Character of Mathematical Inference. In: C. J. Posy and O. Rechter, ed. 2020. Kant’s Philosophy of Mathematics; Volume I: The Critical Philosophy and Its Roots. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 126-154.Kant, I., 1992a. Attempt to Introduce the Concept of Negative Magnitudes into Philosophy. In: I. Kant, 1992. Theoretical Philosophy, 1755-1770. Translated and edited by D. Walford in collaboration with R. Meerbote. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 203-242.Kant, I., 1992b. Inquiry Concerning the Distinctness of the Principles of Natural Theology and Morality. In: I. Kant, 1992. Theoretical philosophy, 1755-1770. Translated and edited by D. Walford and R. Meerbote. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 243-286.Kant, I., 1992c. On the Form and Principles of the Sensible and the Intelligible World. In: I. Kant, 1992. Theoretical Philosophy 1755-1770. Translated and edited by D. Walford. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 373-416.Kant I., 1998. Critique of Pure Reason. Translated by P. Guyer, A. Wood. New York: Cambridge University Press.Kant, I., 1999. Correspondence. Translated and edited by A. Zweig. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Kant, I., 2004a. Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science. Translated by M. Friedman. New York: Cambridge University Press.Kant, I., 2004b. Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics that will be Able to Come Forward as Science. Translated by G. Hatfield. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Kant, I., 2002. On a Discovery Whereby Any New Critique of Pure Reason Is to Be Made Superfluous by an Older One. Translated by H. Allison. In: I. Kant, 2002. Theoretical Philosophy after 1781. Edited by H. Allison and P. Heath. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 281-336.Kant, I., 1992. The Jäsche Logic. in: Lectures on logic. Translated by J. M. Young. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 521-640.Lu-Adler, H., 2018. Kant and the Science of Logic. A Historical and Philosophical Reconstruction. New York: Oxford University Press.Mancosu, P., 1996. Philosophy of Mathematics and Mathematical Practice in the Seventeenth Century. New York: Oxford University Press.Martin, G., 1967. Die mathematischen Vorlesungen Kants. Kant-Studien, 58, pp. 58-62.Martin, G., 1972. Arithmetik und Kombinatorik bei Kant. Berlin: De Gruyter.Meier, G. F., 1752. Vernunftlehre. Halle: Johann Justinus Gebauer.Melnick, A., 1992. The Geometry of a form of Intuition. Kant’s Philosophy of Mathematics. In: C. J. Posy, ed. 1992. Kant’s Philosophy of Mathematics. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 245-255.Mendelssohn, M., 1786. Abhandlung über die Evidenz in metaphysischen Wissenschaften. Neue Auflage. Berlin: Haube & Spener.Parsons, C., 1786. Kant’s Philosophy of Arithmetic. In: C. J. Posy, ed. 1992. Kant’s Philosophy of Mathematics. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 43-79.Parsons, C., 1992b. Arithmetic and the Categories. In: C. J. Posy, ed. 1992. Kant’s Philosophy of Mathematics. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 135-158.Peijnenburg, J., 1994. Formal Proof or Linguistic Process? Beth and Hintikka on Kant’s Use of ’Analytic’. Kant-Studien, 85(2), pp. 160-178.Posy, C. J., 1983. Dancing to the Antinomy: A Proposal for Transcendental Idealism. American Philosophical Quarterly, 20(1), pp. 81-94.Posy, C. J. Mathematics as a Transcendental Science. In: T. M. Seebohm, D. Føllesdal and J. Mohanty, ed. 1991. Phenomenology and the Formal Sciences. Dordrecht, Boston: Kluwer, pp. 107-132.Posy, C. J., 2019. The infinite, the indefinite and the critical turn: Kant via Kripke models. Inquiry. [online] doi: 10.1080/0020174X.2019.1651095. Available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0020174X.2019.1651095 [Accessed 03 January 2021].Posy, C. J., 2020. Of Griffins and Horses: Mathematics, Metaphysics, and Kant’s Critical Turn. In: C. J. Posy and O. Rechter, ed. 2020. Kant’s Philosophy of Mathematics; Volume I: The Critical Philosophy and Its Roots. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 35-65.Posy, C. J. and Rechter O., 2020. Introduction. In: C. J. Posy and O. Rechter, ed. 2020. Kant’s Philosophy of Mathematics; Volume I: The Critical Philosophy and Its Roots. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1-12.Risjord, M., 1990. The Sensible Foundation for Mathematics: a Defense of Kant’s view. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. Part A, 21(1), pp. 123-143.Rusnock, P., 2004. Was Kant’s philosophy of mathematics right for its time? Kant-Studien, 95, pp. 426-442.Rusnock, P. and George, R., 1995. A Last Shot at Kant and Incongruent Counterparts. Kant-Studien, 86(3), pp. 257 277.Russell, B., 2010. Principles of Mathematics. London, New York: Routledge.Schirn, V. M., 1991. Kants Theorie der geometrischen Erkenntnis und die nichteuklidische Geometrie. Kant-Studien, 82(1), pp. 1-28.Schultz, J. Erläuterungen über des Herrn Professor Kant Critik der reinen Vernunft. Neue verbesserte Auflage. Frankfurt & Leipzig: [s. n.], 1791.Shabel, L., 1998. Kant on the ‘Symbolic Construction’ of Mathematical Concepts. Studies in History of Philosophy of Science. Part A, 29(4), pp. 589-621.Shabel, L., 2003. Mathematics in Kant’s Critical Philosophy: Reflections on Mathematical Practice. New York, London: Routledge.Sutherland, D., 2005. The Point of Kant’s Axioms of Intuition. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 86(1), pp. 135-159.Sutherland, D. 2017. Kant’s Conception of Number. Philosophical Review, 126(2), pp. 147-190.Sutherland, D., 2020. Kant’s Philosophy of Arithmetic: An Outline of a New Approach. In: C. J. Posy and O. Rechter, ed. 2020. Kant’s Philosophy of Mathematics; Volume I: The Critical Philosophy and Its Roots. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 248-266.Tait, W. W., 2020. Kant on ‘Number’. In: C. J. Posy and O. Rechter, ed. 2020. Kant’s Philosophy of Mathematics; Volume I: The Critical Philosophy and Its Roots. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 267-291.Thompson, M., 1972. Singular Terms and Intuitions in Kant’s Epistemology. The Review of Metaphysics, 26(2), pp. 314-343.Tolley, C., ed. 2021. Kant: Philosophy of Mathematics. PhilPapers, Bibliography. [online] Available at: [Accessed 03 January 2021].Vaihinger, H., 1921. Kommentar zu Kants Kritik der reinen Vernunft; Band II. Stuttgart, Berlin & Leipzig: Union deutsche Verlagsgesellschaft.Warren, D., 2020. Kant on Mathematics and the Metaphysics of Corporeal Nature: The Role of the Infinitesimal. In: C. J. Posy, O. Rechter, ed. 2020. Kant’s Philosophy of Mathematics; Volume I: The Critical Philosophy and Its Roots. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 66-82.Wilson, K. D., 1975. Kant on Intuition. The Philosophical Quarterly, 25(100), pp. 247-265.Wolff-Metternich, B.-S. v., 1995. Die Überwindung des mathematischen Erkenntnisideals: Kants Grenzbestimmung von Mathematik und Philosophie. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Wolff, C., 1710. Der Anfangs-Gründe Aller Mathematischen Wissenschaften; Erster Theil. Halle: Renger.Wolff, C., 1734. Auszug aus den Anfangsgründen aller mathematischen Wissenschaften, Zu bequemerem Gebrauche der Anfänger, Auf Begehren verfertiget. 5. Auflage. Frankfurt und Leipzig: Rengersche Buchhandlung.Wolff, C., 1740. Philosophia rationalis sive logica, methodo scientifica pertractata. In: Philosophia rationalis sive logica, methodo scientifica pertractata et ad usum scientiarum atque vitae aptata praemittitur discursus praeliminaris de philosophia in genere. Francofurti & Lipsiae: Officina Libraria Rengeriana.Wolff, C., 1742. Vernünftige Gedanken von den Kräften des menschlichen Verstandes und ihrem richtigen Gebrauche in Erkäntniß der Wahrheit. 12. Auflage. Halle: Renger.Wolff, C., 1752. Vernünftige Gedanken von Gott, der Welt und der Seele des Menschen, auch allen Dingen überhaupt. Halle: Rengerischen Buchhandlung,Wolff, R. P., 1963. Kant’s Theory of Mental Activity: a Commentary on the Transcendental Analytic of the Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.