NONE20260606182325038Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal Universityno-reply@journals.kantiana.ruImmanuel Kant Baltic Federal UniversityKantian Journal0207-69182310-370106062026432Письмо Канта на смерть студента Иоганна Фридриха фон Функа (1760): литературно-историческая идентификация. Часть 1: Готшед и Королевское немецкое общество КёнигсбергаM.WalterVinzenz Pallotti UniversityKant’s mourning letter or necrology for his student Johann Friedrich von Funk (1760) has hardly been received. This study attempts to change this by explaining the contexts of the short missive. In the first part this concerns in particular the influence that Gottsched exerted on the style of such printed speeches or necrolo­gies. Kant’s references therefore to the ‘Royal German Society’ in Königsberg and its founder Flottwell, a friend of Gottsched’s, are described. The influence of the Roman Stoa then becomes much clearer through the influence of Gottsched’s rhetoric textbook. All in all, Kant attempts to present rational arguments for dealing with death, which can suddenly strike human life; he writes under the obvious influence of a Stoic mindset (see the second part). Most of the comments by Kant scholars on the little work to date have been negative or vague. Here, the text is to be made fruitful for the development of Kant’s thought by shedding light on its historical contexts. On this basis, the little treatise appears as an important link for Kant’s early thinking. It shows how he makes ancient tradition fruitful again for the Enlightenment as a substitute for rapturous and irrational mysticism as we know it from Jacob Böhme, for example.0606202674910.5922/0207-6918-2024-2-1https://journals.kantiana.ru/kant_collection/15733/80430/Ackeren, M. van, 2011. Die Philosophie Marc Aurels. Band 1: Textform — Stilmerkmale — Selbstdialog. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter.Adelung, J. C., 1801. Grammatisch-kritisches Wörterbuch der hochdeutschen Mundart. Band 4. Leipzig: Breitkopf.Adickes, E., 1924. Kant als Naturforscher. Band 1. Leipzig & Berlin: De Gruyter.Anonym [Mellin, G. S. A.], 1804. Immanuel Kant’s Biographie. Bd. 2. Leipzig: E. G. Weigel.Arnoldt, D. H., 1746. Ausführliche und mit Urkunden versehene Historie der Königsberger Universität. Band 2. Königsberg: J. H. Hartung.Baum, M., 1990. Kritik. In: M. Heinz, Hg. 2019. Kleine Schriften 1. Arbeiten zu Kants theoretischer Philosophie. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter. S. 83-103.Benninghoven, F., Hg. 1974. Immanuel Kant. Leben, Umwelt, Werk. Berlin: Geheimes Staatsarchiv Preußischer Kulturbesitz.Berndt, F. und Spalinger, R., 2023. Rhetorik: Ausführliche Redekunst. In: S. Meixner und C. Rocks, Hg. 2023. Gottsched Handbuch. Leben — Werk — Wirkung. Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler, S. 139-176.Borowski, L. E., 1804. Darstellung des Lebens und Charakters Immnanuel Kant’s. Königsberg: Nicolovius.Döring, D., 2002. Die Geschichte der Deutschen Gesellschaft in Leipzig. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Erb, A., 2023. Deutsche Gesellschaften des 18. Jahrhunderts. Ein Gruppenbild. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter.Erbkam, W. H., 1876. Borowski, Ludwig Ernst. In: Allgemeine Deutsche Biographie. Band 3. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot, S. 177-178.Erler, G., 1911/1912. Die Matrikel der Albertus-Universität zu Königsberg i. Pr. Band 2. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.Euler, W., 1994. Immanuel Kants Amtstätigkeit. Aufgaben und Probleme einer Gesamtdokumentation. In: R. Brandt und W. Stark, Hg. 1994. Autographen, Dokumente und Berichte. Zu Edition, Amtsgeschäften und Werk Immanuel Kants. Hamburg: Felix Meiner, S. 58-90.Euler, W., 2000. Kants Briefwechsel und „Amtlicher Schriftverkehr“. Mit einem Anhang über Kants Vorlesung über römischen Stil. Kant-Studien, 91 (Sonderheft), S. 106-142.Fehr, J. J., 2000. Ein wunderlicher Nexus rerum. Aufklärung und Pietismus in Königsberg. Hildesheim: Georg Olms.Fischer, K., 1889. Immanuel Kant und seine Lehre. Erster Theil. Entstehung und Grundlegung der kritischen Philosophie. 3. Auflage. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Freudenberg, M., 2017. Melanchthon und die Bekenntnisbildung. 2. Reformiertentum. In: G. Frank und A. Lange, Hg., 2017. Philipp Melanchthon. Der Reformator zwischen Glauben und Wissen. Ein Handbuch. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter, S. 179-191.Goldbeck, J.F., 1782. Nachrichten von der Königlichen Universität zu Königsberg in Preußen und den daselbst befindlichen Lehr-, Schul- und Erziehungsanstalten. Königsberg & Leipzig & Dessau: im Selbstverlag des Verfassers.Gottsched, J. G., 1973. Versuch einer critischen Dichtkunst: Erster allgemeiner Theil. Hg. von J. Birke und B. Birke. In: Johann Christoph Gottsched Ausgewählte Werke. Hg. von P. M. Mitchell. Band VI, Teil 1. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter.Gottsched, J. G., 1975a. Ausführliche Redekunst. Hg. von R. Scholl. In: Johann Christoph Gottsched Ausgewählte Werke. Hg. von P. M. Mitchell. Band VII, Teil 1. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter.Gottsched, J. G., 1975b. Ausführliche Redekunst. Hg. von R. Scholl. In: Johann Christoph Gottsched Ausgewählte Werke. Hg. von P.M. Mitchell. Band VII, Teil 2. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter.Gottsched, J. G., 2015. Briefwechsel. Historisch-kritische Ausgabe. Band 9: 1742—1744. Hg. von D. Döring, F. Menzel, R. Otto und M. Schlott. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter.Gottsched, J. G., 2020. Briefwechsel. Historisch-kritische Ausgabe. Band 14: November 1748 — September 1749. Hg. von C. Köhler, F. Menzel, R. Otto und M. Schlott. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter.Gottsched, J. G., 2023. Erste Gründe der gesamten Weltweisheit. Die Kant-Auflage. Theoretischer Teil (1748). Hg. von J. Hüttner und M. Walter. Wiesbaden: Georg Olms.Hamann, J. G., 1952. Trauerschrift auf den Tod der Frau Rentzen [1752]. In: J.G. Hamann, 1952. Werke. Historisch-kritische Ausgabe. Band IV. Herausgegeben von J. Nadler. Wien: Thomas-Morus-Presse im Herder-Verlag, S. 35-39.Hamann, J. G., 1955. Briefwechsel. Herausgegeben von W. Ziesemer und A. Henkel. Band 1. Wiesbaden: Insel-Verlag.Hamann, J. G., 1956. Briefwechsel. Herausgegeben von W. Ziesemer und A. Henkel. Band 2. Wiesbaden: Insel-Verlag.Hamann, J. G., 1965. Briefwechsel. Herausgegeben von W. Ziesemer und A. Henkel. Band 5. Wiesbaden: Insel-Verlag.Harnack, A. von, 1901. Geschichte der Königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin. Berlin: Georg Stilke.Heller, R., 1924. Kants Persönlichkeit und Leben. Versuch einer Charakteristik. Berlin: Pan-Verlag.Hirschberger, J., 1958. Geschichte der Philosophie. Neuzeit und Gegenwart. Freiburg i.Br.: Herder.Hüttner, J. und Walter, M., 2023. Einleitung. In: Gottsched, J. G., 2023. Erste Gründe der gesamten Weltweisheit. Die Kant-Auflage. Theoretischer Teil (1748). Wiesbaden: Georg Olms, S. 9-147.Irlitz, G., 2015. Handbuch Immanuel Kant. Leben — Werk — Wirkung. 3. Aufl. Stuttgart: J.B. Metzler.Jaspers, K., 1956. Die großen Philosophen. Band 1. München: R. Pieper & Co.Jung, M. H., 2010. Philipp Melanchthon und seine Zeit. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Kant, I., 2004. Vorlesung zur Moralphilosophie. Herausgegeben von W. Stark. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter.Klaus, G., 1977. Die Frühschriften Immanuel Kants. In: G. Klaus, 1977. Philosophisch-historische Abhandlungen. Kopernikus — D’Alembert — Condillac — Kant. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag, S. 139-220.Kondylis, P., 2002. Die Aufklärung im Rahmen des neuzeitlichen Rationalismus. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.Krause, G., 1893. Gottsched und Flottwell. Die Begründer der Deutschen Gesellschaft in Königsberg. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.Krouglov, A. N., 2018. Kant and the Crusians in the Debate of Optimism. Kantian Journal, 37(2), S. 7-31.Kuehn, M., 2002. Immanuel Kant. A Biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Kühn, M., 2003. Immanuel Kant. Eine Biographie. Aus dem Englischen von M. Pfeiffer. München: C. H. Beck.Lenz, R., 1974. Leichenpredigten. Eine bisher vernachlässigte Quellengattung. Geschichte, Forschungsstand, methodologische Probleme, Bibliographie. Archiv für Kulturgeschichte, 56, S. 296-312.Malter, R., 1990. Immanuel Kant in Rede und Gespräch. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.Marti, H., 2023. Immanuel Kant und die Disputation als traditionelle Unterrichtsform. In: J. Mähnert und J. Sarnowsky, Hg. 2023. Immanuel Kant und sein Wirkungsort Königsberg. Göttingen: V & R unipress, S. 65-98.Melanchthon, P., 1547. Loci consolationis. In: C. G. Breitschneider, Hg. 1839. Philipi Melanchthonis Opera quae supersunt omnia. Corpus Reformatorum. Volumen VI. Halle: Schwetschke & Sohn, col. 483-488.Menzer, P., 1911. Vorwort. In: P. Menzer, Hg. 1911. Kants Populäre Schriften. Berlin: Georg Reimer, S. III-VI.Menzer, P., 1924. Kants Persönlichkeit. Kant-Studien, 29, S. 1-20.Mitchell, P. M., 1987. Gottsched-Bibliographie. In: P. M. Mitchell, Hg. 1987. Johann Christoph Gottsched Ausgewählte Werke. Band XII. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter.Nadler, J., 1949. Johann Georg Hamann. 1730—1788. Der Zeuge des Corpus Mysticum. Salzburg: Otto Müller.Otto, R., 2018. Band 10 der Gottschedkorrespondenz — Inhalt und Beobachtungen. Denkströme. Journal der Sächsischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 19, S. 16-28.Paulsen, F., 1921. Geschichte des gelehrten Unterrichts auf den deutschen Schulen und Universitäten vom Ausgang des Mittelalters bis zur Gegenwart. 3., erweiterte Aufl. Berlin & Leipzig: De Gruyter.Pufelska, A., Barelkowski, M. 2024. Kant in Olsztyn. Verfügbar unter: https://kant-in-olsztyn.ikgn.de (Zuletzt aufgerufen am 29.08.2024).Reicke, J., 1892. Zu Johann Christoph Gottsched’s Lehrjahren auf der Königsberger Universität. Erster Theil (Dissertation). Königsberg: R. Leupold.Rieck, R., 1972. Johann Christoph Gottsched. Eine kritische Würdigung seines Werkes. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Rink, F. Th., 1807. [Vorrede des Herausgebers]. In: F. Th. Rink und F. Nicolovius, Hg. 1807. Immanuel Kant’s vermischte Schriften. Vierter Band. Sammlung einiger bisher unbekannt gebliebenen kleinen Schriften von Immanuel Kant. Zweyte sehr vermehrte Auflage. Königsberg: Friedrich Nicolovius.Ritzel, W., 1985. Immanuel Kant. Eine Biographie. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter.Rosefeldt, T., 2015. Gedanken bei dem frühzeitigen Ableben des Herrn Johann Friedrich von Funk. In: M. Willaschek, J. Stolzenberg, G. Mohr und S. Bacin, Hg. 2015: Kant-Lexikon. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter, S. 685-686.Rosenkranz, K., 1846. De varia philosophiae ante Kantium in Academia Albertina vicisstudiene. In: K. Rosenkranz, Hg. 1878. Neue Studien. Vierter Band. Zur Literaturgeschichte. Leipzig: Erich Koschny, S. 241-250.Schilling, J., 2017. Erbauungsschriften. In: A. Beutel, (Hg.) 2017. Luther Handbuch. 3., überarbeitete und erweiterte Auflage. Tübingen: Mohr & Siebeck, S. 336-347.Schönfeld, M., 2000. The Philosophy of the Young Kant. The Precritical Project. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Schubert, F. W., 1838. Vorrede. In: K. Rosenkranz und F. W. Schubert, Hg. 1838. Immanuel Kant’s Sämmtliche Werke. Siebter Theil, Abteilung 1. Kleine anthropologisch-praktische Schriften. Leipzig: Leopold Voss, S. V-XVIII.Seneca, 2008. Gespräche. Die kleinen Dialoge. Lateinisch-deutsch. Herausgegeben von G. Fink. Düsseldorf & Zürich: Artemis & Winkler.Simon, J., 2003. Kant, die fremde Vernunft und die Sprache der Philosophie. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter.Stark, W., 1993. Nachforschungen zu Briefen und Handschriften Immanuel Kants. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Stark, W., 1995. Kant als akademischer Lehrer. In: H. Ischreyt, Hg. 1995. Zentren der Aufklärung. Königsberg und Riga. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer, S. 51-68.Stark, W., 2000. Immanuel Kant — ein Dichter? Kant-Studien, 91 (Sonderheft), S. 143-147.Stark, W., 2004. Zur Erinnerung an den 200. Todestag von Immanuel Kant. Zwei Dokumentenfunde. literaturkritik.de [Druckfassung], 6(2), S. 14-17.Stark, W., 2005. Zu Kants Mitwirkung an der Drucklegung seiner Schriften. In: B. Ludwig, Hg. 2005. Kants Rechtslehre. Hamburg: Felix Meiner, S. 7-38.Stark, W., 2023. Ein historischer Blick auf die ersten Jahre des Privatdozenten Immanuel Kant. In: J. Mähnert und J. Sarnowsky, Hg. 2023. Immanuel Kant und sein Wirkungsort Königsberg. Göttingen: V & R unipress, S. 47-64.Stark, W., 2024. Kant als Student, Magister und Privatdozent. In: A. Pufelska und M. Barelkowski, Hg. 2024. Kant in Olsztyn. Verfügbar unter: https://kant-in-olsztyn.ikgn.de/kant-an-der-universitaet/kant-als-magister-und-privatdozent/ (Zuletzt aufgerufen am 23.03.2024).Stockinger, L., 2023. Rhetorik und Metarhetorik in Aufklärung und Romantik. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter.Stupperich, R., 1960. Melanchthon. Berlin: De Gruyter.Vaihinger, H., 1898. Kant als Melancholiker. Kant-Studien, 2, S. 139-141.Vorländer, K., 1992. Immanuel Kant. Der Mann und das Werk. I. u. II. Teil. Herausgegeben von R. Malter und H. Klemme. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.Wald, S. G., 1793. Geschichte der Verfassung der Königl[ichen] Deutschen Gesellschaft zu Königsberg in Preußen. Königsberg: G. L. Hartung.Wald, S. G., 1974. Gedächtnißrede auf Kant. In: J. Kopper und R. Malter, Hg. 1974. Immanuel Kant zu ehren. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp, S. 50-74.Walter, M., 2023. „Ein unbegreiflich zahlreiches Sternenheer“ — Eine Kupfertafel, ergänzend zu Kants Maupertuis-Rezeption in der NTH (1755). Kant-Studien, 114, S. 565-578.Warda, A., 1901. Ergänzungen zu E. Fromms zweitem und drittem Beitrage zur Lebensgeschichte Kants (II). Altpreußische Monatsschrift, 38, S. 398-432.Warda, A., 1905. Aus dem Leben des Pfarrers Christian Heinrich Puttlich. Theil I: 1763—1799. Altpreußische Monatsschrift, 47, S. 253-304.Warda, A., 1919. Die Druckschriften Immanuel Kants. Wiesbaden: Heinrich Staadt.Waschkies, H. -J., 1987. Physik und Physikotheologie beim jungen Kant. Amsterdam: B. R. Grüner.Watkins, E., 1995. The Development of Physical Influx in Early Eighteenth-Century Germany: Gottsched, Knutzen, and Crusius. The Review of Metaphysics, 49(2), S. 295-339.Wolff, E., 1895. Gottscheds Stellung im deutschen Bildungsleben. Band 1. Kiel & Leipzig: Lipsius und Tischer.Особенности толкования термина «следование» у И. КантаA. V.PetrovskayaRussian State University for the HumanitiesModern formal logic, which is based on Kant’s logical project, interprets logical consequence as formal, which leads to substantive paradoxes that combine any thoughts at all and so to the loss of consequence as such. Beginning with A. Tarski, modern history of logic brings the problem of logical consequence into the realmof search for the relation of consequence, or grounding. In his doctoral dissertation on the nature of logical formality J. MacFarlane claims that the paradoxes of formal theories of logical consequence stem from the loss of grounding by the transcendental system of logic in the post­Kantian logical tradition. Arguably, analysis of logical terminology of consequence in Kant’s seminal works — Critique of Pure Reason, Critique of the Power of Judgment — in comparison with the terminology of earlier works, Prolegomena and lectures on logic attributed to him will clarify the question of the relation oflogical consequence in the formal and non­formal sense. The key concept of consequence in Kant’s terminology is Folgerung, which denotes ‘following’ in logical and non­logical contexts. I have also analysed related concepts: Folge, Abfolge, folglich etc., established dif- ferences between logical terms with similar meaning ‘inference’ (Schluss) and ‘conclusion’ (Konklusion). Finally, I make an attempt to formulate the problem of logical consequence in formal logic through the logical terms Schlussfolge, Folgerung and Konsequenz. On the strength of my analysis I propose to consider Kant’s consequence (Folgerung) to be a concept of transcendental logic that reflects the relation of consequence and grounds formal consequence.06062026507810.5922/0207-6918-2024-2-2https://journals.kantiana.ru/kant_collection/15733/80433/Achourioti, T. and van Lambalgen, M., 2011. A Formalization of Kant’s Transcendental Logic. The Review of Symbolic Logic, 4(2), pp. 254-289.Achourioti, T. and van Lambalgen, M., 2017. Kant’s Logic Revisited. Journal of Applied Logics — IfCoLog Journal, 4(4), pp. 845-865.Asmus, C. and Restall, G., 2012. History of Logical Consequence. In: D. Gabbay, F. J. Pelletier, J. Woods, eds. 2012. Logic: A History of Its Central Concepts, Volume 11. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Boghossian, P., 2016. Intuitions and the Understanding. In: M. Á. Fernández Vargas, ed. 2016. Performance Epistemology: Foundations and Applications. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 137-150.Bolzano, B., 2022. Theory of Science: Attempt at a Detailed and in the Main Novel Exposition of Logic with Constant Attention to Earlier Authors. Edited by R. George. Oakland: University of California Press.Dragalina-Chernaya, E., 2020. Material Consequence and Formal Grounding. Epistemology & Philosophy of Science, 57, pp. 79-95. (In Rus.)Etchemendy, J., 1990. The Concept of Logical Consequence. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Evans, R., Sergot, M. and Stephenson, A., 2019. Formalizing Kant’s Rules. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 48, pp. 1-68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-019-09531-x.Kant, I., 1992a. The False Subtlety of the Four Syllogistic Figures. In: I. Kant, 1992. Theoretical Philosophy, 1755-1770. Translated by D. Walford. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 85-106.Kant, I., 1992b. The Jäsche Logic. In: I. Kant, 1992. Lectures on Logic. Translated and edited by J. M. Young. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 521-630.Kant, I., 1992c. The Only Possible Argument in Support of a Demonstration of the Existence of God. In: I. Kant, 1992. Theoretical Philosophy, 1755-1770. Translated by D. Walford. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 107-202.Kant, I., 1998. Critique of Pure Reason. Translated and edited by P. Guyer and A. W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Kant, I., 2000. Critique of the Power of Judgment. Edited by P. Guyer. New York: Cambridge University Press.Kant, I., 2002a. Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics That Will Be Able to Come Forward as Science. Translated by G. C. Hatfield. In: I. Kant, 2002. Theoretical Philosophy after 1781. Edited by H. Allison, P. Heath New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 29-170.Kant, I., 2002b. Critique of Practical Reason. Translated by W. S. Pluhar. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc.Kant, I., 2022. Venskaya logika [The Vienna Logic]. Translated (into Russian) by A. M. Kharitonova and L. E. Kryshtop, edited by A. N. Krouglov. Moscow: Kanon+. (In Rus.)Kharitonova, A. M., 2022. The Doctrine of Reason by G. F. Mayer. In: I. Kant, 2022. Venskaja logika [The Vienna Logic]. Translated (into Russian) by A. M. Kharitonova and L. E. Kryshtop, edited by A. N. Krouglov. Moscow: Canon+, 2022, pp. 83-86. (In Rus.)Kovač, S., 2020. Logical Foundations and Kant’s Principles of Formal Logic. History and Philosophy of Logic, 41(1), pp. 48-70.Krouglov, A. N., 2022. “German Logic” by Christian Wolff. In: I. Kant, 2022. The Vienna Logic. Moscow: Canon+, pp. 30-48. (In Rus.)Krouglov, A. N., 2023. Figurative, Symbolic and Contemplative Cognition. Part II: From Chr. A. Crusius to I. Kant. History of Philosophy. 28(1), pp. 18-28. (In Rus.)Ludovici, C. G., 1737. Ausführliche Entwurff einer vollständigen Historie der Wolffischen Philosophie, zum Gebrauch seiner Zuhörer. Volume 2. Leipzig: Johann Georg Löwe.MacFarlane, J. G., 2000. What Does It Mean to Say That Logic is Formal? Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.Peirce, C. S., 1992. Reasoning and the Logic of Things: The Cambridge Conferences Lectures of 1898. Edited by K. L. Ketner, Introduction by K. L. Ketner and H. Putnam. Cambridge, Mass. & London: Harvard University Press.Poggiolesi, F., 2016. On Defining the Notion of Complete and Immediate Formal Grounding. Synthese, 193(10), pp. 3147-3167.Read, S., 1994. Thinking About Logic: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Logic. New York: Oxford University Press.Rumberg, A., 2013. Bolzano’s Concept of Grounding against the Background of Normal Proofs. The Review of Symbolic Logic, 6(3), pp. 424-459.Tarski, A., 1936. Über den Begriff der logischen Folgerung. In: Actes du Congrès International de Philosophie Scientifique. Sorbonne, Paris 1935. Volume 7. Paris: Hermann & Cie, pp. 1-11.Tarski, A., 1956. On the Concept of Logical Consequence. In: A. Tarski, 1956. Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics. Translated by J. H. Woodger. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 409-420.Tatzel, A., 2002. Bolzano’s Theory of Ground and Consequence. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 43, pp. 1-25.Кантовские «категории свободы» как функции желания объектаS.ZimmermannMartin Luther University Halle-WittenbergThis paper deals with the “Table of the Categories of Freedom” in the second main chapter of Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason. It provides an account of the role these categories are supposed to play and also of their conceptual content. The key to a proper understanding lies in the realisation that they are derived from the so­called table of judgements in the Critique of Pure Reason and the functions of thinking, which it compiles by means of a metaphysical deduction. I therefore interpret the categories of freedom consistently from the table of judgements and reconstruct their conceptual content from the functions of thinking underlying each category. Furthermore, Kant justifies by means of a transcendental deduction the fact that the categories of freedom necessarily relate to all objects of the will. I argue that the categories are concepts constitutive for the object of the will: the role they play is that of the functions of willing an object. Finally, I show that the categories of freedom reach beyond Kant’s foundation of moral philosophy. They point to the later Metaphysics of Morals in that Kant associates an ambitious system­building claim with them. The idea is therefore that the table of the categories organises the system of moral philosophy.060620267912210.5922/0207-6918-2024-2-3https://journals.kantiana.ru/kant_collection/15733/80435/Abaci, U., 2019. Kant’s Revolutionary Theory of Modality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Allison, H., 1995. Kant’s Theory of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Bader, R. M., 2009. Kant and the Categories of Freedom. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 17, pp. 799-820.Baumgarten, A. G., 1760. Initia philosophiae practicae primae acroamatice. Halle: C. H. Hemmerde.Beck, L. W., 1960. A Commentary on Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Bendavid, L., 1796. Vorlesungen über die Critik der practischen Vernunft. Wien: J. Stahel.Benton, R. J., 1980. Kant’s Categories of Practical Reason as Such. Kant-Studien, 71, pp. 181-201.Bobzien, S., 1988. Die Kategorien der Freiheit bei Kant. In: H. Oberer, ed. 1988. Kant. Analysen — Probleme — Kritik. Volume 1. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, pp. 193-219.Bojanowski, J., 2015. Categories of Freedom as Categories of Practical Cognition. Kantian Review, 20, pp. 211-234.Fulda, H. F., 2006. Notwendigkeit des Rechts unter Voraussetzung des Kategorischen Imperativs der Sittlichkeit. Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik, 14, pp. 167-213.Graband, C., 2005. Das Vermögen der Freiheit. Kants Kategorien der praktischen Vernunft. Kant-Studien, 96, pp. 41-65.Gregor, M. J., 1963. Laws of Freedom. A Study of Kant’s Method of Applying the Categorical Imperative in the Metaphysik der Sitten. New York: Barnes & Noble.Haas, B., 1997. Die Kategorien der Freiheit. In: H. Oberer, ed. 1997. Kant. Analysen — Probleme — Kritik. Volume 3. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, pp. 41-80.Herman, B., 2021. The Moral Habitat. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Hill Jr., T. E., 1971. Kant on Imperfect Duty and Supererogation. Kant-Studien, 62, pp. 55-76.Horn, C., 2002. Wille, Willensbestimmung, Begehrungsvermögen. In: O. Höffe, ed. 2002. Immanuel Kant. Kritik der praktischen Vernunft. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, pp. 43-61.Kant, I., 1992a. Attempt to Introduce the Concept of Negative Magnitudes into Philosophy. In: I. Kant, 1992. Theoretical Philosophy, 1755-1770. Translated and edited by D. Walford. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 203-242.Kant, I., 1992b. The Jäsche Logic, in: I. Kant, 1992. Lectures on Logic. Translated and edited by J. M. Young. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 521-630.Kant, I., 1996a. Critique of Practical Reason. In: I. Kant, 1996. Practical Philosophy. Translated and edited by M. J. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 139-271.Kant, I., 1996b. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. In: I. Kant, 1996. Practical Philosophy. Translated and edited by M. J. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 43-108.Kant, I., 1996c. Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason. In: I. Kant, 1996. Religion and Rational Theology. Translated by G. Di Giovanni, edited by G. Di Giovanni and A. W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 39-216.Kant, I., 1996d. The Metaphysics of Morals. In: I. Kant, 1996. Practical Philosophy. Translated and edited by M. J. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 364-603.Kant, I., 1996e. Toward Perpetual Peace. In: I. Kant, 1996. Practical Philosophy. Translated and edited by M. J. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 317-351.Kant, I., 1997a. Morality According to Prof. Kant: Mrongovius’s Second Set of Lecture Notes (Selections). In: I. Kant, 1997. Lectures on Ethics. Translated by P. Heath, edited by P. Heath and J. B. Schneewind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 223-248.Kant, I., 1997b. Kant on the Metaphysics of Morals: Vigilantius’s Lecture Notes. In: I. Kant, 1997. Lectures on Ethics. Translated by P. Heath, edited by P. Heath and J. B. Schneewin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 249-452.Kant, I., 1997c. Metaphysik L2. In: I. Kant, 1997. Lectures on Metaphysics. Translated and edited by K. Ameriks and S. Naragon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 299-354.Kant, I., 1997d. Metaphysik Mrongovius. In: I. Kant, 1997. Lectures on Metaphysics. Translated and edited by K. Ameriks and S. Naragon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 109-286.Kant, I., 1998. Critique of Pure Reason. Translated and edited by P. Guyer and A. W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Kant, I., 1999. Correspondence, Translated and edited by Arnulf Zweig, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Kant, I., 2000. Critique of the Power of Judgment. Translated by P. Guyer and E. Matthews, edited by P. Guyer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Kant, I., 2002a. Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science. In: I. Kant, 2002. Theoretical Philosophy after 1781. Translated by M. Friedman, edited by H. Allison and P. Heath. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 171-270.Kant, I., 2002b. On a Discovery whereby Any New Critique of Pure Reason is to Be Made Superfluous by an Older One. In: I. Kant, 2002. Theoretical Philosophy after 1781. Translated by H. Allison, edited by H. Allison and P. Heath. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 272-336.Kant, I., 2002c. Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics that Will be Able to Come Forward as Science. In: I. Kant, 2002. Theoretical Philosophy after 1781. Translated by G. Hatfield, edited by H. Allison and P. Heath. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 29-170.Kant, I., 2005. Notes and Fragments. Translated by C. Bowman, P. Guyer and F. Rauscher, edited by P. Guyer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Kant, I., 2007. Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View. In: I. Kant, 2007. Anthropology, History, and Education. Edited by G. Zöller and R. B. Louden. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 227-429.Kant, I., 2016. Drafts for the Metaphysics of Morals. In: I. Kant, 2016. Lectures and Drafts on Political Philosophy. Translated by F. Rauscher and K. Westphal, edited by F. Rauscher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 233-354.Kersting, W., 1982. Das starke Gesetz der Schuldigkeit und das schwächere der Gütigkeit. Kant und die Pflichtenlehre des 18. Jahrhunderts. Studia Leibnitiana, 14, pp. 184-220.Kersting, W., 2007. Wohlgeordnete Freiheit. Immanuel Kants Rechts- und Staatsphilosophie. Third Edition. Paderborn: Mentis.Kobusch, T., 1990. Die Kategorien der Freiheit. Stationen einer historischen Entwicklung: Pufendorf, Kant, Chalybäus. Allgemeine Zeitschrift für Philosophie, 15, pp. 13-37.Kontos, P., 2011. Kant’s Categories of Freedom as Rules of Moral Salience. Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung, 65, pp. 218-240.Mellin, G. S. A., 1800. Encyclopädisches Wörterbuch der kritischen Philosophie. Volume 3. Jena & Leipzig: F. Frommann.Mellin, G. S. A., 1802. Encyclopädisches Wörterbuch der kritischen Philosophie. Volume 4. Jena & Leipzig: F. Frommann.Michaelis, C.F., 1796. Ueber die sittliche Natur und Bestimmung des Menschen. Ein Versuch zur Erläuterung über I. Kants Kritik der praktischen Vernunft. Volume 1. Leipzig: J. G. Beigang.Nenon, T., 1993. Freedom, Responsibility, Character: Some Reflections on Kant’s Notion of the Person. Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik, 1, pp. 159-168.Patzig, G., 1965. Die logischen Formen praktischer Sätze in Kants Ethik. Kant-Studien, 56, pp. 237-252.Pieper, A., 1973. Sprachanalytische Ethik und praktische Freiheit. Das Problem der Ethik als autonomer Wissenschaft. Stuttgart et al.: Kohlhammer.Pieper, A., 2002. Zweites Hauptstück (57-71). In: O. Höffe, ed. 2002. Immanuel Kant. Kritik der praktischen Vernunft. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, pp. 115-133.Puls, H., 2013. Funktionen der Freiheit. Die Kategorien der Freiheit in Kants Kritik der praktischen Vernunft. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter.Sänger, M., 1982. Die kategoriale Systematik in den „Metaphysischen Anfangsgründen der Rechtslehre“. Ein Beitrag zur Methodenlehre Kants. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter.Simon, J., 1990. Kategorien der Freiheit und der Natur. Zum Primat des Praktischen bei Kant. In: D. Koch and K. Bort, eds. 1990. Kategorien und Kategorialität. Historisch-systematische Untersuchungen zum Begriff der Kategorie im philosophischen Denken. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, pp. 107-130.Willaschek, M., 1992. Praktische Vernunft. Handlungstheorie und Moralbegründung bei Kant. Stuttgart & Weimar: J. B. Metzler.Wolff, C., 1754. Grundsätzen des Natur- und Völckerrechts. Halle: Rengersche Buchhandlung.Zimmermann, S., 2011. Kants „Kategorien der Freiheit“. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter.Zimmermann, S., 2015. Wovon handelt Kants ‚Typik der reinen praktischen Urteilskraft‘? Kant-Studien, 106, pp. 430-460.Zimmermann, S., 2016a. Kant on ‘Moral Arguments’: What Does the Objectivity of a Postulate of Pure Practical Reason Consist in? In: T. Höwing, ed. 2016. The Highest Good in Kant’s Philosophy. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter, pp. 131-155.Zimmermann, S., 2016b. Kants metaphysische Deduktion der Ideen in der Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Philosophisches Jahrbuch, 123, pp. 58-88.Zimmermann, S., 2016c. Zu den Freiheitskategorien der Quantität, Qualität und Relation. Eine Selbstkorrektur. In: S. Zimmermann, ed. 2016. Die „Kategorien der Freiheit“ in Kants praktischer Philosophie. Historisch-systematische Beiträge. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter, pp. 217-246.Zimmermann, S., 2020. Kant über die Vollständigkeit der ‚Tafel der Kategorien der Freiheit‘. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 102, pp. 426-452.Zimmermann, S., 2023. Was versteht Kant unter einer ‚Ausnahme‘? Zur Unterscheidung vollkommener und unvollkommener Pflichten in der Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten. Kant-Studien, 114, pp. 710-727.S. A.MartynovaThe Herzen State Pedagogical University of RussiaThe key thesis of natural teleology is that the products of nature should be judged by the goal of their existence or they should be explained as if such a goal existed. The prevailing view in the literature is that there are two main stages in the development of teleology in the framework of philosophical knowledge: the classicaland the non­classical. The isolation of these stages is based on the conviction that at a certain period of time finalism is supplanted by the notion of the goal engendered by the developing whole. I submit that we can talk about non­classical teleology in yet another sense.The interest of Aristotle and Kant in the foundations that warrant the existence of purpose of the products of nature is replaced by the attention to the fact that what exists in nature is not sufficiently purposive. The change of perspective is accompanied by a revision of the notions of what exactly purposiveness is, as well as by calls for practical activity in the course of which nature should be the subject of some tweaking. To bolster this hypothesis I turn to the teaching of Nikolay Fyodorov, the father of Russian cosmism, who puts the emergenceof teleological thought in the context of the project of nature regulation. I focus on three of the philosopher’s assertions which show that he departs from the canon of classical teleology to determine a new context of development of teleological thought. First, Fyodorov points to the destructive processes in the organism, namely towards disease and death, which make it impossibleto consider the organism to be purposive. Second, the founder of Russian cosmism understands reason as the instrument that is capable of ridding nature of destructiveness. Thirdly and finally, the Russian philosopher maintains that an indispensable condition of human virtue and the attainment of happiness is the regulation of nature by the human being through prescribing for it an external goal as its own.06062026123151Aristotle, 1957. On the Soul. In: Aristotle, 1957. On the Soul. Parva Naturalia. On Breath. Translated by W. S. Hett. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press, pp. 2-203.Cooper, A., 2016. Nature’s Ultimate End: Hope and Culture in Kant’s Third Critique. Philosophica, 48(1), pp. 31-45.Denis, L., 2000. Kant’s Conception of Duties Regarding Animals: Reconstruction and Reconsideration. History of Philosophy Quarterly, 17(4), pp. 405-423.Dyadkovsky, I. E., 1836. Obshchaya terapiya, sochinennaya dlya rukovodstva slushatelej svoikh [General Therapy, Composed to Guide Its Trainees]. Moscow: V Universitetskoy Tipografii. (In Rus.)Florensky, P. A, 2000. Organoprojection. In: P. A. Florensky, 2000. Sobranie sochineniy v 4 tomakh [Collected Works in 4 Volumes]. Volume 3. Moscow: Mysl’, pp. 402-422. (In Rus.)Frolov, I. T., 2019. Determinizm i teleologiya [Determinism and Teleology]. Moscow: LIBROKOM.Fyodorov, N. F., 1995a. The question of Brotherhood, or Kinship, of the Causes of Non-Brotherhood, Non-Kinship, i.e. Non-Peaceful State of the World and of the Means to Restore Kinship (A Note from Non-Scientists to Scientists, Spiritual and Secular, to Believers and Non-Believers). In: N.F. Fyodorov, 1995. Sobranie sochineniy v 4 tomakh [Collected Works in 4 Volumes]. Volume 1. Moscow: Progress, pp. 35-308. (In Rus.)Fyodorov, N. F., 1995b. Supramoralism, or Universal Synthesis (i.e., Universal Unity). In: N. F. Fyodorov, 1995. Sobranie sochineniy v 4 tomakh [Collected Works in 4 Volumes]. Volume 1. Moscow: Progress, pp. 388-441. (In Rus.)Fyodorov, N. F., 1995c. Three Reasons and the One Reason. In: N. F. Fyodorov, 1995. Sobranie sochineniy v 4 tomakh [Collected Works in 4 Volumes]. Volume 2. Moscow: Progress, p. 90. (In Rus.)Fyodorov, N. F., 1995d. Falling Worlds and the Counter-Fallen Being. In: N. F. Fyodorov, 1995. Sobranie sochineniy v 4 tomakh [Collected Works in 4 Volumes]. Volume 2. Moscow: Progress, pp. 243-249. (In Rus.)Fyodorov, N. F., 1995e. Horizontal Position and Vertical Position — Death and Life. In: N.F. Fyodorov, 1995. Sobranie sochineniy v 4 tomakh [Collected Works in 4 Volumes]. Volume 2. Moscow: Progress, pp. 249-257. (In Rus.)Fyodorov, N. F., 1995f. Parents and Revivalists. In: N. F. Fyodorov, 1995. Sobranie sochineniy v 4 tomakh [Collected Works in 4 Volumes]. Volume 2. Moscow: Progress, pp. 259-260. (In Rus.)Fyodorov, N. F., 1995g. Superhumanity as Vice and as Virtue. In: N. F. Fyodorov, 1995. Sobranie sochineniy v 4 tomakh [Collected Works in 4 Volumes]. Volume 2. Moscow: Progress, pp. 135-136. (In Rus.)Fyodorov, N. F., 1995h. Karazin as a Meteorourg, not a Meteorologist. In: N. F. Fyodorov, 1995. Sobranie sochineniy v 4 tomakh [Collected Works in 4 Volumes]. Volume 2. Moscow: Progress, pp. 260-264. (In Rus.)Fyodorov, N. F., 1995i. Who Is Our Common Enemy, Unified, Everywhere and Always Inherent, Living in Us and Outside of Us, but Nevertheless only a Temporary Enemy? In: N. F. Fyodorov, 1995. Sobranie sochineniy v 4 tomakh [Collected Works in 4 Volumes]. Volume 2. Moscow: Progress, pp. 239-240. (In Rus.)Fyodorov, N. F., 1995j. Disarmament. How to Turn an Instrument of Destruction into an Instrument of Salvation. In: N. F. Fyodorov, 1995. Sobranie sochineniy v 4 tomakh [Collected Works in 4 Volumes]. Volume 2. Moscow: Progress, pp. 239-240. (In Rus.)Gacheva, A. G., 2019. Russkij kosmizm v ideyah i licah [Russian Cosmism in Ideas and Personalities]. Moscow: Akademicheskij proekt. (In Rus.)Gadzhikurbanova, P. A. 2009. Aristotle and Stoics on the Nature of Virtue. In: R. G. Apressyan141*, ed. 2009. Philosofiya i etika: sbornik nauchnyh trudov: k 70-letiyu akademika A. A. Guseynova [Philosophy and Ethics: Collection of Scientific Works: To the 70th Anniversary of A. A. Guseynov]. Moscow: Alfa-M, pp. 171-183. (In Rus).Gillroy, J. M., 1998. Kantian Ethics and Environmental Policy Argument: Autonomy, Ecosystem Integrity, and Our Duties to Nature. Ethics and the Environment, 3(2), pp. 131-155.Ginsborg, H., 2006. Kant’s Biological Teleology and Its Philosophical Significance. In: G. Bird, ed. 2006. A Companion to Kant. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell, pp. 455-469.Hegel, G. W. F., 1970. Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences (1830). Part II: Hegel’s Philosophy of Nature. Edited and translated by A. V. Miller with foreword by J. N. Findlay. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Hoffmanni, F., 1718. Medicina Rationalis Systematica. Halae Magdeburgicae: Prostat in Officina Rengeriana.Kant, I., 2000. Critique of the Power of Judgment. Translated by P. Guyer and E. Matthews. Cambrige: Cambridge University Press.Kant, I., 2015. Critique of Practical Reason. Edited and translated by M. Gregor, translation revised by A. Reath. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Klemme, H. F., 2019. How is Moral Obligation Possible? Kant’s Principle of Autonomy in Historical Context. In: S. Bacin and O. Sensen, eds. The Emergence of Autonomy in Kant’s Moral Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 10-28.Martynova, S. A., 2023. On Aristotle’s Use of the Concept “Organon” in a Biological Context. ΣΧΟΛΗ. Ancient Philosophy and the Classical Tradition, 17(1), pp. 166-176. (In Rus.)Moreno, A. and Mossio, M., 2015. Biological Autonomy. Biological Autonomy: A Philosophical and Theoretical Enquiry. Dordrecht: Springer.Muhin, E. O., 1832. On Excitement. In: M. Lengossek, 1832. Nachal’nye osnovaniya fiziologii [Elementary Foundations of Physiology]. Moscow: Tip. S. Selivanovskogo, pp. 89-216. (In Rus.)Nagel, T., 2012. Mind and Cosmos: Why the Materialist Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature Is Almost Certainly False. Oxford: Oxford University Press.O’Neill, J., 2001. Meta-Ethics. In: D. Jamieson, ed. 2001. A Companion to Environmental Philosophy. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 163-176.Onosov, A. A., 2020. Projective Anthropology: Technogenesis and Organosynthesis in the Philosophy of Cosmism. Solov’evskie Issledovaniya, 3(67), pp. 62-78. (In Rus).Quarfood, M., 2006. Kant on Biological Teleology: Towards a Two-level Interpretation. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 37(4), pp. 735-747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2006.09.007.Schelling, F. W. J., 1997. System of Transcendental Idealism. Translated by P. Heath with an Introduction by M. Vater. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.Sechenov, I. M., 1952. Elements of Thought. In: I. M. Sechenov, 1952. Izbrannye proizvedeniya [Selected Writings]. Volume 1: Physiology and Psychology. Moscow: USSR Academy of Sciences Publishing House, pp. 272-427. (In Rus.).Sehon, S., 2016. Free Will and Action Explanation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Svoboda, T., 2015. Duties Regarding Nature: A Kantian Environmental Ethic. New York & London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.Timothy, W. L., 2020. Anthropocene Alerts: Critical Theory of The Contemporary As Ecocritique. Candor, NY: Telos Press Publishing.Varava, V. V., 2020. Philosophy of Death of N. F. Fyodorov: Tanatology, Immortology or Moral Challenge? Solov’evskie Issledovaniya, 2(66), pp. 166-177. (In Rus.)Yevlampiev, I. I. and Kupriyanov, V. A. 2019. Teleologiya v klassicheskoy i neklassicheskoy filosofii [Teleology in Classical and Non-Classical Philosophy]. St. Petersburg: Russian Christian Academy for the Humanities Press. (In Rus).Русский политический Кант после либерализма: С. И. Гессен о юбилее Канта в 1924 годуM. A.KolerovUsing the Kant jubilee in 1924 as a pretext, Sergey Hessen, a Russian émigré neo­Kantian, draws no direct political conclusions but sets forth a view of the great philosopher’s legacy from the position of a “legal socialist”, selecting from his heritage those parts of German socialist doctrines that to his mind experienced a departure from a recent flowering of Kantian ideas in Neo­Kantianism and the collapse of traditional liberalism in the wake of the First World War. The fact that the text was first published in the Berlin­based Russian liberal newspaper “Rul’”, gives us reason to see it not just as a formal jubilee tribute, but as an act addressed to the qualified liberal audience which witnessed thecollapse of liberalism in Russia.0606202615215910.5922/0207-6918-2024-2-5https://journals.kantiana.ru/kant_collection/15735/80438/Belov, V. N., 2020. “Non-Academic” Neo-Kantian S. I. Hessen. In: V. V. Sapov and T. G. Shchedrina, eds. 2020. Sergey Iosifovich Hessen. Moscow: ROSSPEN, pp. 89-103. (In Rus.)Berdyaev, N. A., 1918. (Book Review:) P. Novgorodtsev. On the Social Ideal. Moscow 1917. In: M. A. Kolerov, 2020. Manifesty russkogo politicheskogo idealizma: “Problemy idealizma” (1902), “Vekhi” (1909), “Iz glubiny” (1918) i ikh nasledniki. [Manifestos of Russian Political Idealism: Problems of Idealism (1902), Milestones (1909), From the Depths (1918) and Their Successors]. Minsk: Limarius, pp. 428-431. (In Rus.)Kolerov, M. A., 2023a. Revolutsionnyi i khristianskii sotsializm v Rossii. S. N. Bulgakov v 1904—1907 gg. [Revolution and Christian Socialism in Russia. S. N. Bulgakov in 1904—1907]. Kaliningrad: IKBFU Press. (In Rus.)Kolerov, M. A., ed. 2023b. Cement i telo russkogo socializma: Kratkaya antologiya [The Cement and Body of Russian Socialism: A Short Anthology]. Moscow: Modest Kolerov. (In Rus.)Kulikov, V. B., 2020. The Decline of Liberalism (Russian Version of Sergei Hessen). In: V. V. Sapov and T. G. Shchedrina, eds. 2020. Sergey Iosifovich Hessen. Moscow: ROSSPEN, pp. 104—118. (In Rus.)Novgorodtsev, P. I., 1901. Kant i Gegel’ v ikh ucheniyakh o prave i gosudarstve: Dva tipicheskih postroeniya v oblasti filosofii prava [Kant and Hegel in Their Doctrines on Law and State: Two Typical Constructions in the Field of Philosophy of Law]. Moscow: University Printing House. (In Rus.)Novgorodtsev, P. I., 1905. Two Sketches: 1. Before the Veil. 2. The Right to a Dignified Human Existence. Polarnaya Zvezda [Polar Star] (St. Petersburg), 30 Dec., 3, pp. 210-222. (In Rus.)Novgorodtsev, P. I., 1911. The Right to a Dignified Human Existence. In: P. I. Novgorodtsev and I. A. Pokrovsky, 1911. O prave na sushchestvovanie. Sotsial’no-filosofskie etyudy [On the Right to Existence. Social and Philosophical Sketches]. Moscow & St. Petersburg: M. O. Volf, pp. 1-13. (In Rus.)Pribytkova, E. A., 2011. Nesvoevremennyj sovremennik: filosofiya prava V. S. Solovyova [Untimely Contemporary: V. S. Solovyov’s Philosophy of Law]. Moscow: Modest Kolerov. (In Rus.)Reisner, L. M., 1904. G. Jellinek and the Modern State. Pravo [Law] (St. Petersburg), 3, col. 159-161. (In Rus.)Rickert, H., 1903. Granicy estestvenno-nauchnogo obrazovaniya ponyatij: logicheskoe vvedenie v istoricheskie nauki [Boundaries of Natural-Scientific Formation of Concepts: Logical Introduction to Historical Sciences]. Translated (into Russian) by A. Voden. St. Petersburg: E. D. Kuskova. (In Rus.)Rickert, H., 1908. Filosofiya istorii [Philosophy of History]. With the author’s preface to the Russian edition; translated by S. I. Hessen. St. Petersburg: D. E. Zhukovsky. (In Rus.)Rickert, H., 1911. Nauki o prirode i nauki o kul’ture [Natural Sciences and Cultural Sciences]. Translated by S. I. Hessen. St. Petersburg: Obrazovanie.Solovyov, V., 2015. Justification of the Moral Good: Moral Philosophy. Edited and translated by T. Nemeth. Cham, Heidelberg etc.: Springer.Stepun, F. A., 1951. In Memory of S. I. Hessen. Novy zhurnal [New Journal] (New York), 25, pp. 215-218.Vishnyak, M. V., 1950. Freedom and Socialism. Novy zhurnal [New Journal] (New York), 23, pp. 160-178. (In Rus.)Zenkovsky, V. V., 1951. S. I. Hessen as a Philosopher. Novy zhurnal [New Journal] (New York), 25, pp. 209-214. (In Rus.)Эммануил Кант. (К двухсотлетию со дня рождения — 24 апр. 1724 г.)S.I.Hessen0606202616017110.5922/0207-6918-2024-2-6https://journals.kantiana.ru/kant_collection/15735/80440/Altashina, V. D., 2012. From a ‘Weak Heddle’ to a ‘Thinking Reed’: On the History of Translations of Pascal’s Thoughts. Review RHGA, 13(4), pp. 105-112. (In Rus.)Cassirer, E., 1981. Kant’s Life and Thought. Translated by J. Haden; introduction by S. Körner. New Haven: Yale University Press.Hegel, G. W. F., 1995. Lectures on the History of Philosophy. Volume 3: Medieval and Modern Philosophy. Translated by E. S. Haldane and F. H. Simson; Introduction by F. C. Beiser. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Kant, I., 1868. Fragmente aus dem Nachlasse. In: G. Hartenstein, ed. 1868. Immanuel Kant’s Sämmtliche Werke in chronologischer Reihenfolge. Band VIII. Leipzig: Leopold Voss, pp. 607-646.Kant, I., 1992. Dreams of a Spirit-Seer Elucidated by Dreams of Metaphysics. In: I. Kant, 1992. Theoretical philosophy, 1755-1770. Translated and edited by D. Walford, R. Meerbote. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 301-360.Kant, I., 1996a. On the Common Saying: That May Be Correct in Theory, But It Is of No Use in Practice (1793). ln: I. Kant, 1996. Practical philosophy. Translated and edited by M.J. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 279-309.Kant, I., 1996b. Critique of Practical Reason. In: I. Kant, 1996. Practical philosophy. Translated and edited by M. J. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 139-271.Kant, I., 1996c. The Metaphysics of Morals. In: I. Kant, 1996. Practical Philosophy. Translated and edited by M. J. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 365-603.Pascal, B., 1941. Pensées. Translated by W. F. Trotter. In: B. Pascal, 1941. Pensées. The Provincial Letters. New York: The Modern Library, pp. 3-321.Schelling, F. W. J., 1980. Philosophical Letters on Dogmatism and Criticism. In: F. W. J. Schelling, 1980. The Unconditional in Human Knowledge. Four Early Essays (1794—1796). Translation and Commentary by F. Marti. Lewisburg: Bucknell University Press; London: Associated University Press, pp. 156-196.Sergius [Hessen, S. I.], 1924. Emmanuil Kant. (K dvuhsotletiyu so dnya rozhdeniya — 24 apr. 1724 g.) [Emmanuel Kant. (On the Bicentenary of His Birth — 24 April 1724)]. Rul’ [Steering Wheel], 1029, 24 April, pp. 5-6. (In Rus.)Обзор современных российских исследований философии Германа КогенаI. Y.LapshinРeoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)J. G.KaragodРeoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)The review covers scholarly publications devoted to the philosophy of Hermann Cohen, the head of the Marburg School of Neo­Kantianism, written by Russ­ ian researchers in the period between 2000 and 2023. Although Cohen commanded unquestioned authorityamong Russian philosophers of his time — among them some followers and pupils — there was no systematic and substantive study of his work in pre­revolutionary Russia. The review below attempts to show the evidentgrowth of interest in Cohen’s philosophy in the last quarter of the century. The teaching of the German philosopher who lived and worked in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries still attracts lively in- terest among Russian philosophers today. Witness the multiple monographs, articles and reports focusing on Cohen’s theory of cognition, his ethics and aesthetics, the search for convergences between the Christian religion and the Judaic tradition, the concept of the philosophy of culture, the relationship between morality and law and many other issues. The review pays particular attention to the works on the reception of Cohen’s philosophy in Russia, as well as previously unpublished translations and archive materials which were part of the scholarly discourse of his time but remained unpublished and then forgotten. The interest of modern Russ­ ian scholars in the work of Cohen does not only point to his importance for the history of philosophy, but attests to the relevance of his ideas whose potential has yet to be fully revealed. The review may serve as a guide to the published literature on Cohen for the students of his philosophy and for all those interested in Neo­Kantianism in general, thereby contributing to the development of such a field in philosophy as Cohen studies.0606202617219310.5922/0207-6918-2024-2-7https://journals.kantiana.ru/kant_collection/15736/80442/Akindinova, T. A., 2005. Aesthetics of Neo-Kantianism in Germany and in Russia (Comparative Analysis). In: V. N. Bryushinkin, ed. 2005. Kant mezhdu Zapadom i Vostokom. K 200-letiyu so dnya smerti i 280-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya Immanuila Kanta [Kant between the West and the East. On the 200th Death Anniversary and the 280th Birth Anniversary of Immanuel Kant]: Proceedings of the International Seminars and International Conferences. In 2 Parts. Kaliningrad: Publishing House of the Immanuel Kant Russian State University. Part 1, pp. 134-141. (In Rus.)Akindinova, T. A., 2009. Hermann Cohen as a Modern Philosopher. In: I. V. Kuzin, ed. 2009. Master i professional: istoriya i sovremennost’ [The Master and the Professional: History and Modernity]: Collection of Articles in Honor of the 70th Anniversary of Professor K.S. Pigrov. St. Petersburg: Publishing House of St. Petersburg University, pp. 25-33. (In Rus.)Akindinova, T. A., 2010. Aesthetics of H. Cohen in the Context of Modern Art: Current Issues. In: I. N. Griftsova and N. A. Dmitrieva, eds. 2010. Neokantianstvo nemezkoe i russkoe: mezhdu teoriei poznania i kritikoi kultury [German and Russian Neo-Kantianism: Between the Theory of Cognition and Critique of Culture]. Moscow: Publishing house “Political Encyclopedia” (ROSSPEN), pp. 506-520. (In Rus.)Akindinova, T. A., 2011. Image of Man in the Aesthetics of the Marburg School of Neo-Kantianism. In: A. B. Rukavishnikov, ed. 2011. Problema dushi i tela v filosofii i nauke [The Problem of Soul and Body in Philosophy and Science]. St. Petersburg: Russian World Publishing House, pp. 104-115. (In Rus.)Akindinova, T. A., 2013. The analysis of feeling as creativity in the aesthetics of Hermann Cohen. Studia Culturae, 17, pp. 5-13.Akindinova, T. A., 2014. Hermann Cohen’s Substantiation of the Systemic Unity of Culture. In: Aktual’naya estetika — II [Actual aesthetics — II]: Proceedings of the International Forum, St. Petersburg, 15-26 May 2014, St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg Philosophical Society, pp. 41-43. (In Rus.)Akindinova, T. A., 2018. Hermann Cohen. The Aesthetics of Pure Feeling. Preface to the translation. Terra Aestheticae, 2(2), pp. 287-291. (In Rus.)Akindinova, T. A. and Belov, V. N., 2015. Review of the International Conference “The Marburg School of Neo-Kantianism: Lessons from History”. Kantian Journal, 3(53), pp. 105-108. (In Rus.)Belov, V. N., 2004. The Philosophy of Hermann Cohen and Russian Neo-Kantianism. Istoriko-filosofskii ezhegodnik / History of Philosophy Yearbook’2003. Moscow: Nauka, pp. 333-353. (In Rus.)Belov, V. N., 2008. Philosophy of Culture by Hermann Cohen. Kantian Journal, 1(27), pp. 74-81. (In Rus.)Belov, V. N., 2010. The Teaching of Hermann Cohen in Russia: Peculiarities of Reception. In: I. N. Griftsova and N. A. Dmitrieva, eds. 2010. Neokantianstvo nemezkoe i russkoe: mezhdu teoriei poznania i kritikoi kultury [German and Russian Neo-Kantianism: Between the Theory of Cognition and Critique of Culture]. Moscow: “Politicheskaya encyclopedia” (ROSSPEN), pp. 299-317. (In Rus.)Belov, V. N., 2013. The Concept of History by H. Cohen and M. Kagan. Kantian Journal, 1(43), pp. 63-72. (In Rus.)Belov, V. N., 2014a. Ethics in the System of Philosophical Criticism of Hermann Cohen Ethical Thought, 14, pp. 98-110. (In Rus.)Belov, V. N., 2014b. Reception of Cohen’s Ethics in Russia. Kantian Journal, 4(50), pp. 98-100.Belov, V. N., 2015a. Cohens Ethik und ihre Rezeption in der russischen Philosophie des Rechts. IDEA — Studia nad strukturą i rozwojem pojęć filozoficznych, 27, pp. 373-381.Belov, V. N., 2015b. Is Hermann Cohen a Neo-Kantian? Kantian Journal, 3(53), pp. 38-45. (In Rus.)Belov, V. N., 2015c. Religion Within the Boundaries of Mere Reason. On Hermann Cohen’s Article “Ethical and Historical Motives of Religion”. Judaica Petropolitana. Research on Jewish Philosophy and Intellectual Traditions of Judaism, 3, pp. 211-218. (In Rus.)Belov, V. N., 2016a. Ideas of Kant and German Militarism: On the Interpretation of Kant’s Idea of “Eternal Peace” by Hermann Cohen. Current Problems of the Humanities and Socio-Economic Sciences, 10(5), pp. 8-11. (In Rus.)Belov, V., 2016b. Hermann Cohens Lehre in Russland: Besonderheiten der Rezeption. Folia Philosophica, 35, pp. 9-27.Belov, V. N., 2016c. Hermann Cohen in the History of Russian Neo-Kantianism. Russian Studies in Philosophy, 54(5), pp. 395-407. https://doi.org/10.1080/10611967. 2016.1290415.Belov, V. N., 2016d. Modern Studies in the Philosophy of Hermann Cohen. Voprosy Filosofii, 6, pp. 218-222. (In Rus.)Belov, V. N., 2018a. The Autonomy of Reason and the Religion of Revelation in Hermann Cohen’s Philosophy of Religion. Philosophy of Religion: Analytic Researches, 2(2), pp. 51-64. https://doi.org/10.21146/2587-683X-2018-2-2-51-64. (In Rus.)Belov, V. N., 2018b. The Method of the Infinitesimal as the Principle of the Theory of Knowledge in Systematic Constructions of H. Cohen. Voprosy Filosofii, 3, pp. 68-74. (In Rus.)Belov, V. N., 2018c. The Concept of Religion in the System of Philosophy of Hermann Cohen. Judaica Petropolitana. Research on Jewish Philosophy and Intellectual Traditions of Judaism, 9, pp. 97-102. (In Rus.)Belov, V. N., 2018d. The Philosophy of the Religion of Hermann Cohen and Its Evaluation by Russian-Jewish Thinkers. In: J. Dobieszewski, S. Krajewski and J. Mach, eds. 2018. Poznanie i religiya. Epistemologiya religioznogo opyta v russkoj i evrejskoj filosofskoj mysli HKH veka = Epistemologia doświadczenia religijnego w XX-wiecznej filozofii rosyjskiej i żydowskiej. Warsaw: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, pp. 219-237. (In Rus.)Belov, V. N., 2019. Cohen’s Philosophy of Religion and Eastern Jewish Identity. Personality. Culture. Society, 21(3-4) (103-104), pp. 43-48. https://doi.org/10.30936/1606-951X-2019-21-3/4-43-48. (In Rus.)Belov, V. N., 2020. Cohen and Natorp’s Philosophy of Religion: the Argument About the Boundary of Reason. Kantian Journal, 39(3), pp. 54-71. https://doi.org/10.5922/0207-6918-2020-3-3. (In Rus.)Belov, V., 2021a. Cohen in Russland: einige allgemeine Bemerkungen. In: L. Bertolino, ed. 2021. “Facciamo l’uomo”: proposte filosofiche per un umanesimo critico. Studi in onore di Andrea Poma. Milano-Udine: Mimesis, pp. 145-149.Belov, V. N., 2021b. Hermann Cohen’s Philosophy of Religion and Western Christianity. St. Tikhon’s University Review. Series I: Theology. Philosophy. Religious Studies, 94, pp. 23-36. (In Rus.)Belov, V. N., 2022a. Hermann Cohen on the Relationship Between Judaism and Christianity. Voprosy Filosofii, 5, pp. 81-91. https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2022-5-81-91. (In Rus.)Belov, V. N., 2022b. Report of the Roundtable “The Relevance of Hermann Cohen’s Philosophy”. Kantian Journal, 41(2), pp. 159-166. https://dx.doi.org/10.5922/0207-6918-2022-2-7.Belov, V. N., 2022c. Filosofskaya sistema Germana Kogena [The Philosophical System of Hermann Cohen]. Moscow: URSS. (In Rus.)Belov, V. N., Berdnikova, A. Yu., and Karagod, J. G. 2021. Immanuel Kant and Hermann Cohen’s Philosophy of Religion. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 37(1), pp. 30-40. (In Rus.)Belov, V. N., Petrov, V. B. and Lebedeva, A. V., 2018. The International Conference: Hermann Cohen in the History of Russian Philosophy. RUDN Journal of Philosophy, 4, pp. 499-508. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2302-2018-22-4-499-508. (In Rus.)Bertolino, L., 2015. Thinking of Nature and the Nature of Thinking: Cohen on Spinoza. Translation and Preface by V. N. Belov. Kantian Journal, 3(53), pp. 48-65. https://dx.doi.org/10.5922/0207-6918-2015-3-4. (In Rus.)Cohen, H., 2002.The Aesthetics of Pure Feeling. V. 1. §11. The Aesthetic Feeling of Love. Translated from German by T. A. Akindinova. Studia culturae, 3, pp. 211-224. (In Rus.)Cohen, H., 2008. The Sciences of the Spirit and Philosophy. Translated by V. N. Belov. Kantian Journal, 1(27), pp. 82-86. (In Rus.)Cohen, H., 2012. Teoriya opyta Kanta [Kant’s Theory of Experience]. Translated by V. N. Belov. Moscow: Academicheskii Project Publishing House. (In Rus.)Cohen, H., 2015. Ethical and Historical Motives of Religion. Translated by V.N. Belov. Judaica Petropolitana, 9, pp. 218-223. (In Rus.)Cohen, H., 2018. The Problem of the Concept of Religion in Relation to the History of Religion and Metaphysics. Translated by V. N. Belov. Judaica Petropolitana, 9, pp. 103-114. (In Rus.)Cohen, H., 2019. Polish Jew. Personality. Culture. Society, 21 (3-4) (103-104), pp. 49-54. (In Rus.)Dlugach, T. B., 2006. On Some Principles of Hermann Cohen’s Theoretical Philosophy. In: Istoriko-filosofskij ezhegodnik / History of Philosophy Yearbook’2006. Мoscow: Nauka, pp. 180-203. (In Rus.)Dlugach, T. B., 2009. Kant and the Theoretical Philosophy of Hermann Cohen. Voprosy Filosofii, 11, pp. 160-170. (In Rus.)Dlugach, T. B., 2010. The Concept and Judgment in the Philosophy of H. Cohen. In: I. N. Griftsova and N. A. Dmitrieva, eds. 2010. Neokantianstvo nemezkoe i russkoe: mezhdu teoriei poznania i kritikoi kultury [German and Russian Neo-Kantianism: Between the Theory of Cognition and Critique of Culture. Moscow: ROSSPEN, pp. 221-226. (In Rus.)Dlugach, T. B., 2016. Riddles of Transcendental Idealism (Marburg School of Neo-Kantianism). In: Istoriko-filosofskij ezhegodnik / Historical and Philosophical Yearbook. Мoscow: Nauka, pp. 145-164. (In Rus.)Dmitrieva, N. A., 2007. Russkoe neokantianstvo: “Marburg” v Rossii. Istoriko-filosofskie ocherki [Russian Neo-Kantianism: “Marburg” in Russia. Historical and Philosophical Essays]. Moscow: ROSSPEN. (In Rus.)Dmitrieva, N. A., 2009. German and Russian Neo-Kantianism in the Past, Present and Future. Voprosy Filosofii, 3, pp. 165-175. (In Rus.)Dmitrieva, N., 2010. Mensch und Geschichte. Zur “anthropologischen Wende” im russischen Neukantianismus. Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics, 12(2), pp. 82-103.Dmitrieva, N. A., 2013a. Philosophy as Science and Worldview: On the Issue of Pacifism in German and Russian Neo-Kantianism. Logos, 2(92), pp. 138-154. (In Rus.)Dmitrieva, N. A., 2013b. The Concept of A Priori in German and Russian Neo-Kantianism. In: A.N. Krouglov, ed. 2013. Mnogoobrazie apriori [Diversity of A Priori]. Moscow: Kanon+, pp. 129-147. (In Rus.)Dmitrieva, N. A., 2014. Kant’s “Eternal peace” at the Turn of the Century and During the First World War. Prepodavatel XXI vek, 2/1, pp. 46-61. (In Rus.)Dmitrieva, N., 2015. Hermann Cohens Konzept der Anthropodizee in der Sicht Jacob Gordins. Kantian Journal, Special Issue, pp. 78-86. https://dx.doi.org/10.5922/0207-6918-2015-3-ENG-7.Dmitrieva, N. A., 2016a. N. V. Boldyrev’s Concept of History: Neo-Kantian Perspectives. The History of Philosophy, 21(2), pp. 45-58. (In Rus.)Dmitrieva, N. A., 2016b. At the Crossroads of Traditions: The Neo-Kantian Anthropodicy of Jakob Gordin. Part Two. Bulletin of the Russian State Humanitarian University. Series: Philosophy. Sociology. Art History, 3(5), pp. 99-114. (In Rus.)Dmitrieva, N. A., 2020. Hermann Cohen’s Ethical Ideas in the Works of Boris Pasternak. Russian Studies in Philosophy, 58(4), pp. 279-291. https://doi.org/10.1080/10611967.2020.1847923.Dmitrieva, N.A., 2021. Sergey Rubinstein on Hegel’s Method of Thinking: Neo-Kantian Criticism. Voprosy Filosofii, 9, pp. 90-102. https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2021-9-90-102. (In Rus.)Dmitrieva, N. A., 2021. The Kantian Origins of Sergei Rubinstein’s Theory of Moral Improvement. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 55(6), pp. 1126-1141. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.12632.Dmitrieva, N. A., 2024a. Das Problem der Anthropodizee in der Religionsphilosophie von Kant und Cohen. In: B. Buchhammer and B. Zehetner, eds. 2024. What Does it Mean to Be Human? — Was heißt es, Mensch zu sein? Celebratory Volume for Herta Nagl-Docekal’s 80th Birthday. Wien: LIT, pp. 161-189.Dmitrieva, N. A., 2024b. The Problem of Anthropodicy in the Philosophy of Religion of Kant, Cohen and Gordin. In: P. V. Rezvykh, ed. 2024. Immanuil Kant i filosofskaya teologiya [Immanuel Kant and Philosophical Theology]. Kaliningrad: IKBFU Publishing House, pp. 239-271. (In Rus.)Dmitrieva, N. A. and Levchenko, V. V., 2015. From Marburg to Odessa: Materials for the Scientific Biography of S.L. Rubinstein. Kantian Journal, 1(51), pp. 55-71. https://dx.doi.org/10.5922/0207-6918-2015-1-5. (In Rus.)Dvorkin, I., 2018. Philosophy in Search of the Origin. Notes on the Footsteps of Hermann Cohen’s Ideas. Terra Aestheticae, 2(2), pp. 81-93. (In Rus.)Dvorkin, I., 2020a. The Place of Hermann Cohen’s Ideas in the Philosophy of Dialogue. Kantian Journal, 39(4), pp. 62-94. https://dx.doi.org/10.5922/0207-6918-2020-4-3. (In Rus.)Dvorkin, I., 2020b. Philosophy of Dialogue: A Historical and Systematic Introduction. Judaica Petropolitana. Research on Jewish Philosophy and Intellectual Traditions of Judaism, 13, pp. 25-44. (In Rus.)Dvorkin, I., 2021. Bakhtin and Cohen: The First Stages in Building the Philosophical System. RUDN Journal of Philosophy, 25(3), pp. 436-456.Dvorkin, I., 2022. Transcendental Dynamics of Closeness in the Philosophy of Cohen and Levinas. In: S.L. Katrechko and A. A. Shiyan, eds. 2022. Transcendental’nyj povorot v sovremennoj filosofii — 7. Epistemologiya, kognitivistika i iskusstvennyj intellekt [The Transcendental Turn in Modern Philosophy — 7. Epistemology, Cognitive Science and Artificial Intelligence]: Collection of Abstracts of the International Conference. Moscow, 21-23 April 2022. Moscow: RSUH Publishing House, pp. 55-57. (In Rus.)Edel, G., 2010. Neo-Kantianism Today: Unresolved Issues. In: I. N. Griftsova and N. A. Dmitrieva, eds. 2010. Neokantianstvo nemeckoe i russkoe: mezhdu teoriej poznaniya i kritikoj kul’tury. [German and Russian Neo-Kantianism: Between the Theory of Cognition and Critique of Culture]. Moscow: ROSSPEN, pp. 532-539. (In Rus.)Ferrari, M., 2010. Dmitry Gavronsky and Ernst Cassirer: From the History of the Marburg School. In: I. N. Griftsova and N. A. Dmitrieva, eds. 2010. Neokantianstvo nemeckoe i russkoe: mezhdu teoriej poznaniya i kritikoj kul’tury. [German and Russian Neo-Kantianism: Between the Theory of Cognition and Critique of Culture]. Moscow: ROSSPEN, pp. 242-256. (In Rus.)Fokht, B. A., 2003. Izbrannoe (iz filosofskogo naslediya) [Selected Works (from the Philosophical Heritage)]. Publication, Preface, Preparation of the Texts, Commentary by N. A. Dmitrieva. Moscow: Progress-Traditsiya. (In Rus.)Frolova, E. A., 2012. Methodological Problems of the Science of Law in the Teachings of B. A. Kistyakovsky (Polemic of the Marburg and Baden Schools of Neo-Kantianism). Bulletin of the Moscow University. Ser. 11: Law, 3, pp. 83-93. (In Rus.)Frolova, E. A., 2013. Neo-Kantianism in the Russian Philosophy of Law in the Second Half of the 19th and the First Half of the 20th Centuries. Dissertation for Doctor of Sciences in Law, Moscow State University, Moscow. (In Rus.)Gaidenko, P. P., 2003. Scientific Rationality and Philosophical Reason. Moscow: Progress-Traditsiya. (In Rus.)Gordin, J. I., 2016. Anthropodicy (Only Lecture). Published and commented by N. A. Dmitrieva with assistance by M. V. Vogman. RSUH Bulletin. Series: Philosophy. Sociology. Art History, 3(5), pp. 115-146. (In Rus.)Goryacheva, T. A., 2009. The Comic in Music as a Phenomenon of the History of Artistic Culture. Dissertation for the Candidate of Sciences in Philosophy, Saint Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg. (In Rus.)Griftsova, I. N. and Dmitrieva, N. A., eds. 2010. Neokantianstvo nemeckoe i russkoe: mezhdu teoriej poznaniya i kritikoj kul’tury. [German and Russian Neo-Kantianism: Between the Theory of Cognition and Critique of Culture]. Moscow: ROSSPEN, pp. 417-427. (In Rus.)Holzhey, H., 2010. On Metaphysical Problems in Marburg Neo-Kantianism. In: I. N. Griftsova and N. A. Dmitrieva, eds. 2010. Neokantianstvo nemeckoe i russkoe: mezhdu teoriej poznaniya i kritikoj kul’tury. [German and Russian Neo-Kantianism: Between the Theory of Cognition and Critique of Culture]. Moscow: ROSSPEN, pp. 31-43. (In Rus.)Karagod, J., 2019. Contemporary Russian Studies of the Life and Works of Hermann Cohen, In: Y. Zhang, I. Rumbal, R. Green and T. Volodina, eds. 2019. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Contemporary Education, Social Sciences and Humanities (ICCESSH 2019), 329, pp. 176-178.Kitayeva, L. A., 2005. Hermann Cohen’s Philosophy of Religion. Dissertation for the Candidate of Sciences in Philosophy. Saratov Chernyshevsky State University, Saratov. (In Rus.)Kolerov, M. A., 2018. Hermann Cohen: Russian Obituaries from 1918. Kantian Journal, 37(2), pp. 58-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.5922/0207-6918-2018-2-4. (In Rus.)Kovrov, A. E., 2012. Modern Strategies of Justifying Free Will. Dissertation for the Candidate of Sciences in Philosophy. Moscow State University. (In Rus.)Krouglov, A. N., 2000. Transcendentalizm v filosofii [Transcendentalism in Philosophy]. Moscow: “Voskhod-A”. (In Rus.)Kurhinen, P., 2015. Human Dignity, Ethical Socialism and Soviet Ethics. Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, 2(30), pp. 107-119. https://doi.org/10.17223/1998863X/30/12 (In Rus.)Makhlin, V. L., 2010. Bakhtin and Neo-Kantianism (Approaches to the Problem). In: I. N. Griftsova and N. A. Dmitrieva, eds. 2010. Neokantianstvo nemeckoe i russkoe: mezhdu teoriej poznaniya i kritikoj kul’tury. [German and Russian Neo-Kantianism: Between the Theory of Cognition and Critique of Culture]. Moscow: ROSSPEN, pp. 441-461. (In Rus.)Meshkov, I. M., 2018. The Epistemology of Values in the Phenomenology and Philosophy of Neo-Kantianism. Context and Reflection: Philosophy of the World and Human Being, 7(5A), pp. 52-57. (In Rus.)Munk, R., 2015. Another Critical Idealism of Hermann Cohen. Translated by V. N. Belov. Kantian Journal, 4(54), pp. 67-81. (In Rus.)Pertsev, A. S., 2023. Hermann Cohen’s Philosophy of Mathematics, or What’s Wrong with the Marburg Method. Voprosy Filosofii, 2, pp. 27-41. (In Rus.)Poma, A., 2012. Kriticheskaya filosofiya Germana Kogena [The Critical Philosophy of Hermann Cohen]. Translated from Italian by O. A. Popova. Moscow: Academicheskii Project Publishing House. (In Rus.)Poma, A. and Belov, V. N., 2021. Is Hermann Cohen a Classical Philosopher? RUDN Journal of Philosophy, 25(3), pp. 371-377.Rubinstein, S. L., 1992. About the Philosophical System of H. Cohen. Published by O. N. Bredikhina. Istoriko-filosofskij ezhegodnik / History of Philosophy Yearbook’92. Moscow: Nauka, pp. 230-259. (In Rus.)Sakketti, A. L., 2017. H. Cohen’s Teaching on the Form of Music. Published and commented by N. A. Dmitrieva with participation by Yu. N. Yakimenko. In: N. S. Plotnikov and N. P. Podzemskaya, eds. 2017. Iskusstvo kak yazyk — yazyki iskusstva. Gosudarstvennaya akademiya hudozhestvennyh nauk i esteticheskaya teoriya 1920-h gg. [Art as a Language — the Languages of Art. The State Academy of Art Sciences and Aesthetic Theory of the 1920s]. Volume II: Publikatsii [Publications]. Moscow: New Literary Review, pp. 412-446. (In Rus.)Sakketti, A. L. and Dmitrieva, N. A., 2021. Philosophy of Hermann Cohen (Publication, Foreword and Commentary by N. A. Dmitrieva). Kantian Journal, 40(2), pp. 95-130. http://dx.doi.org/10.5922/0207-6918-2021-2-4.Savintsev, V. I. and Popova, V. S., 2022. Space and Time as A Priori Forms in the Works of Hermann Cohen and Ivan Lapshin. Kantian Journal, 41(4), pp. 94-121. http://dx.doi.org/10.5922/0207-6918-2022-4-5.Schindler, R., 2010. From the “Eternal Principle of Logic” to the Messianic Future. Aspects of Time in the Cohen’s Critique of Rationality. In: I. N. Griftsova and N. A. Dmitrieva, eds. 2010. Neokantianstvo nemeckoe i russkoe: mezhdu teoriej poznaniya i kritikoj kul’tury. [German and Russian Neo-Kantianism: Between the Theory of Cognition and Critique of Culture]. Moscow: ROSSPEN, pp. 427-440. (In Rus.)Sekundant, S. G., 2010. The Theory of Infinitesimals and Its Role in the Formation of the Philosophical and Methodological Concept of H. Cohen. Epistemology & Philosophy of Science, 26(4), pp. 219-222. (In Rus.)Semyonov, V. Ye., 2008a. Non-Classical Philosophical Thought as Neoclassical Thought: Hermann Cohen. In: A. I. Aleshin, ed. 2008. Neklassicheskaya filosofskaya mysl’: istoriya i sovremennost’ [Non-Classical Philosophical Thought: History and Modernity]: Proceedings of the Interuniversity Conference. Moscow: RSUH Publishing house, pp. 112-120. (In Rus.)Semyonov, V. Ye., 2008b. Transcendental’nye osnovy ponimaniya (I. Kant i neokantianstvo) [Transcendental Foundations of Understanding (I. Kant and Neo-Kantianism)]. Vladimir: Vladimir State University Publishing House. (In Rus.)Semyonov, V. Ye., 2012. Dominiruyushchie paradigmy transcendentalizma v zapadnoevropejskoj filosofii [Dominant Paradigms of Transcendentalism in West European Philosophy]. Moscow: ROSSPEN. (In Rus.)Semyonov, V. Ye., 2022. Constructive Thinking in the Critical Philosophy of Hermann Cohen. Kantian Journal, 41(3), pp. 76-101. (In Rus.)Semyonov, V. Ye., 2023. Kant and Marburg School. RUDN Journal of Philosophy, 27(3), pp. 541-555. (In Rus.)Soboleva, M., 2020. Transcendentalism and its Forms. Studies in Transcendental Philosophy, 1(1), pp. 3-13. (In Rus.)Soboleva, M. E., 2010. Hermann Cohen and Mikhail Bakhtin: a Dialogue About Aesthetics? In: I. N. Griftsova and N. A. Dmitrieva, eds. 2010. Neokantianstvo nemeckoe i russkoe: mezhdu teoriej poznaniya i kritikoj kul’tury. [German and Russian Neo-Kantianism: Between the Theory of Cognition and Critique of Culture]. Moscow: ROSSPEN, pp. 462-476. (In Rus.)Sokuler, Z. A., 2008. Hermann Cohen and the Philosophy of Dialog. Moscow: Progress-Traditsiya. (In Rus.)Sokuler, Z. A., 2010. Ideas for a new Concept of the Subject in Hermann Cohen’s “Religion of Reason from the Sources of Judaism”. In: I. N. Griftsova and N. A. Dmitrieva, eds. 2010. Neokantianstvo nemeckoe i russkoe: mezhdu teoriej poznaniya i kritikoj kul’tury. [German and Russian Neo-Kantianism: Between the Theory of Cognition and Critique of Culture]. Moscow: ROSSPEN, pp. 417-427. (In Rus.)Sokuler, Z. A., 2013. Hermann Cohen as a Relevant Thinker. Reflecting on the Book: H. Cohen. Kant’s Theory of Experience. Voprosy Filosofii, 1, pp. 154-164. (In Rus.)Sokuler, Z. A., 2019. The Concept of Virtue in Religious Philosophy of Hermann Cohen. RUDN Journal of Philosophy, 23 (4), pp. 398-412. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2302-2019-23-4-398-412. (In Rus.)Sokuler, Z. A., 2021. Hermann Cohen and His Idea of the Logic of Pure Knowledge. RUDN Journal of Philosophy, 225(3), pp. 378-393. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2302-2021-25-3-378-393. (In Rus.)Sokuler, Z. A., 2022. Hermann Cohen’s Logic of the Pure Knowledge as a Philosophy of Science. RUDN Journal of Philosophy,26(3), pp. 658-671. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2302-2022-26-3-658-671. (In Rus.)Steinberg, A. Z., 2011. Hermann Cohen as Teacher (1842-1918). In: S. M. Ginsburg, ed. 2011. Filosofskie sochineniya [Philosophical Writings]. Preface and Commentary by V. G. Belous; Afterword and Commentary by L. N. Stolovich. St.-Petersburg: Mir, pp. 284-309. (In Rus.)Tyutyunnikov, A. A., 2018a. Hermann Cohen’s Transcendental Method as a Project (II). Bulletin of PNRPU. Culture. History. Philosophy. Law, 2, pp. 7-26. (In Rus.)Tyutyunnikov, A. A., 2018b. Hermann Cohen’s Transcendental Method as a Project (II). Bulletin of PNRPU. Culture. History. Philosophy. Law, 3, pp. 47-59. (In Rus.)Ustiugova, E. N., 2018. Consonance of Cohen’s Aesthetics with Ideas of Russian and German Avant-Garde of The First Quarter of the 20th Century. Terra Aestheticae, 2(2), pp. 56-68. (In Rus.)Vikhnovich, V. L., 2014. Hermann Cohens Petersburg Episode and Something More than that... Bulletin of Russian Christian Academy for the Humanities, 1, pp. 199-209. (In Rus.)Vladimirov, P. A., 2021. Russian Neo-Kantianism and Philosophy in Russia. Studies in Transcendental Philosophy, 2(3), Available at: https://transcendental.su/s271326680018215-6-1/ (Accessed 25 March 2023). https://doi.org/10.18254/S271326680018215-6. (In Rus.)