2023 Vol. 14 №1

Ekaterinburg — Sverdlovsk — Ekaterinburg: the city image in the dynamics of a toponymic text

DOI

10.5922/2225-5346-2023-1-2

Pages

29-53

Abstract

The article is devoted to reflecting the image of a city in verbal data — topographic names. The author bases the research upon the ideas of the cultural-semiotic approach to city studies, upon the conception of a city as a text and palimpsest and sets the goal of investigat­ing semantic changes in the toponymic text of Ekaterinburg examined in its historical dynam­ics. The main stages of modification of the Ural city toponymic image are characterized via the metaconcept of chronotopos. As a tool of linguocultural analysis per se, generalised onomasio­logical, semantic models, or cultural semantic codes, are used. These involve landscape-distinctive, social-functional and social-symbolic codes. The paper defines the specificity of the realisation of cultural semantic codes in the toponymy (urbanonymy) of Ekaterinburg relative to three chronotopic junctures determined by the city renaming landmark acts — Ekaterin­burg, Sverdlovsk, Ekaterinburg. Topical meanings are revealed in the toponymic portrait of the city in different periods of its life. The changes that increase in the toponymy in the framework of one chronotopic juncture and contribute to the transference of a part of cultural experience to the next historic period are traced. In the image of Ekaterinburg represented in its toponymic text, traits of the city’s territorial identity underpinned by its natural and geo­graphical, economic and social factors are indicated.

Reference

Anisimov, N. O., 2018. City in discourse of semiotics. Juvenis scientia, 12, pp. 33—35, https://doi.org/10.32415/jscientia.2018.12.09 (in Russ.).

Artamonova, I., 2013. How the names of Yekaterinburg streets changed. Oblast­naya gazeta [Regional newspaper]. Available at: https://www.oblgazeta.ru/society/ 12196/ [Accessed 15 November 2022] (in Russ.).

Baraboshina, N. V., 2013. Khronotop malogo goroda: Buzuluk — kul’turnoe pogra­nich’e [Chronotope of a small town: Buzuluk — cultural frontier]. PhD thesis. Saransk (in Russ.).

Berezovich, E. L., 1995. Toponymic space as a text. In: Ezhegodnik Nauchno-issle­do­vatel'skogo instituta russkoi kul'tury. 1994 [Yearbook of the Scientific Research Institute of Russian Culture. 1994]. Ekaterinburg, pp. 86—95 (in Russ.).

Bulygina, E. Yu. and Tripol'skaya, T. A., 2015. Yazyk gorodskogo prostranstva: slo­var’, karta, tekst [The language of urban space: dictionary, map, text]. Moscow (in Russ.).

Burlina, E. Y., 2017. “So many cities so many chronotopes”. Spatial-temporal di­agnostics of the city. International Research Journal, 09 (63), pp. 103—108, https://doi. org/10.23670/IRJ.2017.63.035 (in Russ.).

Chirkov, S., 2020. Naming of the city. Why do streets change names. Gorodskoe media ETV [Urban Media ETV]. Available at: https://art-oleg.blogspot.com/2020/ 11/blog-post_8.html [Accessed 15 November 2022] (in Russ.).

Golomidova, M. V., 1995. The image of space and spatial images in the names of old Yekaterinburg. In: Ezhegodnik Nauchno-issledovatel’skogo instituta russkoi kul’tury. 1994 [Yearbook of the Scientific Research Institute of Russian Culture. 1994]. Ekate­rinburg, pp. 19—25 (in Russ.).

Golomidova, M. V., 2019. Urbanonyms as a resource of management of urban space perception. Communication Studies (Russia), 6 (1), pp. 11—30, https://doi.org/ 10.25513/2413-6182.2019.6(1).11-30 (in Russ.).

Ivanov, A., 2022. Khrebet Rossii [The Backbone of Russia]. Moscow (in Russ.).

Ivanov, Vyach. Vs., 1986. Towards the Semiotic Study of the cultural history of the Big City. Trudy po znakovym sistemam (Uchenye zapiski Tartuskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Vyp. 720) [Sign Systems Studies (Scientific letters of The University of Tartu. Issue 720)]. Tartu, pp. 7—24 (in Russ.).

Kachalkova, Yu. А., 2013. Urbanonymic space of contemporary Ekaterinburg (of­ficial names). Voprosy onomastiki [Problems of Onomastics], 1 (14), pp. 88—104 (in Russ.).

Kasatkina, S. S., 2015. The relationship of traditional and systemic-semiotic ap­proaches to the typology of urban space of Russia in philosophical interpretation. News of Higher Schools. Series “Humanities”, 6 (3), pp. 195—198 (in Russ.).

Khan-Magomedov, S. O., 1975. Architecture of residential buildings. 1917—1932. In: N. V. Baranov, ed. Vseobshchaya istoriya arkhitektury. Tom 12. Kniga pervaya. Ar­khi­tektura SSSR [General history of architecture. Volume 12. The first book. Architectu­re of the USSR]. Moscow, pp. 78—97 (in Russ.).

Lotman, Yu. M., 1984. The symbolism of St. Petersburg and the problems of the semiotics of the city. In: Trudy po znakovym sistemam. Semiotika goroda i gorodskoi kul'tury. [Sign Systems Studies. Semiotics of the city and urban culture], 18. Tartu, pp. 30—45 (in Russ.).

Lotman, Yu. M., 1992. A symbol in the cultural system. In: Yu. M. Lotman, ed. Iz­brannye stat'i v trekh tomakh. T. 1. Stat’i po semiotike i topologii kul’tury [Selected articles in three volumes. Vol. 1. Articles on semiotics and topology of culture]. Tallinn, pp. 191—199 (in Russ.).

Marin, A., 2012. Bordering Time in the Cityscape. Toponymic Changes as Tempo­ral Boundary-Making: Street Renaming in Leningrad/St. Petersburg. Geopolitics, 17 (1), pp. 192—216, https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2011.574652.

Mitin, I. I., 2008. Place as Palimpsest. 60 Parallel, 4 (31), pp. 20—25 (in Russ.).

Mitin, I. I., 2022. City as palimpsest: from a metaphor within Historical Geogra­phy towards a semiotic model of place management. Chelovek: obraz i sushchnost’. Gu­ma­nitarnye aspekty [Human Being: Image and Essence. Humanitarian Aspects], 1 (49), pp. 108—125. https://doi.org/10.31249/chel/2022.01.06 (in Russ.).

Podol'skaya, N. V., 1988. Slovar’ russkoi onomasticheskoi terminologii [Dictionary of Russian Onomastic Terminology]. 2nd ed. Moscow (in Russ.).

Sharifullin, B. Ya., 2007. Language space: language life and the communicative en­vironment of the city. In: Yazyk goroda: Materialy Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prak­ticheskoi konferentsii [The language of the city: Materials of the International Scientific and Practical Conference]. Biysk, pp. 45—50 (in Russ.).

Sverchkov, D., 2014. Why did Yekaterinburg turn into Sverdlovsk 90 years ago? Komsomol’skaya Pravda [Komsomolskaya Pravda]. Available at:https://www.ural. kp.ru/daily/26296/3173845/ [Accessed 15 November 2022] (in Russ.).

Toporov, V. N., 2003. Peterburgskii tekst russkoi literatury [The Petersburg text of Russian literature]. St. Petersburg (in Russ.).

Uspenskii, B. A. and Lotman, Yu. M., 1976. Echoes of the concept of “Moscow the Third Rome” in the ideology of Peter the Great (on the problem of medieval tradition in Baroque culture). In: Kul’turnoe nasledie Drevnei Rusi (Istoki. Stanovlenie. Traditsii) [The cultural heritage of Ancient Russia (Origins. Becoming. Traditions)]. Moscow, pp. 236—249 (in Russ.).

Zorina, L. I. and Slukin, V. M., 2005. Ulitsy i ploshchadi starogo Ekaterinburga [Streets and squares of old Yekaterinburg]. Ekaterinburg (in Russ.).