<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<doi_batch xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.crossref.org/schema/5.3.1" xmlns:jats="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/JATS1" xmlns:fr="http://www.crossref.org/fundref.xsd" xmlns:ai="http://www.crossref.org/AccessIndicators.xsd" version="5.3.1"><head><doi_batch_id>NONE</doi_batch_id><timestamp>20260531103100530</timestamp><depositor><depositor_name>Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University</depositor_name><email_address>no-reply@journals.kantiana.ru</email_address></depositor><registrant>Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University</registrant></head><body><journal><journal_metadata><full_title>Kantian Journal</full_title><issn media_type="print">0207-6918</issn><issn media_type="electronic">2310-3701</issn></journal_metadata><journal_issue><publication_date media_type="print"><month>05</month><day>31</day><year>2026</year></publication_date><journal_volume><volume>1</volume></journal_volume><issue>1</issue></journal_issue><journal_article publication_type="full_text"><titles><title>The machine and the body in the transcendental cosmo-logy of Chr. Wolff and Chr. A. Crusius</title></titles><contributors><person_name sequence="first" contributor_role="author"><given_name>A. M.</given_name><surname>Kharitonova</surname></person_name></contributors><jats:abstract><jats:p>The 18th century philosophy actively used the notion of machine in its extended meaning, especially when describing both the world as a whole and its constituent bodies. Consequently, the initial meaning of that notion underwent peculiar changes: not only an artificial mechanism but also a natural organic body were defined as machines. A metaphysical comprehension of the notion of machine was developed predominantly in the framework of cosmology.</jats:p></jats:abstract><publication_date media_type="print"><month>05</month><day>31</day><year>2026</year></publication_date><pages><first_page>1</first_page><last_page>1</last_page></pages><citation_list><citation key="1"><unstructured_citation>1. Васильев В. В. Философская психология в эпоху Просвещения. М., 2010.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="2"><unstructured_citation>2. Вольф Хр. Метафизика [Разумные мысли о Боге, мире и душе человека, а также о всех вещах вообще, сообщенные любителям истины Христианом Вольфом.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="3"><unstructured_citation>Халле, 1725] // Христиан Вольф и философия в России / под ред. В. А. Жучкова. СПб., 2001.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="4"><unstructured_citation>3. Кротов А. А. Мальбранш и картезианство. М., 2012.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="5"><unstructured_citation>4. Круглов А. Н. Тетенс, Кант и дискуссия о метафизике в Германии второй половины XVIII века. М., 2008.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="6"><unstructured_citation>5. Лейбниц Г. В. Начала природы и благодати, основанные на разуме // Лейбниц Г. В. Соч. : в 4 т. М., 1982. Т. 1.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="7"><unstructured_citation>6. Лейбниц Г. В. Новая система природы и общения между субстанциями, а также о связи между душою и телом // Там же.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="8"><unstructured_citation>7. Лейбниц Г. В. Материя, взятая в себе // Там же.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="9"><unstructured_citation>8. Borsche T., Kaulbach F. Leib, Körper // Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie / Hrsg. von J. Ritter, K. Gründer. Bd 5. Basel, 1980.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="10"><unstructured_citation>9. Crusius Chr. A. Einleitung in die wahre und vollständige Cosmologie / Aus dem Lateinischen überlegt von M. G. H. Schramm. Leipzig, 1774.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="11"><unstructured_citation>10. Crusius Chr. A. Entwurf der notwendigen Vernunft-Wahrheiten, wiefern sie den zufälligen entgegen gesetzet werden. Leipzig, 1766.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="12"><unstructured_citation>11. Eisler R. Wörterbuch der philosophischen Begriffe. Berlin, 1910.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="13"><unstructured_citation>12. Feder J. G. H. Logik und Metaphysik. Hanau, 1775.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="14"><unstructured_citation>13. Gehler J. S. T. Physikalisches Wörterbuch oder Versuch einer Erklärung der vornehmsten Begriffe und Kunstwörter der Naturlehre mit kurzen Nachrichten von der Geschichte der Erfindungen und Beschreibungen der Werkzeuge begleitet in alphabetischer Ordnung. Leipzig, 1787—1796.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="15"><unstructured_citation>14. Heimsoeth H. Metaphysik und Kritik bei Chr. A. Crusius. Ein Beitrag zur ontologischen Vorgeschichte der Kritik der reinen Vernunft im 18. Jahrhundert // Heimsoeth H. Studien zur Philosophie Immanuel Kants. Metaphysische Ursprünge und ontologische Grundlagen. Köln, 1956.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="16"><unstructured_citation>15. Hinske N. Kants Weg zur Transzendentalphilosophie. Der dreißigjährige Kant. Stuttgart; Berlin; Köln; Mainz, 1970.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="17"><unstructured_citation>16. Hinske N. Zwischen Begriff und Metapher zur Verwendung des Stichworts ‘Maschine’ bei Kant // Machina. XI Colloquio Internazionale Roma, 8—10 gennaio 2004 / A cura di M. Veneziani. Firenze, 2005.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="18"><unstructured_citation>17. Kim Ch. W. Der Begriff der Welt bei Wolff, Baumgarten, Crusius und Kant. Frankfurt am Main, 2004.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="19"><unstructured_citation>18. Krouglov A. N. Der Begriff transzendental bei J. N. Tetens. Historischer Kontext und Hintergründe // Aufklärung. Interdisziplinäres Jahrbuch zur Erforschung des</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="20"><unstructured_citation>19. Jahrhunderts und seiner Wirkungsgeschichte. 2005. № 17.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="21"><unstructured_citation>20. Lindemann-Stark A. Wüstemann, Justin Elias // The Dictionary of Eighteenth-Century German Philosophers / Еd. by M. Kuehn, H. F. Klemme. Bristol, 2010. Vol. 2.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="22"><unstructured_citation>21. Nicolai F. Leben und Meinungen des Herrn Magisters Sebaldus Nothanker. Berlin; Stettin; 1799. Bd 1—2.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="23"><unstructured_citation>22. Onomasticon philosophicum. Latinoteutonicum et teutonicolatinum / Hrsg. von K. Aso, M. Kurosaki, T. Otabe, S. Yamauchi. Tokio, 1989.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="24"><unstructured_citation>23. Rosenfield L. C. From Beast-Machine to Man-Machine. N. Y., 1940.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="25"><unstructured_citation>24. Sutter A. Göttliche Maschinen. Die Automaten für Lebendiges bei Descartes, Leibniz, La Mettrie und Kant. Frankfurt am Main, 1988.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="26"><unstructured_citation>25. Tonelli G. Der Streit über die mathematische Methode in der Philosophie in der ersten Hälfte des 18. Jahrhunderts und die Entstehung von Kants Schrift über die „Deutlichkeit“ // Archiv für Philosophie. 1959. № 9.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="27"><unstructured_citation>26. Wolff Chr. Vernünftige Gedanken von Gott, der Welt und der Seele des Menschen, auch allen Dingen überhaupt. Halle, 1751. ND: Gesammelte Werke / Hrsg. und bearbeitet von J. École. Hildesheim, 2009. Abt. 1, Bd 2.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="28"><unstructured_citation>27. Wolff Chr. Philosophia rationalis sive logica, methodo scientifica pertractata et ad usum scientiarum atque vitae aptata. Praemittitur discursus praeliminaris de philosophia in genere. Frankfurt; Leipzig, 1732.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="29"><unstructured_citation>28. Wolff Chr. Vernünftige Gedanken von den Würkungen der Natur. Halle, 1723.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="30"><unstructured_citation>29. Wüstemann J. E. Einleitung in das philosophische Lehrgebäude des Herrn D. Crusius zum Gebrauche seiner akademischen Vorlesungen. Wittenberg, 1757.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="31"><unstructured_citation>30. Zedler J. H. Grosses vollständiges Universal Lexicon. Halle, 1732—1754.</unstructured_citation></citation></citation_list></journal_article><journal_article publication_type="full_text"><titles><title>The categorical imperative of the karma-yogin</title></titles><contributors><person_name sequence="first" contributor_role="author"><given_name>S. A.</given_name><surname>Chernov</surname></person_name></contributors><jats:abstract><jats:p>This article offers a comparison of certain fundamental ethical ideas of Eastern philosophical traditions with Kant's categorical imperative aiming to corroborate the thesis about the moral unity of humanity and give a moral assessment of the state of Russian society.</jats:p></jats:abstract><publication_date media_type="print"><month>05</month><day>31</day><year>2026</year></publication_date><pages><first_page>1</first_page><last_page>1</last_page></pages><citation_list><citation key="1"><unstructured_citation>1. Вивекананда С. Карма-йога. Пг., 1916.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="2"><unstructured_citation>2. Дао дэ цзин / пер. Ян Хин-шуна. СПб., 2011.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="3"><unstructured_citation>3. Кант И. Основы метафизики нравственности // Кант И. Соч. : в 6 т. М., 1965. Т. 4, ч. 1. С. 219—310.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="4"><unstructured_citation>4. Малявин В. Конфуций. М., 1992.</unstructured_citation></citation></citation_list></journal_article><journal_article publication_type="full_text"><titles><title>Kant and his time — the essay Toward Perpetual Peace against the background of the French Revolution and ensuing wars</title></titles><contributors><person_name sequence="first" contributor_role="author"><given_name>J. (translation from german. I. D. Koptsev and A. Zilber)</given_name><surname>Krause</surname></person_name></contributors><jats:abstract><jats:p>This article considers the events and ideas that served as a background to the creation of the essay Towards Perpetual Peace, as well as the earliest reviews of it. The author pays special attention to the objections voiced by Kant’s student Friedrich Gentz who turned from the advocate of his teacher’s ideas into his opponent. The conclusion offers an attempt to envisage the philosophers’ reactions to the current state of international politics.</jats:p></jats:abstract><publication_date media_type="print"><month>05</month><day>31</day><year>2026</year></publication_date><pages><first_page>1</first_page><last_page>1</last_page></pages><citation_list><citation key="1"><unstructured_citation>1. Bahner W. Der Friedensgedanke in der Literatur der französischen Aufklärung // Grundpositionen der französischen Aufklärung / Hrsg. W. Krauss, H. Mayer. Berlin, 1965. S. 139—208.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="2"><unstructured_citation>2. Beutin W. Kants Schrift „Zum ewigen Frieden“ (1795) und die zeitgenössische Debatte // Hommage a Kant. Kants Schrift „Zum ewigen Frieden“. Hamburg, 1996. S. 97—126.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="3"><unstructured_citation>3. Brandt R. Historisch-kritische Beobachtungen zu Kants Friedensschrift // „Zum ewigen Frieden“, Grundlagen, Aktualität und Aussichten einer Idee von Immanuel Kant / Hrsg. R. Merkel, R. Wittmann. Frankfurt, 1996. S. 31—66.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="4"><unstructured_citation>4. Burke Ed. Reflections on the Revolution in France, and on the Proceedings in Certain Societies in London Relative to that Event. In a Letter Intended to Have Been Sent to a Gentleman in Paris. London, 1790.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="5"><unstructured_citation>5. Clausewitz C. von. Vom Kriege. Hinterlassene Werke über Krieg und Kriegführung des Generals Carl von Clausewitz. Dritte Auflage. Berlin, 1867. Bd. 1—3.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="6"><unstructured_citation>6. Dahrendorf R. Die angewandte Aufklärung. Frankfurt, 1963.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="7"><unstructured_citation>7. Dietze A., Dietze W. Ewiger Friede? Dokumente einer deutschen Diskussion um 1800. München, 1989.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="8"><unstructured_citation>8. Doyle M. W. Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs // Philosophy and Public Affairs. 1983. Vol. 12, N 3. S. 205—235; 1983. N 4. S. 323—353.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="9"><unstructured_citation>9. Doyle M. W. Liberalism and World Politics // American Political Science Review. 1986. Vol. 80, N 4. S. 1151—1169.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="10"><unstructured_citation>10. Geismann G. Kant als Vollender von Hobbes und Rousseau // Der Staat. 1982. N 21. S. 161—189.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="11"><unstructured_citation>11. Gentz F. von. Über den Ewigen Frieden // Historisches Journal. 1800. Jg. 2, Bd 3. S. 709—790. Цит. по: Raumer, 1953. S. 461—497 (Neudruck in Friedrich Gentz. Gesammelte Schriften / Hrsg. G. Kronenbitter. Hildesheim; Zürich; N. Y., 1992. Bd 5. S. 603—682).</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="12"><unstructured_citation>12. Gentz F. von. Über den Ursprung und Charakter des Krieges gegen die französische Revolution. Berlin (Neudruck in Friedrich Gentz. Gesammelte Schriften / Hrsg G. Kronenbitter. Hildesheim; Zürich; N. Y., 1997. Bd 3).</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="13"><unstructured_citation>13. Hoeres P. Kants Friedensidee in der deutschen Kriegsphilosophie des Ersten Weltkrieges // Kant-Studien. 2002. 93. Jg. S. 84—112.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="14"><unstructured_citation>14. Ikenberry G. J. After Victory. Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars. Princeton, 2001.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="15"><unstructured_citation>15. Kaeber E. Die Idee des europеischen Gleichgewichts in der publizistischen Literatur vom 16. bis zur Mitte des 18. Jahrhunderts. Berlin, 1907 (Neuauflage Hildesheim: Verlag Dr. H. A. Gerstenberg, 1971).</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="16"><unstructured_citation>16. Kagan R. Paradise and Power. America and Europe in the New World Order. London, 2003.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="17"><unstructured_citation>17. Kater T. Forschungsbericht. Der Krieg, die Republik und der Friede: Zur Rezeption von Immanuel Kants Zum ewigen Frieden // Militarismus in Deutschland 1871 bis 1945. Zeitgenössische Analysen und Kritik / Hrsg. W. Wette. Jahrbuch für Historische Friedensforschung. 1999. Bd 8. S. 327—345.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="18"><unstructured_citation>18. Mansfield E. D., Snyder J. Democratization and the Danger of War // International Security. 1995. Vol. 20, N 2. S. 5—38.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="19"><unstructured_citation>19. Montesquieu C.-L. de Secondat, Baron de. Des l’esprit des loix. Geneve, 1748. Цит. по: Vom Geist der Gesetze / Übers. und hrsg. von E. Forsthoff. Tübingen, 1992.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="20"><unstructured_citation>20. Raumer Kurt von. Ewiger Friede. Friedensrufe und Friedensplane seit der Renaissance. Freiburg; Munchen, 1953.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="21"><unstructured_citation>21. Saint Pierre, Abbe Castel de Charles Francois. Projet pour rendre la paix perpetuelle en Europe. Цит. по: Der Traktat vom ewigen Frieden 1713 / Hrsg. von W. Michael. Berlin, 1922.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="22"><unstructured_citation>22. Schumpeter J. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. N. Y., 1942.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="23"><unstructured_citation>23. Stein L. von. Die Gesellschaftslehre (1856). Erste Abteilung: Der Begriff der Gesellschaft und die Lehre von den Gesellschaftsklassen. Цит. по переизд. 1964 года (Osnabrück: Otto Zeller Verlagsbuchhandlung).</unstructured_citation></citation></citation_list></journal_article><journal_article publication_type="full_text"><titles><title>A. A. Fet and Kant’s stars-and-morals motif in Russian philosophical poetry</title></titles><contributors><person_name sequence="first" contributor_role="author"><given_name>L. A.</given_name><surname>Kalinnikov</surname></person_name></contributors><jats:abstract><jats:p>This article maintains that the founder of the “stars-and-morals” cycle in Russian philosophical poetry of the 1840s is A. A. Fet. From the poems “I stood a long time without moving” (1843) and “To Le Verrier's Neptune” (1846) to “To extinguished stars” (1890), i. e. over half a century, Fet created lyrical miniatures under the influence of Kant’s and Schopenhauer’s ideas.</jats:p></jats:abstract><publication_date media_type="print"><month>05</month><day>31</day><year>2026</year></publication_date><pages><first_page>1</first_page><last_page>1</last_page></pages><citation_list><citation key="1"><unstructured_citation>1. Благой Д. Д. Мир как красота. (О «вечерних огнях» А. Фета) // Фет А. А. Вечерние огни. М., 1981.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="2"><unstructured_citation>2. Григорьев А. А. Комета // Григорьев А. Стихотворения. Поэмы. Драмы. СПб., 2001.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="3"><unstructured_citation>3. Калинников Л. А. «Звездное небо» и «моральный закон» — поэтическая тема в вариациях // Калинников Л. А. Иммануил Кант в русской поэзии (Философско-этические этюды). М., 2008.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="4"><unstructured_citation>4. Кант И. Всеобщая естественная история и теория неба // Кант И. Собр. соч. : в 6 т. М., 1964. Т. 1.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="5"><unstructured_citation>5. Кант И. Критика чистого разума // Там же. Т. 3.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="6"><unstructured_citation>6. Кант И. Пролегомены ко всякой будущей метафизике … // Там же. Т. 4(1).</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="7"><unstructured_citation>7. Розенблюм Л. М. А. Фет и эстетика «чистого искусства» // Литературное наследство. А. А. Фет и его литературное окружение. М., 2008. Кн. 1.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="8"><unstructured_citation>8. Фет А. А. Мои воспоминания. М., 1992. Т. 2.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="9"><unstructured_citation>9. Фет А. А. О стихотворениях Ф. Тютчева // Фет А. А. Соч. : в 2 т. Т. 2 : Рассказы. О поэзии и искусстве. Письма. М., 1982.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="10"><unstructured_citation>10. Фет А. А. Полн. собр. стихотворений. Л., 1959.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="11"><unstructured_citation>11. Шопенгауэр А. Мир как воля и представление. М., 1993. Т. 1.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="12"><unstructured_citation>12. Шопенгауэр А. О четверояком корне закона достаточного основания // А. Шопенгауэр. О четверояком корне… Мир как воля и представление. Т. 1 : Критика кантовской философии. М., 1993.</unstructured_citation></citation></citation_list></journal_article><journal_article publication_type="full_text"><titles><title>The notion of history in the works of H. Cohen and M. Kagan</title></titles><contributors><person_name sequence="first" contributor_role="author"><given_name>V. N.</given_name><surname>Belov</surname></person_name></contributors><jats:abstract><jats:p>This article considers the attempt by the Russian Neokantianer M. Kagan to create a concept of philosophy of history through developing the main ideas of philosophy of history formulated by his teacher, the founder of the Marburg School of Neokantianism, H. Cohen. The author emphasizes the cardinal importance of philosophy of history for the philosophical position of the Russian thinker.</jats:p></jats:abstract><publication_date media_type="print"><month>05</month><day>31</day><year>2026</year></publication_date><pages><first_page>1</first_page><last_page>1</last_page></pages><citation_list><citation key="1"><unstructured_citation>1. Каган М. И. Автобиографические заметки // Каган М. И. О ходе истории / ред.-сост. В. Л. Махлин. М., 2004. С. 24—28.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="2"><unstructured_citation>2. Каган М. И. Герман Коген // Там же. С. 33—45.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="3"><unstructured_citation>3. Каган М. И. Еврейство в кризисе культуры // Там же. С. 171—183.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="4"><unstructured_citation>4. Каган М. И. Как возможна история? // Там же. С. 199—238.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="5"><unstructured_citation>5. Каган М. И. О личности в социологии // Там же. С. 394—424.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="6"><unstructured_citation>6. Каган М. И. Проблема единства бытия // Там же. С. 333—360.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="7"><unstructured_citation>7. Каган Ю. М. Люди не нашего времени // Там же. С. 10—23.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="8"><unstructured_citation>8. Кацис Л. Еврейство в кризисе культуры // Лехаим. 2009. № 2(202). URL: http://www.lechaim.ru/ARHIV/202/filkam.html</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="9"><unstructured_citation>9. Cohen H. Kants Begründung der Ethik // Cohen H. Werke. Bd 2. / Hrsg. vom Hermann-Cohen-Archiv am Philosophischen Seminar der Universität Zürich unter Leitung von H. Holzhey. Hildesheim; Zürich; N. Y., 2001.</unstructured_citation></citation></citation_list></journal_article><journal_article publication_type="full_text"><titles><title>B. V. Yakovenko and Logos journal</title></titles><contributors><person_name sequence="first" contributor_role="author"><given_name>T. Yu.</given_name><surname>Pankova</surname></person_name></contributors><jats:abstract><jats:p>This article investigates the history and priority fields of the Russian journal on philosophy of culture, Logos, whose ideological inspirator and one of the chief editors was the Russian philosopher Boris V. Yakovenko. The author also focuses on the history of the first issue of Logos published in Prague and the reasons behind the suspension of the second issue.</jats:p></jats:abstract><publication_date media_type="print"><month>05</month><day>31</day><year>2026</year></publication_date><pages><first_page>1</first_page><last_page>1</last_page></pages><citation_list><citation key="1"><unstructured_citation>1. Белов В. Н., Рожков В. П. История русской философии. Саратов, 2006.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="2"><unstructured_citation>2. Ермичев А. А. О неокантианстве Б. В. Яковенко и его месте в русской философии // Яковенко Б. В. Мощь философии / сост., пер., вступ. ст., коммент. А. А. Ермичева. СПб., 2000.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="3"><unstructured_citation>3. Кантор В. К. Ф. А. Степун, «Мусагет», Э. К. Метнер // Кантовский сборник. 2010. № 1(31). С. 48—58.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="4"><unstructured_citation>4. Сапов В. В. Рыцарь философии // Вестник РХГА. 1999. Т. 64, № 8. С. 753—760.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="5"><unstructured_citation>5. Степун Ф. А. Три письма о пражском «Логосе» // Вестник РХГА. 2010. Т. 11, вып. 2. С. 181—189.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="6"><unstructured_citation>6. Яковенко Б. В. Тридцать лет русской философии // Яковенко Б. В. Мощь философии / сост., пер., вступ. ст., коммент. А. А. Ермичева. СПб., 2000. С. 848—877.</unstructured_citation></citation></citation_list></journal_article><journal_article publication_type="full_text"><titles><title>Analytic Philosophy: a Historico-Critical Survey</title></titles><contributors><person_name sequence="first" contributor_role="author"><surname>Wright</surname></person_name><person_name sequence="additional" contributor_role="author"><given_name>H. von. (translated from English by L. B. Makeeva)</given_name><surname>G.</surname></person_name></contributors><publication_date media_type="print"><month>05</month><day>31</day><year>2026</year></publication_date><pages><first_page>1</first_page><last_page>1</last_page></pages><citation_list><citation key="1"><unstructured_citation>1. Austin, 1956: Austin J. L. Ifs and C ans // Proceedings of the British Academy. 1956. Vol. 42.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="2"><unstructured_citation>2. Black, 1940: Black M. Relations between Logical Positivism and the Cambridge School of Analysis // Erkenntnis. 1939—1940. Vol. 8.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="3"><unstructured_citation>3. Black, 1964: Black M. A Companion to Wittgenstein’s TRACTATUS.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="4"><unstructured_citation>4. Carnap, 1931: Carnap R. Überwindung der Metaphysik durch logische Analyse der Sprache // Erkenntnis. 1931. Vol. 2.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="5"><unstructured_citation>5. Carnap, 1934: Carnap R. Logische Syntax der Sprache. Wien : Julius Springer, 1934.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="6"><unstructured_citation>6. Fodor, 1975: Fodor J. The Language of Thought. N. Y. : Thomas Y. Crowell, 1975.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="7"><unstructured_citation>7. Gellner, 1959: Gellner E. Words and Things, A Critical Account of Linguistic Philosophy and a Study in Ideology. With an Introduction by Bertrand Russell. L. : Gollanz, 1959.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="8"><unstructured_citation>8. Goodman, 1951: Goodman N. The Structure of Appearance. Cambridge (Mass.) : Harvard University Press, 1951.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="9"><unstructured_citation>9. Moore, 1905: Moore G. E. The Nature and Reality of Objects of Perception. Reprinted in: Moore G. E. Logical Studies. L. : Routledge &amp; Kegan Paul, 1922.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="10"><unstructured_citation>10. Moore, 1954—1955: Moore G. E. Wittgenstein’s Lectures in 1930—33. 1—3 // Mind. 1954—1955. Vols. 63 &amp; 64. Reprinted in: Moore G. E. Philosophical Papers. L. : Allen &amp; Unwin, 1959.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="11"><unstructured_citation>11. Moore, 1966: Moore G. E. Lectures on Philosophy / ed. by C. L. Lewy. Allen &amp; Unwin, 1966.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="12"><unstructured_citation>12. Pap, 1949: Pap A. Elements of Analytic Philosophy. N. Y. : Macmillan, 1949.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="13"><unstructured_citation>13. Pap, 1955: Pap A. Analytische Erkenntnistheorie. Wien : Julius Springer, 1955.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="14"><unstructured_citation>14. Quine, 1953: Quine W. V. O. Two Dogmas of Empiricism. Reprinted in: Quine W. V. O. From a Logical Point of View. Cambridge (Mass.) : Harvard University Press, 1953.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="15"><unstructured_citation>15. Ramsey,1931: Ramsey F. P. The Foundations of Mathematics and Other Logical Essays. L. : Kegal Paul, Trench, Trübner &amp; Co., 1931.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="16"><unstructured_citation>16. Ramsey, 1991: Ramsey F. P. Notes on Philosophy, Probability and Mathematics / ed. by M. C. Galavotti. Napoli : Biopolis, 1991.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="17"><unstructured_citation>17. Rescher, 1973: Rescher N. The Coherence Theory of Truth. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1973.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="18"><unstructured_citation>18. Rorty, 1980: Rorty R. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Oxford : Basil Blackwell, 1980.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="19"><unstructured_citation>19. Russell, 1914: Russell B. Our Knowledge of the External World as a Field for Scientific Method in Philosophy. Reprinted in: Russell B. Our Knowledge of the External World as a Field for Scientific Method in Philosophy. L. : Allen &amp; Unwin, 1949.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="20"><unstructured_citation>20. Russell, 1924: Russell B. Logical Atomism // Contemporary British Philosophy. First Series. L. : Allen &amp; Unwin, 1924.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="21"><unstructured_citation>21. Russell, 1928: Russell B. Sceptical Essays. N. Y. ; W. W. Norton, 1928.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="22"><unstructured_citation>22. Russell, 1944: Russell B. The Philosophy of Bertrand Russell / ed. by Schilpp. The Library of Living Philosophers. N. Y., 1944.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="23"><unstructured_citation>23. Russell, 1959: Russell B. My Philosophical Development. L. : Allen &amp; Unwin, 1959.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="24"><unstructured_citation>24. Schlick, 1929: Schlick M. Die Wende der philosophie // Erkenntnis. 1929. Vol. 1.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="25"><unstructured_citation>25. Schlick, 1979: Schlick M. Philosophical Papers / ed. by Mulder H. Velde-Schlick van de B. F. B. Dordrecht : Reidel Publishing Co., 1979.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="26"><unstructured_citation>26. Stegmüller, 1979: Stegmüller W. Hauptströmungen der Gegenwartsphilosophie. Stuttgart : Kröner Verlag, 1979.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="27"><unstructured_citation>27. Stenius, 1960: Stenius E. Wittgenstein’s ‘Tractatus’. Oxford : Basil Blackwell, 1960.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="28"><unstructured_citation>28. Waismann, 1939: Waismann F. Was ist logische Analyse? // Erkenntnis. 1939—1940. Vol. 8.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="29"><unstructured_citation>29. Waismann, 1976: Waismann F. Logik, Sprache und Philosophie / ed. by G. P. Baker, McGuinness B. F. Stuttgart : Reclam, 1976.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="30"><unstructured_citation>30. Wittgenstein, 1967: Witgenstein und der Wiener Kreis / ed. by B. F. McGuinness. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1967. In English: Wittgenstein and the Vienna Circle. Ed. by McGuinness B. F. Oxford : Basil Blackwell, 1979.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="31"><unstructured_citation>31. Wright von, 1971: Wright von G. H. Explanation and Understanding. L. : Routledge, Kegan Paul, 1971.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="32"><unstructured_citation>32. Wright von, 1989: The Philosophy of Georg Henrik von Wright / ed. by L. Hahn, P. A. Schilpp The Library of Living Philosophers. Chicago : Open Court, 1989.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="33"><unstructured_citation>33. Cultural Relativism and Philosophy / ed. by M. Dascal. Leiden : Brill E. J., 1991.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="34"><unstructured_citation>34. Rationality and Relativism / ed. by M. Hollis, S. Lukes. Oxford, 1982.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="35"><unstructured_citation>35. The revolution in Philosophy / ed. by A. J. Ayer, Kneale W. C., Paul G. A. [et al.]. With an Introduction by Ryle G. L., 1956.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="36"><unstructured_citation>36. Der Wiener Kreis der Wissenschaftlichen Weltauffassung. Herausgegeben vom Verein Ernest Mach. Wien : Artur Wolf Verlag, 1929.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="37"><unstructured_citation>37. The Scientific Conception of the World: The Vienna Circle. Dordrecht : D. Reidel, 1973.</unstructured_citation></citation></citation_list></journal_article><journal_article publication_type="full_text"><titles><title>Hamann’s letter to Chr. J. Kraus regarding Kant’s work «An Answer to the Question: “What is Enlightenment?”»</title></titles><contributors><person_name sequence="first" contributor_role="author"><given_name>from German by V. Kh. Gilmanov</given_name><surname>translated</surname></person_name></contributors><publication_date media_type="print"><month>05</month><day>31</day><year>2026</year></publication_date><pages><first_page>1</first_page><last_page>1</last_page></pages></journal_article><journal_article publication_type="full_text"><titles><title>Indeed, what is Enlightenment? (an afterword to Ha-mann’s letter to Kraus)</title></titles><contributors><person_name sequence="first" contributor_role="author"><given_name>V. Kh.</given_name><surname>Gilmanov</surname></person_name></contributors><publication_date media_type="print"><month>05</month><day>31</day><year>2026</year></publication_date><pages><first_page>1</first_page><last_page>1</last_page></pages><citation_list><citation key="1"><unstructured_citation>1. Волкова К. А. Моисей Мендельсон и его статьи о просвещении // Кантовский сборник. 2011. № 3 (37).</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="2"><unstructured_citation>2. Кант И. Ответ на вопрос: Что такое Просвещение? // Кант И. Собр. соч. : в 8 т. Юбилейное издание 1794—1994 / под ред. А. В. Гулыги. М., 1994. Т. 8.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="3"><unstructured_citation>3. Лавринович К. К. Альбертина: очерки истории Кёнигсбергского университета. Калининград, 1995.</unstructured_citation></citation><citation key="4"><unstructured_citation>4. Hamann J. G. Sämtliche Werke: 6 Bde. Historisch-kritische Ausgabe von J. Nadler. Wien, 1949—1957.</unstructured_citation></citation></citation_list></journal_article><journal_article publication_type="full_text"><titles><title>K. Immanuel Kant in his final years</title></titles><contributors><person_name sequence="first" contributor_role="author"><given_name>E. A. (continuation</given_name><surname>Wassianski</surname></person_name><person_name sequence="additional" contributor_role="author"><given_name>and foreword by A. S. Zilber</given_name><surname>translation</surname></person_name><person_name sequence="additional" contributor_role="author"><given_name>by I. D. Koptsev)</given_name><surname>edited</surname></person_name></contributors><publication_date media_type="print"><month>05</month><day>31</day><year>2026</year></publication_date><pages><first_page>1</first_page><last_page>1</last_page></pages></journal_article><journal_article publication_type="full_text"><titles><title>A postcard sent by Edmund Husserl to Gustav Shpet</title></titles><contributors><person_name sequence="first" contributor_role="author"><given_name>L. N.</given_name><surname>Stolovich</surname></person_name></contributors><jats:abstract><jats:p>This article presents for the first time the postcard sent by Edmund Husserl to Gustav G. Shpet.</jats:p></jats:abstract><publication_date media_type="print"><month>05</month><day>31</day><year>2026</year></publication_date><pages><first_page>1</first_page><last_page>1</last_page></pages></journal_article></journal></body></doi_batch>
