NONE20260530172856779Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal Universityno-reply@journals.kantiana.ruImmanuel Kant Baltic Federal UniversityKantian Journal0207-69182310-37010530202611L.KalinnikovThis article continues to analyse the systemacity of the CPR as a text ensuring the integrity of Kant’s philosophical system. Following the ideas presented in the first two parts of this work, part three considers the correlation between the spheres of concepts and reality. Kant divides concepts into phaenomena and noumena. The former are apprehended by the senses and the latter express the things-in-themselves. It is shown that, as concepts of things, noumena are divided into substan tial and empty ones. Substantial noumena correspond to transcendental objects as the material of possible experience, which has become or can become actual, on the one hand. On the other, they correspond to abstract idealisation relations – norms and values – that are immanent in the world of phenomena and contribute to the organisation of that world.05302026111. Kant, I. 1965a, Kritika practicheskogo razuma [Critique of Practical Reason] in: Kant, I. Sobranie sochineniy v 6 t. [Collected works in 6 volumes], vol. 4 (1), Moscow.2. Kant, I. 1966, Kritika sposobnosti suzhdenija [Critique of Judgment], in: Kant, I. Sobr. soch. v 6 t., [Collected works in 6 volumes], vol. 5, Moscow.3. Kant, I. 1965б, Osnovyi metafiziki nravstvennosti [Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals], in: Kant, I. Sobranie sochineniy v 6 t. [Collected works in 6 volumes], vol. 4 (1), Moscow.4. Kant, I. 1963, Kritika chistogo razuma [Critique of Pure Reason], in: Kant, I. Sobr. soch. v 6 t., [Collected works in 6 volumes], vol. 3, Moscow.S.KatrechkoKant’s transcendental philosophy (transcendentalism) focuses on both the human method of cognition in general [CPR, B 25] and certain types of cognition aimed at justifying their objective significance. This article aims to explicate Kant’s understanding (resp. justification) of the abstract nature of mathematical knowledge (cognition) as the “construction of concepts in intuition” (see: “to construct a concept means to exhibit a priori the intuition corresponding to it”; [CPR, A 713/В 741], which is “thoroughly grounded on definitions, axioms, and demonstrations” [CPR, A 726/В 754]. Unlike specific ‘physical’ objects, mathematical objects are of abstract nature and they are introduced using Hume’s principle of abstraction. Based on the doctrine of schematism, Kant develops an original theory of abstraction: Kant’s schemes serve as a means to construct mathematical objects, as an “action of pure thought" [CPR, B 81]. A ‘constructive’ understanding of mathematical acts going back to Euclid’s genetic method is an important innovation introduced by Kant. This understanding is at the heart of modern mathematical formalism, intuitionism, and constructivism. Within Kant’s constructivism, mathematics can be described as a two-tier system, which suggests a “shift” from the level of concepts of the understanding to the level of sensual intuition, where mathematical acts are performed, followed by a subsequent return to the initial level. On this basis, the author develops a theory of transcendental constructivism (pragmatism). In particular, Kant's ‘intuitionism’ of mathematics can be understood as structural properties of mathematical language or its ‘logical space’ (Wittgenstein; cf. mathematical structuralism). In his theory, Kant distinguishes between two types of constructing — ostensive (geometric) and symbolic (algebraic). The paper analyses these types and shows that modern mathematical structures are a combination and intertwining of both. The author also identifies a third type — logical constructing [in proving theorems], which inherits the features of both Kant's types.05302026111. Aristotle, 2011, in: Shiffman, M. De Anima: On the Soul, (Newburyport, MA: Focus Publishing.2. Frege, G. 1884, Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik: eine logisch-mathematische Untersuchung über den Begriff der Zahl. Breslau. (English: The Foundations of Arithmetic: the logical-mathematical Investigation of the Concept of Number).3. Galileiy, G, 1964,Izbrannye trudy v 2 t. M.: Nauka, 1964. v.1.4. Galileiy, G., 1987, Probirnyh del master. M. Nauka.5. Gil'bert. D., 1998, Aksiomaticheskoe myshlenie //Ego j`e. Izbrannye trudy, T. 1, M. : Faktorial.6. Gil'bert, D., 1948 O ponjatii chisla // Ego j`e. Osnovanija geometrii M.—L., OGIZ.7. Gudsteiyn,R. L., 1961, Matematicheskaja logika. M. : Izd-vo IL.8. Hintikka, J. 1978, Surface Information and Depth Information. In: Logico-Epistemologic Research.9. Kant I., 1994, Kritika chistogo razuma. In: Kant I. Sob. soch. v 8-mi tt. V. 3. M.: CHoro.10. Katrechko, S. L. 2003, K voprosu ob apriornosti matematicheskogo znanija [On the question of a priori mathematical knowledge]. In: Matematika i opyt [Mathematics and Experience]. M. : MGU, s. 545—574.11. Katrechko, S. L. 2007, Modelirovanie rassuj`deniiy v matematike: transcendental'nyiy podhod [Modeling reasoning in mathematics: transcendental approach]. In: Modeli rassuj` deniiy — 1 : Logika i argumentacija. Kaliningrad : Izd. RGU im. I. Kanta, 2007. s. 63—90.12. Katrechko, S. L. 2008, Transcendental'naja filosofija matematiki [Transcendental philosophy of mathematics]. In: Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Serija 7 «Filosofija [Philosophy] », № 2, 2008. M. : Izd—vo MGU, s. 88—106.13. Katrechko S. L., 2011, Abstraktnaja priroda logiko-matematicheskogo znanija i prirashenie informacii. In: Sed'mye Smirnovskie chtenija. M. : Sovremennye tetradi, s. 176—178.14. Katrechko, S. L. 2013, Platonovskiiy chetyrehchastnyiy otrezok (Linija): Platon i Kant o prirode (specifike) matematicheskogo znanija [Plato’s Divided Line: Plato and Kant about the nature (specific) of the mathematics]. In: Vestnik RHGA, T. 14, vyp. 3, 2013. s. 172—177.15. Katrechko, S. L. 2014а, Transcendental'nyy analiz matematicheskoy deiatel'nosti: abstraktnye (matematicheskie) ob'ekty, konstrukcii i dokazatel'stva [Transcendental analysis of mathematics: abstract (mathematical) objects, constructions and proofs]. In: Dokazatel'stvo: ochevidnost', dostovernost' i ubeditel'nost' v matematike [Proof: evidence, credibility and convincing sequences in mathematics. Moscow Study in the Philosophy of Mathematics], Moscow, s. 86—120.16. Katrechko, S. L. 2014в, Matematika kak «rabota» s abstraktnymi ob"ektami: ontologo— transcendental'nyiy status matematicheskih abstrakciiy [Mathematics as a "job" with abstract objects: ontological-transcendental status of mathematical abstractions]. In: Matematika i real'nost' [Mathematics and reality]. Trudy Moskovskogo seminara po filosofii matematiki. M., Izd-vo MGU, s. 421—452.17. Katrechko S. L., 2015, Transcendental'nyiy analiz matematiki: abstraktnaja priroda matematicheskogo znanija. In: Kantovskiiy sbornik [The Kantovsky sbornik], 2015, № 2 (52). s. 16—31 (http://journals. kantiana. ru/kant_collection/2017/5885/).18. Klini S., 1957, Vvedenie v metamatematiku, M. : IL.19. Koiyre A., 1985, Ocherki po istorii filosofskoiy mysli, M.20. Maslov S. JU., 1986, Teorija deduktivnyh sistem i ee primenenija. M. : Radio i svjaz'.21. Lakatos, I. 1976, Proofs and Refutations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.22. Novoselov M. M., 2000, «Abstrakcija», «abstraktnyiy ob"ekt». In: Novoiy filosofskoiy enciklopedii [The new philosophical encyclopedia]: http://iph. ras. ru/elib/0019.html23. Novoselov M. M. Logika abstrakciiy (metodol. analiz). M. : IFRAN.24. Parsons, C. 2008, Mathematical Thought and Its Objects, Cambridge Univ. Press.25. Rosen, G. 2001, Аbstract Objects; URL: http://plato. stanford. edu/entries/abstractobjects/26. SHul'pekov V. A., 2014, Instrumental'naja struktura matematicheskih postroeniiy. In: Dokazatel'stvo: ochevidnost', dostovernost' i ubeditel'nost' v matematike [Proof: evidence, credibility and convincing sequences in mathematics. Moscow Study in the Philosophy of Mathematics], Moscow, s. 331—335.27. Smirnov, V. A. 2001, Geneticheskiiy metod postroenija nauchnoiy teorii //Logikofilosofskie trudy V. A. Smirnova. M. Editoral URSS, s. 417—438. \28. Vinberg E., 2002, Kurs algebry, M., Faktorial Press.A.ZilberThis article presents a comprehensive analysis of the content, meaning, and scenarios of applying the transcendental principles of public law formulated in the second appendix to Kant’s treatise Toward Perpetual Peace. The author compares different interpretations of these principles by Russian and international researchers. The article strives to answer the question as to what type of ‘public’ is meant by these principles, whether these principles can serve as a priori criteria for selecting maxims, how efficient these principles are as empirical criteria for establishing legitimacy, and whether they can be characterized as ‘transcendental’. Kant’s discourse on publicity — a result of strenuous efforts presented in a number of writings and lectures — takes the reader to the area of empirical practices and anthropological observations capable of distorting the required purity of the form when taken together. In effect, they turn out to be either motives for searching for transcendental principles or example s targeted at a certain type of readers and political agents. Identifying the role of publicity principles in Kant’s system of law and their strict positioning is also a complicated problem raising new questions as to their acceptable and preferable application. The principles are explicated in the treatise on perpetual peace. However, this article demonstrates that, despite the dominant opinion, further comments and examples can be found in Kant’s later writings. Finally, the author considers a moderate interpretation that makes it possible to harmonise the publicity principles as (meta) principles of lawmaking and law enforcement with the core of Kant’s system of law and morals. This resolves the issue of direct efficiency of these principles, whereas the declaration of the formal character of the ‘doctrine of happiness’ dispels doubts over the implicitly a posterior and empirical nature of criteria introduced as formal and a priori ones.05302026111. Arendt, H. 2011, O politicheskoj filosofii Kanta: Kurs lekcij. Perev. A. N. Salikova. Lekcija 10 [Lectures on Kant's Political Philosophy. Transl. by A. N. Salikov. Lecture 10], in: Kantovskij sbornik [Kant’s Compendium]. 2011. No. 4 (38). P. 106—112.2. Brock, L. 2013, Legitimacija i kritika nasilija v mezhdunarodnom prave. Politologicheskaja perspektiva. Per. s nem. A. S. Zil'bera [The Legitimation and the Criticism of Violence in International Law. A political science perspective], in: Kantovskij sbornik [Kant’s Compendium]. 2013. No. 4 (46). P. 30—41.3. Gutorov, V. А. 2005, Sovremennaja politicheskaja filosofija v kontekste nasledija I. Kanta [The Modern Political Philosophy in a Context of Kant’s Heritage], in: Politeks. Politicheskaja jekspertiza. Al'manah. [Politex. Political Review. Almanac] 2005. No. 2. P. 7—14. URL: http:// www. politex. info/content/view/153/30/ (accessed on 22.06.2015)4. Zilber, А. S. 2014, «Negativnaja mudrost'» politicheskogo Prosveshhenija [The „Negative Wisdom“ of Political Enlightenment], in: XI Kantovskie chtenija: Kantovskij proekt prosveshhenija segodnja: materialy mezhdunarodnoj konferencii [XI Kant Readings: Kant's Enlightenment Project Today: Proceedings of the International Conference]. Kaliningrad. P. 178—181. URL: kant-online. ru/?p=1693 (accessed on 18.07.2015).5. Kant, I. 1994а, Antropologija s pragmaticheskoj tochki zrenija [Anthropology from a Pragmatical Point of View], in: Kant, I. Soch.: v 8 t. T. 7. [Writings: in 8 vol. Vol. 7] М.6. Kant, I. 1994б, Zum ewigen Frieden, in: Kant, I. Werke. Zweisprachige deutsch-russische Ausgabe. Bd. 1. М.7. Kant, I. 2001, Kritik der Urteilskraft, in: Kant, I. Werke. Zweisprachige deutsch-russische Ausgabe. Bd. 4. М.8. Kant, I. 2006, Kritik der reinen Vernunft. 2-е изд., in: Kant, I. Werke. Zweisprachige deutsch-russische Ausgabe. Bd. 2. Tl. 1. М.9. Kant, I. 2014, Die Metaphysik der Sitten. Erster Teil, in: Kant, I. Werke. Zweisprachige deutsch-russische Ausgabe. Bd. 5. Tl. 1. М.10. Kant, I. 1994в, Über den Gemeinspruch: Das mag in der Theorie richtig sein, taugt aber nichts für die Praxis, in: Kant, I. Werke. Zweisprachige deutsch-russische Ausgabe. Bd. 1. М.11. Kant, I. 2009, Ob odnom otkrytii, posle kotorogo vsjakaja novaja kritika chistogo razuma stanovitsja izlishnej vvidu nalichija prezhnej (Protiv Jeberharda) [On a Discovery Whereby any new Critique of Pure Reason is to be Made of Superfluous by an Older one (Contrary to Eberhard)], in: Kant, I. Traktaty, recenzii, pis'ma [Tractates, Reviews, Letters]. Kaliningrad. URL: kant-online. ru/?p=1617 (accessed on 23.07.2015)12. Kant, I. 1999, Spor fakul'tetov [The Contest of the Faculties]. Kaliningrad. URL: kant-online. ru/?p=3137 (accessed on 23.09.2015)13. Kalinnikov, L. А. 2005, Razvitie uchenija o kategoricheskom imperative prava v traktate «K vechnomu miru» [Development of Theory of the Categorical Imperative of Law in the Tractate “Toward Perpetual Peace”], in: Kalinnikov, L. А. Kant v russkoj filosofskoj kul'ture [Kant in the Russian Philosophical Culture]. Kaliningrad. P. 78—81.14. Krouglov, А. N. 2014, Nesovershennoletie i zadacha istinnogo preobrazovanija obraza myshlenija [Immaturity and the Objective of a True Reform in Ways of Thinking], in: Kantovskij sbornik [Kant’s Compendium]. No. 49(а), 50(б).15. Salikov, А. N. 2013, Mirnyj proekt I. Kanta i modeli reshenija dilemmy bezopasnosti v sovremennoj teorii mezhdunarodnyh otnoshenij [Kant’s Peace Project and the Models of Solution of Security Dilemmas in the Modern Theory of International Relations], in: Kantovskij proekt vechnogo mira v kontekste sovremennoj politiki: materialy mezhdunar. seminara [Kant’s Project of Perpetual Peace in the Context of Contemporary Politics: proceedings of international seminar]. Kaliningrad. URL: kant-online. ru/en/?p=556 (accessed on 07.04.2015)16. Solov‘jov, E. Yu. 2005, Kategoricheskij imperativ nravstvennosti i prava [The Categorical Imperative of Morals and Right]. М.17. Solov‘jov, E. Yu. 2011, Ponjatie prava v kantovskom proekte «vechnogo mira». Doklad na Shestyh senatskih chtenijah [Concept of Right at the Kant’s Project of Perpetual Peace. The paper from “The 6th Senat Readings”]. URL: www.ksrf.ru/ru/Info/Reading/Pages/ PerformanceSolovev. aspx (accessed on 19.05.2015)18. Habermas, Yu. 1996, Kantova ideja vechnogo mira — iz 200-letnej istoricheskoj perspektivy [Kant’s Idea of Perpetual Peace — From the 200 Years Historical Perspective], in: Habermas, Yu. Vovlechenie drugogo. Ocherki politicheskoj teorii [Involving one Another. Essays on Political Theory]. SPb.19. Habermas, Yu. 2008, Kantovskij proekt i raskolotyj Zapad [Kant’s Project and the Divided West], in: Habermas, Yu. Raskolotyj Zapad [The Divided West]. М.20. Hinske, N. 2007, Mezhdu Prosveshheniem i kritikoj razuma: jetjudy o korpuse logicheskih rabot Kanta. Perev. A. K. Sudakova [Among the Enlightenment and the Critique of Reason: Studies on the Case of Kant’s Logical Works. Transl. by A. K. Sudakov]. М.21. Blesenkemper, K. 1987, „Publice age“ — Studien zum Öffentlichkeitsbegriff bei Kant. Frankf. a. M.22. Ceballes, J. 2007, Hearing the Call of Reason: Kant and Publicity. Doct. Diss., Indiana Univ.23. Davis, K. R. 1991, „Publicity“ and Political Justice, in: History of Philosophy Quarterly, Vol. 8, No. 4, Hume and Kant Issue, p. 409—421.24. Davis, K. R. 1992, Kant's Different “Publics” and the Justice of Publicity, in: Kant- Studien, Jg. 83. Issue 2. P. 170—184.25. Dierksmeier, C. 2009, Zur systematischen Liberalität von Kants Politik- und Staatsbegriff, in: Kants Lehre von Staat und Frieden. Hrsg. v. H. Ottmann. Baden-Baden.26. Garcia-Marza, D. 2012, Kant’s Principle of Publicity: The Intrinsic Relationship between the two Formulations, in: Kant-Studien. Jg. 103. S. 96—113.27. Gerhardt, V. 1995, I. Kants Entwurf “Zum ewigen Frieden”. Darmstadt.28. Gutschker, T. 1999, Ästhetik und Politik. Annäherungen an Kants politische Philosophie, in: Kant als politischer Schriftsteller. Hrsg. v. T. Stammen. Würzburg. S. 43—56.29. Eberl, O., Niesen, P. (Hg.) 2011, Immanuel Kant. „Zum ewigen Frieden“ und Auszüge aus der Rechtslehre. Kommentar von Oliver Eberl und Peter Niesen. Berlin.30. Eisler, R. 1984, Kant-Lexikon. Hildesheim.31. Habermas, J. 1962, Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit: Untersuchungen zu einer Kategorie der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft. Neuwied.32. Hidalgo, O. 2012, Kants Friedensschrift und der Theorienstreit in den internationalen Beziehungen. Wiesbaden.33. Klemme, H. F. 1992, Einleitung, in: Kant, I. Über den Gemeinspruch… Zum ewigen Frieden. Hamburg.34. Laursen, J. C. 1986, The Subversive Kant: The Vocabulary of "Public" and "Publicity", in: Political Theory. Vol. 14. No. 4. Pp. 584—603.35. Menzer, P. 1924, Eine Vorlesung Kants über Ethik. Berlin.36. Riley, P. 1992, Hannah Arendt on Kant, Truth and Politics, in: Essays on Kant’s Political Philosophy. Ed. by H. Williams. Cardiff. 37. Sassenbach, U. 1992, Der Begriff des Politischen bei Immanuel Kant. Würzburg.A.SattarThis article considers early Schopenhauer’s polemic against Kant's epistemology and views on the objectives and methods of philosophy. The crucial influence of this polemic and Kant’s works on the development of Schopenhauer’s philosophy is stressed. The author investigates Schopenhauer’s reception of the above aspects of Kant’s philosophy in 1811—1813 and its later evolution. For this purpose, the author addresses Schopenhauer’s manuscripts (early philosophical aphorisms and comments and marginal notes on Kant’s works, etc.), as well as the first edition of Schopenhauer’s doctoral dissertation On the Fourfold Root of the Principle of Sufficient Reason (1813). The mentioned influence of Kant’s philosophy on Schopenhauer and its decisive role in the development of the latter’s philosophy can be summed up as follows. Firstly, early Schopenhauer considered Kant as his only ally in the struggle against the speculative idealism of his followers. Secondly, this resulted in an almost complete acceptance of Kant’s epistemology and terminology. Only later, he developed an independent terminology, which was nevertheless largely influenced by that created by Kant. Thirdly, at the time, Schopenhauer believed his vision of objectives and essence of philosophy to be a direct continuation of Kant’s philosophy, the central objective being the construction of metaphysics of a science responsible for the conceptual grasping associated with cognizing the divine and supersensible. Schopenhauer called such science ‘genuine criticism’ and the faculty of supersensible cognition a ‘better consciousness’. Fourthly, Schopenhauer’s alteration of Kant’s epistemology related to the need to com lete the system of ‘genuine criticism’, since the inclusion of a ‘better consciousness’ into a priori cognitive faculties justified its ‘metaphysical’ character. Fifthly, the first edition of Schopenhauer’s doctoral dissertation adhered to Kant’s concept of noumenal freedom, whereas the metaphysics of a ‘better consciousness’ was associated with Kant’s notion of ‘intelligible character’.05302026111. Kant, I. 1965, Kritika practicheskogo razuma [Critique of Practical Reason] in: Kant, I. Sobranie sochineniy v 6 t. [Collected works in 6 volumes], vol 5, Moscow.2. Kant, I. 1964, Kritika chistogo razuma [Critique of Pure Reason] in: Kant, I. Sobranie sochineniy v 6 t. [Collected works in 6 volumes], vol 3, Moscow.3. Kant, I. 1965, Prolegomenyi… [Prolegomena…] in: Kant, I. Sobranie sochineniy v 6 t. [Collected works in 6 volumes], vol 5, Moscow.4. Schopenhauer, A. 1999—2001, Sobranie sochineniy v 6 tomakh. [A. Schopenhauer’s Works in 6 volumes] Moscow.5. Schopenhauer A. 1966—1975. Der Handschriftliche Nachlaß. Hrsg. von Arthur Hübscher. 5 Bände. Frankfurt am Main: Verlag Waldemar Kramer.6. Schopenhauer A. 1911—1942. Sämtliche Werke. Hrsgg. von P. Deussen. München: R. Piper.7. Schopenhauer 2008. Schopenhauers Kollegnachschriften der Metaphysik- und Psychologievorlesungen von G. E. Schulze: (Göttingen, 1810—11) Ergon.8. Zint, H. 1921. Schopenhauers Philosophie des doppelten Bewußtseins // Jahrbuch der Schopenhauer-Gesellschaft, Nr. 10. S. 3—45.This article considers early Schopenhauer’s polemic against Kant's epistemology and views on the objectives and methods of philosophy. The crucial influence of this polemic and Kant’s works on the development of Schopenhauer’s philosophy is stressed. The author investigates Schopenhauer’s reception of the above aspects of Kant’s philosophy in 1811—1813 and its later evolution. For this purpose, the author addresses Schopenhauer’s manuscripts (early philosophical aphorisms and comments and marginal notes on Kant’s works, etc.), as well as the first edition of Schopenhauer’s doctoral dissertation On the Fourfold Root of the Principle of Sufficient Reason (1813).B.CzardybonV.BelovThe article deals with the jey areas of Russian Neo-Kantianism studies in Poland. Although the number and quality of studies on the history of Russian Neo-Kantianism cannot be equated to those on the history of German Neo-Kantianism, the situation is improving. The authors stress the undeniable progress in Russian Neo-Kantianism studies in Poland: monographs, articles, collections, and research projects dedicated to certain scholars or aspects of the history of Russian Neo-Kantianism have appeared recenly. The authors believe that a breakthrough in the Polish Neo-Kantianism Russian studies is associated with the works on Russian thought by Sister Teresa Obolevitch. The authors consider A. Noras’s idea about the development of the neo-Kantian concept into post-Neo-Kantianism as rather heuristic. One of the main features of this development is the ontologization of cognitive process and the recognition of existential characteristics of the knowing subject as primary and exerting a significant impact on its cognitive structure. This ‘ontological turn’, typical of Russian Neo-Kantianism and, in particular, Sergey Hessen, Boris Yakovenko, and Vasily Sesemann, is, on the one hand, the hallmark of entire Russian philosophy, including its most representative parts, namely, Russian religious philosophy (ontologism). On the other hand, it brings the philosophical efforts of Russian neo-Kantians closer to the concept proposed by the creator of ‘new ontology’ Nicolai Hartmann. Therefore, Polish researchers make successful efforts aimed at identifying the ‘intersections’ between the doctrines of Russian neo-Kantians and those of their German colleagues and teachers from Marburg, Freiburg, and Heidelberg, as well as Russian religious philosophy and N. Hartmann’s philosophical constructs.05302026111. Belov V. N. 2012, Russkoje neokantianstwo: istorija i osobiennosti razvitija [Russian neo-Kantianism: history and features of development] // Kantovskij sbornik [Kants Collection]. № 1, p. 27—39.2. Valickij А. 1994, Posleslovije k publikacii «ziznieopisanija» S. I. Gessena [Afterword to the publication of S. I. Hessen’s „biography”] // Voprosy filosofii [Problems of Philosophy]. № 7—8, p. 182—187.3. Valickij А. 1998, Sergej Gessen: filosof v izgnanii [Sergey Hessen: philosopher in exile] // Gessen S. I. Izbrannyje sochinienija / pod red. А. Valickogo, N. Chystiakovoj [S. I. Hessen. Selected works / eds. A. Walicki, N. Chistyakova]. Мoscow, p. 3—28.4. Gessen S. I. 1994, Moje zyznieopisanije [My life] // Voprosy filosofii [Problems of Philosophy]. № 7—8, p. 152—181.5. Gessen S. I. 1995, Moje zyznieopisanije [My life] // Gessen S. I. Osnovy pedagogiki. Vvedenije v prikladnuju filosofiju / pod red. P. V. Aleksejeva [S. I. Hessen. Basics of pedagogy. Introduction to applied philosophy / ed. P. V. Alekseev]. Moscow, p. 412—447.6. Gessen S. I. 1998, Moje zyznieopisanije [My life] // Gessen S. I. Izbrannyje sochinenija / pod red. А. Valickogo, N. Chystiakovoj [S. I. Hessen. Selected works / eds. A. Walicki, N. Chistyakova]. Мoscow, p. 723—782.7. Kubalica Т. 2010, Otnositelnaja istinnost’ teorii otrazenija v interpretacii Genriha Rikkerta. Pier. V. Prohorova, V. Belova [Relative validity of the theory of reflection in the interpretation of Heinrich Rickert. Trans. V. Prochorov, V. Belov] // Kantovskij sbornik [Kant’s Collection]. № 2, p. 69—79.8. Maslin М. А. 2012, Andzej Valickij. Intellektualnyj portret polskogo istorika russkoj filosofii [Andrey Valicky. Smart portrait of the Polish historian of Russian philosophy] // Gumanitarnyje nauki. Vestnik Finansovogo universitieta [Humanities. Bulletin of the University of Finance]. № 4, p. 88—92.9. Obolevich Т. 2012, Spor Vladimira Solov’eva s Aleksandrom Vvedenskim po povodu Spinozy [Dispute Vladimir Solovyov and Alexander Vvedensky about Spinoza] // Solov’evskije issledovanija [Soloviev Study]. № 4, p. 38—45.10. Obolevich Т. 2014, Ot neokantianstva k ontologizmu [From neo-Kantianism to ontologism] // Mysl [Thought]. № 16, p. 62—69.11. Obolevich Т. 2015 (a) [preprint], Stepun Fedor Avgustovich [Stepun Fedor Avgustovich // Novaja rossijskaja enciklopedija. Т. 15 / pod red. V. I. Danilova-Danilana [New Russian encyclopedia. Vol. 15 / ed. V. I. Danilov-Danilyan]. Мoscow.12. Obolevich Т. 2015 (b), Uchastije russkih filosofov vo Vtorom polskom filosofskom kongresse (1927) [Participation of Russian philosophers of the Second Polish Congress of Philosophy (1927)] // Filosofskij zurnal [Philosophical Magazine]. № 2, p. 128—145.13. Frank S. L. 2013, Problema realnosti. Pier. B. Czardybon, V. S. Miroshnichenko [The problem of reality. Trans. B. Chardybon, V. S. Miroshnichenko] // Filosofskije nauki [Philosophical Sciences]. № 4, p. 122—125.14. Shchukin V. G. 2009, Jewropejskije lanshafty i cyvilizacija bolshoj ravniny (F. А. Stepun) [European landscapes and high plains of civilization (F. A. Stepun)] // Rossija: voobrazenije prostranstva/prostranstvo i voobrazenija / pod red. I. I. Mitina, D. N. Zamiatina [Russia: the imagination of space/space and imaginations / eds. I. I. Mitin, D. N. Zamyatin]. Мoscow, p. 378—397.15. Shchukin V. G. 2012, Ot mietafiziki lanshafta k fienomienologii nacii. F. А. Stepun ob osobennostiah russkoj kultury [From metaphysics to the phenomenology of the landscape of the nation. F. A. Stepun about the peculiarities of Russian culture] // Fedor Avgustovich Stepun / pod red. V. K. Kantora [Fyodor Avgustovich Stepun / ed. V. K. Kantor]. Мoscow, p. 55—74.16. Czardybon B. А. 2011, Belyj i neokantianstvo [A. Belyj and neo-Kantianism] // Miry Andreja Belogo / pod red. K. Ichin, M. Spivak [Andrew Belyj worlds / eds. K. Ichin, M. Spivak]. Belgrade — Мoscow, p. 678—686.17. Czardybon B. 2014, Posleslovije: Sergej Gessen v Polshe do i poslie 2-j mirovoj vojny. Pier. I. V. Obuhovoj-Zielin’skoj [Epilogue: Sergey Hessen in Poland before and after the 2nd World War. Trans. I. N. Obuhova-Zielinska] // Russkije jevrei v Polshe. Stat’i, publikacii, miemuary i esse / pod red. K. Kikoina, I. V. Obuhovoj-Zielin’skoj, М. А. Parhomovskogo [Russian Jews in Poland. Articles, publications, memoirs and essays / ed. K. Kikoin, I. V. Obuhova- Zielinska, M. A. Parhomovsky]. Jerusalem, p. 233—256.18. Czardybon B., Miroshnichenko V. S. 2013, О vystuplenii S. L. Franka na vtorom polskom filosofskom s’ezde (Varshava, 1927) [About speech S. L. Frank on the second Polish Philosophical Congress (Warsaw, 1927)] // Filosofskije nauki [Philosophical Sciences]. № 4, p. 120—122.19. Czelpanov G. 1907, Ob umie zywotnyh [On the minds of animals] // Voprosy filosofii i psihologii [Problems of Philosophy and Psychology]. № 91, p. 45—75.20. Augustyn L. 2012, Wartosc bytu. Ontologizm etyczny w filozofii rosyjskiej (Rozwazania wokoł filozofii Borysa Wyszeslawcewa) [The value of being. Ethical ontologism in Russian philosophy (Reflections on the philosophy of Boris Vysheslavtsev)] // Postneokantyzm — ontologizm / pod red. B. Czardybon, L. Augustyna, M. Bohuna. Estetyka i Krytyka [Post-neo-Kantianism —ontologism / eds. B. Czardybon, L. Augustyn, M. Bohun. Aesthetics and Criticism]. № 26, p. 309—324.21. Beben D. 2012, Kilka uwag o «Logosie», czyli filozofia kultury jako filozofia pierwsza [Some remarks on „Logos”, or philosophy of culture as first philosophy] // Folia Philosophica [Folia Philosophica]. № 30, p. 285—302.22. Bild, Abbild und Wahrheit. Von der Gegenwart des Neukantianismus, 2013 / ed. T. Kubalica. Würzburg.23. Bober I. 1990, Sergiusza Hessena proba przezwyciezenia relatywizmu w naukach o kulturze [Sergey Hessen’s attempt to overcome relativism in the sciences of culture] // Z problematyki filozoficznej i ekonomicznej wspolczesnosci / pod red. C. Szczepanczyka [From a philosophical and economic issues of the present day / ed. C. Szczepanczyk]. Kielce, p. 7—33.24. Bohun M. 2012, Nowa ontologia czy «prywatna metafizyka»? Kilka uwag na marginesie «syntezy krytycznej» Fiodora Stiepuna [The new ontology or „the private metaphysics”? Some remarks on Fyodor Stepun’s „critical synthesis”] // Postneokantyzm — ontologizm / pod red. B. Czardybon, L. Augustyna, M. Bohuna. Estetyka i Krytyka [Post-neo-Kantianism — ontologism / eds. B. Czardybon, L. Augustyn, M. Bohun. Aesthetics and Criticism]. № 26, p. 295—307.25. Bohun M. 2014, Smiertelna cywilizacja. Katastroficzny antyokcydentalizm rosyjski i europejskie paradoksy [The mortal civilization. The Russian antioccidental catastrophism and European paradoxes]. Kultura i Wartosci [Culture and Values]. № 2, p. 45—62.26. Cohen H. 2012, Kantowska teoria doswiadczenia. Pier. A. J. Norasa [Kant’s theory of experience. Trans. A. J. Noras]. Kety.27. Czardybon B. 2009, Wiara w ujeciu Aleksandra I. Wwiedienskiego [Faith according to Alexander I. Vvedensky] // Logos i Ethos [Logos and Ethos]. № 2, p. 235—253.28. Czardybon B. 2010 (a), Andrieja Biełego teoria symbolizmu jako swiatopoglądu [Andrey Bely’s theory of symbolism as a worldview] // Symbol w paradygmatach kultury europejskiej. Od czasow antycznych do wspolczesnosci / pod red. A. Borkowskiego, J. Urban. Colloquia Litteraria Sedlcensia. Studia Minora II [Symbol in the paradigms of European culture. From antiquity to the present day / eds. A. Borkowski, J. Urban. Colloquia Litteraria Sedlcensia. Studia Minora II]. Siedlce, p. 37—40.29. Czardybon B. 2010 (b), Motywy neokantowskie w rosyjskim symbolizmie [Neo- Kantian motifs in the Russian symbolism] // Symbol w kulturze rosyjskiej / pod red. K. Dudy, T. Obolevitch [Symbol in Russian culture / eds. K. Duda, T. Obolevitch]. Cracow, p. 473—491.30. Czardybon B. 2011 (a), Doswiadczenia marburskie Wladyslawa Tatarkiewicza and Borysa L. Pasternaka [The Marburg experiences of Wladyslaw Tatarkiewicz and Boris L. Pasternak] // Filo-Sofija [Filo-Sofija]. № 13—14, p. 505—520.31. Czardybon B. 2011 (b), Symbolizm jako modus cogitandi i modus vivendi. Pojecie symbolu w mysli Andrzeja Biełego [Symbolism as a modus cogitandi and modus vivendi. The concept of symbol in the thought of Andrey Bely] // Przeglad Rusycystyczny [Russian Studies Review]. № 3, p. 47—61.32. Czardybon B. 2012 (a), «Nowe ontologie». Tradycja postneokantyzmu w Niemczech i Rosji (10—11 stycznia 2012, Krakow, Uniwersytet Jagiellonski). Sprawozdanie z konferencji [„The new ontologies”. Tradition of post-neo-Kantianism in Germany and Russia (10—11 January 2012, Cracow, Jagiellonian University). Conference report] // Kultura i Wartosci [Culture and Values]. № 1, p. 129—137.33. Czardybon B. 2012 (b), Primum esse, deinde cognoscere. Metafizyka poznania Nicolaia Hartmanna a ontologizm Siemiona L. Franka [Primum esse, deinde cognoscere. Nicolai Hartmann’s metaphysics of knowledge and Semyon L. Frank’s ontologism] // Ruch Filozoficzny [Philosophical Movement]. № 3—4, p. 499—516.34. Czardybon B. 2012 (c), Rosyjski wariant neokantyzmu i postneokantyzmu [The Russian variant of neo-Kantianism and post-neo-Kantianism] // Postneokantyzm — ontologizm / pod red. B. Czardybon, L. Augustyna, M. Bohuna. Estetyka i Krytyka [Post-neo-Kantianism — ontologism / eds. B. Czardybon, L. Augustyn, M. Bohun. Aesthetics and Criticism]. № 26, p. 237—257.35. Czardybon B. 2013, Filozofia Nicolaia Hartmanna a filozofia rosyjska — wybrane analogie [The philosophy of Nicolai Hartmann and the Russian philosophy — selected analogies] // Studia nad filozofia Nicolaia Hartmanna (z bibliografia polskich przekładow i opracowan po roku 1945) / pod red. L. Kopciucha [The studies of the philosophy of Nicolai Hartmann (with Polish translations and elaborations after 1945) / ed. L. Kopciuch]. Lublin, p. 235—252.36. Czardybon B. 2014, Sezeman Wasyl [Vasily Sesemann] // Idei w Rossii — Idee w Rosji — Ideas in Russia. Leksykon rosyjsko-polsko-angielski. Т. 8 / pod red. J. Dobieszewskiego [Ideas in Russia. Russian-Polish-English lexicon. Vol. 8 / ed. J. Dobieszewski]. Lodz, p. 380—385.37. Czardybon B. 2015 (a), Hartmann Nicolai [Hartmann Nicolai] // Idei w Rossii — Idee w Rosji — Ideas in Russia. Leksykon rosyjsko-polsko-angielski. Т. 9 / pod red. J. Dobieszewskiego [Ideas in Russia. Russian-Polish-English lexicon. Vol. 9 / ed. J. Dobieszewski]. Lodz.38. Czardybon B. 2015 (b), Logizm [Logism] // Idei w Rossii — Idee w Rosji — Ideas in Russia. Leksykon rosyjsko-polsko-angielski. Т. 9 / pod red. J. Dobieszewskiego [Ideas in Russia. Russian-Polish-English lexicon. Vol. 9 / ed. J. Dobieszewski]. Lodz.39. Danilkina N. 2012, Filozofia i metafizyka w rozumieniu Sergiusza Hessena. Pier. D. Wanczyka [„Philosophy” and „metaphysics” in Sergey Hessen’s interpretation. Trans. D. Wanczyk] // Postneokantyzm — ontologizm / pod red. B. Czardybon, L. Augustyna, M. Bohuna. Estetyka i Krytyka [Post-neo-Kantianism — ontologism / eds. B. Czardybon, L. Augustyn, M. Bohun. Aesthetics and Criticism]. № 26, p. 275—285.40. Diec J. 1998, Koncepcja kultury Sergiusza Hessena [Sergey Hessen’s conception of culture] // Archiwum Historii Filozofii i Mysli Spolecznej [Archives of the History of Philosophy and Social Thought]. № 43, p. 195—202.41. Filozofia wychowania Sergiusza Hessena, 1997 / pod red. H. Rotkiewicz [Sergey Hessen’s philosophy of education / ed. H. Rotkiewicz]. Warsaw.42. Folkierska A. 2005, Sergiusz Hessen: pedagog odpowiedzialny [Sergei Hessen: responsible educator]. Warsaw.43. Hartmann N. 2007, Zarys metafizyki poznania. Pier. E. Drzazgowskiej, P. Piszczatowskiego [Outline of a metaphysics of knowledge. Trans. E. Drzazgowska, P. Piszczatowski]. Warsaw.44. Hessen S. 1956, Autobiografia. La pedagogia russa del XX secolo [Autobiography. The pedagogy of the Russian twentieth century] // I Problemi della Pedagogia. Т. 17 / pod red. L. Volpicelliego [I Problems of pedagogy. Vol. 17 / ed. L. Volpicelli]. Roma. p. 9—62.45. Hessen S. 1968, Studia z filozofii kultury / sost. A. Walicki [Studies in the philosophy of culture / ed. A. Walicki]. Warsaw.46. Hessen S. 1973, Filozofia, kultura, wychowanie / sost. M. Hessenowa [Philosophy, culture, education / ed. M. Hessenowa]. Wroclaw — Warsaw.47. Hessen S. 1997 (a), Podstawy pedagogiki (Dziela wybrane. Т. 1) / sost. W. Okon, pier. A. Zielenczyka [Basics of pedagogy (Selected works. Vol. 1) / ed. W. Okon, trans. A. Zielenczyk]. Warszawa.48. Hessen S. 1997 (b), Szkola i demokracja na przelomie (Dziela wybrane. Т. 2) / sost. W. Okon, pier. A. Zielenczyka [School and democracy at the turn (Selected works. Vol. 2) / ed. W. Okon, trans. A. Zielenczyk]. Warsaw.49. Hessen S. 1997 (c), O sprzecznosciach i jednosci wychowania. Zagadnienia pe-dagogiki personalistycznej (Dziela wybrane. Т. 3) / sost. W. Okon [The contradictions and unity of education. Issues personalistic pedagogy (Selected works. Vol. 3) / ed. W. Okon]. Warsaw.50. Hessen S. 1997 (d), Struktura i tresc szkoły wspolczesnej. Zarys dydaktyki ogolnej (Dziela wybrane. Т. 4) / sost. W. Okon [The structure and content of contemporary school. An outline of general didactics (Selected works. Vol. 4) / ed. W. Okon]. Warsaw.51. Hessen S. 1997 (e), Moje zycie. Pier. A. Kaminskiego [My life. Trans. A. Kaminski] // Hessen S. Pisma pomniejsze (Dziela wybrane. Т. 5) / sost. W. Okon [Hessen S. Minor writings. (Selected works. Vol. 5) / ed. W. Okon]. Warsaw, p. 45—47.52. Hessen S. 1997 (f), Pisma pomniejsze (Dziela wybrane. Т. 5) / sost. W. Okon [Minor writings (Selected works. Vol. 5) / ed. W. Okon]. Warsaw.53. Hessen S. 2003, Panstwo prawa i socjalizm. Pier. S. Mazurka [The state of law and socialism. Trans. S. Mazurek]. Warsaw.54. Kojkol J. 2001 (a), Kultura i wychowanie w filozoficznej wizji edukacji Sergiusza Hessena [Culture and education in Sergey Hessen’ philosophical vision of education] // Czlowiek i kultury. Liber amicorum. Studia poswiecone profesorowi Miroslawowi Nowaczykowi / pod red. Z. Stachowskiego [Man and cultures. Liber amicorum. Studies dedicated to Professor Miroslaw Nowaczyk / ed. Z. Stachowski]. Warsaw — Tyczyn, p. 85—98.55. Kojkol J. 2001 (b), Wartosci a wychowanie w personalistycznej wizji edukacji Sergiusza Hessena [Values and education in Sergey Hessen’s personalistic vision of education] // Elitaryzm. Mistrz w edukacji / pod red. M. Szczepanskiej [Elitism. Master in education / ed. M. Szczepanska]. Slupsk, p. 19—29.56. Kojkol J. 2009, Posthistoryczne traktowanie wartosci: B. Nawroczynski — S. Hessen — H. Elzenberg [Post-historical treatment values: B. Nawroczynski — S. Hessen — H. Elzenberg] // Acta Facultatis Philosophicae Universitatis Presoviensis. Studia Aesthetica [Acta Universitatis Facultatis Philosophicae Presoviensis. Studia Aesthetica]. №XI, p. 124—142.57. Krasicki J. 2012 (a), Bierdiajew i Kant [Berdyaev and Kant] // Krasicki J. Bierdiajew i inni. W kregu mysli rosyjskiego renesansu religijno-filozoficznego [J. Krasicki. Berdyaev and others. In the circle of the thought of Russian religious-philosophical renaissance]. Warsaw, p. 105—132.58. Krasicki J. 2012 (b), Bierdiajew i neokantyzm // Krasicki J. Bierdiajew i inni. W kregu mysli rosyjskiego renesansu religijno-filozoficznego [Berdyaev and neo-Kantianism // Krasicki J. Berdyaev and others. In the circle of thoughts of Russian religious-philosophical renaissance]. Warsaw, p. 133—147.59. Krasicki J. 2012 (c), «Filozoficzna donkichoteria»? Mikolaj Bierdiajew w poszukiwaniu idealu filozofii [„Philosophical Quixotism”? Nikolai Berdyayev and the search for the ideal of philosophy] // Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Sklodowska [Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Sklodowska]. № 2, p. 39—57.60. Krasicki J. 2012 (d), Mikolaj Bierdiajew a neokantyzm [Nicolai Berdyayev and neo-Kantianism] // Postneokantyzm — ontologizm / pod red. B. Czardybon, L. Augustyna, M. Bohuna. Estetyka i Krytyka [Post-neo-Kantianism — ontologism / eds. B. Czardybon, L. Augustyn, M. Bohun. Aesthetics and Criticism]. № 26, p. 223—236.61. Kubalica T. 2009, Prymat rozumu praktycznego w logice. Teoria prawdy neokantowskiej szkoły badenskiej [Primacy of practical reason in the logic. Theory of truth of neo-Kantian Baden school]. Katowice.62. Kubalica T. 2011, Wahrheit, Geltung und Wert. Die Wahrheitstheorie der Badischen Schule des Neukantianismus. Wurzburg.63. Kubalica T. 2014, Johannes Volkelt und das Problem der Metaphysik. Wurzburg.64. Kubalica T. 2015, Wladysław Tatarkiewicz und der Marburger Neukantianismus // Neukantianismus in Polen / pod red. T. Kubalicy, S. Nachtsheima. Würzburg, p. 115—124.65. Kucha R., Swiderska M. 2013, Sergiusz Hessen (1887—1950) — as creative European educationalist with no homeland. Journal of Intercultural Management. № 4, p. 81—92.66. Kuderowicz Z. 1969, Sergiusz Hessen a przelom antypozytywistyczny [Sergey Hessen and antipositivisitc turn] // Studia Filozoficzne [Philosophical Studies]. № 4, p. 161—164.67. Losski M. 2000, Idealizm transcendentalno-logiczny w Rosji i jego krytyka. Wlodzimierz Ern (1. Przedstawiciele idealizmu transcendentalno-logicznego) [Transcendental logical idealism in Russia and its criticism. Vladimir Ern (1. Representatives of transcendental- logical idealism)] // Losski M. Historia filozofii rosyjskiej. Pier. H. Paprockiego [Lossky M. The history of Russian philosophy. Trans. H. Paprocki]. Kety, p. 357—365.68. Marburg versus Südwestdeutschland. Philosophische Differenzen zwischen den beiden Hauptschulen des Neukantianismus / eds. Ch. Krijnen, A. J. Noras. Würzburg, 2012.69. Mazurek S. 2012, Rosyjski renesans religijno-filozoficzny wobec filozofii Kanta [Russian religious-philosophical renaissance and Immanuel Kant’s philosophy] // Postneokantyzm — ontologizm / pod red. B. Czardybon, L. Augustyna, M. Bohuna. Estetyka i Krytyka [Post-neo-Kantianism — ontologism / eds. B. Czardybon, L. Augustyn, M. Bohun. Aesthetics and Criticism]. № 26, p. 215—221.70. Miroshnychenko V. 2011, Na drodze do Bogoludzkiego uzasadnienia kultury: S. L. Frank a neokantyzm. Pier. B. Czardybon [On the way to theo-antropologic legitimation of culture: S. L. Frank and neo-Kantianism. Trans. B. Czardybon] // Przeglad Filozoficzny. Nowa Seria [Philosophical Review. New Series]. № 1, p. 63—80.71. Neokantyzm 1984 / sost. B. Borowicz-Sierocka, C. Karkowski [Neo-Kantianism / ed. B. Borowicz-Sierocka, C. Karkowski]. Wroclaw.72. Neokantyzm badenski i marburski. Antologia tekstow 2011 / pod red. A. J. Norasa, T. Kubalicy [The Baden and Marburg neo-Kantianism. Anthology / ed. A. J. Noras, T. Kubalica]. Katowice.73. Neukantianismus in Polen 2015 / ed. T. Kubalica, S. Nachtsheim. Würzburg.74. Niznikow S. A. 2004, O specyfice rosyjskiego neokantyzmu (uwagi o filozofii wiary A. I. Wwiedienskiego). Pier. H. Rarot [On specific character of the Russian neo-Kantianism (notes on A. I. Vvedensky’s philosophy of faith). Trans. H. Rarot] // Rosja — Wielki Nieznajomy. Wybor tekstow ze wspolczesnej filozofii i socjologii rosyjskiej / pod red. H. Rarot, J. Mizinskiej. Colloquia Communia [Russia — Great Stranger. Selection of texts on the Russian contemporary philosophy and sociology / eds. H. Rarot, J. Mizinska. Colloquia Communia]. № 2, p. 29—39.75. Noras A. J. 2011, Kant a novokantovstvo — badenska a marburska skola. Pier. E. Andreanskyego, V. Lesko, P. Tholta [Kant and neo-Kantianism — Baden and Marburg school. Trans. E. Andreansky, V. Lesko, P. Tholt]. Kosice.76. Noras A. J. 2012, Historia neokantyzmu [The history of neo-Kantianism]. Katowice.77. Obolevitch T. 2007, Ontologizm, czyli Siemiona Franka polemika z pokantowskim epistemologizmem [Ontologism. Semyon Frank’s polemic with post-Kantian epistemologism] // Roczniki Filozoficzne [Annals of Philosophy]. № 2, p. 67—79.78. Obolevitch T. 2008 (a), Animal symbolicum. Mysl E. Cassirera i A. F. Losiewa [Animal symbolicum. E. Cassirer and A. F. Losiev’s thought] // W poszukiwaniu swoistosci czlowieka / pod red. G. Bugajaka, J. Tomczyka [In search of specificity man / eds. G. Bugajak, J. Tomczyk]. Warsaw, p. 141—157.79. Obolevitch T. 2008 (b), Polemiczne watki w filozofii wszechjednosci Siemiona Franka [Polemical themes in Semyon Frank’s philosophy of all-unity] // Przeglad Filozoficzny. Nowa Seria [Philosophical Review. New Series]. № 3, p. 61—70.80. Obolevitch T. 2012 (a), Animal symbolicum. Mysl Ernsta Cassirera i Aleksego Losiewa [Animal symbolicum. Thought of Ernst Cassirer and Alexei Losev] // Aleksy Losiew, czyli rzecz o tytanizmie XX wieku / pod red. J. Uglika, E. Tacho-Godi, L. Kiejzik [Alexei Losiew. or thing about titanism at 20th century / eds. J. Uglik, E. Tacho-Godi, L. Kiejzik]. Warsaw, p. 406—418.81. Obolevitch T. 2012 (b), Wlodzimierza Solowjowa i Aleksandra Wwiedienskiego spor o Spinoze [Vladimir Solovev and Alexander Vvedensky polemic on Spinoza] // Logos i Ethos [Logos and Ethos]. № 1, p. 233—240.82. Obolevitch T. 2012 (c), W strone ontologizmu. Ewolucja tworcza Siemiona Franka [Towards ontologism. Creative evolution on Semyon Frank] // Postneokantyzm — ontologizm / pod red. B. Czardybon, L. Augustyna, M. Bohuna. Estetyka i Krytyka [Post-neo-Kantianism —ontologism / eds. B. Czardybon, L. Augustyn, M. Bohun. Aesthetics and Criticism]. № 26, p. 259—274.83. Paradowski R. 2011, Mikolaj Bierdiajew i Fiodor Stiepun o wolnosci. Wolnosc jako wiernosc [Nicolai Berdyayev and Fyodor Stepun on freedom. Freedom as fidelity] // Paradowski R. Metafizyka i kultura. Repetycje kartezjanskie [Paradowski R. Metaphysics and culture. Cartesian repetitions]. Warsaw, p. 319—326.84. Pluta A. 1992, Kultura i ksztalcenie. Proba kulturoznawczego odniesienia do koncepcji dydaktyki krytycznej Sergiusza Hessena [Culture and education. Attempt cultural studies reference to the conception of critical didactics of Sergey Hessen]. Czestochowa.85. Polskie badania filozofii rosyjskiej. Przewodnik po literaturze. T. 1 / pod red. L. Kiejzik, J. Uglika [Polish studies on Russian philosophy. A guidebook to literature. Vol. 1 / eds. L. Kiejzik, J. Uglik]. Warsaw, 2009.86. Polskie badania filozofii rosyjskiej. Przewodnik po literaturze. Т. 2 / pod red. L. Kiejzik, J. Uglika [Polish study Russian philosophy. A guidebook to literature. Vol. 2 / eds. L. Kiejzik, J. Uglik]. Warsaw, 2012.87. Przebinda G. 1998, Rola «kantyzmu» w procesie ewolucji mysli Nikolaja Bierdiajewa [The role of the „Kantianism” in the process of evolution of Nicolai Berdyaev’s thought]. Slavia Orientalis [Slavia Orientalis]. № 3, p. 433—446.88. Przebinda G. 2003, Rola «kantyzmu» w procesie ewolucji mysli Nikolaja Bierdiajewa [The role of the „Kantianism” in the process of evolution of Nicolai Berdyaev’s thought] // Przebinda G. Między Moskwą a Rzymem. Myśl religijna w Rosji XIX i XX wieku [Between Moscow and Rome. Russian religious thought in Russia at the 19th and XXth centuries]. Cracow, p. 159—171.89. Przybycien K. K. 2007, Osobowosc w koncepcji pedagogicznej Sergiusza Hessena [Personality in the pedagogical conception of Sergey Hessen] // Ukrains’ka polonistika (Piedagogichni dostizenija) [Ukrainian Polish studies (Pedagogical achievements)]. № 3—4, p. 83—95.90. Solowjow W. S. 2012, Pojecie Boga (w obronie filozofii Spinozy) / Pier. koll. pod red. T. Obolevitch [The concept of God (the defense of Spinoza’s philosophy) / Trans. coll. ed. T. Obolevitch] // Logos i Ethos [Logos and Ethos]. № 1, p. 203—231.91. Stiepun F. 1999, Zycie a tworczosc. Pier. W. Sawickiego [The life and creativity. Trans. W. Sawicki]. Warsaw.92. Stiepun F. 2007, «Biesy» a rewolucja bolszewicka. Pier. R. Papieskiego [„The devils” and the Bolshevik Revolution. Trans. R. Papieski] // Kronos. Metafizyka — Kultura — Religia [Kronos. Metaphysics — Culture — Religion]. № 4, p. 36—47.93. Stolowicz L. 2008, Prady filozoficzne pierwszej polowy XX wieku. Neokantyzm rosyjski [Philosophical directions at first half of the 20th century. Russian neo-Kantianism] // Stolowicz L. Historia filozofii rosyjskiej. Podrecznik. Pier. B. Zylko [Stolowicz L. History of Russian philosophy. Coursebook. Trans. B. Zylko]. Gdansk, p. 333—363.94. Styczynski M. 2004 (a), Neokantysta Sergiusz Hessen [Sergey Hessen, neo-Kantian] // Miedzy reforma a rewolucja. Rosyjska mysl filozoficzna, polityczna i spoleczna na przelomie XIX i XX wieku / pod red. A. Ochotnickiej, W. Rydzewskiego [Between reform and revolution. Russian philosophical, political and social thought at the turn of the 19th and 20th century / ed. A. Ochotnicka, W. Rydzewski]. Cracow, p. 127—140.95. Styczynski M. 2004 (b), Sergei Hessen, Neo-Kantian // Studies in East European Thought. № 56, p. 55—71.96. Styczynski M. 2012, Neokantysta Sergiusz Hessen [Neo-Kantian Sergei Hessen] // Styczynski M. Ratio a Logos: jedno czy dwoje? O filozofii rosyjskiej, sowietologii i o filozofii politycznej Andrzeja Walickiego. Zbior rozpraw [Styczynski M. Ratio and Logos: one or two? On the Russian philosophy, sovietology and political philosophy of Andrzej Walicki. Collection of treatises]. Lodz, p. 85—98.97. Szczukin W. 2008, Mietafizika landshafta i cywilizacija rawniny (Fedor Stiepun) [Metaphysics landscape and civilization of the plains (Fedor Stepun)] // Studia Litteraria Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis [Studia Litteraria Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis]. № 3, p. 145—162.98. Sztobryn S. 1994, Filozofia wychowania Sergiusza Hessena [Sergey Hessen’s philosophy of education]. Lodz.99. Sztobryn D., Sztobryn S. 1997, Transcendentalny empiryzm jako postac Hessenowskiego neokantyzmu [Transcendental empiricism as a character Hessen neo-Kantianism] // Filozofia wychowania Sergiusza Hessena / pod red. H. Rotkiewicz [Sergey Hessen’s philosophy of education / ed. H. Rotkiewicz]. Warsaw, p. 116—130.100. Szulakiewicz M. 2002, Mikolaj Bierdiajew jako krytyk filozofii transcendentalnej [Nikolaj Berdyaev as a critic of transcendental philosophy] // Emigracja rosyjska. Losy i idee / pod red. R. Bäckera, Z. Karpusa [Russian emigration. Fate and ideas / eds. R. Backer, Z. Karpus]. Lodz, p. 111—122.101. Szulakiewicz M. 2003, Mikolaj Bierdiajew i filozofia krytyczna [Nicolai Berdyayev and critical philosophy] // SOFIA. Pismo Filozofow Krajow Słowianskich [SOFIA. Journal of the Philosophers of Slavic Countries]. № 3, p. 131—145.102. Swiecicki z(e) Lwowa H. G. 1910, Czelpanow. O rozumie zwierzat (rec.) [G. Czelpanow. About mind animals (rev.)] // Przeglad Filozoficzny [Philosophical Review]. № 4, p. 520.103. Walicki A. 1973, Rosyjska filozofia i mysl spoleczna od Oswiecenia do marksizmu [Russian philosophy and social thought from the Enlightenment to Marxism]. Warsaw.104. Walicki A. 1979, A history of Russian thought from the Enlightenment to Marxism. Trans. H. Andrews-Rusiecka. Stanford.105. Walicki A. 1980, A history of Russian thought from the Enlightenment to Marxism. Trans. H. Andrews-Rusiecka. Oxford.106. Walicki A. 1995, Sergiusz Hessen: synteza porewolucyjna [Sergey Hessen: postrevolutionary synthesis] // Walicki A. Filozofia prawa rosyjskiego liberalizmu. Wybor pism. Pier. J. Stawinskiego [Walicki A. Philosophy of law of Russian liberalism. Choosing writings. Trans. J. Stawinski]. Warsaw, p. 419—478.107. Walicki A. 2007, Moj lodzki Mistrz i pluralizm wartosci [My Lodzian master and pluralism of values] // Walicki A. O inteligencji, liberalizmach i o Rosji [Walicki A. On the intelligence, liberalisms and Russia]. Cracow, p. 219—232.108. Wieczorek Z. 2005, Filozofia wszechjednosci Sergiusza Hessena [Sergey Hessen’s philosophy of all-unity]. Cracow.109. Wokoł idei pedagogicznych Sergiusza Hessena, 2013 / pod red. M. Bledowskiej, A. Wrobel [Around the pedagogical ideas of Sergey Hessen / eds. M. Błędowska, A. Wrobel]. Lodz.110. Wwiedienski A. I. 2009, O rodzajach wiary w jej relacji do wiedzy. Cz. 1. Pier. T. Obolevitch, B. Czardybon [On the kinds of faith with reference to knowledge. Vol. 1. Trans. T. Obolevitch, B. Czardybon] // Logos i Ethos [Logos and Ethos]. № 2, p. 197—234.111. Wwiedienski A. I. 2010, O rodzajach wiary w jej relacji do wiedzy. Cz. 2. Pier. B. Czardybon [On the kinds of faith with reference to knowledge. Vol. 2. Trans. B. Czardybon] // Logos i Ethos [Logos and Ethos]. № 1, p. 179—204.112. Ziomek M. 2008, W poszukiwaniu kulturowej tozsamosci — rosyjscy Europejczycy: Fiodor Stiepun i Gieorgij Fiedotow i czasopismo «Nowyj grad» [In the search for cultural identity —Russian Europeans: Fyodor Stepun and Georgy Fedotov and the magazine „New hail”] // Studenckie Zeszyty Naukowe (Instytut Filologii Wschodnioslowianskiej Uniwersytetu Jagiellonskiego, Kolo Naukowe (W)Koło Rosji) [Student Scientific Papers (Institute of Slavonic Philology of the Jagiellonian University, Scientific Circle (In) Circle Russia)]. № 4, p. 40—48.113. Ziomek M. 2012, Neokantyzm Fiodora Stiepuna [Fyodor Stepun’s neo-Kantian philosophy] // Postneokantyzm — ontologizm / pod red. B. Czardybon, L. Augustyna, M. Bohuna. Estetyka i Krytyka [Post-neo-Kantianism — ontologism / eds. B. Czardybon, L. Augustyn, M. Bohun. Aesthetics and Criticism]. № 26, p. 287—294.M.ZagirnyakThis paper analyzes receptions of phenomenological and neo-Kantian axiology trends in the interpretation of the concept and status of value in N. N. Alekseev’s philosophy of law. The author identifies the role of Neo-Kantian nomothetic—idiographic division of sciences proposed by the Southwest German school of Neo-Kantianism in interpreting the essence of law within Aleseev’s philosophy. It is shown that Alekseev uses Windelband's distinction between the due and the existing as a convenient methodological technique for understanding features of social phenomena. The article considers the context of Windelband’s philosophy in Alekseev’s interpretation of the role of the rule in philosophy of law. It is shown that Alekseev employs the distinction between the a priori and empirical, suggested by the theory of values, in his philosophy. Values are identified as a basis for the development of law and morals in Alekseev’s philosophy. Comparing reality and values makes it possible to see how Alekseev combines the id eas of axiology of Neo-Kanitianism and phenomenology. To narrow the gap between the a priori and empirical in the theory of values proposed by the Southern German school of Neo-Kantianism, Alekseev uses the solutions proposed by M. Scheler’s phenomenological axiology. It is stressed that Alekseev does not adopt either M. Scheler’s personalistic approach or his hierarchy of values. In his mature period, Alekseev supplements his interpretation of values with the religious aspect. He understands religion as a means to link the a priori and empirical and translate both into reality. It is emphasized that religion becomes a tool for understanding values as rules. It is concluded that Alekseev’s philosophy of law combines Neo-Kantian and phenomenological principles with religious aspects.05302026111. Alexeev, N. N., 1912, Nauki obshhestvennye i estestvennye v istoricheskom vzaimootnoshenii ih metodov: ocherki po istorii i metodologii obshhestvennyh nauk [Social and natural sciences in the historic relationship between their methods: essays on the history and methodology of the social sciences], Moscow, 272 p.2. Alexeev, N. N., 1918, Vvedenie v izuchenie prava [Introduction to the study of law], Moscow, 188 p.3. Alexeev, N. N., 1919a, Obshhee uchenie o prave. Kurs lekcij, prochitannyh v Tavricheskom Universitete v 1918—19 godu. [The general theory of law. The course of lectures in Tavrichesky University in 1918—19.], Simferopol, 162 p.4. Alexeev, N. N., 1919b, Ocherki po obshhej teorii gosudarstva. Osnovnye predposylki i gipotezy gosudarstvennoj nauki [Essays on the general theory of the state. Basic assumptions and hypotheses of the state of science]. Moscow, 209 p.5. Alexeev, N. N., 1930, Religija, pravo i nravstvennost' [Religion, law, and morality], Paris, 106 p.6. Alexeev, N. N., 1934, Ob idee filosofii i ejo obshhestvennoj missii [About the intention of philosophy and its social mission] // Put' = Voie = [The way], no. 44 (June- September 1934) — Paris: Izdanie Religiozno-Filosofskoi Akademii, P. 27—43.7. Alexeev, N. N., 1955, Ideja gosudarstva: Ocherki po istorii politicheskoj mysli [The idea of the State: Essays on the history of political thought] New York, 412 p.8. Alexeev, N. N., 1998a, Duhovnye predposylki evrazijskoj kul'tury [Spiritual preconditions of Eurasian culture] // Alexeev, N. N., Russkii narod i gosudarstvo [Russian nation and the state], Moscow, P. 142—154.9. Alexeev, N. N., 1998b, Na putiakh k budushchei Rossii [On the way to the future Russia] // Alexeev, N. N., Russkii narod i gosudarstvo [Russian nation and the state], Moscow, P. 282—371.10. Alexeev, N. N., 1998c, Sovremennoe polozhenie nauki o gosudarstve i ee blizhajshie zadachi [The current situation and immediate objectives of the science of the state] // Alexeev, N. N., Russkii narod i gosudarstvo [Russian nation and the state], Moscow, P. 386—624.11. Alexeev, N. N., 1999, Osnovy filosofii prava [The base of the philosophy of law]. Saint Petersburg, 256 p.12. Vasil'eva, S. V., 2011, Fenomenologicheskaja teorija poznanija M. Shelera — sozercanie sushhnosti [The phenomenological theory of cognition of M. Scheler — contemplation of the the essence] // Filosofskaja antropologija Maksa Shelera: uroki, kritika, perspektivy [Philosophical anthropology of Max Scheler: tasks, critique, perspectives], Saint Petersburg, P. 27—42.13. Windelband, W., 1995a, Chto takoe filosofija? (O ponjatii i istorii filosofii) [What is philosophy? (On the concept and the history of philosophy)]) // Windelband, W., Izbrannoe: Duh i Istorija [Selected: Spirit & History], Moscow, P. 22—58.14. Windelband, W., 1995b, Normy i zakony prirody [Norms and laws of nature] // Windelband, W., Izbrannoe: Duh i Istorija [Selected: Spirit & History], Moscow, P. 184—208.15. Dmitrieva, N. A., 2007, Russkoje neokantianstvo: “Marburg” v Rossii. Istoriko-filosofskije ocherki [Russian Neo-Kantianism: “Marburg” in Russia. Historical and philosophical essays], Moscow, 512 p.16. Dmitrieva, N. A., 2013, Ponjatie «apriori» v nemeckom i russkom neokantianstve [The concept of “a priori” in the German and Russian Neo-Kantianism] // Mnogoobrazie apriori. Materialy mezhdunarodnoj konferencii na filosofskom fakul’tete RGGU19—20 aprelja 2012 g. Pod red. A. N. Kruglova [The variety of a priori. Materials of the International Conference on the Philosophy Faculty of Russian State University for the Humanities, 19—20 April 2012. Ed. by A. N. Krouglov], Moscow, P. 129—147.17. Markov, B. V., 2013, Apriori povsednevnosti [A priori of everyday life] // Mnogoobrazie apriori. Materialy mezhdunarodnoj konferencii na filosofskom fakul'tete RGGU 19—20 aprelja 2012 g. Pod red. A. N. Kruglova [The variety of a priori. Materials of the International Conference on the Philosophy Faculty of Russian State University for the Humanities, 19—20 April 2012. Ed. by A. N. Krouglov], Moscow, P. 300—323.18. Nazmutdinov, B. V., 2013, Politiko-pravovye vozzrenija evrazijcev v rossijskom gosudarstvovedenii XX veka: uchebnoe posobie [Political and legal views of Eurasians in Russian political science of XX century: Textbook], Moscow, 247 p.19. Polyakov, A. V., Fenomenologicheskaja teorija prava N. N. Alekseeva // Polyakov, A. V., Rossijskij pravovoj diskurs i ideja kommunikacii [The phenomenological theory of law of N. Alexeev // Polyakov, A. V., The Russian legal discourse and the idea of communication] available at: http://window. edu. ru/resource/545/24545/files/1135700.pdf P. 27—38. (accessed 09 August 2015)20. Rickert, H., 1998, O ponjatii filosofii [About the concept of philosophy]// Rickert, H., Nauki o prirode i nauki o kul'ture [The science of nature and science of culture], Moscow, P. 13—42.21. Sсhе1еr, M., 1994a, Ordo amoris // Sсhе1еr, M., Izbrannye proizvedenija [Selected works], Moscow, P. 339—377.22. Sсhе1еr, M., 1994b, Formalizm v jetike i material'naja jetika cennostej [Formalism in Ethics and Non-Formal Ethics of Values]// Sсhе1еr, M., Izbrannye proizvedenija [Selected works], Moscow, P. 259—337.23. Shokhin, V.K, 2006, Filosofija cennostej i rannjaja aksiologicheskaja mysl' [Philosophy of values and early axiological ideas], Moscow, 457 p.V.Belov0530202611S.KarechkoYu.Egorova0530202611V.BelovL.Tetyuev0530202611