Revisiting Schleiermacher’s On the Different Methods of Translating: On the Foundations of Translation Relativity Theory
- DOI
- 10.5922/2225-5346-2017-4-6
- Pages
- 67-80
Abstract
Translation is a multidimensional phenomenon. All the theories stress the diversity of its types and strategies. Phenomena described as an unexplainable deviation within one theory can form the foundation for another. This may lead to the idea of replacing a theory of translation with its empiric version. However, a different approach is also possible. The outlines of the theory of translational and traductological relativity can be derived from the ideas first voiced by Schleiermacher in his lecture On the different methods of translation (1813), from Quineʼs theory of indeterminacy of translation, and from Benjaminʼs concept of untranslatability. From a multi-disciplinary perspective, this heterogeneity is viewed as a benefit. Instead of a universal typology, which inevitably breaks down into a plethora of loosely connected theories of literary, technical, simultaneous, and other types of translation, one can employ an approach where theories differ in axiomatics rather than descriptions. This will produce a family of linguistic, semiotic, and hermeneutic theories. These theories will a) be based on family resemblance, b) aim to describe adequately a certain type of translation, and c) complement each other. Instead of searching for principles universal to all types of translation, this approach strives to correlate different theories, to estimate the range of applications of these theories, and to analyse the mutual translatability/untranslatability of translation theories.
Reference
|
1. Avtonomova, N., 2008. Poznanie i perevod. Opyty filosofii yazyka [Cognition and translation. Experiences of language philosophy]. Moscow. 2. Avtonomova, N., 1969. M. Gasparov: 'Shakespeare's sonnets — translations of Marshak'. Voprosy literatury [Issues of literature], 2, p. 100—112. 3. Ben'yamin, V., 2012. Task of the translator. Foreword to the translation of Baudelaire's «Paris paintings». In: Ben'yamin, V. Uchenie o podobii. Mediaesteticheskie proizvedeniya [The doctrine of similarity. Media-aesthetic works]. Available at: http://kassandrion.narod.ru/ commentary/11/6ben.htm [Accessed 17 May 2017]. 4. Vitgenshtein, L., 1958. Logiko-filosofskii traktat [Logico-philosophical treatise]. Moscow. 5. Zolyan, S. T., 2013. Text-centric semantics and translation theory. Inostrannye yazyki v vysshei shkole [Foreign languages in higher education], 2 (25), p. 11—18. 6. Zolyan, S. T., 2016. Text-centric semantics and translation theory. Article 2: Semantics of translation as a semiotic variable. Inostrannye yazyki v vysshei shkole [Foreign languages in higher education], 4 (39), p. 45—55. 7. Zolyan, S. T., 2017. M. L. Gasparov and the principle of relativity of poetic translation. In: M. Akimova, M. Tarlinskaya, eds. M. L. Gasparov. O nem. Dlya nego: Stat'i i materialy [Gasparov. About him. For him: Articles and materials]. Moscow, p. 486—504. 8. Quine, W., 2000. Slovo i ob"ekt [Word and object]. Moscow. 9. Quine, W., 2005. Eshche raz o neopredelennosti perevoda [Once again about the uncertainty of the translation]. Logos, 2(47), p. 32—45. 10. Lotman, Yu. M., 2000. Semiosfera [Semiosphere]. St. Petersburg. 11. Fedorov, A. V., 1938. Osnovy obshchei teorii perevoda [Fundamentals of general theory of translation]. Moscow. 12. Shleiermakher, F., 2000. 'On different methods of translation: Lecture, read on June 24, 1813'. Vestnik MGU, Ser. 9.: Filologiya [Bulletin of the MSU, Ser. 9: Philology], 2, p. 127—145. 13. Barthes, R., 1979. From Work to Text. Textual Strategies: Perspectives in Poststructuralist Criticism. Ithaca, N. Y., p. 73—81. 14. Derrida, J., 2001. What Is a "Relevant" Translation. Critical Inquiry, 27 (2), p. 174—200. 15. Eco, U., 2008. Experiences in translation. Toronto. 16. Kearney, R., 2006. Introduction: Ricoeur’s philosophy of translation. Ricoeur, P. On Translation. Routledge, London, p. 7—20. 17. Jakobson, R., 1960. Linguistics and Poetics. In: T. Sebeok, ed. Style in Language. N. Y. 18. Nida, E. A., 1991. Theories of Translation. TTR: traduction, terminologie, rédaction, 4 (1), p. 19—32. 19. Ricoeur, P., 2006. On Translation. London. 20. Steiner, G., 1998. After Babel. Aspects of Language and Translation. Oxford. |