Actor-based network theory in the context of ideology and political ontology
- Pages
- 88-94
Abstract
The aim of this research is to consider the possibility of applying actornetwork theory (STS) to political processes. The authors analyze B. Latour’s criticism of the traditional political science and sociological approaches to the understanding of different spheres through the prism of ideology and interest. The initial assumptions and main arguments of the actor-network theory are compared with the post-Marxist theory of hegemony by E. Laclau and C. Mouffe. The conclusion draws attention to the limited possibilities of the practical application of STS since it lacks instruments of political action.
Reference
1. Латур Б. Пересборка социального: введение в акторно-сетевую теорию. М., 2014.
2. Латур Б. Дайте мне лабораторию, и я переверну мир // Логос. 2002. № 5—6 (35). С. 211—242.
3. Льюкс С. Власть. Радикальный взгляд. М., 2010.
4. Мейясу К. После конечности: эссе о необходимости контингентности. Екатеринбург ; М., 2016.
5. Харман Г. Четвероякий объект: метафизика вещей после Хайдеггера. Пермь, 2015.
6. Харман Г. Сети и ассамбляжи: возрождение вещей у Латура и Деланда // Логос. 2017. № 3. С. 1—34.
7. Althusser L. On The Reproduction Of Capitalism: Ideology And Ideological State Apparatuses. Verso, 2014.
8. Gramsci and Marxist Theory / ed. Ch. Mouffe. Routledge & Kegan Paiul, 1979.
9. Gratton P. Speculative Realism: Problems and Prospects. Bloomsbury, 2014.
10. Harman G. Bruno Latour: Reassembling the Political. Pluto Press, 2014.
11. Harvey I. The Rhetoric of Esotericism: The Challenge to Deconstruction // in Law and Semiotics / ed. R. Kevelson. Plenum Press, 1987.
12. Laclau E. Politics and Ideology in Marxist Theory. Verso, 2012.
13. Laclau E., Mouffe С. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. Verso, 2013.
14. Latour B. Politics of nature: how to bring the sciences into democracy. Harvard University Press, 2004.