Slovo.ru: Baltic accent

2024 Vol. 15 №2

Back to the list Download the article

Technological Metaphor and Communicative Models in Contemporary Russian Poetry

DOI
10.5922/2225-5346-2024-2-10
Pages
160-179

Abstract

The article investigates the functioning of technological metaphor and communication models in poetic discourse. The aim of the study is to explore contemporary Russian poetry in its relation to digital technologies, employing cognitive-discursive and media-cognitive ap­proaches. Technological metaphor is an implicit property inherent in both technical objects and poetic texts, which manifests itself on two levels: lexical-semantic and cognitive-communicative. The article proposes an approach to the study of technological metaphor in three aspects: the examination of a technical object as containing its own metaphorical sub­strate, the thematization of a technical object in a poetic text and metaphorization strategies, and the implicit functioning of a technological metaphor at the level of the whole text, which affects the communication structure of poetic discourse. The key parameters of the new com­munication models in poetic discourse include the transformation of the prototypical space of the poetic text, changes in the principles of poetic framing, semantic and syntactic compres­sion, multiple integration of mental spaces, referential uncertainty, the functioning of com­puter terms as metaphors in poetic discourse, and their secondary metaphorization/deme­ta­pho­rization. The active interaction of poetry and technology leads to the creation of communi­cation aesthetics, with a key parameter being the formation of hybrid cognitive-communi­ca­tive zones in poetic discourse.

Reference

Azarova, N. M., 2010. Yazyk filosofii i yazyk poezii — dvizhenie navstrechu (grammat­ika, leksika, tekst) [The language of philosophy and the language of poetry — a move­ment towards each other (grammar, vocabulary, text)]. Moscow (in Russ.).

Baytov, N., 2003. Stikhotvoreniya 2003 goda [Poems of 2003]. Available at: http:// levin.rinet.ru/FRIENDS/BYTOV/stihi31.html [Accessed 8 July 2023] (in Russ.).

Beloglazova, Ye. V., 2010. Polydiscursivity in the context of ideas about discur­sive heterogeneity. In: Aktual'nye problemy sovremennoi lingvistiki [Actual problems of modern linguistics]. Vol. 2, рр. 105—111 (in Russ.).

Bruno, G., 2014. Surfaces matters of aesthetics, materiality, and media. Chicago: Uni­versity of Chicago Press.

Busareva, S., 2021. The search for new means of significance in the Digital Age. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie [New Literary Review], 167, pp. 235—243 (in Russ.).

Chun, W. H. K., 2006. Control and Freedom. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

Darin, A., 2015. PerseverationTextOnly, 1 (43). Available at: http://textonly. ru/votum/?issue=43&article=38878 [Accessed 8 July 2023] (in Russ.).

Demyankov, V. Z., 2018a. The sociocultural cognitive engineering. Kognitivnye is­sledovaniya yazyka [Cognitive studies of language], 35, pp. 13—21 (in Russ.).

Demyankov, V. Z., 2018b. Transfer of hermeneutic ideas into cognitive linguis­tics. Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki [Issues of Cognitive Linguistics], 4, pp. 5—14, https://doi.org/10.20916/1812-3228-2018-4-5-14 (in Russ.).

Drucker, J., 2014. Graphesis. Visual Forms of Knowledge Production. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

Farman, J., 2012. Mobile interface theory: embodied space and locative media. New York; London: Routledge.

Fauconnier, G. and Turner, M., 2003. Conceptual blending, form and meaning. Recherches en communication, 19, pp. 57—86, https://doi.org/10.14428/rec.v19i19. 48413.

Feshchenko, V. V., 2021. Literary communication: from semiotic models to a the­ory of linguistic aesthetics. Slovo. ru: Baltic accent, 12 (1), pp. 7—31, https://doi.org/ 10.5922/2225-5346-2021-1-1 (in Russ.).

Feshchenko, V. V., 2022a. Yazyk v yazyke. Khudozhestvennyi diskurs i osnovaniya lingvoestetiki [The language in language. Art discourse and foundations of linguo-aesthetics]. Мoscow (in Russ.).

Feshchenko, V. V., 2022b. Continuous Reframing: G. Lakoff, Cognitive Linguis­tics, and “Language Poetry”. Critique and Semiotics, 2, pp. 9—17, https://doi.org/ 10.25205/2307-1737-2022-2-9-17 (in Russ.).

Foucauld, M., 1996. Arkheologiya znaniya [Archeology of knowledge]. Kiev (in Russ.).

Friedberg, A., 2006. The Virtual Window: From Alberti to Microsoft. Cambridge, MA.

Galloway, A., 2012. Interface Effect. Cambridge; Malden, Massachusetts: Polity.

Gasparov, B. M., 1996. Yazyk, pamyat', obraz. Lingvistika yazykovogo sushchestvo­va­niya [Language, memory, image. Linguistics of linguistic existence]. Moscow (in Russ.).

Hayles, N. K., 1999. How we became posthuman: virtual bodies in cybernetics, litera­ture, and informatics. Chicago; London: The University of Chicago Press.

Hui, Yu., 2020. Rekursivnost' i kontingentnost' [Recursiveness and contingency]. Moscow (in Russ.).

Hui, Yu., 2023. Vopros o tekhnike v Kitae. Esse o kosmotekhnike [The Question Con­cerning Technology in China. An essay on cosmotechniques]. Moscow (in Russ.).

Iampolski, M., 2015. Iz khaosa (Dragomoshchenko: poeziya, fotografiya, filosofiya) [Out of chaos (Dragomoshchenko: poetry, photography, philosophy)]. St. Petersburg (in Russ.).

Iriskhanova, O. K., 2014. Igry fokusa v yazyke. Semantika, sintaksis i pragmatika defokusirovaniya [Focus games in language. Semantics, syntax and pragmatics of defo­cusing]. Moscow (in Russ.).

Jakobson, R., 1975. Linguistics and poetics. In: Strukturalizm: «za» i «protiv»: sbor­nik statei [Structuralism: “pro” and “contra”: a collection of articles]. Moscow, pp. 193—230 (in Russ.)

Kibrik, A. A., 2003. Analiz diskursa v kognitivnoi perspektive [Discourse Analysis in a Cognitive Perspective]. PhD Dissertation. Moscow (in Russ.).

Koblov, K., 2018. prototipy [prototypes]. St. Petersburg (in Russ.).

Kubryakova, E. S., 1986. Nominativnyi aspekt rechevoi deyatel'nosti [The nominative aspect of speech activity]. Moscow (in Russ.).

Kubryakova, E. S., 2012. On the term “discourse” and the structure of knowledge behind it. In: V poiskakh sushchnosti yazyka: Kognitivnye issledovaniya [In search of the essence of language: cognitive research]. Moscow, pp. 113—127 (in Russ.).

Kukulin, I. V., 2015. Mashiny zashumevshego vremeni. Kak sovetskii montazh stal metodom neofitsial'noi kul'tury [Noisy time machines: how Soviet editing became a method of non-official culture]. Moscow (in Russ.).

Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M., 2004. Metafory, kotorymi my zhivem [Metaphors we live by]. Moscow (in Russ.).

Lovink, G., 2019. Kriticheskaya teoriya interneta [The critical theory of the Internet]. Moscow (in Russ.).

Morits, Yu., 2008. Poeziya [Poetry]. Available at: http://owl.ru/morits/stih/ takim-obrazom-pushkin.htm [Accessed 8 July 2023] (in Russ.).

Mukhtarullina, A. R., 2012. Terms-metaphors in computer discourse. Vestnik Bashkirskogo universiteta. Filologiya i iskusstvovedenie [Bulletin of the Bashkir Universi­ty. Philology and art history], 17 (3—1), pp. 1628—1631 (in Russ.).

Nelson, T., 1963. Complex information processing: a file structure for the com­plex, the changing and the indeterminate. In: L. Winner, ed. Association for computing machinery: proceedings of the 20th National Conference. Cleveland, pp. 84—100.

Parisi, L., 2019. Instrumental Reason, Algorithmic Capitalism, and the Incompu­table. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie [New Literary Review], 158, pp. 169—181 (in Russ.).

Parshchikov, A., 2003. Neft' [Oil]. Available at: http://parshchikov.ru/neft/neft [Accessed 8 July 2023] (in Russ.).

Parshchikov, A., 2006. Returning of the aura? Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie [New Literary Review], 82, pp. 391—399 (in Russ.).

Parshchikov, A., 2014. Dirizhabli [The airships]. Moscow (in Russ.).

Pold, S.2006. Button. In: M. Fuller, ed. Software Studies: A Lexicon. Cambridge, Mas­sachusetts; London: The MIT Press.

Revzina, O. G., 1999. The language and discourse. Vestnik Moskovskogo universi­teta. Seriya 9: Filologiya [Moscow University Bulletin. Series 9. Philology], 1. pp. 25—33 (in Russ.).

Revzina, O. G., 2005. Discourse and discursive formations. Critique and Semiotics, 8, pp. 66—78 (in Russ.).

Rodionova, A., 2019. Simple reflectors. Translit, 22, рр. 84—87 (in Russ.).

Rodionova, A., 2022. “We do not have an Automatic Station”: Filters of Techno­logical Imagination in the Poetry of Genrikh Sapgir and Igor Kholin. Novoe litera­turnoe obozrenie [New Literary Review], 176, pp. 254—269, https://doi.org/10.53953/ 08696365_2022_176_4_254 (in Russ.).

Safonov, N., 2016. The space that does not exist when it will be. AroundArtAvailable at: http://aroundart.ru/2016/05/13/prostranstvo-kotorogo-net-kogda- ono-budet/ [Accessed 8 July 2023] (in Russ.).

Samostienko, E. V., 2022. Renderings of speculation: on introspective modes in the poetry of Alexei Parshchikov. In: Figury intuitsii: poetika Alekseya Parshchikova: sbornik statei [Figures of intuition: the poetics of Alexei Parshchikov: a collection of articles]. Moscow, pp. 82—89 (in Russ.).

Simondon, G., 2009. Entretien sur la mechanology. Revue de synthèse, 1, pp. 103—132.

Simondon, G., 2013. The essence of technicity. Sinii divan [The Blue sofa], 18, pp. 93—114 (in Russ.).

Sokolova, O. V., 2014. Tipologiya diskursov aktivnogo vozdeistviya: poeticheskii avan­gard, reklama i PR [The typology of discourses of active influence: poetic avant-garde, advertising and PR]. Moscow (in Russ.).

Sokolova, O. V., 2018. Specificity of reference in avant-garde artistic discourse (Italian, Russian and American avant-garde). In: V. Feshchenko, ed. Obrazy yazyka i zigzagi diskursa: sbornik nauchnykh statei k 70-letiyu V. Z. Dem'yankova [Images of lan­guage and zigzags of discourse. Collection of articles dedicated to the 70th anniver­sary of V. Z. Demyankov]. Moscow, pp. 227—240 (in Russ.).

Sokolova, O. V., 2019. Ot avangarda k neoavangardu: yazyk, sub"ektivnost', kul'tur­nye perenosy [From avant-garde to neo-avant-garde: language, subjectivity, cultural transfers]. Moscow (in Russ.).

Stigler, B., 2019. The time of reading and new memory tools. Lacanalia, 32, pp. 142—166 (in Russ.).

Stockwell, P., 2002. Cognitive Poetics: An Introduction. New York; London: Rout­ledge.

Tsur, R., 1978. Emotions, Emotional Qualities and Poetry. Psychocultural Review, 2, pp. 165—180.

Tsve, O., 2021. Following Barrett Watten's Notzeit: Six Poets on the Experience of Isolation. Flagi [Flags]. Available at: https://flagi.media/piece/203 [Accessed 8 July 2023] (in Russ.).

Ulunov, G., 2020. 200,000 poems about the nastya. In: Premiya Arkadiya Drago­moshchenko. Sait premii. 2020 [Arkady Dragomoshchenko Award. The website of the award. 2020.]. Available at: https://atd-premia.ru/2020/09/12/ [Accessed 8 July 2023] (in Russ.).

Verhoeff, N., 2012. Mobile Screens. The Visual Regime of Navigation. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

Vygotsky, L. S., 1984. Orudie i znak v razvitii rebenka: sobranie sochinenii v 6 tomakh [The tool and sign in the development of the child. Collected works in 6 volumes]. Vol. 6. Moscow, рр. 5—90 (in Russ.).

Zakharkiv, E., 2021. Contemporary Poetry in the Digital Age: A New Function of Prag­matic Markers. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie [New Literary Review], 167, pp. 211—221 (in Russ.).

Zubova, L. V., 2010. Prigov: installation of verbal objects. In: E. Dobrenko, I. Ku­kulin, M. Lipovetsky and M. Mayofis, eds. Nekanonicheskii klassik: Dmitry Aleksandro­vich Prigov (1940—2007): sbornik statei i materialov [Non-canonical classic: Dmitry Ale­xandrovich Prigov (1940—2007): collection of articles and materials]. Moscow, pp. 540—565 (in Russ.).